Mechanism of Human Antibody-Mediated Neutralization of Marburg Virus

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 13, Pages (November 2016)
Advertisements

Volume 15, Issue 7, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 156, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Structure of the Human Telomerase RNA Pseudoknot Reveals Conserved Tertiary Interactions Essential for Function  Carla A. Theimer, Craig A. Blois, Juli.
Competition binding assays.
Volume 165, Issue 7, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 125, Issue 1, Pages (April 2006)
Structure of the Human Telomerase RNA Pseudoknot Reveals Conserved Tertiary Interactions Essential for Function  Carla A. Theimer, Craig A. Blois, Juli.
Molecular Model of the Human 26S Proteasome
Supplemental Materials
Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e3 (September 2017)
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (June 2018)
by Guntur Fibriansah, Kristie D. Ibarra, Thiam-Seng Ng, Scott A
Model Building and Refinement of a Natively Glycosylated HIV-1 Env Protein by High- Resolution Cryoelectron Microscopy  Jeong Hyun Lee, Natalia de Val,
Volume 63, Issue 6, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 167, Issue 3, Pages e9 (October 2016)
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 124, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
by Zachary A. Bornholdt, Hannah L. Turner, Charles D
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages e3 (February 2018)
by Zachary A. Bornholdt, Hannah L. Turner, Charles D
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages e4 (September 2018)
Volume 43, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (March 2007)
The Dynamics of Signal Triggering in a gp130-Receptor Complex
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Adam S. Dingens, Hugh K. Haddox, Julie Overbaugh, Jesse D. Bloom 
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages e2 (December 2017)
Volume 15, Issue 7, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (April 2018)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (August 2017)
Crystal Structure of β-Arrestin at 1.9 Å
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages e10 (August 2018)
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (April 2018)
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages (July 2004)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Ebolavirus’s Foibles Cell
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (April 2017)
Michael S. Kuhns, Mark M. Davis  Immunity 
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 2, Issue 7, Pages (July 1994)
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 1998)
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages e5 (August 2018)
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (August 2018)
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages e8 (August 2018)
Volume 153, Issue 7, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
HIV Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies: Taking Good Care Of The 98%
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages e5 (June 2019)
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (February 1998)
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Atsushi Yamanaka, Eiji Konishi
Feverish Quest for Ebola Immunotherapy: Straight or Cocktail?
Crystal Structure of β-Arrestin at 1.9 Å
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Presentation transcript:

