White Label Truck Platooning specifications

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
M. Tech. Project Presentation Automatic Cruise Control System By: Rupesh Sonu Kakade Under the guidance of Prof. Kannan Moudgalya and Prof. Krithi.
Advertisements

Sharing the Road With Others Chapter 8. PEDESTRIANS Always be aware of Pedestrians, especially in densely populated areas such as cities or town centers,
© Ricardo plc 2012 Eric Chan, Ricardo UK Ltd 21 st October 2012 SARTRE Demonstration System The research leading to these results.
Aerial Apparatus Operator Operating Emergency Vehicles.
Transportation Tuesday TRANSPORTATION TUESDAY REAR ENDERS – HOW CAN WE PREVENT THEM? A collision occurs when two vehicles occupy the same space!
Winter Driving Safety Tips. Winter Driving  Drivers should be able to recognize and effectively deal with hazardous driving conditions  Prepare yourself.
1 Challenge the future The Dutch Automated Vehicle Initiative: Challenges for automated driving Dr. R.(Raymond) G. Hoogendoorn Assistant Professor Delft.
Amanda Felix BUS 550 Tuesday, May 24,  Traditional methods are not enough!  Reduce costs, improve efficiency and spur innovation!  Information.
Field evaluation of an advanced brake warning system David Shinar Human Factors 1995 Presented by: Derrick Smets.
The Promotion of Active Safety Measures in Japan - collision damage mitigation brake - September 2007 Road Transport Bureau Road Transport Bureau MLIT.
Definition for Levels of Automation
Ian Fraser Highways Agency Co-operative Vehicle - Highway Systems Research.
1 Development and Evaluation of Selected Mobility Applications for VII (a.k.a. IntelliDrive) Steven E. Shladover, Sc.D. California PATH Program Institute.
AHS – The Vision. The Automated Highway System (AHS) and The Intelligent Vehicle Initiative (IVI)
Outline of Definition of Automated Driving Technology Document No. ITS/AD (5th ITS/AD, 24 June 2015, agenda item 3-2) Submitted by Japan.
Interacting With Other Users. Most collisions occur when two or more objects try to occupy the same space at the same time. Drivers must identify movement.
The Promotion of Active Safety Measures in Japan - collision damage mitigation brake - February 2007 Road Transport Bureau Road Transport Bureau MLIT Japan.
Chapter 43 Emergency Vehicle Operations. © 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning,a part of The Thomson Corporation. All Rights Reserved 2 Overview  Readiness.
Protective Braking for ACSF Informal Document: ACSF
Safety Distances and Object Classifications for ACSF Informal Document: ACSF
DSRC and SPaT, SSM, SRM & MAP
1. Overview of the past and future work of WP29 ITS Round Table 18/2/2004 Geneva Kenji Wani Co-chairman of ITS informal Group, ECE/WP29 Ministry of Land,
Fleet Operator Recognition Scheme (FORS)
1 6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016 Requirements for “Sensor view” & Environment monitoring version 1.0 Transmitted by the Experts of OICA and CLEPA.
Transmitted by the Experts of TRL (EC)
VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY Module 10 Topic 4 VEHICLE SUSPENSION Helps to smooth out weight transfers Helps keep all four wheels on the ground Helps keep the.
OICA „Certification of automated Vehicles“
Emerging Technologies in Autonomous Driving
Vehicle to Vehicle Communication
Next Step Meeting EU Truck Platooning Challenge
Critical systems design
Regional Road Safety Workshop African Development Bank,
PATH’s Recent Truck Platooning Research for FHWA EARP and DOE
Automatic Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS)
ACSF-C2 2-actions system
SAE DSRC Technical Committee work and outlook
Overview of CV2X Requirements
Presented by Sanil Kumar .P.V Roll no:62 S7 Mechanical Engg:
Proposal for UN Regulation on AEBS for M1/N1
IVG Driver Training Critical Event Reporting.
Informal document GRRF-86-36
Feedback from ACEA truck manufacturers and next steps
TUGS Jason Higuchi && Julia Yefimenko && Raudel mayorga
Industry Homework from AEB 02
Expansion of consideration target of ITS-AD IWG
NGV SG Use Cases (Next Generation V2X Study Group)
AEBS 4th Meeting UK Position Paper December 18 OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE
ENabling SafE Multi-Brand Platooning for Europe
FREIGHT PLANNING & EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES
Road Infrastructure for Road Vehicles Automation
Automated heavy vehicles in remote areas
Safety Distance to the front
VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY BRAKE SYSTEMS.
Safety Assessment of Automated Vehicles
Reason for performance difference between LVW and GVW
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Report on Automated Vehicle activities
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
Anti-lock Brake System (ABS)
How technology and data can bring needed improvements to air quality and the environment Dr Dave Williams 8th November 2018.
Safety concept for automated driving systems
ENabling SafE Multi-Brand Platooning for Europe
AEB IWG 02 ISO Standard: FVCMS
lesson 16.2 ENTERING CONTROLLED- ACCESS HIGHWAYS
Tomorrow’s Mobility…Is Here Today!
ENabling SafE Multi-Brand Platooning for Europe
ACSF-17 – Industry Preparation
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Automated Lane Keeping Systems
Presentation transcript:

White Label Truck Platooning specifications

Platooning levels and SAE Truck platooning, involves driving at short inter-vehicle distances for an extended period. The platoon as a whole can be seen as a system of interconnected systems with specific requirements.   The driver cannot be held responsible for timely intervention in case of safety-critical events such as hard braking. Hence, the first three SAE automation levels are not directly applicable for the platooning application. Need arises to create a different automation level classification for heavy duty vehicles that considers the explained needs of Platooning. ENSEMBLE will demonstrate Platoon level A and research B and C specifications

Platoon level A Maximum number of trucks of 7 is considered for platoon level A in ENSEMBLE ​ The time gap distance target between 0.8 and 1.4 s. (as close as possible to reach the benefits), ​Longitudinal automation with fail operation, not lateral automation This requires new longitudinal functions, e.g. Brake Performance Calculation and safety functions e.g. redundant braking functions, additional sensors New members of a running platoon can only join from the rear. ​ ​The system is in control of the longitudinal functional safety of the vehicle Interaction with platooning services and infrastructure is technically available  Note: the driver will remain legally responsible at all times such as adverse conditions like bad weather, slopes, etc (it is the drivers decision to activate platooning)

Platoon level A use cases The main high level use cases of platoon level A are: Platoon formation Platoon formation based on generic match making (Orchestrated non real-time) Platoon formation based on just extended awareness (Orchestrated real-time) Engaging to platoon Join from behind by single vehicle Merge from behind by existing platoon Platooning Steady state platooning Follow to stop (&go) Emergency braking (caused by AEB system or manual overrule) Platoon gap adaptation I2V interaction Cut-in (long time) Cut-in (short time) (“Cut-through”) System status (e.g. packet loss) Disengage platoon Leave Split

Platooning Layers

White Label Truck Platooning functional modules

CLEPA ‘s role in the ENSEMBLE project CLEPA is WP2 leader - WP2 Specification of a generic solution This WP will define the specification for the whole multi-brand truck platooning concept. Input for regulation and standardization