Peter Lee MD, Howard Gimbel MD, Maria Ferensowicz MA

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Comparison of Visual Outcomes With Toric IOL and With Limbal Relaxing Incisions in Cataract Surgery Eriko Fukuyama, MD Fukuyama Eye Clinic Fukuoka, Japan.

Advertisements

Discrepancy Between Scheimpflug and Placido-Based Topographies and Correlation with Astigmatism After Scheimpflug Topography-Guided LASIK Mohamed Abou.

Comparison between Dynamic contour tonometry, Goldmann applanation tonometry and Ehlers-corrected Goldmann applanation tonometry in eyes after Laser In.

Agreement Between Corneal Topography with the Dual-Scheimpflug Placido Corneal Topographer, Scheimpflug Corneal Topographer, and Scanning-Slit Topography.

In-the-Bag Toric IOL for Correction of Astigmatism in Keratoconus and after Corneal Surgery Bart T.H. van Dooren, M.D., Ph.D Ilse E.M.A. Mol, M.D. Department.

INTRAOPERATIVE FLAP COMPLICATIONS IN LASIK SURGERY PERFORMED BY OPHTHALMOLOGY RESIDENTS IN TRAINING Arturo Gómez-Bastar MD Arturo Ramirez-MirandaMD Lorena.

Placement of Toric Intraocular Lens and the Long-term Change in the Axis of Corneal Astigmatism after Sutureless Cataract Extraction by Phacoemulsification.

Experience with Patient Satisfaction with Monovision Targeted in PRK and LASIK C R Shah MD M K Purba OD A Dardzhikova MD J A van Westenbrugge MD H V Gimbel.

Managing the Refractive “Surprise” After Toric IOL Placement Managing the Refractive “Surprise” After Toric IOL Placement Brad H Feldman, MD Derek DelMonte,

Hyun Seung Kim, M.D. Department of Ophthalmology, St. Mary’s hospital, The Catholic University of Korea Changes in Astigmatism After Clear Corneal Temporal.

Nizar S Abdelfattah, M.D.1, Marina Israel2, Nermin Osman, M.D.3,

G. Jacob 1,2, C. Bouchard 2, S. Kancherla 1. Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL, Department of Ophthalmology 1. Loyola University Medical Center,

Comparison of Orbscan and Ultrasound Pachymetry Measurements Faik Orucov, MD, Abraham Solomon, MD,Ziv Caspi, David Landau, MD, Eyal Strassman, MD, and.

Effects of IOP Lowering Agents on Myopic Regression after Refractive Surgery Lim, Taehyung M.D., Hong, So Jin M.D., Cho, Beom Jin M.D., Ph.D. Chung Kyu-Hyung.

Astigmatism management with toric intraocular lenses in cataract patients Adriano Guarnieri 1-2, Luis W. Lu 3-4, Alfonso Arias- Puente INCIVI, Madrid,

Jamie Ng, Marcus Tan, Lennard Thean National University Health System

M. Vokrojova MD, M. Vokrojova MD, D. Sivekova MD, L. Wagnerova MD D. Sivekova MD, L. Wagnerova MD Prof. P. Kuchynka MD, PhD Prof. P. Kuchynka MD, PhD The.

Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness and Peripheral Corneal Thickness using Sheimpflug system, Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasound Pachymetry.

REFRACTIVE OUTCOMES WITH TORIC ICL IMPLANTS CHIEF AUTHOR: Dr. D.RAMAMURTHY CO – AUTHOR: Dr. R.CHITRA The authors have no financial interest in the subject.

The Effect of Corneal Anterior Surface Eccentricity on Astigmatism after Cataract Surgery Choul Yong Park MD 1 Sung Jun Lee MD 1 Prabjot Channa MD 2 Roy.

1 P.O. dei Pellegrini; A.S.L. Napoli 1Centro 2 Dipartimento di Oftalmologia, Seconda Università degli Studi Napoli Scheimpflug topography, Scanning-Slit.

Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Intracorneal Ring Segment (Intacs SK) in Keratoconus Abdulrahman Al-Muammar, MD, FRCSC I have no financial interest.

Evaluation of Corneal Tomography in Primary Pterygium Sahil Goel, MD (Presenting Author), Murugesan Vanathi MD *The authors have no financial interests.

DR. TEJAS D. SHAH AMDAVAD EYE LASER HOSPITALS PVT LTD GOOD BYE GLASSES LASER CENTRE AHMEDABAD, INDIA NO FINANCIAL INTEREST

Jae Lim Chung MD, MBA 1,3 ; Jin Pyo Hong MD 2,3 ; Kyoung Yul Seo MD, PhD 3 ; Eung Kweon Kim MD, PhD 3 ; Tae-im Kim MD, PhD Noo Ne Eye Hospital, Seoul,

Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty (DALK) Vs Penetrating Keratoplasty (PK) in patients with Keratoconus (KC). Dr. K.S.SIDDHARTHAN Aravind Eye Hospital.

Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness, Anterior Chamber Depth, and Central Corneal Power Measurements between Two Scheimpflug Imaging Systems Yuichi.

Prevalence of corneal astigmatism in cataract surgery candidates in Bangkok, Thailand Kaevalin Lekhanont, MD, Wadakarn Wuthisiri, MD, Porntip Chatchaipun,

Three-Year Study Results of Trans-epithelial Corneal Collagen Crosslinking for Keratoconus Brian S. Boxer Wachler, M.D. Lorelei L. Vicente, M.D. BEVERLY.

Post-LASIK Intraocular Lens Power Adjustment Nomogram Joseph Diehl Kevin Miller, MD Jules Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine.

Assessing the Need for Iris Registration System with Active Tracking Capability Julio Narvaez, MD; Peter Bekendam, MD; Kristin Schmid, BS; Gregory Bacon,

Comparison of Endothelial Keratoplasty (EK) Visual Outcomes with OCT Derived Corneal Thickness Measurements Authors Abraham K. Sleem, MD Robert L. Schultze,

Long Term Results of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Sutureless Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty “FALK” Mohamed Abou Shousha, MD, Sonia H. Yoo, MD, William Feuer,

CORNEAL ENDOTHELIAL PROFILE AFTER FERRARA RING IMPLANTATION Leonardo Torquetti, MD, PhD Paulo Ferrara, MD, PhD Paulo Ferrara Eye Clinic Belo Horizonte.

Laser in Situ Keratomileusis Decentration With and Without Active Eye-Tracking System Mark Edmund Johnston MD FRCSC P 167: The author.

Intrastromal Ring Segments for Keratoconus: A Retrospective Review Brad Feldman MD, Alan Carlson MD, Terry Kim MD, Natalie Afshari MD, Ricardo Santaella.

Intraocular Lens Outcomes: Comparison of Technologies and Formulas Carolina Eyecare Physicians, LLC Research Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology Storm.

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine,

P-WT-325- Corneal Topography In Childhood Glaucoma Patients

Late wound revision for post PKP high astigmatism or ectasia

Postoperative Refraction and Patient Satisfaction after Bilateral Implantation of Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses Robert Cionni, MD Financial.

Hayashi Eye Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan

17100 Contact lens fitting after corneal CXL

A Comparison of Visual Acuity, Refractive Outcomes, and Satisfaction Between LASIK Performed with a Microkeratome and a Femto Laser Nauman hashmani (MBBS),

Nienke Visser, Tos T.J.M. Berendschot, Rudy M.M.A. Nuijts

Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness measured by

Mehdi Ghajarnia, MD Mark Mifflin, MD John A. Moran Eye Center

Comparison of corneal powers obtained from four different devices

Ashkan M. Abbey, BA, Takeshi Ide, MD, PhD, George D

Authors have no financial interest in any product mentioned herein

Comparison of Autokeratometry and Manual Keratometry

Long-term refractive results after multizone LASIK for extreme myopia

LASIK Application in High Myopic Eyes; 10 Years Survey

Comparison of Automated and Manual Measurements of Horizontal Corneal Diameter in Contact Lens Wearers Using Orbscan Eye Metrics Function and Orbscan 11z.

No financial interest for all authors

Asociación Para Evitar La Ceguera En México

Mohamed A Guenena, MD Helga P Sandoval, MD, MSCR Kerry D Solomon, MD

Is Photorefractive Keratectomy the Laser Vision Correction of Choice?

Barry A Schechter, MD Florida Eye Microsurgical Institute

Comparison of topography-guided (TGL) to standard LASIK (SL) for hyperopia. How important is adjustment for angle kappa? ASCRS 08 A. John Kanellopoulos,

First 10 Cases with 150 kHz Intralase Enabled Keratoplasty (IEK) Compared to Standard Penetrating Keratoplasty (PK) Christopher L. Blanton, M.D. Financial.

None of the authors has a financial interest on the presented data.

성모병원 안센터 CHANGES IN ASTIGMATISM RELATIVE TO IOL HAPTIC INSERTION AXIS IN WITH-THE-RULE AND AGAINST-THE-RULE ASTIGMATISM PATIENTS Hyun Seung Kim, M.D.

Bernilla E; Izquierdo Jr. L; Miranda M.

Lasik decentration with the VISX ActiveTrak™ System

Hayashi Eye Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan

Mohamed Abdelrahman Awadalla,FRCS Magrabi Eye Hospital Cairo - Egypt

Visual Outcomes and Satisfaction with Toric IOL Versus Monofocal IOL

Shorter Duration, Higher Ultraviolet A Irradiation (UVA) Fluence Collagen Cross-linking (CCL) for Keratoconus (KCN) Frank A. Killian, MD and A. John Kanellopoulos,

Prospective Comparison of Manifest Refraction with Autorefraction Before and After Sub-Bowman Keratomileusis Joel D. Hunter MD Frank Schwendeman OD Daniel.

Presentation transcript:

Peter Lee MD, Howard Gimbel MD, Maria Ferensowicz MA Variability in Preoperative Measurement of Astigmatism in Refractive Patients: Instrument Variability or Patient Positioning? Peter Lee MD, Howard Gimbel MD, Maria Ferensowicz MA

Financial Interest Disclosure The authors have no financial interest in any product, corporations, or companies referred to in this presentation

Purpose To report the variability in preoperative measurements of astigmatism in refractive patients using three different corneal topographies and compared to manifest refraction.

Methods 1151 consecutive eyes underwent corneal topography by Orbscan, OPD and Pentacam and manifest refraction before refractive surgery (2005-2007) All surgeries were done by one surgeon Surgeon chose the measurement of astigmatic correction based on pre-operative data Manifest refraction used most frequently

Results – Cylinder Power The pre-operative measurements of cylinder power (mean +/- SD) for the different modalities were: 0.88+/-0.89 (manifest refraction), 1.18+/-2.49 (Orbscan), 0.91+/-1.40 (OPD) and 1.06+/-1.38 (Pentacam). Using dependent T-test for comparison: manifest refraction vs. Orbscan p=0.000043 (highly significantly different), manifest refraction vs. OPD p=0.389666 (not significantly different), and manifest refraction vs. Pentacam p=0.000008 (highly significantly different).

Cylinder Power ** ** ** highly significant

Results – Cylinder Axis The pre-operative measurements of cylinder axis (mean +/- SD) for the different modalities were: 80.13+/-67.33 (manifest refraction), 86.74+/-75.63 (Orbscan), 90.61+/-70.07 (OPD), and 81.39+/-70.95 (Pentacam). Using dependent T-test for comparison: manifest vs. Orbscan p=0.006629 (significantly different), manifest vs. OPD p=0.000004 (highly significantly different), and manifest vs. Pentacam p=0.613283 (not significantly different).

Cylinder Axis ** * * significant ** highly significant

Mean Absolute Difference in Axis Manifest vs. Topography Dependent T-tests: OPD vs Orbscan p=0.487, OPD vs Pentacam p<0.001, Orbscan vs Pentacam p<0.001

Patient Positioning?

Sample Patient How does a slight head tilt affect measurements of astigmatism by corneal topographies? Before head tilt After head tilt Cylinder Power (D) Axis (º) Orbscan 1.5 79 1.4 72 OPD 96 99 Pentacam 1.2 13 3.8 10 * Patient positioning study in progress

Conclusion Inter-instrument variability and patient positioning and facial asymmetry add to the challenges of determining the true measurement of astigmatism in the refractive surgical population.