Applying ICN UC Workbook on Exclusive Dealing Arrangements

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Exploring the Role of Legal Presumptions under the Convincing Evidence Standard in EC Merger Control Alexandr Svetlicinii European University Institute.
Advertisements

SUBSTANTIAL CONVERGENCE Margaret Bloom King’s College London Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer.
ICN Merger Working Group Work Product Merger Review Workshop March 10-11, 2009 Taipei.
JAMES S. VENIT 30 SEPTEMBER 2014 THE INTEL JUDGMENT - - SELECTED ISSUES.
The fundamentals of EC competition law
International Merger Enforcement Cooperation and younger/newer agencies ICN Annual Conference, MWG BOS 5, April 29, 2015 Hiromitsu Miyakawa, Jones Day.
Enforcement pluralism Regulation of market conduct –EU Commission General surveillance of compliance with the Treaty “Trustbuster”: DG Comp –National Competition.
T HURSDAY B REAKOUT SESSION 2 R ELATIONSHIP BETWEEN A GENCIES AND THE B AR 2012 ICN Cartel Workshop Kamil Nejezchleb & Huy Do.
European Commission – DG SANCO Workshop “Economic Operators’ Obligation to Notify Dangerous Products” Practical Aspects of Dealing with the Notification.
Plenary I: Overview of Anti-Cartel Enforcement Manual Chapters – Best Practices Searches, Raids and Inspections A South African perspective 2012 ICN Cartel.
1 LEAR Conference 2009 HOW MUCH CERTAINTY? 25 June 2009 Margaret Bloom King’s College London Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer.
Italian Competition Authority European Competition Day – Brno 14 May 2009 Celebration of the Fifth Anniversary of the ECN Challenges for the Future Ombretta.
Detecting and investigating cartels Limits with pro-active and re-active detection tools Antonio Capobianco Senior Competition Law Expert OECD Competition.
EQUINET LEGAL SEMINAR DISCRIMINATION CASES IN FRONT OF THE EUROPEAN COURT S AND THE ROLE OF NATIONAL EQUALITY BODIES Wednesday 28 March 2012, Brussels.
European Commission – Directorate General for Competition Dr. K. Mehta, Director, Cartels A PRIMER ON ANTI-TRUST POLICY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION UCL – Louvain-la-Neuve.
Substantive Issues in Merger Review Report on the 2007 ICN Merger Workshop, Dublin Thursday, 31 st May 2007 John Evans The Competition Authority, Ireland.
ICN Annual Conference UCWG: Panel on Dominance and State Created Monopolies 30 May 2007 Emil Paulis DG Competition.
European Competition Policy. References Faull & Nikpay: The EC Law of Competition. 2nd Ed. Oxford University Press, 2007 Bellamy, C., Child, G. European.
STRUCTURE AND FUNCTIONS OF COMPETITION AGENCIES. GENERAL STRUCTURE OF CA CAs differ in size, structure and complexity The structure depicts power distribution.
The European Union Race Directive attorney Lilla Farkas LLM.
State-created monopolies Break-out session ICN 6 th Annual Conference 30th May 2007, Moscow.
1 Behavioural Remedies in EC Merger Control – Theory and Practice Dr Ariel Ezrachi, Slaughter and May Lecturer in Competition Law, The University of Oxford.
1 European Commission, DG Competition Filip Kubik European Commission, DG Competition Brno, 12 November 2008 White Paper on Damages Actions for Breach.
1 SECTION 337 INVESTIGATIONS Managing Intellectual Property IP In China April 30, 2013 New York, New York.
Announcements - NO Response Papers due in Section tomorrow. BUT don’t get behind on your reading, as discussion questions/guide is posted.
Equality impact assessment in public sector policy making Lisa King Director – Policy Equinet – Promoting Equality: Equality Impact Assessment Thursday.
1 Social Considerations in EC Public Procurement Loredana Puiu Internal Market & Services DG Directorate C: Public Procurement Policy.
1 Ensuring the protection of bidders’ rights.  The Federal Law of № 94-FZ "On placing orders for goods, works and services for state and municipal.
Best Practices on the conduct of proceedings concerning Articles 101 and 102 TFEU: Talking business, or real business? GCLC Lunch Talk Series, Hilton Hotel,
Competition Policy and Law Presentation to Study Tour for Russian Member Universities of the Virtual Institute Network 26 March 2009.
Mini Plenary 3: Cartel Enforcement and Leniency in Developing Agencies A South African perspective 2013 ICN Cartel Workshop Cape Town, South Africa 16.
BIICL Conference – Reform of Article 82 Antitrust Rules and the Role of the Community Courts Christian Ahlborn 24 February 2006.
Executing Environmental Judgments in Criminal Proceedings.
DOJ Perspectives on Effective Compliance and Investigations Maxwell Carr-Howard Husch Blackwell, LLP October 8, 2012.
Settlements Wouter Wils * BIICL, 15 May 2008 * All views expressed are strictly personal.
© Hogan & Hartson LLP. All rights reserved. Judges & Economics How Can Non-specialized Judges Deal with Antitrust Economics? ICN Annual Conference Moscow.
The Governance of Global Competition: ICN’s Next Decade Alessandra Tonazzi International Affairs Italian Competition Authority The views expressed herein.
Seminar on EC case-law Bedanna Bapuly Brno, 2007 October 15th.
GCLC Lunch Talk Brussels, October 24, 2011 Fabien Zivy Director, Legal Service Autorité de la concurrence (France) (All views expressed are strictly personal)
Unilateral Exclusionary Conduct – An Analytical Framework Jorge Fagundes 3rd Coloquio - ForoCompetencia Buenos Aires, Argentina – November 2, 2007 Fagundes.
EU Discussion Paper on Exclusionary Abuses Michael Albers European Commission DG Competition 54th Antitrust Law Spring Meeting Washington DC, 30 March.
The EU Response Developments in EU Cartel Enforcement Howard T. Rosenblatt Howrey LLP Brussels International Cartels Law Seminars International Conference.
European Commission, DG Competition, A, A-4 ECN The ECN, coherency and the review of decisions of the Commission and the National Competition Authorities.
Introduction to ICN Work Products ICN Agency Effectiveness Workshop 2016 Gaborone, Botsuwana, March.
1 Unilateral Conduct Dr. SUN Lih-Chyun Commissioner, Taiwan Fair Trade Commission 3 October, 2012.
Dr. Anastasios Xeniadis Dr. Luca Schicho
12/05/2018 Industry expectations about European Aviation Safety plan (EASp) and Certification activities G.Garrouste ASD AirWorthiness Committee chairman.
Competition Law and its Application: European Union
2017 ICN Annual Cartel Workshop Romina Polley
ANTITRUST DAMAGES CLAIMS UNDER EU AND NATIONAL LAW A TRANSPORTATION SECTOR FOCUS Pedro Callol.
Mark Krotoski September 15, 2015
BVI Business Companies Act Workshop
“Revisiting Abuse of Dominance & IPRs: Emerging Jurisprudence of the Indian Competition Law” “Plenary 2: A comparative perspective to IPR and Competition:
Sessions 7&8. Organizational Ethics
The Review of the Remedies Directives the Commission’s perspective
The interaction between public and private enforcement of EU competition rules Helena Penovski European Competition Network and Private Enforcement Unit.
ICN CWG SG1 webinar on ‘”Parental liability”
Intel and the future of Article 102 TFEU
Rights, Powers and Duties of NCAs: A Review of recent ECJ Rulings
ICN webinar on parental liability 20 September 2017 Tímea Pálos
Yasuhiro Yoshikawa Senior Investigator IV, JFTC
Loyalty Rebates: Exclusive Dealing, Predatory Pricing, or Both?
BTEC LEVEL 3 HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE
Information Sharing Mini Plenary 4 Antonio Capobianco
ICN Unilateral Conduct Workshop 2 November 2018, Stellenbosch Exclusivity rebates in a post-Intel world Massimiliano Kadar DG Competition, European.
Strategic Appropriate Assessment of Spatial Plans
The City of East Lansing Board & Commission Training Seminar
6th Framework Programme on Research
2012 ICN Cartel Workshop Panama City, Panama 2 – 4 October 2012
Getting to Know Environments and Materials That Support Mathematics
Presentation transcript:

Applying ICN UC Workbook on Exclusive Dealing Arrangements Alvaro Ramos NGA Spain 2018 ICN Unilateral Conduct Workshop, Stellenbosch, South Africa

Topics European Perspective: Intel case Difficulties and challenges in enforcing antitrust rules to exclusivity Practical and procedural considerations

1. European Perspective on exclusivity Guidance Paper GC ruling on Intel Previous caselaw on exclusivity ECJ appeal on Intel European Commission reaction to the Intel case

Rebuttable presumption Standard of foreclosure Access to evidence 2. Difficulties and challenges in enforcing antitrust rules to exclusivity Rebuttable presumption Standard of foreclosure Access to evidence

3. Practical and procedural considerations Don’t start cases with a long and painful RFI. Identify key data points Identify cases with greater risk of Type II errors Understand early on if a decision imposing a fine and remedies is the right tool Put cases out of its misery quickly but do not punish case handlers for not finding an infringement: Due process is not a “case retardant” but rather the opposite Work with other agencies