WWiSE summary, prior to first downselect

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WWISE LDPCC performance
Advertisements

LB84 General AdHoc Group Sept. Closing TGn Motions
LB84 General AdHoc Group Sept. Closing TGn Motions
[ Interim Meetings 2006] Date: Authors: July 2005
March 2013 Opening Report Date: Authors: March 2013
TGn Sync Atlanta Presentation on Confirmation
TGn LB97 Frame Format Ad Hoc
IEEE White Space Radio Contribution Title
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
SG CUB Tentative Timeline
Waveform Generator Source Code
TGn LB97 Frame Format Ad Hoc
March 2014 Election Results
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: July 2005 Month Year
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: July 2007 Month Year
Attendance and Documentation for the March 2007 Plenary
3GPP Extended Date: Authors: July 2005 July 2005
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
Motion to accept Draft p 2.0
[place presentation subject title text here]
TGp Motions Date: Authors: November 2005 Month Year
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2006 Month Year
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: May 2007 Month Year
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: March 2006 March 2006
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2006 Month Year
Reflector Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
TGv Redline D0.07 Insert and Deletion
TGv Redline D0.06 Insert and Deletion
July 2012 Opening Report Date: Authors: July 2012
“Comment Status” Definitions
IEEE White Space Radio Draft Development Procedure
Selection Procedure Recommendation
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: July 2006 July 2006
TGu-changes-from-d0-01-to-d0-02
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
IEEE White Space Radio Intended timeline
March 2012 Opening Report Date: Authors: March 2012
TGy draft 2.0 with changebars from draft 1.0
IEEE White Space Radio Draft Development Process
TGv Redline D0.10 Insert and Deletion
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
Document Motions Date: Authors: November 2005 November 2005
November Opening Report
TGr Proposed Draft Revision Notice
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
March Opening Report Date: Authors: March 2011
Liaison Report From Date: Authors: Month Year
Beamforming and Link Adaptation Motions
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
November 2012 Opening Report
Questions to the Contention-based Protocol (CBP) Study Group
January Opening Report
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
Motion to go to Letter Ballot
TGu-changes-from-d0-04-to-d0-05
WWiSE IEEE n Proposal Authors: Date:
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: January 2006 Month Year
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: January 2005 January 2005
TGu Motions Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
TGu Draft Revision Procedure
11k Public Awareness Program
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: May 2005 May 2005
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: July 2005 July 2005
IEEE White Space Radio First Call for Contributions
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
TGr Proposed Draft Revision Notice
TGp Motions Date: Authors: January 2006 Month Year
May 2012 Opening Report Date: Authors: May 2012
Presentation transcript:

WWiSE summary, prior to first downselect Date: 2005-01-20 Authors: Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE 802.11. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.11. Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures <http:// ieee802.org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws.pdf>, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair <stuart.kerry@philips.com> as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE 802.11 Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at <patcom@ieee.org>. Sean Coffey, Texas Instruments, et al.

Additional authors: VK Jones Airgo Networks vkjones@airgonetworks.com Richard van Nee richardvannnee@airgonetworks.com Ali Raissinia aliraissinia@airgonetworks.com Allert van Zelst allertvanzelst@airgonetworks.com Bruce Edwards Broadcom bedwards@broadcom.com Matthew Fischer mfischer@broadcom.com Chris Hansen chansen@broadcom.com Tushar Moorti tushar@broadcom.com Chris Young cyoung@broadcom.com Takashi Ishidoshiro Buffalo doshir@melcoinc.co.jp Masato Kato mkato@melcoinc.co.jp Dave Hedberg Conexant dave.hedberg@conexant.com Michael Seals michael.seals@conexant.com Sean Coffey, Texas Instruments, et al.

Additional authors: Mark Webster Conexant mark.webster@conexant.com Menzo Wentink menzo.wentink@conexant.com Taehyun Jeon ETRI thjeon@etri.re.kr Sok-kyu Lee sk-lee@etri.re.kr Heejung Yu heejung@etri.re.kr Mustafa Eroz Hughes Network Systems feroz@hns.com Lakshmi Iyer liyer@hns.com Lin-Nan Lee llee@hns.com Feng-Wen Sun fsun@hns.com Stephan ten Brink Realtek stenbrink@realtek-us.com Gabriella Convertino STMicroelectronics gabriella.convertino@st.com Mike Moreton mike.moreton@st.com Fabio Osnato fabio.osnato@st.com Pratima Pai pratima.pai@st.com Sean Coffey, Texas Instruments, et al.

Additional authors: Vincenzo Scarpa STMicroelectronics vincenzo.scarpa@st.com Massimiliano Siti massimiliano.siti@st.com George Vlantis george.vlantis@st.com Srikanth Gummadi Texas Instruments sgummadi@ti.com Manoneet Singh msingh@ti.com Richard Williams richard@ti.com Keith Chugg TrellisWare kchugg@trellisware.com Paul Gray pgray@trellisware.com Bob Ward bward@trellisware.com Jeng-Hong Chen Winbond Electronics jhchen2@winbond.com Pansop Kim pkim@winbond.com Alfred Lin halin@winbond.com Wei-Chung Peng wcpeng0@winbond.com Sean Coffey, Texas Instruments, et al.

Abstract The presentation summarizes the WWiSE complete proposal, in the context of the first downselect vote Sean Coffey, Texas Instruments, et al.

State of the Task Group The Task Group will soon, in March, have to make an irrevocable decision that will have significant consequences for the success or failure of the entire project This decision is not whether to choose WWiSE, or TGnSync, or MitMot The irrevocable step is the enabling of the first draft of TGn Sean Coffey, Texas Instruments, et al.

State of the Task Group, contd. Any items in the first draft that are unspecified, or undecided, can only be corrected by a 75% majority of the entire Task Group, under formal Robert’s Rules of Order proceedings In 2001, there were minor mechanisms in the .11e draft that were generally agreed to be broken, but the proceedings deadlocked for 6 months because of the 75% hurdle .11e is still in progress, now up to draft 12 Sean Coffey, Texas Instruments, et al.

Suitability as basis for first draft The current TGnSync specification is not in adequate state to form a first draft Massive technical inconsistencies Some on the order of 10 dB or more, even within TGnSync simulations Very sophisticated techniques with severely underspecified mechanisms Descriptions to support closed loop either inadequately described or not described at all Disjointed features rather than consistent design Further major changes pending due to mergers Sean Coffey, Texas Instruments, et al.

Purpose of the vote The primary significance of this vote is for the Task Group to offer feedback on preferred direction The final decision will be in March The final opportunity for feedback is now Choices: WWiSE TGnSync MitMot Not vote Sean Coffey, Texas Instruments, et al.

WWiSE as draft 1.0 of .11n The WWiSE specification, 11-04-0886r6, is ready for immediate use as the basis for draft 1.0 and submission to WG letter ballot The mechanisms are well suited for all extensions, including beamforming and closed loop feedback, multiple backward compatibility mechanisms, and also give significant advantages in range, coverage, and robustness The core of WWiSE is an efficient embodiment of items that are mostly in general agreement Sean Coffey, Texas Instruments, et al.

Conclusion The WWiSE specification will enable the Task Group to progress efficiently to finish the .11n amendment and facilitate rapid market development of High Throughput technology Sean Coffey, Texas Instruments, et al.