The Effect of Dye-Dye Interactions on the Spatial Resolution of Single-Molecule FRET Measurements in Nucleic Acids  Nicolas Di Fiori, Amit Meller  Biophysical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Probing α-310 Transitions in a Voltage-Sensing S4 Helix
Advertisements

Probing α-310 Transitions in a Voltage-Sensing S4 Helix
Kinetics of the Triplex-Duplex Transition in DNA
A Protein Dynamics Study of Photosystem II: The Effects of Protein Conformation on Reaction Center Function  Sergej Vasil’ev, Doug Bruce  Biophysical.
Investigation of Domain Formation in Sphingomyelin/Cholesterol/POPC Mixtures by Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer and Monte Carlo Simulations  Monica.
Volume 102, Issue 11, Pages (June 2012)
Urea-Induced Unfolding of the Immunity Protein Im9 Monitored by spFRET
Probing Membrane Order and Topography in Supported Lipid Bilayers by Combined Polarized Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence-Atomic Force Microscopy 
Volume 87, Issue 4, Pages (October 2004)
M.C. Murphy, Ivan Rasnik, Wei Cheng, Timothy M. Lohman, Taekjip Ha 
Gil Rahamim, Dan Amir, Elisha Haas  Biophysical Journal 
John P. Hale, C. Peter Winlove, Peter G. Petrov  Biophysical Journal 
Intensity Correlation-Based Calibration of FRET
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Arne Gennerich, Detlev Schild  Biophysical Journal 
Sonja Schmid, Markus Götz, Thorsten Hugel  Biophysical Journal 
Marc Jendrny, Thijs J. Aartsma, Jürgen Köhler  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
He Meng, Johan Bosman, Thijn van der Heijden, John van Noort 
Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
Serapion Pyrpassopoulos, Henry Shuman, E. Michael Ostap 
Volume 107, Issue 12, Pages (December 2014)
Volume 106, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Jennifer L. Ross, Henry Shuman, Erika L.F. Holzbaur, Yale E. Goldman 
Optical Pushing: A Tool for Parallelized Biomolecule Manipulation
Christopher B. Stanley, Tatiana Perevozchikova, Valerie Berthelier 
DNA Translocation Governed by Interactions with Solid-State Nanopores
Single Vesicle Assaying of SNARE-Synaptotagmin-Driven Fusion Reveals Fast and Slow Modes of Both Docking and Fusion and Intrasample Heterogeneity  Sune.
Scanning Near-Field Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Microscopy
Sean A. McKinney, Chirlmin Joo, Taekjip Ha  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 107, Issue 3, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (February 2006)
On the Distribution of Protein Refractive Index Increments
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 99, Issue 9, Pages (November 2010)
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 114, Issue 12, Pages (June 2018)
Volume 102, Issue 11, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 113, Issue 5, Pages (September 2017)
Kinesin Moving through the Spotlight: Single-Motor Fluorescence Microscopy with Submillisecond Time Resolution  Sander Verbrugge, Lukas C. Kapitein, Erwin.
Volume 107, Issue 8, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 96, Issue 9, Pages (May 2009)
FRET or No FRET: A Quantitative Comparison
Volume 113, Issue 5, Pages (September 2017)
Pulsed Interleaved Excitation
Rapid Assembly of a Multimeric Membrane Protein Pore
Volume 108, Issue 10, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
Saswata Sankar Sarkar, Jayant B. Udgaonkar, Guruswamy Krishnamoorthy 
Characterization of the Photoconversion on Reaction of the Fluorescent Protein Kaede on the Single-Molecule Level  P.S. Dittrich, S.P. Schäfer, P. Schwille 
Richa Dave, Daniel S. Terry, James B. Munro, Scott C. Blanchard 
M. Müller, K. Katsov, M. Schick  Biophysical Journal 
Saswata Sankar Sarkar, Jayant B. Udgaonkar, Guruswamy Krishnamoorthy 
L. Stirling Churchman, Henrik Flyvbjerg, James A. Spudich 
Volume 102, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Fluorescence Fluctuation Spectroscopy of mCherry in Living Cells
Volume 108, Issue 7, Pages (April 2015)
Mediha Esra Altuntop, Cindy Tu Ly, Yuhong Wang  Biophysical Journal 
Single-Molecule Three-Color FRET
Quantification of Fluorophore Copy Number from Intrinsic Fluctuations during Fluorescence Photobleaching  Chitra R. Nayak, Andrew D. Rutenberg  Biophysical.
Yongli Zhang, Junyi Jiao, Aleksander A. Rebane  Biophysical Journal 
Amir Marcovitz, Yaakov Levy  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 114, Issue 6, Pages (March 2018)
Kinetic Folding Mechanism of Erythropoietin
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 102, Issue 9, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 114, Issue 4, Pages (February 2018)
George D. Dickinson, Ian Parker  Biophysical Journal 
Jennifer L. Ross, Henry Shuman, Erika L.F. Holzbaur, Yale E. Goldman 
Presentation transcript:

The Effect of Dye-Dye Interactions on the Spatial Resolution of Single-Molecule FRET Measurements in Nucleic Acids  Nicolas Di Fiori, Amit Meller  Biophysical Journal  Volume 98, Issue 10, Pages 2265-2272 (May 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.02.008 Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Schematic view of the dsDNA molecule showing the relative positions of the acceptor dye (red) and donor (green) as the latter was walked down the double helix. In this way, 14 constructs with varying donor-acceptor distances was generated, labeled D1A–D19A. The donor-acceptor pair was positioned on a homogeneous poly(dA)-poly(dT) tract that kept the nucleotide microenvironment, and hence Förster radius, identical for all inter-dye separations. Biophysical Journal 2010 98, 2265-2272DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2010.02.008) Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Representative single-molecule traces for donor-acceptor separations of 16, 12, 6, and 1 bp, with acceptor emission in red and donor in green. Below each trace, the FRET efficiency trace (calculated using Eq. 1) is shown in blue. The right panels show the all-point histograms for the acceptor intensity (top, red), together with the all-point histogram of the FRET efficiency (bottom, blue). As the FRET pair is moved closer together, the efficiency of the energy transfer increases, as expected. For short dye-dye separations (Δn < 8 bp), most traces show fluorescence fluctuating among two or three distinct intensity levels, as shown for samples D6A and D1A. Biophysical Journal 2010 98, 2265-2272DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2010.02.008) Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 (Left axis, solid circles) Percentage of single-molecule traces showing intensity fluctuations in the acceptor channel. (Right axis, open circles) Acceptor fluorescence intensity from ensemble measurements when exciting the donor (Ex = 514 nm). Δn= 8 bp marks the transition from steady to fluctuating traces, which coincides with the separation at which a marked reduction in the acceptor emission in spectra is first observed. Dashed curves are guides to the eye. Biophysical Journal 2010 98, 2265-2272DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2010.02.008) Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Histograms of average FRET efficiency from single-molecule traces for donor-acceptor separations of 16, 12, 6, and 1 bp. For the first two, the efficiencies can be well fitted using a single Gaussian distribution. In contrast, for the shortest separations, three Gaussians are needed, each corresponding to one intensity level (H, M, and L, see text) of the acceptor dye (insets). Biophysical Journal 2010 98, 2265-2272DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2010.02.008) Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Single-molecule (solid symbols) and ensemble (open circles) FRET efficiencies as a function of donor-acceptor separation (in basepairs, bottom axis, and Ångstroms, top axis). (Solid circles, squares, and triangles) Values obtained from H, M, and L levels of the fluctuating traces (see text). (Solid line) Fit to the H level of the single-molecule data using the geometrical model for dsDNA (inset). Biophysical Journal 2010 98, 2265-2272DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2010.02.008) Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 The sm-ALEX traces of construct D6A showing the donor (green) and acceptor (red) fluorescence when exciting the donor (Ex = 514 nm, top panel) and acceptor dye (Ex = 640 nm, bottom panel). The all-point histograms of the acceptor intensity reveal that the quenching levels, H, M, and L, are independent of the excitation mechanism. ALEX measurements prove that both donor and acceptor dyes are quenched simultaneously (see text). Biophysical Journal 2010 98, 2265-2272DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2010.02.008) Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 (a) Representative single-molecule traces and all-point histograms of acceptor intensity for Cy3-A647N, TMR-A647N, TMR-Cy5, and Cy3-Cy5 (top to bottom). In all cases the donor-acceptor distances was 6 bp. The acceptor dye A647N shows three well-defined states with distinct quenching efficiencies regardless of the donor with which it is paired. (b) Incidence of traces showing fluctuations in the acceptor intensity when the inter-dye distance is 6 bp for the four different FRET pairs. Biophysical Journal 2010 98, 2265-2272DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2010.02.008) Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions