Volume 16, Issue 23, Pages (December 2006)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Binocular rivalry Colin W.G. Clifford Current Biology Volume 19, Issue 22, Pages R1022-R1023 (December 2009) DOI: /j.cub Copyright ©
Advertisements

A Gαq-Ca2+ Signaling Pathway Promotes Actin-Mediated Epidermal Wound Closure in C. elegans Suhong Xu, Andrew D. Chisholm Current Biology Volume 21, Issue.
Volume 16, Issue 13, Pages (July 2006)
RNA-Directed DNA Methylation: Getting a Grip on Mechanism
Volume 24, Issue 23, Pages R1109-R1111 (December 2014)
Auguste M.P. von Bayern, Nathan J. Emery  Current Biology 
Eukaryotic Evolution: The Importance of Being Archaebacterial
Mark J. Costello, Chhaya Chaudhary
Ocean Depths: The Mesopelagic and Implications for Global Warming
Unsupervised statistical learning in newly hatched chicks
Visual Development: Learning Not to See
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (June 2014)
Sexual Selection: Roles Evolving
Volume 16, Issue 14, Pages (July 2006)
G. Lorimer Moseley, Timothy J. Parsons, Charles Spence  Current Biology 
Ryota Kanai, Naotsugu Tsuchiya, Frans A.J. Verstraten  Current Biology 
Unsupervised statistical learning in newly hatched chicks
Unearthing the Phylogenetic Roots of Sleep
Volume 26, Issue 12, Pages (June 2016)
Ayelet McKyton, Itay Ben-Zion, Ravid Doron, Ehud Zohary 
Novelty and Innovation in the History of Life
Marianne Elias, Colin Fontaine, F.J. Frank van Veen  Current Biology 
Phenotypic Plasticity: Different Teeth for Different Feasts
Competitive Helping in Online Giving
Evolutionary Conditions for the Emergence of Communication in Robots
Small Molecule Fluoride Toxicity Agonists
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages R60-R61 (January 2014)
Small Molecule Fluoride Toxicity Agonists
Empathy and the Somatotopic Auditory Mirror System in Humans
Children, but Not Chimpanzees, Prefer to Collaborate
Serial Dependence in the Perception of Faces
Volume 17, Issue 21, Pages (November 2007)
What We Know Currently about Mirror Neurons
Rhamnose-Containing Cell Wall Polymers Suppress Helical Plant Growth Independently of Microtubule Orientation  Adam M. Saffer, Nicholas C. Carpita, Vivian.
Volume 22, Issue 13, Pages (July 2012)
A General Principle of Neural Arbor Branch Density
Identification of novel F-box proteins in Xenopus laevis
Volume 16, Issue 14, Pages (July 2006)
Jake E. Bicknell, Matthew J. Struebig, David P. Edwards, Zoe G. Davies 
Clustered Organization of Reproductive Genes in the C. elegans Genome
Nicolas Arnaud, Tom Lawrenson, Lars Østergaard, Robert Sablowski 
Planar Cell Polarity: Microtubules Make the Connection with Cilia
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 5-11 (January 2008)
Ralf J. Sommer, Akira Ogawa  Current Biology 
Visual Development: Learning Not to See
Jingping P. Xu, Zijiang J. He, Teng Leng Ooi  Current Biology 
Noa Raz, Ella Striem, Golan Pundak, Tanya Orlov, Ehud Zohary 
CRAC Channels Drive Digital Activation and Provide Analog Control and Synergy to Ca2+-Dependent Gene Regulation  Pulak Kar, Charmaine Nelson, Anant B.
Auguste M.P. von Bayern, Nathan J. Emery  Current Biology 
Odr-10 Encodes a Seven Transmembrane Domain Olfactory Receptor Required for Responses to the Odorant Diacetyl  Piali Sengupta, Joseph H Chou, Cornelia.
B. subtilis GS67 Protects C
Neil F. Milan, Balint Z. Kacsoh, Todd A. Schlenke  Current Biology 
Volume 24, Issue 13, Pages (July 2014)
Repeating Spatial Activations in Human Entorhinal Cortex
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Category Selectivity in the Ventral Visual Pathway Confers Robustness to Clutter and Diverted Attention  Leila Reddy, Nancy Kanwisher  Current Biology 
Small RNAs: How Seeds Remember To Obey Their Mother
Volume 16, Issue 13, Pages (July 2006)
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages R353-R355 (May 2009)
Sugar Receptors in Drosophila
Humans Can Continuously Optimize Energetic Cost during Walking
Sound Facilitates Visual Learning
Conservation Biology: The Importance of Wilderness
Equivalent Parental Contribution to Early Plant Zygotic Development
Proteinase K challenged by a novel protease
Neural Sex Modifies the Function of a C. elegans Sensory Circuit
Basal bodies Current Biology
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages R198-R202 (March 2008)
Akira Ogawa, Adrian Streit, Adam Antebi, Ralf J. Sommer 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 16, Issue 23, Pages 2359-2365 (December 2006) Chemoattraction in Pristionchus Nematodes and Implications for Insect Recognition  Ray L. Hong, Ralf J. Sommer  Current Biology  Volume 16, Issue 23, Pages 2359-2365 (December 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.031 Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Semiochemical Attraction Profiles of Pristionchus Species Pristionchus attraction profiles to semiochemicals at 10% concentration (w/v or v/v). Verbenol and leucine methyl ester were at 100 mM. 10-fold dilutions of these compounds resulted in similar profiles (data not shown). The left side shows the phylogenetic relationship of four Pristionchus species based on 18S ribosomal DNA sequences, with Koerneria as the most basal species, along with known beetle associations: P. maupasi (Melolontha sp., European Cockchafers), P. entomophagus (Geotrupes sp., dung beetles), and P. uniformis (Leptinotarsa decemlineata, Colorado potato beetle) (modified from [1]). The natural insect host for P. pacificus remains unidentified. All data points were derived from at least two separate experiments with 3–6 replicates each. Error bars denote 95% confidence intervals. Current Biology 2006 16, 2359-2365DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.031) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Differences between C. elegans and P. pacificus Chemoattraction Error bars denote 95% confidence intervals. All assays for different species were conducted concurrently during multiple sessions with each value representing at least six experiments. (A) The strongest C. elegans N2 attractants elicited quantitatively but not qualitatively different attraction for C. elegans Hawaii, C. briggsae, and C. remanei. (B) P. pacificus share a set of attractants with C. elegans. C. elegans attraction profiles at 1% concentration are shown as positive controls (white bars). P. pacificus attraction profiles 100%–1% are shown for all compounds except for pyrazine (∗), for which the 10%–0.1% profile is shown (filled and shaded bars). P. pacificus was attracted to 100% diacetyl and pentanedione as well as weakly attracted to 10% pyrazine and 1% 2,4,5-trimethylthiazole (2,4,5-TMT). P. pacificus was repulsed by high concentrations of benzaldehyde and TMT and showed no attraction to isoamyl alcohol, benzaldehyde, and 2-butanone. The response to 10% 2-butanone is considered borderline attraction (CI ∼0.3). (C) Discrimination assays show that P. pacificus discriminated conserved attractants to C. elegans (100% diacetyl, 10% pyrazine, 10% isobutanol, and 100% 2,3-pentanedione) from 1:10,000 dilution of β-caryophyllene in NGM agar. P. pacificus also discriminated P. pacificus-specific attractants (10% β-caryophyllene, 10mM 1-mono-olein, 1% myristate, and 10% E-TDA) from 1:10,000 dilution of diacetyl in NGM agar. As controls (asterisks), diacetyl and β-caryophyllene chemoattraction were abolished in the presence of the same scent in the agar. Current Biology 2006 16, 2359-2365DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.031) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Time-Course Comparisons of P. pacificus Attractions to 1% Myristate and E-TDA The chemoattraction indices were taken at multiple time intervals for attraction to myristate at 1% (A) and 10% (C) as well as E-TDA at 1% (B) and 10% (D). Except for 10% myristate (three replicates each), each data point is an average of 6–12 replicates from three experiments. Current Biology 2006 16, 2359-2365DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2006.10.031) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions