The Role of Oocyte Transcription, the 5′UTR, and Translation Repression and Derepression in Drosophila gurken mRNA and Protein Localization  Carol Saunders,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kálmán Somogyi, Pernille Rørth  Developmental Cell 
Advertisements

Oogenesis We then dissect ovaries from the created fly and use the egg chambers from stages in midoogenesis to visualize endogenous.
Sex-Specific Deployment of FGF Signaling in Drosophila Recruits Mesodermal Cells into the Male Genital Imaginal Disc  Shaad M. Ahmad, Bruce S. Baker 
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (March 2005)
Volume 13, Issue 20, Pages (October 2003)
The Salvador-Warts-Hippo Pathway Is Required for Epithelial Proliferation and Axis Specification in Drosophila  Carine Meignin, Ines Alvarez-Garcia, Ilan.
D-cbl, a Negative Regulator of the Egfr Pathway, Is Required for Dorsoventral Patterning in Drosophila Oogenesis  Li-Mei Pai, Gail Barcelo, Trudi Schüpbach 
Ying Wang, Veit Riechmann  Current Biology 
Marios Agelopoulos, Daniel J. McKay, Richard S. Mann  Cell Reports 
Abdur Rahaman, Nels C. Elde, Aaron P. Turkewitz  Current Biology 
Volume 19, Issue 23, Pages (December 2009)
Drosophila gurken (TGFα) mRNA Localizes as Particles that Move within the Oocyte in Two Dynein-Dependent Steps  Nina MacDougall, Alejandra Clark, Eilidh.
Gáspár Jékely, Hsin-Ho Sung, Carlos M. Luque, Pernille Rørth 
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (April 2010)
Drosophila wingless and Pair-Rule Transcripts Localize Apically by Dynein-Mediated Transport of RNA Particles  Gavin S. Wilkie, Ilan Davis  Cell  Volume.
Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)
Douglas J Guarnieri, G.Steven Dodson, Michael A Simon  Molecular Cell 
The GSL biosynthetic pathway is active in both germ line and follicle cells. The GSL biosynthetic pathway is active in both germ line and follicle cells.
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (October 1996)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Live Imaging of Endogenous RNA Reveals a Diffusion and Entrapment Mechanism for nanos mRNA Localization in Drosophila  Kevin M. Forrest, Elizabeth R.
A Combinatorial Code for Pattern Formation in Drosophila Oogenesis
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages (June 2006)
Mechanisms of Odor Receptor Gene Choice in Drosophila
Volume 105, Issue 2, Pages (April 2001)
Volume 12, Issue 23, Pages (December 2002)
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages (April 2004)
Vitaly Zimyanin, Nick Lowe, Daniel St Johnston  Current Biology 
Regulation of Temporal Identity Transitions in Drosophila Neuroblasts
Abdur Rahaman, Nels C. Elde, Aaron P. Turkewitz  Current Biology 
From Stem Cell to Embryo without Centrioles
Periodic Lunatic fringe Expression Is Controlled during Segmentation by a Cyclic Transcriptional Enhancer Responsive to Notch Signaling  Aixa V. Morales,
Anchor Cell Invasion into the Vulval Epithelium in C. elegans
Rongwen Xi, Jennifer R. McGregor, Douglas A. Harrison 
Recognition of a bicoid mRNA Localization Signal by a Protein Complex Containing Swallow, Nod, and RNA Binding Proteins  Eric A. Arn, Byeong J. Cha, William.
Changes in bicoid mRNA Anchoring Highlight Conserved Mechanisms during the Oocyte-to-Embryo Transition  Timothy T. Weil, Richard Parton, Ilan Davis, Elizabeth.
The Level of C/EBP Protein Is Critical for Cell Migration during Drosophila Oogenesis and Is Tightly Controlled by Regulated Degradation  Pernille Rørth,
Volume 102, Issue 8, Pages (April 2012)
Ying Wang, Veit Riechmann  Current Biology 
Elizabeth H. Chen, Eric N. Olson  Developmental Cell 
Kami Ahmad, Steven Henikoff  Molecular Cell 
Mark Van Doren, Anne L. Williamson, Ruth Lehmann  Current Biology 
Drosophila gurken (TGFα) mRNA Localizes as Particles that Move within the Oocyte in Two Dynein-Dependent Steps  Nina MacDougall, Alejandra Clark, Eilidh.
Volume 106, Issue 2, Pages (July 2001)
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages (September 2001)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 2004)
Posterior Localization of Dynein and Dorsal-Ventral Axis Formation Depend on Kinesin in Drosophila Oocytes  Robert P. Brendza, Laura R. Serbus, William.
Modes of Protein Movement that Lead to the Asymmetric Localization of Partner of Numb during Drosophila Neuroblast Division  Bingwei Lu, Larry Ackerman,
Magalie Lecourtois, François Schweisguth  Current Biology 
Stefano De Renzis, J. Yu, R. Zinzen, Eric Wieschaus  Developmental Cell 
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Zhenyu Zhang, Leslie M. Stevens, David Stein  Current Biology 
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 2004)
Patricia J. Hilleren, Roy Parker  Molecular Cell 
The Drosophila Homolog of C
Paracrine Signaling through the JAK/STAT Pathway Activates Invasive Behavior of Ovarian Epithelial Cells in Drosophila  Debra L. Silver, Denise J. Montell 
Jacques P. Bothma, Joe Magliocco, Michael Levine  Current Biology 
Variation in the Dorsal Gradient Distribution Is a Source for Modified Scaling of Germ Layers in Drosophila  Juan Sebastian Chahda, Rui Sousa-Neves, Claudia Mieko.
Oocyte polarity is disrupted in the presence of FP41 mutant PFCs
Inscuteable and Staufen Mediate Asymmetric Localization and Segregation of prosperoRNA during Drosophila Neuroblast Cell Divisions  Peng Li, Xiaohang.
The Origin of Centrosomes in Parthenogenetic Hymenopteran Insects
Volume 115, Issue 5, Pages (November 2003)
Gene Amplification as a Developmental Strategy
The receptor tyrosine phosphatase Dlar and integrins organize actin filaments in the Drosophila follicular epithelium  Jack Bateman, R.Srekantha Reddy,
Salvador-Warts-Hippo Signaling Promotes Drosophila Posterior Follicle Cell Maturation Downstream of Notch  Cédric Polesello, Nicolas Tapon  Current Biology 
The Drosophila SDE3 Homolog armitage Is Required for oskar mRNA Silencing and Embryonic Axis Specification  Heather A Cook, Birgit S Koppetsch, Jing Wu,
The Cytoplasmic Dynein and Kinesin Motors Have Interdependent Roles in Patterning the Drosophila Oocyte  Jason E Duncan, Rahul Warrior  Current Biology 
Markus Kaspar, Axel Dienemann, Christine Schulze, Frank Sprenger 
The Drosophila Microtubule-Associated Protein Mini Spindles Is Required for Cytoplasmic Microtubules in Oogenesis  Woongjoon Moon, Tulle Hazelrigg  Current.
Drosophila wingless and Pair-Rule Transcripts Localize Apically by Dynein-Mediated Transport of RNA Particles  Gavin S. Wilkie, Ilan Davis  Cell  Volume.
Presentation transcript:

The Role of Oocyte Transcription, the 5′UTR, and Translation Repression and Derepression in Drosophila gurken mRNA and Protein Localization  Carol Saunders, Robert S Cohen  Molecular Cell  Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 43-54 (January 1999) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80173-2

Figure 1 grk mRNA Is Produced in the Oocyte (A) Whole-mount in situ hybridization to gpro-Z transcripts. Transcripts are detected in the oocytes (arrowheads) but are not localized. (B and C) Whole-mount in situ hybridization to endogenous grk (B) and osk (C) transcripts in sister ovarioles of a colchicine-fed fly. The grk transcripts are concentrated in the oocyte, while the osk transcripts are concentrated in nurse cells. (D) Whole-mount in situ hybridization to endogenous grk transcripts in egg chambers of a cytochalasin D–fed fly. Molecular Cell 1999 3, 43-54DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80173-2)

Figure 2 Localization Dynamics of grk mRNA in Colchicine-Treated and Untreated Oocytes Oocytes were doubly labeled for grk mRNA (green) and nuclear lamin (red). The oocyte nuclei are intensely stained and appear in the center of the micrographs. Follicle cell nuclei are small and at the periphery of the micrographs, while nurse cell nuclei are large and to the anterior (left) of the oocyte. (A) Various stage oocytes from colchicine-fed flies. Note that the mRNA is aggregated into one or a few clumps along a single side of the nucleus. (B) Untreated oocytes of the following stages: i, 6; ii, 7; iii, 8; and iv, 9. Panel ii shows a dorsal-midline view, while the other panels show lateral views with dorsal on top. (C) A sagittal series of optical sections through a single stage 7 oocyte undergoing nuclear migration. A lateral view (dorsal on top) of the reconstructed image is shown at the bottom right. Molecular Cell 1999 3, 43-54DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80173-2)

Figure 7 The Role of K10 and the 3′UTR in grk Translation (A and B) Localization of grk mRNA (green) and protein (red) in wild-type (A) and K10 mutant (B) oocytes. Stages: (i) early stage 7; (ii) late stage 7/early stage 8; (iii) late stage 8; (iv) stage 9. In wild-type late stage 7/early stage 8 oocytes, Grk (arrowheads) is restricted to the anterodorsal corner of cell, even though grk mRNA is found all along the anterior cortex. In contrast, Grk accumulates all along the anterior cortex of the late stage 7/early stage 8 oocytes of K10 mutants. (B, iv) Control showing that K10 gene activity is not required for the association of grk mRNA (green) with the oocyte nucleus (red). (C and D) Immunolocalization of β-gal fusion protein produced by the gz3′ (C) and gzΔ3′ (D) transgenes. Stages: i, stage 6; ii, stage7/8; iii, stage 9/10. Note that fusion protein (arrowheads) accumulates all along the anterior cortex of gzΔ3′ transformants but is restricted to the anterodorsal corner of gz3′ transformants. The high background staining seen throughout the ooplasm of gzΔ3′ and gz3′ transformants is likely due to inefficient turnover of fusion protein synthesized during earlier stages of oogenesis, since the intensity of the such staining peaks during stage 6 and gradually disappears thereafter. Molecular Cell 1999 3, 43-54DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80173-2)

Figure 3 Localization Dynamics of the ER and grk mRNA during Oogenesis Stage 5 (A–C), early stage 7 (D–F), and stage 9 (G–I) oocytes doubly labeled for the ER (A, D, and G) and grk mRNA (B, E, and H). (C, F, and I) Merged images. Arrowheads mark that side of the nucleus that lies farthest from the overlying follicle cell epithelium. Molecular Cell 1999 3, 43-54DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80173-2)

Figure 4 Efficient grk mRNA Localization Requires the grk 3′UTR, but Not Translation of the Signal Sequence Whole-mount in situ hybridization to gzΔ3′ (A) and gz3′ (B) transcripts. Note the more rapid disappearance of gz3′ transcripts from the anterior cortex (compare the two middle panels). (C) Whole-mount in situ hybridization to gzstop transcripts, which contain a stop codon at the beginning of the grk protein-coding sequence (see text). (D) Immunolocalization of gzstop- encoded protein, with an anti-β-gal antibody. No protein is detectable, indicating that the stop codon has effectively blocked translation. Molecular Cell 1999 3, 43-54DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80173-2)

Figure 5 Low-Resolution Deletion Analysis of the grk 5′UTR The starting construct (gz3′) is shown at the top of the diagram (see Experimental Procedures). The AB, BC, and B diagrams highlight the nondeleted portions of the ABgz, BCgz, and Bgz constructs, respectively (for details, see Experimental Procedures). The bottom panels show representative whole-mount in situ hybridization to ABgz and Bgz transcripts, respectively. The ABgz transcripts exhibit a normal localization pattern, while only diffuse distribution throughout the ooplasm is seen for Bgz transcripts. The distribution pattern of BCgz transcripts (not shown) is indistinguishable from that of Bgz transcripts. Molecular Cell 1999 3, 43-54DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80173-2)

Figure 6 Localization and Translational Control Elements in the grk 5′ UTR (A) Schematic diagram and localization summary of linker scan mutations in the 5′UTR. The mutations are identified by the nucleotides substituted, for example, the 36/65 mutation carries a substitution of nucleotides +36 to +65, where +1 corresponds to the first nucleotide of the mRNA. All of the substitution mutations were derived from the gz 3′ construct (diagrammed at the top of the figure and see Experimental Procedures). The Δ36/347 mutation is a deletion of the segment +36 to +347, where the translation start codon begins at +355. This mutation was made with and without the 3′UTR (see Results and Experimental Procedures). The grk 5′ intron, which follows residue +164 (see Experimental Procedures), is not shown for simplicity. Early localization refers to posterior localization and the cortical arc and anterior ring transition stages (see Results). Late localization refers to anterodorsal localization. All transcripts that failed to exhibit wild-type anterodorsal localization were degraded during late stage 8 and 9. (B) Representative in situ hybridization to transcripts of the large deletion (Δ36/347z3′) that contains the 3′UTR. (C) Immunolocalization of lacZ fusion protein in oocytes carrying the gz3′ (left panel) and Δ36/347z3′ transgenes, which contain and lack GLE2, respectively. Molecular Cell 1999 3, 43-54DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80173-2)