The Elastic Properties of the Cryptococcus neoformans Capsule

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Actin Protofilament Orientation at the Erythrocyte Membrane
Advertisements

Madoka Suzuki, Hideaki Fujita, Shin’ichi Ishiwata  Biophysical Journal 
Mahito Kikumoto, Masashi Kurachi, Valer Tosa, Hideo Tashiro 
Volume 107, Issue 4, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 103, Issue 5, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 104, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 105, Issue 3, Pages (August 2013)
Benoit Tesson, Michael I. Latz  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 90, Issue 10, Pages (May 2006)
Substrate Viscosity Enhances Correlation in Epithelial Sheet Movement
Volume 102, Issue 10, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 98, Issue 12, Pages (June 2010)
Dynamics of Membrane Nanotubulation and DNA Self-Assembly
Metastatic State of Cancer Cells May Be Indicated by Adhesion Strength
Maxim E. Dokukin, Nataliia V. Guz, Igor Sokolov  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 104, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 96, Issue 6, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 107, Issue 5, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 109, Issue 5, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 101, Issue 11, Pages (December 2011)
Mechanical Forces of Fission Yeast Growth
Quantifying Cell Adhesion through Impingement of a Controlled Microjet
Physical Properties of Polymorphic Yeast Prion Amyloid Fibers
On the Origin of Kinesin Limping
Volume 95, Issue 8, Pages (October 2008)
Worms under Pressure: Bulk Mechanical Properties of C
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
Cellular Contraction Can Drive Rapid Epithelial Flows
Mechanical Distortion of Single Actin Filaments Induced by External Force: Detection by Fluorescence Imaging  Togo Shimozawa, Shin'ichi Ishiwata  Biophysical.
J.E. Jeon, K. Schrobback, D.W. Hutmacher, T.J. Klein 
Traction Forces of Neutrophils Migrating on Compliant Substrates
Volume 103, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 90, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
Modulating Vesicle Adhesion by Electric Fields
Matthias D. Koch, Alexander Rohrbach  Biophysical Journal 
Stefan Nehls, Andreas Janshoff  Biophysical Journal 
Dmitry A. Fedosov, Bruce Caswell, George Em Karniadakis 
Volume 111, Issue 7, Pages (October 2016)
Adaptive Response of Actin Bundles under Mechanical Stress
V.M. Burlakov, R. Taylor, J. Koerner, N. Emptage  Biophysical Journal 
Cell Surface Topography Is a Regulator of Molecular Interactions during Chemokine- Induced Neutrophil Spreading  Elena. B. Lomakina, Graham Marsh, Richard E.
Arpita Upadhyaya, Michael P. Sheetz  Biophysical Journal 
Bart Smeets, Maxim Cuvelier, Jiri Pešek, Herman Ramon 
Volume 104, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Martin Clausen, Michael Koomey, Berenike Maier  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 97, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
K. Venkatesan Iyer, S. Pulford, A. Mogilner, G.V. Shivashankar 
Quantitative Image Restoration in Bright Field Optical Microscopy
Statistics of Active Transport in Xenopus Melanophores Cells
Single-Cell Adhesion Tests against Functionalized Microspheres Arrayed on AFM Cantilevers Confirm Heterophilic E- and N-Cadherin Binding  Chawin Ounkomol,
Focal Adhesion Kinase Stabilizes the Cytoskeleton
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages (November 2013)
Probing the Cell Peripheral Movements by Optical Trapping Technique
Continuous Allosteric Regulation of a Viral Packaging Motor by a Sensor that Detects the Density and Conformation of Packaged DNA  Zachary T. Berndsen,
Venkat Maruthamuthu, Margaret L. Gardel  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 108, Issue 10, Pages (May 2015)
Felix Kohler, Alexander Rohrbach  Biophysical Journal 
Interaction of Oxazole Yellow Dyes with DNA Studied with Hybrid Optical Tweezers and Fluorescence Microscopy  C.U. Murade, V. Subramaniam, C. Otto, Martin.
Hydrodynamic Determinants of Cell Necrosis and Molecular Delivery Produced by Pulsed Laser Microbeam Irradiation of Adherent Cells  Jonathan L. Compton,
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages (November 2013)
John E. Pickard, Klaus Ley  Biophysical Journal 
How Cells Tiptoe on Adhesive Surfaces before Sticking
Change in Rigidity in the Activated Form of the Glucose/Galactose Receptor from Escherichia coli: A Phenomenon that Will Be Key to the Development of.
A New Angle on Microscopic Suspension Feeders near Boundaries
Anil K. Dasanna, Christine Lansche, Michael Lanzer, Ulrich S. Schwarz 
Madoka Suzuki, Hideaki Fujita, Shin’ichi Ishiwata  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 114, Issue 6, Pages (March 2018)
Cell Cytoskeleton and Tether Extraction
Bistability of Cell Adhesion in Shear Flow
Volume 110, Issue 11, Pages (June 2016)
Presentation transcript:

The Elastic Properties of the Cryptococcus neoformans Capsule Susana Frases, Bruno Pontes, Leonardo Nimrichter, Marcio L. Rodrigues, Nathan B. Viana, Arturo Casadevall  Biophysical Journal  Volume 97, Issue 4, Pages 937-945 (August 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.04.043 Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Proposed model for determination of the elastic properties of the C. neoformans capsule. (a) Initial situation where the bead (solid bead) is in its equilibrium position in the trap, ρ = 0, and the capsule is not deformed, z¯ = 0. (b) As the microscope stage moves left under controlled velocity, the cell adhered to the coverslip similarly moves to the left. There appears a “tug of war” between the cell and the optical tweezers. As a result, the trapped bead changes its equilibrium position, from ρ(0) to ρ(V), resulting in Δρ > 0, and the capsule deforms, z¯ > 0, to balance the optical force. Biophysical Journal 2009 97, 937-945DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2009.04.043) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Measurement of the contact angle after attachment of beads to the capsule of C. neoformans. (a) Bright-field image showing four polystyrene beads attached to the C. neoformans capsule. (b) Corresponding immunofluorescence after capsule staining with 18B7 antibody. (c) Merging of the images shown in a and b. (d) A high-magnification look at the boxed zone in c showing the bead-capsule contact angle. Scale bar for a–c, 5μm. Biophysical Journal 2009 97, 937-945DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2009.04.043) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Young's modulus determination for the C. neoformans capsule. (a) Schematic representation of the change in bead position, resulting in displacement from its initial equilibrium position, Δρ. (b) A sequence of three distinct frames in the same experiment showing the variation in the bead equilibrium position. Scale bar, 5 μm. (c) A typical Young's modulus experimental curve under control conditions. For this experiment, the slope of the curve Δρ ×t is A = 0.021 μm/s. Using the theoretical model described in the Materials and Methods section, the Young's modulus value determined for this experiment was 77 Pa. Arrowheads 1–3 correspond to the three representative frames shown in Fig. 3 b. Biophysical Journal 2009 97, 937-945DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2009.04.043) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Divalent cations influence the elasticity of the C. neoformans polysaccharide capsule. (a) Representative images of C. neoformans after incubation in two different Ca2+ concentrations. Scale bar, 5 μm. (b) Values of Young's modulus after incubation of C. neoformans in different cation Ca2+ concentrations. Data are mean ± SE (n = 20 cells). Biophysical Journal 2009 97, 937-945DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2009.04.043) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Influence of growth time and capsule size on the elastic properties of the C. neoformans capsule. (a) Representative images of C. neoformans cells stained with India ink for each culture interval. Scale bar, 5 μm. (b) Representative bright-field images of C. neoformans cells used in the Young's modulus experiments. Scale bar, 5 μm. (c) Mean ± SE of C. neoformans after 1, 3, and 6 days of growth, confirming that the capsule increases as a function of time. Scale bar, 5 μm. (d) Plot of the Young's modulus as a function of capsule thickness. Data are mean ± SE. Biophysical Journal 2009 97, 937-945DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2009.04.043) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Binding of mAb 18B7 to C. neoformans cells treated with different concentrations of CaCl2 as revealed by indirect immunofluorescence. (a) Fluorescence microscopy revealing mAb 18B7 capsular binding (green, FITC) and the fungal cell wall (blue, UVITEX). Scale bar, 3 μm. (b) Width of the mAb18B7 binding band depended on calcium concentration. The width of 18B7 biding is represented by solid bars. The distance between the cell wall and the edge of mAb binding is represented by open bars. (Inset) Illustration of the measured distances. Significant (p < 0.05) differences in binding between the samples and control conditions were observed. Biophysical Journal 2009 97, 937-945DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2009.04.043) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Binding of mAb 18B7 to PS-coated polystyrene surfaces as a function of Ca2+ and GXM concentrations. The y axis represents absorbance at 405 nm. Biophysical Journal 2009 97, 937-945DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2009.04.043) Copyright © 2009 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions