Membrane Protein TM Segments Are Retained at the Translocon during Integration until the Nascent Chain Cues FRET-Detected Release into Bulk Lipid  Bo.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How Cholesterol-Dependent Cytolysins Bite Holes into Membranes
Advertisements

Volume 127, Issue 4, Pages (November 2006)
YidC and Oxa1 Form Dimeric Insertion Pores on the Translating Ribosome
Dynamics of SecY Translocons with Translocation-Defective Mutations
Volume 102, Issue 12, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 127, Issue 5, Pages (December 2006)
Interaction of Era with the 30S Ribosomal Subunit
A Fence-like Coat for the Nuclear Pore Membrane
Volume 58, Issue 2, Pages (April 2015)
Zachary Lee Johnson, Jue Chen  Cell 
Closing In on the Resting State of the Shaker K+ Channel
Sudha Chakrapani, Luis G. Cuello, D. Marien Cortes, Eduardo Perozo 
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Richard J. Law, Keith Munson, George Sachs, Felice C. Lightstone 
Dissecting the Actinoporin Pore-Forming Mechanism
Michael Kowarik, Stephanie Küng, Bruno Martoglio, Ari Helenius 
Molecular Model of the Human 26S Proteasome
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Structure of the Papillomavirus DNA-Tethering Complex E2:Brd4 and a Peptide that Ablates HPV Chromosomal Association  Eric A. Abbate, Christian Voitenleitner,
How Far Will You Go to Sense Voltage?
Structural Basis for the Specific Recognition of Methylated Histone H3 Lysine 4 by the WD-40 Protein WDR5  Zhifu Han, Lan Guo, Huayi Wang, Yue Shen, Xing.
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2009)
Membrane Hemifusion: Crossing a Chasm in Two Leaps
Volume 135, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Hani S. Zaher, Rachel Green  Molecular Cell 
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (March 2005)
HyeongJun Kim, Jen Hsin, Yanxin Liu, Paul R. Selvin, Klaus Schulten 
Volume 130, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Nascent Membrane and Secretory Proteins Differ in FRET-Detected Folding Far inside the Ribosome and in Their Exposure to Ribosomal Proteins  Cheryl A.
Stephen P. Muench, Martin van der Laan  Molecular Cell 
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 69, Issue 6, Pages e3 (March 2018)
How Does a Voltage Sensor Interact with a Lipid Bilayer
The Path of Messenger RNA through the Ribosome
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Orientational Preferences of Neighboring Helices Can Drive ER Insertion of a Marginally Hydrophobic Transmembrane Helix  Karin Öjemalm, Katrin K. Halling,
Volume 55, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
The Ribosome Emerges from a Black Box
Stacy D Benson, Jaana K.H Bamford, Dennis H Bamford, Roger M Burnett 
The Aqueous Pore through the Translocon Has a Diameter of 40–60 Å during Cotranslational Protein Translocation at the ER Membrane  Brian D Hamman, Jui-Chang.
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Zhenjian Cai, Nabil H. Chehab, Nikola P. Pavletich  Molecular Cell 
Computational Modeling Reveals that Signaling Lipids Modulate the Orientation of K- Ras4A at the Membrane Reflecting Protein Topology  Zhen-Lu Li, Matthias.
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 89, Issue 4, Pages (May 1997)
Protein Translocons Cell
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 16, Issue 7, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 40, Issue 2, Pages (October 2003)
A Flip Turn for Membrane Protein Insertion
Thomas H. Schmidt, Yahya Homsi, Thorsten Lang  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 85, Issue 3, Pages (May 1996)
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (May 2009)
Ligand-Driven Vectorial Folding of Ribosome-Bound Human CFTR NBD1
Michael S. Kuhns, Mark M. Davis  Immunity 
Nascent Membrane and Secretory Proteins Differ in FRET-Detected Folding Far inside the Ribosome and in Their Exposure to Ribosomal Proteins  Cheryl A.
