Computer-assisted Hydrodynamic Gene Delivery

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Targeting Improves MSC Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Advertisements

Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Tracking cardiac engraftment and distribution of implanted bone marrow cells: Comparing intra-aortic, intravenous, and intramyocardial delivery  Shu-Hong.
Genetic Manipulation of Brown Fat Via Oral Administration of an Engineered Recombinant Adeno-associated Viral Serotype Vector  Wei Huang, Travis McMurphy,
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
Tracking cardiac engraftment and distribution of implanted bone marrow cells: Comparing intra-aortic, intravenous, and intramyocardial delivery  Shu-Hong.
Volume 69, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 68, Issue 2, Pages (August 2005)
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Inhibition of Platelet GPIbα and Promotion of Melanoma Metastasis
Hydrodynamic Gene Delivery: Its Principles and Applications
Targeting Improves MSC Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages (December 2007)
Homing of intravenously infused embryonic stem cell-derived cells to injured hearts after myocardial infarction  Jiang-Yong Min, MD, Xuling Huang, MD,
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages (November 2017)
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
Volume 129, Issue 2, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Efficacy and Safety of Pancreas-Targeted Hydrodynamic Gene Delivery in Rats  Kohei Ogawa, Kenya Kamimura, Yuji Kobayashi, Hiroyuki Abe, Takeshi Yokoo,
Xiaoyin Xu, Zhong Yang, Qiang Liu, Yaming Wang  Molecular Therapy 
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (August 2004)
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages (October 2014)
Development of Peptide-targeted Lipoplexes to CXCR4-expressing Rat Glioma Cells and Rat Proliferating Endothelial Cells  Wouter HP Driessen, Nobutaka.
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Decreased renal ischemia–reperfusion injury by IL-16 inactivation
Kidney-specific Sonoporation-mediated Gene Transfer
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Kenya Kamimura, Guisheng Zhang, Dexi Liu  Molecular Therapy 
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Incorporation of the B18R Gene of Vaccinia Virus Into an Oncolytic Herpes Simplex Virus Improves Antitumor Activity  Xinping Fu, Armando Rivera, Lihua.
Volume 56, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
piggyBac Transposon-mediated Long-term Gene Expression in Mice
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (December 2008)
Plasmid Delivery in Vivo from Porous Tissue-Engineering Scaffolds: Transgene Expression and Cellular Transfection  Jae-Hyung Jang, Christopher B. Rives,
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
Hong Du, Mark Levine, Chandrashekar Ganesa, David P. Witte, Edward S
Kasey L Jackson, Robert D Dayton, Ronald L Klein 
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (August 2004)
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Effect of age and biopsy site on extracellular matrix mRNA and protein levels in human kidney biopsies  Michael Eikmans, Hans J. Baelde, Emile De Heer,
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Ultrasound-Mediated Gene Therapy in Swine Livers Using Single-Element, Multi-lensed, High-Intensity Ultrasound Transducers  Misty L. Noble-Vranish, Shuxian.
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Aminoglycoside Enhances the Delivery of Antisense Morpholino Oligonucleotides In Vitro and in mdx Mice  Mingxing Wang, Bo Wu, Sapana N. Shah, Peijuan.
Presentation transcript:

Computer-assisted Hydrodynamic Gene Delivery Takeshi Suda, Kieko Suda, Dexi Liu  Molecular Therapy  Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages 1098-1104 (June 2008) DOI: 10.1038/mt.2008.66 Copyright © 2008 The American Society of Gene Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Schematic presentation of computer-controlled hydrodynamic injection device (A/D, analog-to-digital converter). Molecular Therapy 2008 16, 1098-1104DOI: (10.1038/mt.2008.66) Copyright © 2008 The American Society of Gene Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Pressure profiles of hydrojector-assisted injection. (a) Experimental setup for computer-assisted hydrodynamic gene delivery into liver [arrowheads: clamping sites on the inferior vena cava (IVC)]. (b) Pressure profiles of hydrodynamic injection with the peak pressure set at 10, 15, or 20 mm Hg. (c), Pressure profiles of hydrodynamic injection with fixed peak pressure and different injection durations for reaching peak pressure. (d) Pressure profile of a prolonged injection at the peak pressure. (e) Pressure profile of an injection at peak pressure followed by a sustained injection at lower pressure. (f) Pressure profile of repeated injections with the same peak pressure and time intervals of 250 ms. Molecular Therapy 2008 16, 1098-1104DOI: (10.1038/mt.2008.66) Copyright © 2008 The American Society of Gene Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Comparison of conventional (systemic) and computer-assisted (local) hydrodynamic gene delivery. (a) Comparison in respect of injection volume. (b) Comparison of levels of luciferase gene expression. (c, d) Comparison of densities of transfected cells in the liver. (e) Comparison of pressure profiles in the inferior vena cava (IVC) (blue line, computer-assisted injection; grey line, conventional hydrodynamic injection through the tail vein). RLU, relative light unit. Molecular Therapy 2008 16, 1098-1104DOI: (10.1038/mt.2008.66) Copyright © 2008 The American Society of Gene Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Hydrojector-assisted hydrodynamic gene delivery into muscle and kidney in rats. (a) Intrafemoral vein pressure during a continued injection (10 seconds) with programmed peak pressure at 350 mm Hg. (b) Comparison between conventional (systemic) and computer-assisted (local) hydrodynamic gene delivery in respect of levels of luciferase gene expression in muscle. (c) Intrarenal vein pressure of computer-assisted hydrodynamic injection into the right kidney with intravascular pressure set at 100 mm Hg. (d) Comparison between conventional (systemic) and computer-assisted (local) hydrodynamic gene delivery in respect of the levels of luciferase gene expression in kidney. The values shown on the bars in b and d represent the injection volumes presented as a percentage of total body weight. The data are presented as mean values ± SD, n = 3. RLU, relative light unit. Molecular Therapy 2008 16, 1098-1104DOI: (10.1038/mt.2008.66) Copyright © 2008 The American Society of Gene Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Comparison of the levels of green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression in muscle and kidney. Fluorescence microscope images were taken (a,c) 4 days after computer-assisted hydrodynamic delivery, or (b,d) slow infusion of Ad-GFP vectors in (a,b) muscle, and (c,d) kidney. Immunohistochemical examination of the (e) nontargeted kidney sample, and targeted kidney sample (f) without or (g,h) with anti-GFP antibody staining. Clear positive signals are seen, both in the (g) medulla and (h) cortex of the surrounding glomerulus. Original magnifications are ×4 (a–d), ×10 (e,f), and ×40 (g,h). Molecular Therapy 2008 16, 1098-1104DOI: (10.1038/mt.2008.66) Copyright © 2008 The American Society of Gene Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Image-guided hydrodynamic gene delivery to pig liver and kidney. (a,b) Fluoroscopic images of the pig liver and kidney showing the relative locations of the inserted balloon catheters [the injection balloon catheter (*), the occlusion balloon in portal vein (**), and the occlusion balloon in the IVC (***)]. The distribution of phase contrast medium injected through the injection catheter to verify obstruction of blood vessels by the balloon catheters is also indicated (****). (c) Lateral hepatic vein pressure profile during and soon after hydrodynamic injection with peak pressure set at 100 mm Hg. (d) Right renal vein pressure profile during and soon after hydrodynamic injection with peak pressure set at 240 mm Hg. (e) Photograph of hydrodynamically transfected pig liver in cross-section, showing the levels of luciferase gene expression at the approximate sites from which liver samples were collected. (f) Photograph of hydrodynamically transfected right kidney cut in half in the middle, showing the levels of luciferase gene expression at the sites from which tissue samples were collected. (g) Photograph of untreated left kidney cut in half in the middle, showing the background level of luciferase activity. The levels of luciferase gene expression were determined 6 hours after gene delivery. The data presented are from two pigs, one each for gene delivery to the liver and the kidney. The values in e–g represent luciferase activity in relative light unit/mg of extracted proteins. Molecular Therapy 2008 16, 1098-1104DOI: (10.1038/mt.2008.66) Copyright © 2008 The American Society of Gene Therapy Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Assessment of tissue damage after hydrodynamic gene delivery using the computer-controlled injection device. Serum concentrations of tissue-specific marker enzymes in rats [(a) alanine aminotransferase (ALT) for liver, (b) creatinine (Crt) for kidney, and (c) creatinine phosphokinase (CPK) for muscle] at 6, 24, 48, 72, 120, and 168 hours after (closed circles) computer-assisted hydrodynamic gene delivery, or after (open circles) a slow (60 seconds) infusion of the same volume of saline. Open bars in each plot represent the serum concentration of marker enzyme in untreated animals. The data are presented as mean values ± SD, n = 3. Molecular Therapy 2008 16, 1098-1104DOI: (10.1038/mt.2008.66) Copyright © 2008 The American Society of Gene Therapy Terms and Conditions