Mechanism of Human Antibody-Mediated Neutralization of Marburg Virus Andrew I. Flyak, Philipp A. Ilinykh, Charles D. Murin, Tania Garron, Xiaoli Shen, Marnie L. Fusco, Takao Hashiguchi, Zachary A. Bornholdt, James C. Slaughter, Gopal Sapparapu, Curtis Klages, Thomas G. Ksiazek, Andrew B. Ward, Erica Ollmann Saphire, Alexander Bukreyev, James E. Crowe  Cell  Volume 160, Issue 5, Pages 893-903 (February 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.031 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Cell 2015 160, 893-903DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.031) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 MARV-Neutralizing mAbs Display a Unique Binding Pattern and Target a Distinct Antigenic Region on the GP Surface (A) Neutralization activity of MR77 (non-neutralizing antibody) or MR213 (neutralizing antibody) against VSV/GP-Uganda (red circles) or MARV-Uganda (black circles). Error bars represent the SE of the experiment performed in triplicate. (B) Binding of representative mAbs from four distinct binding groups to the MARV GP (blue squares) or MARV GPΔmuc (green squares). A dotted line indicates 0.5 μg/ml threshold for categorizing group 3 antibodies as possessing low (3A) or high (3B) EC50 values. (C) Heatmap showing the neutralization potency of MARV GP-specific mAbs against VSV/GP-Uganda or MARV-Uganda. The IC50 value for each virus-mAb combination is shown, with dark red, orange, yellow, or white shading indicating high, intermediate, low, or no potency, respectively. IC50 values greater than 1,000 μg/ml are indicated by >. Neutralization assays were performed in triplicate. (D) Data from competition binding assays using mAbs from binding groups 2, 3A, or 3B. Numbers indicate the percent binding of the competing mAb in the presence of the first mAb, compared to binding of competing mAb alone. MAbs were judged to compete for the same site if maximum binding of the competing mAb was reduced to <30% of its un-competed binding (black boxes with white numbers). MAbs were considered non-competing if maximum binding of the competing mAb was >70% of its un-competed binding (white boxes with red numbers). Gray boxes with black numbers indicate an intermediate phenotype (between 30 and 70% of un-competed binding). See also Figures S2, S3, S4, and S5. Cell 2015 160, 893-903DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.031) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Neutralizing Antibodies from a Human Survivor of MARV Bind to the Receptor-Binding Site of GP at Two Distinct Angles of Approach (A) Representative reference-free 2D class averages of the MARV GPΔMuc:MR Fab complexes. (B) EM reconstructions of seven Fab fragments of neutralizing antibodies bound to MARV GPΔmuc (side views). All seven antibodies target a similar epitope on the top of GP. (C) These antibodies can be subdivided based on their angles of approach: (1) those that bind toward the top and side of GP1 at a shallow angle relative to the central 3-fold axis (MR72 in red, MR78 in orange, MR201 in yellow, or MR82 in green) and (2) those that bind at a steeper angle toward the top of GP1 (MR191 in cyan, MR111 in blue, or MR198 in purple). (D) The crystal structure of EBOV GPΔmuc (GP1 in white and GP2 in dark gray) is modeled into the MARV GP density (mesh), and the angles of approach of the neutralizing antibodies are indicated with arrows, colored as in (B). The footprint of the antibodies is indicated by a black circle targeting residues in the putative receptor-binding site (RBS) through a variety of approach angles. See also Figure S1. Cell 2015 160, 893-903DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.031) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Generation of Escape Mutants for MARV-Neutralizing Antibodies (A) VSV-MARV-72.5 (dotted lines) or VSV-MARV-78.1 (dashed line) escape mutations mapped onto the domain schematic of MARV GP. RBS, receptor binding site; GLC, glycan cap; MUC, mucin-like domain. (B) Neutralization activity of antibodies from binding group 3B against wild-type VSV/GP-Uganda (circles, straight curves), VSV/GP-72.5 (squares, dotted curves), or VSV/GP-78.1 (triangles, dashed curves) escape mutant viruses. Cell 2015 160, 893-903DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.031) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Breadth of Binding or Neutralization of Human MARV-Specific mAbs for Diverse Filoviruses (A) A heatmap showing the binding in ELISA of neutralizing mAbs from binding group 3B to the MARV and EBOV GPs. EC50 value for each antigen-mAb combination is shown, with dark red shading indicating lower EC50 values and orange or yellow shading indicating intermediate or higher EC50 values. EC50 values greater than 1,000 μg/ml are indicated by >. (B) A heatmap showing the neutralization breadth of mAbs from binding group 3B. The IC50 value for each virus-mAb combination is shown, with dark red shading indicating increased potency and orange or yellow shading indicating intermediate or low potency. IC50 values greater than 1,000 μg/ml are indicated by >. Neutralization assays were performed in triplicate. Cell 2015 160, 893-903DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.031) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Survival and Clinical Overview of Mice Treated with MARV mAbs (A–C) Groups of mice at five animals per group were injected with individual mAbs by the intraperitoneal route twice: 1 hr prior and 24 hr after MARV challenge at 100 μg per treatment. Untreated animals served as controls. (A) Kaplan-Meier survival curves. (B) Body weight. (C) Illness score. Cell 2015 160, 893-903DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.031) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S1 General Schematic of the Marburg Virus Glycoprotein Trimer with Its Major Structural Domains and Features, Related to the Introduction and Figure 2 Based on the accompanying paper by Hashiguchi et al. (2015). Cell 2015 160, 893-903DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.031) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S2 Neutralization Activity of MARV GP-Specific mAbs against VSV/GP-Uganda, Related to Figure 1 Red circles represent percent neutralization relative to control at different antibody concentrations. Logistic curves are indicated by solid lines, and 95% confidence intervals are indicated by dashed lines. Cell 2015 160, 893-903DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.031) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S3 Neutralization Activity of MARV GP-Specific mAbs against MARV-Uganda, Related to Figure 1 Red circles represent percent neutralization relative to control at different antibody concentrations. Logistic curves are indicated by solid lines, and 95% confidence intervals are indicated by dashed lines. Cell 2015 160, 893-903DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.031) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S4 Heatmaps Showing the Neutralization Potency of MARV GP-Specific mAbs against VSV/GP-Uganda in Panel A or MARV-Uganda in Panel B, Related to Figure 1 (A and B) Half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) and confidence interval values (in μg/ml) for each virus-mAb combination are shown, with dark red, orange, yellow or white shading indicating high, intermediate, low or no potency. IC50 values greater than 1,000 μg/ml are indicated by >. R2 values indicating curve fit are shown for each virus-mAb combination, with dark pink color indicating high R2 values. Neutralization assays were performed in triplicate. Cell 2015 160, 893-903DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.031) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S5 Binding Patterns of MARV GP-Specific Antibodies, Related to Figure 1 Antibodies were segregated into four Binding Groups based on the binding to MARV GP (blue squares) or MARV GPΔmuc (green squares). Binding was categorized based on the OD405 values at the highest antibody concentration tested (Emax) and half maximal effective concentration (EC50) as shown below:Binding Group 1: Emax GP < 2,Binding Group 2: Emax GP > 2, EC50 GP < EC50 GPΔmuc,Binding Group 3: Emax GP > 2, EC50 GP ≈EC50 GPΔmuc,Binding Group 3A: Emax GP > 2, EC50 GP ≈EC50 GPΔmuc, EC50 GP < 0.5 μg/ml (dashed line), andBinding Group 3B: Emax GP > 2, EC50 GP ≈EC50 GPΔmuc, EC50 GP > 0.5 μg/ml. Cell 2015 160, 893-903DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.031) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions