Seattle Transportation Benefit District

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lectures 8: The Performance and Condition of Transit in the United States.
Advertisements

1 Metrolinx delivers The Big Move Regional Transportation Plan: Transforming Transportation in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area November 5, 2012 Bruce.
Rapid Transit Investment Plan David Armijo, CEO March 19, 2010.
STBD Proposition One Budget Amendment. STBD Proposition 1 Timeline November 2014Prop 1 approved by voters ▪ $60 vehicle license fee (VLF) ▪ 0.1% sales.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
11. 2 Public Transportation’s Role in a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategy Kevin Desmond King County Metro Transit Division Seattle, WA On behalf of the.
Performance Analysis Presentation to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (NCR-TPB) November 28, 2012 Adopted: July 18, 2012 Item.
EFFECTS OF RISING GAS PRICES ON BUS RIDERSHIP FOR SMALL URBAN AND RURAL TRANSIT SYSTEMS Jeremy Mattson 18 th National Conference on Rural Public and Intercity.
Transit Partnerships. Goal of Presentation Review the Transit Partnership Proposal Seek Ordinance Approval: –Authorizing the Mayor to submit Transit Partnership.
DRAFT What If… The Washington Region Grew Differently? Public Forum on Alternative Transportation and Land-Use Scenarios National Capital Region.
1 Transit Capacity Constraint Presented to: TPB Technical Committee April 1, 2005 Lora Byala Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Office of Business.
1 Mountain Metropolitan Transit Sustainability Committee March 20, 2009 Presented By: Sherre Ritenour & Tim McKinney.
2009 COMMUNITY SURVEY Presentation of Final Results January 21, 2010.
1 What If… The Washington Region Grew Differently? The TPB Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study Ronald F. Kirby Director, COG Department of Transportation.
Photos by Susie Fitzhugh Bell Times Analysis Task Force (Metro Service) (January 22, 2015date)
Transportation Fee FY2016 January 16, Services Provided by Transportation Stinger Buses - Three routes with 10 buses operating weekdays and two.
Indianapolis Public Public Hearing – Proposed 2014 Budget Thursday, August 15, 2013 Transportation Corporation.
Our Seniors, Our Streets, Our Schools TAM Listening Tour 2010.
DESTINATION 2030 Regional Local Personal Adopted May 24, 2001.
Regional Transportation Investment District Overview Presentation to the Discovery Institute, Cascadia Project, Transportation Working Group Kjristine.
Proposed Route Modifications
Multi Agency Exchange May 16, 2017.
Sustainability Programs
Move New Haven Transit Mobility Study:
Integrating Transit and Highway Solutions In High Volume Corridors
Finance Committee & City Council October 10, 2016
Comprehensive Route Network Analysis
Out-of-State Motor Vehicle Sales Tax Election
APTA Sustainability and Public Transportation Workshop Benjamin Smith
Cost-Benefit Analysis: Seattle Link Light Rail, Initial Segment
Move New Haven CEC Meeting #2:
Gunnison Valley Transportation Authority (RTA) 2016 Transit Planning Process Funded through a Section 5304 Planning Grant 5/23/2018.
TRANSIT WALKING BICYCLING THOUGHTFUL DEVELOPMENT
Community Outreach Spring 2016.
and Transportation Impacts
Capital Metro Long-Range Financial Forecast ( )
Votran Transit Development Plan (TDP)
Propose March 2018 Service Improvements
Introduction This presentation will provide an overview of the transit situation in Middle Tennessee and what organizations like the Transit Alliance of.
D Line Station Plan Overview
Orange County Transportation Authority Micro-Transit Pilot Program
HB 2017 Transit Advisory Committee January 19, 2018
Transportation Management Plan Modernization Project
Use of Transportation Network Companies among MARTA Patrons
Introduction This presentation will provide an overview of the transit situation in Middle Tennessee and what organizations like the Transit Alliance of.
D Line Station Plan Overview
Promoting Shared Rides: Where do Transit Agencies Fit?
Central Puget Sound Regional Fare Coordination System
Proposed Service Changes
D Line Station Plan Overview
Lorain County Transit Needs Assessment
D Line Station Plan Overview
D Line Station Plan Overview
different Approaches different generations
MTA 2019 Final Proposed Budget November Financial Plan
Status Report on Rochester’s DMC Transportation Plan
2019 Fare and Toll Proposals
Where’s My Ride William Tsuei Director of IT.
Transit Integration and Efficiency Study Transit Advisory Committee
April 23, 2018.
Partnering with Cities
D Line Project Overview
Transportation Management Plan Modernization Project
1. Where should buses run and with what frequency?
RTC RIDE Service Improvement Recommendations
Mobility Management: Do you save money by allowing paratransit customers to ride free on fixed-route? CalACT Conference April 2019.
Draft Fiscal Year Bus Service Plan
HRT Workshop: Transit Strategic Plan and Aug-Dec working items
Performance Measurement
2019 Durham Affordable Housing Referendum
Presentation transcript:

Seattle Transportation Benefit District Nico Martinucci, Seattle Dept. of Transportation CALACT Spring 2019

Program Overview

April 2014 King County Prop. 1 Results: 44% Yes, 55% No $60 Vehicle License Fee King County Sales Tax of 0.1% Combined with County roads Failed 55% to 44% Map shows final election results Blue indicates more than 50% yes votes, darker blue is higher percentage of yes votes Red/orange indicates less than 50% yes votes, red indicates under 25% Yes Prior to election, message changed from cutting 600,000 hours to 550,000 hours Improved revenue forecasts Metro began planning implementation of cuts Mention need and creation of a new “Seattle rider” and “Seattle route” lens – how do transit needs differ for those living within the city? Greater diversity, beyond the typical commute; off-peak commuting, non-work-related transit trips, higher demand in general, all require greater span, frequency, and reliability Source: Seattle Transit Blog

November 2014 – Seattle Prop. 1 Seattle adds Prop. 1 to November 2014 ballot after King County measure doesn’t pass County sees improved sales tax revenue Messaging shift from saving service to adding service Approved on November 4, 2014 62% Yes, 38% No Generates over $50M annually for transit service and access Overwhelming support for Prop. 1 in City of Seattle Metro planning to cut 550,000 hours Proposed cuts – delete 26 Seattle routes and reduce/revise another 33; 550,000 annual service hours Seattle introduces Prop. 1 for November 2014 $60 VLF 0.1% Sales Tax Designed to save service Metro to implement Phase 1 of cuts in September 2014 Phase 1 (of 4) cuts implemented – reduction of 54,000 annual service hours on 11 Seattle routes September 2014- King County Council cancels plans for further cuts Improved sales tax revenue Saves ~400,000 annual hours of service3 Phases 2, 3, and 4 weren’t needed Change in messaging Moved from saving service to adding service While the King County proposition failed overall, election results showed overwhelming support for the measure within Seattle. As such, consistent with City of Seattle priorities and understanding the growing demand for transit service in the city, Mayor Ed Murray proposed Seattle Transportation Benefit District (STBD) Proposition 1 on the November 2014 ballot to address transit funding shortfalls within the city. On November 4, 2014, Seattle voters approved STBD Proposition 1 (62% Yes, 38% No), providing approximately $45 million annually for the expansion of transit service and low-income transportation equity. While the measure was initially targeted to prevent Metro’s service reductions in the city, thanks to improved sales tax revenues and the corresponding shift in reductions, King County Metro canceled reductions after September 2014 and Seattle funds generated by the ballot measure were able to expand transit service throughout Seattle.

Where do STBD dollars go currently?

Added Service Across Seattle Every Urban Center and Urban Village received new transit trips thanks to STBD

Access to Frequent Transit 2015: 25% 2016: 51% 2017: 64% 2018: 67% 2019: 71% Surpassed 2020 Goal by 14% Within 5% of 2025 Goal 7

Walksheds of Very Frequent Transit Routes

Continued Transit Growth in Seattle Since 2010, the number of commuters traveling to downtown Seattle in the morning using modes like transit, walking, biking, and carpooling grew by nearly 10%. Most of this growth occurred on transit: 48% rode the bus or light rail in 2017, compared to 42% just seven years prior. Overall, ridership during the most congested times of day increased by over 200,000 rides per day, while SOV trips decreased 10% - from 35% in 2010 to 25% in 2017.

Increased Ridership throughout the City

Low Income Access to Transit ORCA LIFT Pre-Loaded Cards Education & Engagement Vehicle License Fee Rebate 9,260 pre-loaded ORCA LIFT cards distributed (since start of program) 41% reloaded (3,823) for continued use Since 2016, these cards have generated 1,226,707 boardings on all ORCA services, with 958,668 boardings on King County Metro alone. 22 events 9+ languages represented 2,300+ people reached 170+ mobility surveys collected Year 1: 4,909 rebates issued Year 2: 4,152 rebates issued Year 3: 5,186 rebates issued Highlights many of the primary activities of the program including: 9,260 pre-loaded ORCA LIFT cards distributed since start of the program; 41% loaded for continued use; generating about 960,000 boardings Metro alone. Education and Engagement – informing folks about the suite of programs and products available to them and collecting information on mobility needs of different communities. Income-eligible vehicle owners receive a $20 annual rebate on the costs of their vehicle license fee. (Mirrors UDP). Year 3 issued 5,186 rebates, saving Seattle residents $103,720 ORCA LIFT Enrollment: Metro’s low-income fare card program. 146,000 eligible Seattle residents Year 1: 17,572 residents enrolled (11%) Year 2: 28,816 residents enrolled (19%) Year 3 : 40,424 residents enrolled ( 28%) Seattle Residents account for 58% of total enrollment in King County (69,632) NEW: Transportation Equity Workgroup 6

Lessons Learned & Key Takeaways

1. Voter support is key  2014, STBD Prop 1 ($50M/yr, 6 years); 2015, Move Seattle ($103M/yr, 9 years)  2006, Transit Now ($55M/yr)  1996, ST1 ($390M/yr, 10 years); 2008, ST2 ($1.2B/yr, 15 years); 2016, ST3 ($2.2B/yr, 24 years)

2. Each community has different needs Creating a functional network is not “one size fits all” Frequency vs. Coverage Peak vs. All-day vs. Nights & Weekends What is the greatest need for your jurisdiction? What is most valued?

3. Small improvements can have big impacts… Metro’s Network (~4.4M Annual Service Hours) STBD’s Total Investment (~350k Annual Service Hours)

3. …but think big too! 81,000 73,000 65,000 36,000 2017 2018

4. Access is as important as service Q1 2019: 1,720,600 trips * *May be closer to 33% in Seattle

5. Think beyond productivity of Seattle households are within a 10-minute walk of 10-minute or better all-day transit service 71% of Urban Villages (growth centers) are served by at least one route providing 15-minute or better service of Frequent Transit Network routes have a minimum of 30-minute service, 18-hours per day, 7-days per week

6. Think carefully about the role of TNCs Seattle Times, November 2018 ~91,000 daily TNC rides in Seattle, 40,000 starting in greater downtown Data is important! SFCTA, October 2018 In SF, TNCs accounted for ~50% of change in congestion, 2010 – 2016 Congestion affects transit too!

6. Think carefully about the role of TNCs University of Kentucky, November 2018 TNCs enter the market: Light/Heavy Rail -1.3%, Bus -1.7% (per year, cumulative!) Time is of the essence! UC Davis, October 2017 Between 49% and 61% of TNC trips would’ve been by walking, biking, transit, or not at all Don’t believe the hype!

Questions? Thanks!