Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages e8 (June 2017)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Advertisements

Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Hierarchical Binding of Cofactors to the AAA ATPase p97
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 18, Issue 12, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (August 2017)
Glycan Receptor Binding of the Influenza A Virus H7N9 Hemagglutinin
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Kinetic Discrimination of tRNA Identity by the Conserved Motif 2 Loop of a Class II Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetase  Ethan C. Guth, Christopher S. Francklyn 
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Large-Scale Conformational Dynamics of the HIV-1 Integrase Core Domain and Its Catalytic Loop Mutants  Matthew C. Lee, Jinxia Deng, James M. Briggs, Yong.
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages e5 (September 2017)
Monika Sharma, Alexander V. Predeus, Nicholas Kovacs, Michael Feig 
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Charlotte Hodson, Andrew Purkiss, Jennifer Anne Miles, Helen Walden 
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Influence of Protein Scaffold on Side-Chain Transfer Free Energies
Crystal Structures of Oligomeric Forms of the IP-10/CXCL10 Chemokine
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e3 (May 2017)
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Leonardus M.I. Koharudin, Angela M. Gronenborn  Structure 
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-19 (October 2005)
Adam S. Dingens, Hugh K. Haddox, Julie Overbaugh, Jesse D. Bloom 
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (August 2017)
Structural Basis for Protein Recognition by B30.2/SPRY Domains
Shaun K. Olsen, Christopher D. Lima  Molecular Cell 
Volume 129, Issue 5, Pages (June 2007)
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (December 1998)
Volume 66, Issue 5, Pages e3 (June 2017)
Structural Basis of EZH2 Recognition by EED
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages e4 (November 2017)
Insights into Oncogenic Mutations of Plexin-B1 Based on the Solution Structure of the Rho GTPase Binding Domain  Yufeng Tong, Prasanta K. Hota, Mehdi.
Structure of an mRNA Capping Enzyme Bound to the Phosphorylated Carboxy-Terminal Domain of RNA Polymerase II  Carme Fabrega, Vincent Shen, Stewart Shuman,
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Crystallographic Identification of Lipid as an Integral Component of the Epitope of HIV Broadly Neutralizing Antibody 4E10  Adriana Irimia, Anita Sarkar,
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Kalyan S. Chakrabarti, Jess Li, Ranabir Das, R. Andrew Byrd  Structure 
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Visualizing the ATPase Cycle in a Protein Disaggregating Machine: Structural Basis for Substrate Binding by ClpB  Sukyeong Lee, Jae-Mun Choi, Francis.
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 153, Issue 7, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages e5 (June 2019)
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Mechanism of Interaction between the General Anesthetic Halothane and a Model Ion Channel Protein, III: Molecular Dynamics Simulation Incorporating a.
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
Parul Mishra, Julia M. Flynn, Tyler N. Starr, Daniel N.A. Bolon 
Volume 65, Issue 4, Pages e5 (February 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (September 2004)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages 742-753.e8 (June 2017) Diversity of Functionally Permissive Sequences in the Receptor-Binding Site of Influenza Hemagglutinin  Nicholas C. Wu, Jia Xie, Tianqing Zheng, Corwin M. Nycholat, Geramie Grande, James C. Paulson, Richard A. Lerner, Ian A. Wilson  Cell Host & Microbe  Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages 742-753.e8 (June 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2017.05.011 Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Cell Host & Microbe 2017 21, 742-753. e8DOI: (10. 1016/j. chom. 2017 Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Profiling of Fitness Effects of Mutations in WSN HA RBS (A) The locations of mutated residues are indicated on the structure. PDB: 1RVX is used (Gamblin et al., 2004), since it is the only hemagglutinin structure that matches WSN for the amino acid identities at the residues of interest. (B) The maximum RF index among all mutants that carry the indicated substitution is shown. If all mutants that carry a given substitution are lethal in the deep mutational scanning experiment, the cell in the heatmap that corresponds to that particular substitution is colored in white. If at least one mutant that carries a given substitution is as fit as the wild-type (WT) in the deep mutational scanning experiment, the cell in the heatmap that corresponds to that particular substitution is colored in red. “Single mutants” means the RF index of the indicated single substitution. “Double mutants” means the maximum RF index of all single and double mutants that contained the indicated substitution. “Triple mutants” means the maximum RF index of all single, double, and triple mutants that contained the indicated substitution. The RF index of the amino acid representing the WT sequence is set as 1. For visualization purpose, the maximum RF index is capped at 1. Cell Host & Microbe 2017 21, 742-753.e8DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2017.05.011) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Experimental Validation and Epistasis in the 220-Loop of WSN HA RBS (A) The relationship between log10 RF index and log10 TCID50 from virus rescue experiment of WSN mutants is shown as a scatterplot. The green dashed line represents the lower detection limit of the TCID50 assay. (B) The relationship between log10 RF index and log2 HA titer measured by agglutination of turkey red blood cell is shown. (C) Representative images of turkey red blood cell agglutination in the presence of WSN virus with increasing dilution factor. With a high dilution factor, red blood cell formed a palette. (D) The log10 RF index (top) and the log10 TCID50 (bottom) of the indicated double-mutant cycle is shown. A double-mutant cycle includes the wild-type (WT), two single mutants, and the corresponding double mutant. The blue and red lines represent each of the two possible evolutionary pathways from WT to the double mutant (from left to right). The green dashed line represents the lower detection limit of the TCID50 assay. (E) The left panels represent the double-mutant cycle on wild-type (WT). The right panels represent the double-mutant cycle in the presence of D225E. The TCID50, HA titer, and RF index for each validated WSN variants are listed in Data S1. Cell Host & Microbe 2017 21, 742-753.e8DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2017.05.011) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 WSN Escape Mutants of a Broadly Neutralizing Antibody (A) The neutralizing activity of C05 IgG against different mutants was measured by a cell viability assay. (B) The neutralizing activity of S139/1 IgG against different mutants was measured by a cell viability assay. (C and D) The binding of 50 nM C05 IgG (C) and 50 nM S139/1 IgG (D) to immobilized biotinylated purified HA mutants was measured by Bio-Layer Interferometry (BLI). The raw data (semitransparent) are overlaid with solid lines that represents the best fit model (1:2 bivalent analyte model). The dissociation constants (Kd) are listed in Table S1. Cell Host & Microbe 2017 21, 742-753.e8DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2017.05.011) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Profiling the Fitness Effects of Mutations in HK68 HA RBS (A) The maximum RF index of all HK68 mutants that contained the indicated substitution is shown as heatmaps. This is the same analysis as in Figure 1B, but on HK68. The RF index of the amino acid representing the WT sequence is set as 1. For visualization purpose, the maximum RF index is capped at 1. (B) The relationship between log10 RF index and log10 TCID50 from virus rescue experiment is shown as a scatterplot. The green dashed line represents the lower detection limit of the TCID50 assay. (C) The relationship between log10 RF index and log2 HA titer measured by agglutination of turkey red blood cell is shown. The TCID50, HA titer, and RF index for each validated HK68 variants are listed in Data S1. (D) The log10 RF index (top) and the log10 TCID50 (bottom) of the indicated double-mutant cycle is shown. The green dashed line represents the lower detection limit of the TCID50 assay. (E) The left panels represent the double-mutant cycle on wild-type (WT). The right panels represent the double-mutant cycle in the presence of G225E. (F) The neutralizing activity of S139/1 IgG against different mutants were measured by a cell viability assay. Data are represented as mean ± SD from three replicates. Cell Host & Microbe 2017 21, 742-753.e8DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2017.05.011) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Comparison of the Evolutionary Properties of WSN and HK68 RBS 220-Loops (A and B) The fraction of pairwise substitutions at the indicated residue pairs classified as reciprocal sign epistasis is shown for WSN (A) and HK68 (B). A pair of substitution is classified as interacting with reciprocal sign epistasis when both single substitutions have a lower RF index than WT and the double substitution. Fisher’s exact test was performed to compute the p value. (C) A total of 3,269 variants were included in the fitness profiling dataset for WSN and HK68. Each variant is denoted by the single-letter codes of amino acids at residues 225, 226, and 228. For each variant, the relationship between the log10 RF index for WSN and for HK68 is shown. Variants carrying a stop codon (nonsense variants) are colored in red. Variants that are included in the validation experiment of both WSN and HK68 are colored in green. Variants that are included in the validation experiment of WSN, but not HK68, are colored in blue. Variants that are included in the validation experiment of HK68, but not WSN, are colored in yellow. Variants corresponding to WT sequence are colored in purple. DQG is the WT sequence for WSN and GLS for HK68. (D) Virus rescue experiments were performed for nine HK68 HA variants, including WT. However, instead of pairing with HK68 neuraminidase (N2) as in Figure 4, WSN neuraminidase (N1) was used. This experiment was designed to examine the influence of neuraminidase subtype on the fitness of the tested HK68 HA variants. Cell Host & Microbe 2017 21, 742-753.e8DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2017.05.011) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Structural Characterization of HK68 HA RBS 220-Loop Variants (A) Comparison of HA RBS backbone conformation between WT (gray) and three variants, namely MTA (lime), LSS (pink), and QAS (cyan). For the WT structure, PDB: 4FNK was used (Ekiert et al., 2012). (B) Comparison of 220-loop backbone conformation between WT and three variants. Distance between the Cα of residue 225 (sphere representation) in WT and in each variant is indicated. (C–E) Side chains of residues 225, 226, and 228 and interacting residues (hydrogen bonding) are shown in sticks representation. Hydrogen bonds that are present in the HK68 HA RBS 220-loop variants, but not in the wild-type (WT), are shown in black dashed lines for MTA (C), LSS (D), and QAS (E). Cell Host & Microbe 2017 21, 742-753.e8DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2017.05.011) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Structural Comparison of HK68 HA RBS 220-Loop Variants with WT (A) Residue 225 in the crystal structures of wild-type (WT) (Ekiert et al., 2012) and all three variants (MTA, LSS, and QAS) is in a left-handed helix conformation. The side chain of W222 and main chain of residues 224 and 225 are shown in sticks representation. In the left-handed helix conformation, the distance between the backbone amide nitrogen atom of residue 225 to the center of the aromatic ring is around 3.4 to 3.6 Å. (B) When residue 225 is modeled in right-handed helix conformation, the main-chain carbonyl of residue 224 points toward the plane of the indole ring in W222. These two nucleophilic groups would result in a repulsive force. In this conformation, the distance between the backbone carbonyl oxygen atom of residue 224 to the center of the aromatic ring would be around 2.4 to 2.6 Å. (C) The Ramachandran plot of residue 225 in the apo form of WT and the three indicated variants are shown. Here, three different crystal structures of WT were analyzed, namely PDB: 4FNK (Ekiert et al., 2012), PDB: 4ZCJ (Lee et al., 2015), and PDB: 4WE4 (Yang et al., 2015). Residue 225 from each HA monomer within the crystal asymmetric unit was analyzed. The orange shading area was created based on data points for the general case of non-Gly (Lovell et al., 2003). Region in white, lighter, and darker orange represents disallowed, allowed, and favored regions, respectively. (D) The side-chain position and conformation of residue 226 in the crystal structures of WT (PDB: 2YPG) (Lin et al., 2012) and the three indicated variants were compared in the presence of a bound human receptor analog. Cell Host & Microbe 2017 21, 742-753.e8DOI: (10.1016/j.chom.2017.05.011) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions