Human Transposon Tectonics

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LINEs and SINEs ….& towards cancer! Presenter: Manindra Singh Course: MCB 720 (Winter Qt.)
Advertisements

Genomics – The Language of DNA Honors Genetics 2006.
Supplementary Figure 1. AB Supplementary Figure 1. L1 and Alu retrotransposition assay. A. Schematic of L1 retrotransposition plasmid (L1). ORF1 and ORF2.
Retroviruses and Retroposons Chapter Introduction Figure 22.1.
Long Interspersed Nucleotide Elements (LINEs) Rami Al-Ouran.
GENE DUPLICATIONS A.Non-homologous recombination B.Transposition C.Non-disjunction in meiosis.
Genomic Repetitive Elements (Human Focus). TYPES OF ELEMENTS Tandem repeats: a) satellite DNA 1) centromeric and heterochromatic 2) minisatellite 3) microsatellite.
Students ± PV92 Alu Insert. Transposons are “mobile genetic elements” of which there are a great many kinds. Some jump around in genomes. Others jump,
Retroviruses and Retroposons
Transposition Evidence Mechanisms: DNA-mediated RNA-mediated.
Selfish DNA Honors Genetics.
Fig Genome = Genic + Intergenic (or non-genic) Eukaryotic genomes: composition of human genome.
Instability: Mutation and DNA repair Mutations DNA repair.
A unified classification system for eukaryotic transposable elements
Lecture 9 Site Specific Recombination and Transposition Quiz 5 due today at 4 PM.
BB30055: Genes and genomes Genomes - Dr. MV Hejmadi Lecture 2 – Repeat elements.
Introduction to Molecular Genetics Studiju materiāli / MolekularasBiologijas / Ievads MolGen / EN.
Alu Elements PCR Workshop Instruction manuals that come with new gadgets are notoriously frustrating…but at least they do not insert, just when.
Homologous Recombination
 DNA- genetic material of eukaryotes.  Are highly variable in size and complexity.  About 3.3 billion bp in humans.  Complexity- due to non coding.
Genetic Code and Interrupted Gene Chapter 4. Genetic Code and Interrupted Gene Aala A. Abulfaraj.
The evolution of selfishness HW#5: FASTA sequence Function.
Sridaran Dhivya, Kumpati Premkumar 
A Robust Network of Double-Strand Break Repair Pathways Governs Genome Integrity during C. elegans Development  Daphne B. Pontier, Marcel Tijsterman 
Gene-related Sequence
Instability: Mutation and DNA repair
A 3′ Poly(A) Tract Is Required for LINE-1 Retrotransposition
2013 Curt Stern Award Address1
Evolution of eukaryote genomes
Fig Figure 21.1 What genomic information makes a human or chimpanzee?
What kinds of things have been learned?
Genomes on the Edge: Programmed Genome Instability in Ciliates
Organization of the human genome
LINEs Mobilize SINEs in the Eel through a Shared 3′ Sequence
Noncoding RNAs and Gene Silencing
L1 Mosaicism in Mammals: Extent, Effects, and Evolution
Base-Pairing between Untranslated Regions Facilitates Translation of Uncapped, Nonpolyadenylated Viral RNA  Liang Guo, Edwards M. Allen, W.Allen Miller 
Gene Density and Noncoding DNA
Allan Award Lecture: On Jumping Fields and “Jumping Genes”
Retrotransposition and Structural Variation in the Human Genome
Volume 146, Issue 6, Pages (September 2011)
Codon Clarity or Conundrum?
lincRNAs: Genomics, Evolution, and Mechanisms
Figure: L1 retrotransposition cycle
Impulse Control: Temporal Dynamics in Gene Transcription
Addison V. Wright, James K. Nuñez, Jennifer A. Doudna  Cell 
John T. Arigo, Kristina L. Carroll, Jessica M. Ames, Jeffry L. Corden 
High Frequency Retrotransposition in Cultured Mammalian Cells
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (April 2005)
A Comprehensive Analysis of Recently Integrated Human Ta L1 Elements
Paramutation: From Maize to Mice
Germline Epigenetic Silencing of the Tumor Suppressor Gene PTPRJ in Early-Onset Familial Colorectal Cancer  Ramprasath Venkatachalam  Gastroenterology 
Transposable Elements
M.Joan Curcio, Marlene Belfort  Cell 
Frpo: A Novel Single-Stranded DNA Promoter for Transcription and for Primer RNA Synthesis of DNA Replication  Hisao Masai, Ken-ichi Arai  Cell  Volume.
Regulatory RNAs in Bacteria
Divergent Transcription: A Driving Force for New Gene Origination?
A HERV-K provirus in chimpanzees, bonobos and gorillas, but not humans
Poised RNA Polymerase II Gives Pause for Thought
Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages (August 2015)
Promoting in Tandem: The Promoter for Telomere Transposon HeT-A and Implications for the Evolution of Retroviral LTRs  O.N Danilevskaya, I.R Arkhipova,
Mighty Piwis Defend the Germline against Genome Intruders
Identification of TSIX, Encoding an RNA Antisense to Human XIST, Reveals Differences from its Murine Counterpart: Implications for X Inactivation  Barbara.
Steven West, Nicholas J. Proudfoot, Michael J. Dye  Molecular Cell 
Volume 110, Issue 3, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 21, Issue 23, Pages (December 2011)
Adam T. McGeoch, Stephen D. Bell  Cell 
CNVs: Harbingers of a Rare Variant Revolution in Psychiatric Genetics
CRISPR Immunological Memory Requires a Host Factor for Specificity
Allan Award Lecture: On Jumping Fields and “Jumping Genes”
Presentation transcript:

Human Transposon Tectonics Kathleen H. Burns, Jef D. Boeke  Cell  Volume 149, Issue 4, Pages 740-752 (May 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.019 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Human Retrotransposons (A) Composition of the human genome with respect to high copy number repeats. Data are from the RepeatMasker analysis of the hg19 human genome assembly (Genome Reference Consortium GRCh37). The illustration shows fractions of the genome derived from the major orders (Wicker et al., 2007) of retrotransposons. The remaining 55% of the genome bears low homology to TEs, although substantial portions may be derived from mobile DNA. (B) Transposon types illustrated as fractions of total ongoing activity. AluY are the most prolific source of new insertions at 1 de novo germline insertion per 20 births; L1 and SVA are thought to be comparable in current activity, responsible for 1 insertion per 100–200 births. (C) Schematic showing an accumulation of interspersed repeat insertions over time. New integrations are stochastic events in individuals (star), such that coexistence with the antedating empty allele occurs in the population initially. In the schematic, two alleles are present currently, reflecting presence and absence of the most recent insertion (a retrotransposon insertion polymorphism [RIP]). As persisting insertions age, they become fixed, or invariant, in the population and decrease in sequence likeness to similar elements (black to gray). (D) Structure of the most active retroelements in human genomes. L1 LINEs have a CpG-rich 5′ UTR with an internal RNA Pol II promoter (5′ rightward arrow), two open reading frames encoding ORF1p and ORF2p (orange segments), and a 3′ UTR with a polyadenylation (pA) sequence. The ORF2 reading frame encodes endonuclease (EN) and reverse transcriptase (RT) domains. Alu elements are derived from 7SL ribosomal RNAs; they have two internal monomer sequences with a centrally located A-rich sequence and an RNA Pol III promoter (A and B, gray). The sequence ends in multiple adenosines (An). SVAs are composites of other repeats, from left to right: a CCCTCTn repeat, two tandem Alu-like sequences in antisense (leftward arrows), a variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) region, and a SINE-R region with HERV homology. Sequence suggests RNA Pol II-driven transcription (5′ rightward arrow), and there is a 3′ AAUAAA sequence (pA). Cell 2012 149, 740-752DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.019) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 L1 LINE Propagation L1 retrotransposition requires RNA and two proteins encoded by L1; they assemble into ribonucleic acid particles during translation. Reverse transcription of the RNA is coupled to insertion as it initiates from the 3′-OH of the broken strand (target primed reverse transcription, TPRT). Resolution of the structure results in target site duplication (TSD). Cell 2012 149, 740-752DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.019) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Sequence Signatures of Active Elements (A) Families of L1 LINEs have expanded over evolutionary time in primate genomes in a singular succession of retrotransposition “waves”; that is, elements have accumulated in a specific order, with L1PA5 insertions preceding L1PA4 preceding L1PA3, L1PA2, and L1PA1 (Boissinot and Furano, 2001). For the last 2 million years, continued L1 activity is largely owed to the L1(Ta) subset (L1PA1). A 3 nt sequence in the 3′ UTR of L1(Ta) can be used to physically distinguish its members from sequences of older L1 LINEs in the human genome; this can lend specificity to L1(Ta)-mapping PCRs. (B) Similarly, an 8 base-pair insertion near the 3′ end of AluYb8/9 subfamilies can be used to specifically recover insertion sites of these elements. Cell 2012 149, 740-752DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.019) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 A Schematic of Retrotransposon Dynamics (A) An L1 insertion of moderate activity (blue) and allelic frequency (circle size) is shown (1). It templates new insertions, many of which are 5′ truncated or mutated at the time of insertion (gray denotes inactivity). The new insertions segregate mostly as neutral alleles; some accumulate to a higher allele frequency over time (larger gray circles in subsequent panels). (B) A new insertion is generated that is highly competent, or hot, for retrotransposition (2, blue). This may be because of intrinsic sequence features or its location in a region that permits expression. (C) This hot L1 templates others; there may be a tendency to template other full-length, hot progeny insertions. Hot elements are continually lost through negative selection (3, interrupted diagonal) or (D) mutation (2, interrupted arrow from C). However, some remain to potentiate other retrotransposition events (4). It is envisioned that these hot elements are relatively transient in genomes due to purifying selection against them and do not achieve high allele frequency but are responsible for the bulk of transposition in modern humans. Cell 2012 149, 740-752DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.019) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions