Memory. Watch this clip and answer the following questions qaLrc4.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reconstruction of Automobile destruction
Advertisements

Loftus and Palmer Leading Questions.
PYA1: Critical Issue Eye Witness Testimony EWT. Eye Witness Testimony EWT The statements provided by witnesses of a crime or situation which help to establish.
BIG 12 - Powerpoint #1 Loftus & Palmer 1974; Bartlett 1932.
Write them down Did you note down ‘sweet’ and ‘angry’?
Evaluating Loftus (1979) ‘The weapon effect’
LOFTUS & PALMER (1974) Starter: Here is an introduction to Loftus & Palmer (1974)…what information is missing…  Loftus carried out an experiment where.
Cognitive Approach AS Level Psychology The core studies.
Eye Witness Testimony Objectives 1.Be able to appreciate the importance of memory research 2.Be able to describe the key study 3.Be able to evaluate the.
Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction
Loftus and Palmer Evaluation Cognitive Core Study.
By Dhina, Haneen, Viveka, and Natsuki Elizabeth Loftus.
Loftus & Palmer (1974) - Aim: - To see the effect of leading questions on Eye Witness Testimony.
Eye-witness testimony
Memory – Module 27 Forgetting and Memory Construction Memory – Module 27 Forgetting and Memory Construction General Psych 1 April 12, 2005 Class #21.
LOFTUS AND PALMER CORE STUDY SLIDES Get out your APFC.
Nancy Jenkins Barbara Ostrowska Esha Patnaik IB Psychology, Pamoja TO WHAT EXTENT IS ONE COGNITIVE PROCESS RELIABLE?
Readings 25 & 26. Reading 25: Classic Memory and the eye-witness Experiment 1 Experiment 2 Conclusion Reading 26: Contemporary Misinformation Effect Memory.
EWT and Anxiety. How will I know if I am learning? By the end of the lesson… E Will be able to define weapon focus. C Will be able to explain how anxiety.
EYE WITNESS TESTIMONY. WHAT IS EYE WITNESS TESTIMONY? Question – write your answer on your mini-whiteboards – What is an Eyewitness Testimony? AQA Definition:
THE COGNITIVE INTERVIEW Improving Eye Witness Testimony.
Memory and the power of suggestion
Eyewitness Testimony Reconstructive memory Reconstructive memory Schema driven errors Schema driven errors Effect of leading questions Effect of leading.
Yuille and Cutshall (1986) A case study of eyewitness memory of a crime.
3 FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE EWT 1.Anxiety 2.Age of Witness 3.Misleading Information What research/studies are associated with each of the factors below… Coxon.
Reliability of one cognitive process
AS Level Psychology The core studies Cognitive Approach.
AREA OF STUDY 2 MEMORY UNIT 3 THE CONSCIOUS SELF.
Question Wording and Eyewitness Testimony © POSbase 2005 The study of Loftus & Palmer (1974):Loftus & Palmer (1974): Participants viewed films about a.
Memorise these words, you have until I have finished reading them out. sournicecandy honeysugarsoda bitterchocolategood hearttastecake toothtartpie.
Loftus And Palmer The Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction.
Factors affecting eyewitness testimony. Eyewitness testimony Eye witnesses who have ‘seen with their own eyes’ tend to be believed more by juries than.
Do Now What are some factors that you think could influence eyewitness testimony?
Memory Eyewitness Testimony. Learning objectives Understand what is meant by eyewitness testimony (EWT) Be aware of some of the factors that affect the.
MEMORY IN EVERYDAY LIFE MEMORY IN EVERYDAY LIFE Factors Affecting EWT Anxiety.
Eyewitness Testimony Elizabeth Loftus.
AS Level Psychology The core studies
WHS AP Psychology Unit 2: Memory (Cognition) Essential Task 2-4: Describe special topics in memory with specific attention to eidetic memories, and eye-witness.
ARTICLE ANALYSIS OVERALL, YOU ARE NOT LINKING THE CONCEPTS INTO THE ARTICLES BUT DISCUSSING THE 2 SEPARATELY.
Loftus & Palmer Cognitive Psychology The Core Studies.
You’re the psychologist You can pick either L&P, Pickel or Yarmey. You must be then and answer questions from the rest of the group for 3 minutes. Rest.
Eyewitness Testimony Violence and Recall Loftus & Burns: showed participants a filmed bank robbery. One version shots were fired but no one was hurt.
Read the following; ‘When the man entered the kitchen, he slipped on a wet spot and dropped the delicate glass pitcher on the floor. The pitcher was very.
About how fast were the cars going when they hit each other? collided smashed bumped contacted.
Reliability in Memory.  In 1984 Jennifer Thompson, a 22-year-old college student was raped at knifepoint. She testified that during the crime she made.
Memory Bingo! HypothesisIndependent variable Dependent variable Weapon focusDecaySensory store CapacityEncodingPeterson and Peterson LoftusCentral ExecutivePhonological.
Getting you thinking: Extension: Read the ‘Apply your knowledge’ section on p55. Discuss the task with your neighbour.
Eyewitness Testimony Reliability in Memory.
Discussion Loftus and Palmer suggest 2 explanations for the results of Experiment 1: Response Bias: The different speed estimates occurred because the.
How reliable is your memory? PART 2
MEMORY FALLIBLITY OF MEMORY.
Multiple choice questions
Loftus and Palmer (1974) (A2) Reconstruction of automobile destruction and example of the interaction between language and memory.
What is an article analysis and how do you perform one?
Presentation by Jordan Cline, Sarah Swift, and Anita Bainbridge
Reliability of Memory Ms. Carmelitano.
The reliability of Memory
PSYA1: Cognitive Psychology Memory
A case study of eyewitness memory of a real crime.
A case study of eyewitness memory of a crime.
Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction
what have we learned from past two lessons?
A case study of eyewitness memory of a crime.
Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction
Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction
Sour Nice Candy Honey Pie Toffee Taste Cake Tooth Tart Sugar Pop
L.O: Misleading information leading questions post-event discussion.
The cognitive area.
Reconstructive memory.
The effect of Anxiety on Eyewitness Testimony
Presentation transcript:

Memory

Watch this clip and answer the following questions qaLrc4

Questions 1. How many parked cars did you overtake before the roundabout? 2. What coloured top was the person wearing who was talking into the passenger side? 3. What was the registration no. of the white transit van? 4. How many people were waiting to cross at the first set of traffic lights? 5. What colour was the car that over took you?

Share your answers Are they all the same? Was the pedestrian male or female? Can you be sure? Did the wording of the questions influence your answers?

Eyewitness Testimony Important aspect of criminal trials. Often very influential. Juries can decide based on eyewitness testimony alone.

Reliable? Factors affecting? How accurate do you think you would be in describing what you witnessed about the crash? What factors might influence your statement? Would being in a police station influence you? Would the police officers have any effect on you, say in their manner or in their questioning technique, even in the language they used? Would your impressions about police through television influence you?

Factors affecting testimony: Anxiety / Stress Reconstructive Memory Weapon Focus Leading Questions (Loftus and Palmer, 1974)Loftus and Palmer, 1974

Anxiety/stress Clifford and Scott (1978) found that people who saw a film of a violent attack remembered fewer of the 40 items of information about the event than a control group who saw a less stressful version. As witnessing a real crime is probably more stressful than taking part in an experiment, memory accuracy may well be even more affected in real life. However, Yuille and Cutshall (1986) found that witnesses of a gun shooting had remarkable memory. Even after 5 months and despite leading questions.

Chinese Whispers

Reconstructive Memory Bartlett, 1932 – recall subject to our perception based on our culture, norms and experience. We fit memories into our understanding. This means memories can be distorted or unreliable. 'War of the Ghosts', Bartlett (1932)

Weapon Focus As a witness you focus on the weapon making all other details secondary. Loftus, 1987 Selective attention. Do you remember the clip with the gorilla?

Loftus and Palmer, 1974 Aim – to test if leading questions can distort eyewitness accounts. M&P – Asked ppts (45 American students) to estimate the speed of vehicles after watching a clip of a car accident. A task ppl are generally poor at. The IV was the verb used in the question eg smashes, collided, contacted etc.

Results

Conclusions A week later ppts were asked if they saw any glass at the scene. Despite there being none ppts in the smashed condition were much more likely to say yes. This suggests that memories are open to distortion by language and that confabulation can occur (addition of false details to an existing memory). How might you use this knowledge if you are: a) A police officer b) A lawyer?

Loftus and Zanni, 1975 Did you see the broken headlight? VS Did you see a broken headlight? Ppts asked the were twice as likely to answer yes.

Evaluation Lacks ecological validity. Consequences? Closed questions.

For you to research: Effect of individual differences on EWT: Age Occupation This work has led to the development of cognitive interview technique. Research more about this technique.