Workshop on metals bioavailability under the Water Framework Directive

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Katrien Delbeke, ECI, Frank Van Assche,IZA- Europe Frank Van Assche,IZA- Europe On behalf of the Eurometaux Water Project Team Accounting for bioavailability.
Advertisements

MODULE 1 Water Framework Directive, Relation of WFD with Daughter Directives, River Basin Management Planning, Water Bodies, Typology, Classification Environmental.
Water.europa.eu EQS revision for existing priority substances WG E Chemical Aspects Brussels October 2010 Agenda Item 5.3(b) Helen Clayton WFD Team.
EU Project: Trans-Boundary River Management Phase II for the Kura River basin – Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan
Water.europa.eu Preparation of the Commission’s 2011 proposal on Priority Substances Strategic Co-ordination Group meeting May 2011 Jorge Rodriguez.
A practical approach to account for the bioavailability of metals Bruce Brown WCA Environment REPRESENTING Eurometaux November 25 th 2010.
1 Workshop on Metal bioavailability under the Water Framework Directive Jorge Rodriquez Romero & Madalina David DG Environment D2 Gerrit Niebeek – NL Graham.
DIRECTIVE 2000/60/EC 2 nd MEETING CHEMICAL MONITORING ACTIVITY (CMA) BRUSSELS, 17 th NOVEMBER 2005 Chemical Monitoring Activity Draft Outline of a Guidance.
Water.europa.eu Draft mandate WGE Chemical Status WG E Priority Substances 8-9 October 2009 Jorge Rodriguez Romero Madalina David DG Environment, European.
Water.europa.eu Preparation of the Commission’s 2011 proposal on Priority Substances Part I – Technical process 13 th Working Group E meeting March.
Metal bioavailability under the Water Framework Directive Implementation in monitoring and assessment frameworks Implementation of Bioavailability 1.
Draft Mandate Johannes Grath Balázs Horvath (DG Env)
Diffuse Sources of Water Pollution
Groundwater Watch List Meeting
Draft examples of possible GES Decision criteria Descriptor 8
Links between the Floods Directive and the Water Framework Directive
Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview
D8 and D9 REVIEW PROCESS April-June 2014: February 2015:
Purpose Independent piece of legislation, closely integrated in a larger regulatory framework (complement to WFD): prevent deterioration protect, enhance.
Review of the WFD priority substances list
CIS General progress report WD meeting 16 June 2008 Jorge Rodríguez Romero, Unit D.2, DG Environment, European Commission.
Proposed CIS Workshop on WFD Economic Issues
Outline Introduction Extending the validated boundaries of the BLMs – Progress? Nickel Copper Zinc Future BLM/User-friendly tool boundaries Regulatory.
EU Water Framework Directive
on Priority Substances Strategic Coordination Group
Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview
WGC-2 Status Compliance and Trends
European Commission DG ENV Unit C1 Water
Bioavailability and Metals Standards- Workshop
Revision of the TGD-EQS - Update
CMA on-site 2 Announcement
Nickel Risk Assessment
NATURA 2000 and Water Framework Directive (CIS )
Introduction- Link with WG E activity CMEP PLENARY MEETING-PRAGUE
Diffuse Sources of Water Pollution
Priority substances Water Directors meeting Paris November 2008
Drafting group Mixing Zones
Water reuse Drafting process for the guidance document
Project 2.7 Guidance on Monitoring
CMA Drafting group on sediment/biota monitoring
WG C Groundwater Progress Report to SCG SCG-Meeting, 11/
Paul Whitehouse Chair, EG-EQS
Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC
EU Water Framework Directive
EU Water Framework Directive
Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC
Plenary Session 21° October Paris
Existing Priority Substances EQS revision - MS questionnaire
Summing up and next steps
Preparation of the Commission’s 2011 proposal on Priority Substances
Part I.
EU Water Framework Directive
PRIORITY (HAZARDOUS) SUBSTANCES
Meeting of the WFD Strategic Co-ordination Group 11 March 2009
WG E on Priority Substances
Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive
Legal issues and compliance checking in WFD implementation SCG meeting 5-6 November 2008 Jorge Rodríguez Romero, Unit D.2, DG Environment, European.
Compliance checking of RBMP An inventory of questions
Draft Mandate to request SCHER opinion on the TGD-EQS
Sub-Group on Review of Priority Substances – state of play
EU Water Framework Directive
Concept paper on the assessment of WFD River Basin Management Plans
Incorporating metal bioavailability into permitting – UK experience
Working Group D Reporting, Brussels 31 March – 1 April 2008
EU Water Framework Directive
EU Water Framework Directive
EU Water Framework Directive
EU Water Framework Directive
7th Expert Advisory Forum on Priority Substances June 2004 Article 16 on priority substances under the Water Framework Directive.
Mandate and proposal for working methods
Presentation transcript:

Workshop on metals bioavailability under the Water Framework Directive 21 June 2011 Jorge Rodriguez Romero WFD Team, Unit D1 DG Environment

Policy background I Bioavailability is relevant to determining the possible effects of concentrations of pollutants in water Particularly relevant to metals (but also to some other substances) Therefore relevant to determining chemical status under the WFD, including Ni, Cd and Pb (existing Priority Substances - in Annex X - whose EQS are under review); and to better assessing the risk posed by other metals such as Zn (considered during the current review) Also relevant to Annex VIII of WFD.

Policy background II EQS Directive Part B (3): With the exception of cadmium, lead, mercury and nickel (hereinafter ‘metals’) the EQS set up in this Annex are expressed as total concentrations in the whole water sample. In the case of metals the EQS refers to the dissolved concentration, i.e. the dissolved phase of a water sample obtained by filtration through a 0,45 μm filter or any equivalent pre-treatment. Member States may, when assessing the monitoring results against the EQS, take into account: (a) natural background concentrations for metals and their compounds, if they prevent compliance with the EQS value; and (b) hardness, pH or other water quality parameters that affect the bioavailability of metals.

Policy background III Advances in biotic ligand models have made it possible to consider applying such models to metals. SCHER Opinion 2010 on the Technical Guidance Document on Deriving Environmental Quality Standards confirmed that the methodology for deriving EQS(bioavailable) for metals is sufficiently advanced for this to be done. How to apply this provision in practice?

Objectives of workshop Share experiences and information on using bioavailability-based approaches for metals Consider technical, implementation, and policy aspects, including meeting the needs of the WFD Identify obstacles to applying bioavailability approaches and ways of overcoming them Agree on the essentials of a practical and transparent methodology Discuss potential follow-up

Plenary in morning, with three main presentations Agenda Plenary in morning, with three main presentations Three break-out sessions in the afternoon about three areas: Technical Implementation Policy Plenary to conclude