The WTO-Agreement on Agriculture

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presentation on the Agreement on Import Licensing Procedures By Shashank Priya, Director, Department of Commerce.
Advertisements

WTO AGREEMENT ON AGRICULTURE: LEGAL AND CONCEPTUAL ISSUES
Hamid Dom Reg WS March 04 1 INTRODUCTION THE GATS and DOMESTIC REGULATION.
WTO Compatibility of «Green Border Taxes» Dr. Joëlle de Sépibus World Trade Institute, Bern.
State of WTO Agricultural Negotiations Meeting on the Integrated Assessment of Trade Liberalization in the Agriculture Sector February 2003 Note:
The Multilateral Trading System: Opportunities and Challenges for the East African Community (EAC) Countries Anne Kamau Ministry of Trade Department of.
WTO Forum Kaliningrad State Technical University March 2014 Clem Boonekamp Aspects of the WTO Agreement on Agriculture.
Twenty-Five Ways to Improve the Derbez Draft International Food and Agriculture Trade Policy Council
Trade Remedies. US Cartel Law Price Discrimination Predatory Pricing GATT Law Price Discrimination from abroad Reduction: only with material injury.
REGIONAL LIBERALIZATION ON SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH MULTILATERAL DISCIPLINES Commercial Diplomacy Programme UNCTAD.
Resource Schizophrenia: Deciding a Trade Policy for Natural Resources The Case of Agricultural Commodities in Times of Food Insecurity Ellen Terpstra International.
Agriculture Negotiations in the WTO Dr Biswajit Dhar Professor and Head Centre for WTO Studies Indian Institute of Foreign Trade New Delhi WTO Cell, IIFT.
INDIA AND THE WTO IN THE CONTEXT OF AGRICULTURE
Origins of WTO General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) –Established in 1947 as a forum to reduce trade barriers WTO replaced GATT in 1995 as legal.
Subsidies in Agriculture – are they good/bad? MERC SEMINAR 10 September 2009 By Bonani Nyhodo (NAMC)
WTO AGRICULTURAL NEGOTIATIONS Portfolio Committee Agriculture and Land Affairs April 2003 Günter Müller Directorate: International Trade National Department.
WTO Agriculture Negotiations Outstanding Issues for Developing Countries Tim Ruffer Oxford Policy Management
Training session - Vietnamese agriculture and WTO - Hanoi - sept The notifications of Viet Nam.
1 [Giovanni Anania, IAAE Congress, Durban, August 2003] The Fischler reform of the CAP and the WTO negotiations Giovanni Anania Department of Economics.
The Doha Endgame SS Economics of Food Markets Alan Matthews.
Implementation of the Uruguay Round Agreement Lecture 20. Economics of Food Markets Alan Matthews.
The EU’s CAP and the likely impact of a Doha Agreement Lecture 24. Economics of Food Markets Alan Matthews.
TRIMS - Trade Related Investment Measures
Impact of WTO on Indian Agriculture
Domestic Support and the WTO: Comparison of Support Among OECD Countries C. Edwin Young Mary Burfisher Frederick Nelson Lorraine Mitchell Economic Research.
Negotiations on Agriculture State of Play by Surabhi Mittal WTO &The Doha Round : The Way Forward 6-7 April, 2006.
1 Agriculture in July Package: Nepal Presentation by South Asia Watch on Trade Economics and Environment (SAWTEE), Kathmandu.
1 Nepal’s WTO Membership and the Agriculture Sector Navin Dahal South Asia Watch on Trade Economics and Environment.
IPC Seminar Multilateral Trade Negotiations: Update on The Doha Development Round MARCELO REGUNAGA Hanoi – October 2005.
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE IFPRI On Food Stocks, “Peace Clauses” and “Permanent Solutions” after Bali Eugenio Diaz-Bonilla (IFPRI) A.
WORKSHOP ON MARKET ACCESS IN THE DOHA WORK PROGRAMME Ministry of Foreign Trade & International Cooperation and UNCTAD Guyana, September 2002 WTO NEGOTIATIONS.
NON-DISCRIMINATION UNDER GATT94 Tariq Al –Zuhd Consultant for WTO Affairs 12 August 2004.
Agriculture Negotiations: Moving Forward Ashok Gulati IFPRI Director in Asia WTO and The Doha Round: The Way forward ICRIER-SRTT Conference 6-7 April,
“July Package” & South Asian Agriculture Prof. J. George Faculty of Economics & Development Planning (FEDP), Haryana Institute of Public Administration,
AG -1 © WTO – OMC 2012 The WTO Agreement on Agriculture Serafino Marchese, Chief, Training and Capacity Building Section WTO Institute for Training and.
- Existing Multilateral Disciplines on Trade in Services First agreement of multilateral and legally-enforceable rules aimed at the liberalisation of trade.
The Potential Impacts of Changes in Export Competition Policies.
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT TOTAL (trillion $) PER CAPITA ($/person) WORLD37.07,600 U.S ,300 France1.525,400 Spain0.818,900.
Brazil’s Challenge to the U.S. Cotton Subsidies
Ag Policy, Lecture 6 Knutson, Penn, & Flinchbaugh, Chapter 5 World Trade Organization Review.
Sino-US Agriculture Trade and WTO Negotiations (Draft) Embassy of China, P.R. Weining Zhao March, 2005.
1 Competition policy in WTO sectoral agreements Dr. Pierre Arhel Counsellor (competition policy) Intellectual Property Division Sao Paulo, April.
Manila, June Fisheries in the WTO. Manila, June DDA and Fisheries Main centre of interest to fisheries and aquaculture are negotiations.
THE ROLE OF TRADE: SOUTH-SOUTH AND GLOBAL Ing. MARCELO REGUNAGA New Delhi, November 2003.
The Doha Round of WTO Negotiations: The U.S. Perspective Robert L. Thompson Chairman International Food & Agricultural Trade Policy Council and Gardner.
WTO Status of Negotiation, July 2004 Framework... and Beyond Debra Henke USDA/ Foreign Agricultural Service.
Twenty-Five Ways to Improve the Derbez Draft International Food and Agriculture Trade Policy Council
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 30 –External Relations Bilateral screening:
INTERNATIONAL TRADE POLICY
National Treatment Presenters: Mikhail Lee & Jeong-Gon Kim
The EU’s CAP and the likely impact of a Doha Agreement
The WTO-Ministerial Decisions at Nairobi (MC 10)
Workshop of the Confederation of Nepalese Industries (CNI)
European agriculture, the future of the CAP and the WTO negotiations
Customs duties (I) No prohibition.
EU-Project: Trade and Private Sector Development (TPSD)
Comparison of Obligations in U. S
The WTO-Agreement on Import Licensing
The WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)
The WTO-TBT-Agreement
The WTO Agreement on Safeguards
The EU-US Agricultural Framework Agreement
EU Food Safety Requirements: - Hygiene of Foodstuffs -
„The WTO-Anti-Dumping Agreement“
The WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM)
The WTO-Agreement on Trade-Related Investment Measures (TRIMs)
Workshop of the Confederation of Nepalese Industries (CNI)
Trade in Services Negotiations: Scheduling techniques
Agriculture in the July Framework
The WTO-Agreement on Trade Facilitation
Presentation transcript:

The WTO-Agreement on Agriculture Achim Seiler, Trade Consultant and Capacity Building Specialist EU-Project: Trade and Private Sector Development (TPSD) TPSD is implemented by in cooperation with and

The Agreement on Agriculture Market Access (Art. 4 and 5) Domestic Support (Art. 6 and 7) Export Subsidies (Art. 8-11) The Country Schedules

Market Access Tariffication Tariff-Reductions Minimum Market Access Special Safeguards Provisions Special Treatment

Specific Modalities: Market Access I For agricultural products currently subject to ordinary customs duties only, the reduction commitment shall be implemented at the bound duty level or, in the case of unbound duties, on the level applied as at 1 September 1986. (Para 3) For agricultural products currently subject to border measures other than ordinary customs duties, the reduction commitment (...) shall be implemented on customs duties resulting from the conversion of such measures (“tariffication”). The modalities of the conversion and other related provisions, including those relating to current access opportunities, and the establishment of minimum access opportunities are set out in Annex 3. The special safeguard provision may be invoked only in respect of these tariffied products. (Para 4)

Specific Modalities: Market Access II Ordinary customs duties, including those resulting from tariffication, shall be reduced, over the six-year period commencing in the year 1995, on a simple average basis by 36 per cent with a minimum rate of reduction of 15 per cent for each tariff line. Where there are no significant imports, minimum access opportunities shall be established. They shall represent in the first year of the implementation period not less than 3 per cent of corresponding domestic consumtion in the base period 1986-88 and shall be expanded to reach 5 per cent of that base figure by the end of the implementation period. (Para 5)

Specific Modalities: Market Access III Current access opportunities, which during the base period are in excess of the minimum access opportunities as defined in paragraph 5 above, shall be maintained and increased over the implementation period. However, in relation to the expansion of current access, due account shall be taken of reduction commitments in the export competition area. (Para 6) The reductions in ordinary customs duties and expansion of access opportunities shall be implemented in equal installments. All customs duties, including those resulting from tariffication, shall be bound. (Para 7)

Tariffication Formula T = Tariff equivalent Pd = the domestic price Pw = the adjusted c.i.f. price T = 100* (Pd-Pw)/Pw

Market Access Obligations Market access concessions contained in Schedules relate to bindings and reductions of tariffs, and to other market access commitments as specified therein. Members shall not maintain, resort to, or revert to any measures of the kind which have been required to be converted into ordinary customs duties, except as otherwise provided for in Article 5 and Annex 5) Footnote 1: quantitative import restrictions; variable import levies; minimum import prices; discretionary import licensing; non-tariff measures maintained through state-trading enterprises; voluntary export restraints; similar border measures other than ordinary customs duties

Domestic Support Amber Box (Art.6) Blue Box (Art. 6.5) Green Box (Annex II)

Domestic Support I All domestic support in favour of agricultural producers, with the exception of measures meeting the criteria set out in Annex IV or elsewhere in these modalities shall be subject to commitments expressed and implemented through Aggregate Measurements of Support calculated as provided for in Annex 5, or, where the calculation of an AMS is not practicable, through Equivalent Measurements of Support calculated as provided for in Annex 6. The base period shall be the years 1986 to 1988. A total AMS shall be calculated as the sum of the value of all Aggregate Measurements of Support and Equivalent Measurements of Support. The Total AMS shall be reduced during the period of implementation in equal annual instalments and shall be bound, at the end of the period, at a level 20 per cent below the base period level. Credit shall be allowed in respect of actions undertaken since the year 1986 (Para 8)

Domestic Support II Domestic support measures that cannot be shown to satisfy the criteria set out in Annex 4 or elsewhere in these Modalities shall be included in the base Total AMS. Participants shall not be required to include in the calculation of their base Total AMS: (i) product-specific domestic support which would otherwise be required to be included where such support does not exceed 5 per cent of the total value of production of a basic product; and (ii) non-product-specific domestic support which would otherwise be required to be included where such support does not exceed 5 per cent of the value of total agricultural production (para 9)

Calculation of the current total AMS I Example: Member X (developed country), year Y Wheat: Intervention price for wheat =$255 per tonne Fixed external reference price (world market price) = $110 per tonne Domestic production of wheat = 2,000,000 tonnes Value of wheat production = $510,000,000 Wheat AMS (AMS1) ($255-$110) x 2,000,000 tonnes = $290,000,000 De minimis level = $25,500,000

Calculation of the current total AMS II Barley Deficiency payments for barley =$3,000,000 Value of barley production = $100,000,000 Barley AMS (AMS 2) = $3,000,000 De minimis level = $5,500,000 Oilseeds Deficiency payments for oilseeds = $13,000,000 Fertilizer subsidy = $1,000,000 Value of oilseeds production = $250,000,000 Oilseeds AMS (AMS 3) = $14,000,000 De minimis level = $12,500,000

Calculation of the current total AMS III Support not specific to products Generally available interest rate subsidy = $4,000,000 Value of toyal agricultural production = $860,000,000 Non-product-specific AMS (AMS 4) = $4,000,000 De minimis level + $43,000,000 Current total AMS (AMS 1 + AMS 3) = $304,000,000

Reduction Commitments Exemptions: Green Box Blue Box Developmental measures De minimis

Green Box Government service programs e.g.: general services; public stockholding programs for food security purposes and domestic food aid; research; pest and disease-control programs; agricultural training services and extension and advisory services; inspection services; marketing and promotion services; infrastructural services; including electricity reticulation; roads and other means of transport, etc.) Direct payments to producers (decoupled from production, prices or factors of production)

Blue Box Direct payments under production limiting programs 5 a) Direct payments under production-limiting programs shall not be subject to the commitment to reduce domestic support if: Such payments are based on fixed area or yields, or Such payments are made on 85 per cent or less of the base level of production; or Livestock payments are made on a fixed number of head. b) The exemption from the reduction commitment for direct payments meeting the above criteria shall be reflected by the exclusion of the value of those direct payments in a Member’s calculation of its Current Total AMS”

Developmental Measures “...investment subsidies which are generally available to agriculture in developing country Members and agricultural input subsidies generally available to low-income or resource-poor producers in developing country Members shall be exempt from domestic support reduction commitments that would otherwise be applicable to such measures, as shall domestic support to producers in developing country Members to encourage diversification from growing illicit narcotic crops. Domestic support meeting the criteria of this paragraph shall not be required to be included in a Member’s calculation of its Current Total AMS. (Art. 6.2)

De minimis All domestic support measures in favor of agricultural producers that do not fit into any of the above exempt categories are subject to reduction commitments. However, under the de minimis provisions of the Agreement there is no requirement to reduce such trade-distorting domestic support in any year, in which the aggregate value of the product-specific support does not exceed 5 per cent of the total value of production of the agricultural product in question. In addition, non-product specific support which is less than 5 per cent of the value of total agricultural production is also exempt from reduction. The 5 per cent threshold applies to developed countries whereas in the case of developing countries the de minimis ceiling is 10 per cent.

Export Subsidies The export subsidies listed in Annex 7 shall be subject to budgetary outlay and quantity commitments. Outlays and quantities shall be reduced, over a six-year period, commencing in the year 1995 by 36 per cent and 21 per cent respectively. The base period shall be the year 1986 to the year 1990. These commitments shall be established in accordance with the modalities prescribed in Annex 8. (para 11) Commitments shall include undertakings not to introduce or re-introduce subsidies on the export of agricultural products or groups of products in respect of which such subsidies were not granted during the course of the base period. In addition, commitments may be negotiated to limit the scope of subsidies on exports of agricultural products as regards individual or regional markets. The markets to which such commitments apply shall be specified in the lists of commitments on export competition. (para 12)

Export Subsidy Reduction Commitments by Country (Millions of US$) Participant Export Subsidies Product composition of export subsidies Base Final Change EU 13,274 8,496 -36% Bovine meat (19%), wheat (17%), coarse grains (13%), butter (13%), other milk products (10%) US 929 594 Wheat (61%), skim milk powder (14%) Mexico 748 553 -26% Sugar (76%), cereal preparations (21%) Colombia 371 287 -23% Rice (32%), cotton (20%), fruits and vegetables (23%) Turkey 157 98 -37% Fruits and vegetables (36%), wheat (23%) Australia 107 69 Other milk products (32%), skim milk powder (27%), cheese (25%), butter (16%) Brazil 96 73 -24% Sugar (56%), fruits and vegetables (30%) Indonesia 28 22 Rice (100%) Uruguay 2 1 Rice (83%), butter (12%)

Export Restrictions I Where any Member institutes any new export prohibition or restriction on foodstuffs (...) the Member shall observe the following provisions: a) the Member instituting the export prohibition or restriction shall give due consideration to the effects of such prohibition or restriction on importing Member’s food security b) before any Member institutes an export prohibition or restriction, it shall give notice in writing, as far in advance as practicable, to the Committee on Agriculture comprising such information as the nature and the duration of such measure, and shall consult, upon request, with any other member having a substantial interest as an importer with respect to any matter related to the measure in question. The Member instituting such export prohibition or restriction shall provide, upon request, such a Member with necessary information (Art. 12.1)

Export Restrictions II The provisions of this Article shall not apply to any developing country Member, unless the measure is taken by a developing country Member which is a net-food exporter of the specific foodstuff concerned (Art. 12.2)

Reduction Commitments Developed countries 6 years 1995 - 2000 Developing countries 10 years 1995 -2004 Least developed countries Tariffs Average cut for all products Minimum cut per product 36% 15% -24% -10% ./. Domestic Support Total AMS cuts for sector (base period: 1986-88) -20% -13% Exports Value of subsidies Subsidized quantities (base period: 1986 – 90) -36% -21% -14%

Tariff-quotas Tariff rate Quota limit 80% Out-of-quota 10% Charged 80% 1,000 tons Import quantity

Peace Clause The provisions provide that Green Box domestic support measures cannot be subject of countervailing duty action or other subsidy action under the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, nor can they be subject to actions based on non-violation nullification or impairment of tariff concessions under the GATT. Other domestic support measures which are in conformity with the provisions of the Agreement on Agriculture may be the subject of countervailing duty actions, but due restraint is to be exercised by Members in initiating such investigations.

Domestic Support Peace Clause Coupled-up Coupled-down De-coupled De minimis Peace Clause (new “blue-box” under discussion)

Special and Differential Treatment In keeping with the recognition that differential and more favorable treatment for developing country Members is an integral part of the negotiation, special and differential treatment in respect of commitments shall be provided as set out in the relevant provisions of this Agreement and embodied in the Schedules of concessions and commitments. Developing country Members shall have the flexibility to implement reduction commitments over a period of up to 10 years. Least-developed country Members shall not be required to undertake reduction commitments. (Art. 15)

Least-Developed and Net Food-Importing Countries Developed country Members shall take such action as is provided for within the framework of the Decision on Measures Concerning the Possible Negative Effects of the Reform Program on Least-Developed and Net Food-Importing Developing Countries. The Committee on Agriculture shall monitor, as appropriate, the follow-up to this Decision. (Art. 16)

Mandate for Multilateral Trade Negotiations on Agriculture Art. 20: Continuation of the reform process Doha Mandate Substantial improvements in market access Reductions of, with a view to phasing out, all forms of export subsidies Substantial reductions in trade-distorting domestic support Special and differential treatment provisions as an integral part of all elements of the negotiations