A YidC-like Protein in the Archaeal Plasma Membrane
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Irina Artsimovitch, Georgi A. Belogurov  Molecular Cell 
Damian Dawidowski, David S. Cafiso  Structure 
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (November 2005)
Calibrated Measurement of Gating-Charge Arginine Displacement in the KvAP Voltage- Dependent K+ Channel  Vanessa Ruta, Jiayun Chen, Roderick MacKinnon 
Cheryl A. Woolhead, Arthur E. Johnson, Harris D. Bernstein 
Matthieu Chavent, Elena Seiradake, E. Yvonne Jones, Mark S.P. Sansom 
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Structural Switch of the γ Subunit in an Archaeal aIF2αγ Heterodimer
Presentation transcript:

Membrane Protein TM Segments Are Retained at the Translocon during Integration until the Nascent Chain Cues FRET-Detected Release into Bulk Lipid  Bo Hou, Pen-Jen Lin, Arthur E. Johnson  Molecular Cell  Volume 48, Issue 3, Pages 398-408 (November 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.08.023 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 When Does a TMS Enter the Bulk Lipid? (A) The translocon (yellow) is viewed from above the plane of the membrane. A nascent chain TMS (black) is depicted as having entered the aqueous pore (white), from which the TMS moves directly (red arrow) into the bulk lipid of the ER membrane (gray) (Martoglio et al., 1995; Heinrich et al., 2000). (B) A TMS helix remains adjacent to translocon proteins even though more than 400 Å of nascent chain have emerged from the ribosome (blue) (Do et al., 1996) and are exposed to the cytosol (Liao et al., 1997). Ion movement through the pore is inhibited by the combined actions of, among others, BiP (green) and a J domain-containing ER membrane protein (magenta) (Haigh and Johnson, 2002; Alder et al., 2005). (C) Acceptor-labeled PLs (BOP-PE; red) are distributed by diffusion within the bulk lipid. After release from the translocon, donor-acceptor proximity is maximal because the TMS labeled with a donor dye (green) is completely surrounded by BOP-PE. (D) A TMS donor adjacent to or inside the translocon has a reduced proximity to acceptors because BOP-PE is excluded from area occupied by the translocon and associated proteins. Distances, sizes, and concentrations are not to scale. Molecular Cell 2012 48, 398-408DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.08.023) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 SSMP TMS Proximity to BOP-PE (A) Topogenic sequences in SSMP 111p: VSVG TMS (green); SS, preprolactin signal sequence (orange). NBD (red) is attached at residue 75. (B) Average NBD-to-BOP E values (±SD; n = 3) are shown for 111p232 that has been terminated normally (green), has been released from tRNA by puromycin (yellow), or is still attached to the tRNA (magenta). (C) Nascent, normally terminated (FL), or puromycin-reacted 111p232 with an εANB-Lys probe at 75 were photolyzed, immunoprecipitated with antibodies to Sec61α (α), Sec61β (β), or TRAM (T), and analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Photoadducts containing Sec61α (●), Sec61β (▴), and TRAM (♦) are indicated. The arrow indicates unreacted 111p. See also Figure S1 and Table S1. Molecular Cell 2012 48, 398-408DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.08.023) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 TMS1 and TMS2 Are Retained at the Translocon (A) Topogenic sequences for PMPs with an opsin 2 TMS (OP2; yellow) are identified as in Figure 2A. NBD (red) is positioned in either TMS1 (K1) or TMS2 (K2). (B) 2TM topology before (i) and after (ii) termination. (C) E values (±SD; n = 3–4) of each NBD-TMS to BOP-PE FRET before and after PMP release from tRNA. (D) Photocrosslinking of TMS1 and TMS2 to translocon components before and after termination. Symbols are defined in Figure 2C. (E) A longer TMS1-TMS2 loop had little effect on E (±SD; n = 4–5). (F) Inverting TMS1 and TMS2 in the PMP did not alter protein topology (Lin et al., 2011a) and had little effect on E (±SD; n = 3). See also Table S1. Molecular Cell 2012 48, 398-408DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.08.023) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 TMS3 Stays at Translocon, but Triggers TMS1 and TMS2 Release into Bulk Lipid (A) Topogenic sequences for PMPs with an opsin 3 TMS (OP3; magenta) are identified as in Figure 3A. NBD (red) is positioned in TMS1 (K1), TMS2 (K2), or TMS3 (K3). (B) 3TM topology before (i) and after (ii) termination. (C) E values (±SD; n = 3) of each NBD-TMS to BOP-PE FRET before and after PMP release from tRNA. (D) A longer TMS2-TMS3 loop had little effect on E (±SD; n = 4). (E) Photocrosslinking of TMS1, TMS2, and TMS3 to translocon components before and after termination of PMP. (F) Nascent chain length dependence of TMS2 and TMS3 photocrosslinking to Sec61α. Symbols are defined in Figure 2C. See also Table S1. Molecular Cell 2012 48, 398-408DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.08.023) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 SA Proximity to Bulk Lipid and Translocon Proteins (A) Location of Lep SA sequence (blue) and NBD dye (red) in Lep1 derivative (McCormick et al., 2003) that lacked the second TMS. (B) Nascent chain length dependence of NBD-SA to BOP-PE FRET E (±SD; n = 3–4) before and after termination. (C) Sec61α proximity to four different helical surfaces of SA was assessed by photoadduct formation (●) before and after termination. (D) Nascent chain length dependence of Sec61α photocrosslinking from four different SA probe locations. Symbols are defined in Figure 2C. See also Table S1. Molecular Cell 2012 48, 398-408DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.08.023) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 TMS1-TMS2 Separation (A) Donor (green) and acceptor (red) dyes were incorporated into TMS2 and TMS1, respectively. (B) E (±SD; n = 3) was determined before and after termination. Molecular Cell 2012 48, 398-408DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.08.023) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions