Philosophy 1100 Class #7 Title: Critical Reasoning

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reason and Argument Chapter 7 (1/2).
Advertisements

Deductive Arguments: Categorical Logic
Categorical Arguments, Claims, and Venn Diagrams Sign In! Review Group Abstractions! Categorical Arguments Types of Categorical Claims Diagramming the.
1 Philosophy 1100 Title:Critical Reasoning Instructor:Paul Dickey Website:
Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 Yet, still, Even further More and yet more, etc., ad infinitum, Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking Dr. Robert Barnard.
Philosophy 1100 Today: Hand Back “Nail that Claim” Exercise! & Discuss
Chapter 9 Categorical Logic w07
Building Logical Arguments. Critical Thinking Skills Understand and use principles of scientific investigation Apply rules of formal and informal logic.
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual Chapter 9 Evaluating Analogical Arguments.
RESEARCH IN EDUCATION Chapter I. Explanations about the Universe Power of the gods Religious authority Challenge to religious dogma Metacognition: Thinking.
Critical Thinking Lecture 8 An introduction to Categorical Logic By David Kelsey.
English Language Services
Critical Thinking Lecture 8 An introduction to Categorical Logic
Chapter 13: Categorical Propositions. Categorical Syllogisms (p. 141) Review of deductive arguments –Form –Valid/Invalid –Soundness Categorical syllogisms.
 Reading Quiz  Peer Critiques  Evaluating Peer Critiques.
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual
Eng 10 Q3 W2 Spring MLK’s Letter from a Birmingham Jail Unit Standards RI.10.6 Determine an author’s point of view or purpose in a text and analyze.
Critical Thinking Lecture 8 An introduction to Categorical Logic By David Kelsey.
Introduction to Categorical Logic PHIL 121: Methods of Reasoning February 18, 2013 Instructor:Karin Howe Binghamton University.
GST 113: LOGIC, PHILOSOPHY AND HUMAN EXISTECE
Categorical Propositions Chapter 5. Deductive Argument A deductive argument is one whose premises are claimed to provide conclusive grounds for the truth.
Tutorial 4: Critical Reading. Inductive Arguments White swan Therefore, all swans are white. Discuss Activity G (only first paragraph).
ASH BUS 250 Week 5 Final Case Analysis Paper Mattel and Toy Safety Check this A+ tutorial guideline at
BA Art Extension Examination Preparation
Academic Writing for TMA04
REPORT WRITING.
Part 4 Reading Critically
The Literature Review 3 edition
SPE 512 STUDY creative knowledge /spe512study.com
PSY 325 aid Something Great/psy325aid.com
psy 325 aid Expect Success/psy325aiddotcom
Deductive Logic, Categorical Syllogism
Today’s Topics Introduction to Predicate Logic Venn Diagrams
Deep dive into pacing guide, lesson plans and history labs
Philosophy 1010 Class #8 Title: Introduction to Philosophy
HUM 440 Enthusiastic Studysnaptutorial.com
HUM 440 RANK Education for Service-- hum440rank.com.
Philosophy 1100 Title: Critical Reasoning Instructor: Paul Dickey
Preparing for the Verbal Reasoning Measure
Writing the Persuasive/Argumentative Essay
..
Philosophy 1100 Class #8 Title: Critical Reasoning
Critical Thinking Lecture 9 The Square of Opposition
Philosophy 1100 Chapters 3 & 5 of your text. (skip pp )
Philosophy 1100 Title: Critical Reasoning Instructor: Paul Dickey
Philosophy 2200 Spring, 2016 Class #1
Critical Thinking (Chapter 7)
The WPA WHAT IS THE WPA? Every campus in the CSU is subject to the Graduate Writing Assessment requirement, or GWAR. At SDSU, students take the WPA, or.
Deep dive into pacing guide, lesson plans and history labs
“Still I Look to Find a Reason to Believe”
Critical Thinking The answer is right in front of you! You’ll have four minutes. No cheating or talking!
“Still I Look to Find a Reason to Believe”
Essay.
“Only,” Categorical Relationships, logical operators
Chapter 6 Categorical Syllogisms
Exam technique.
Assessing My Writing with Portfolios
Philosophy 1100 Class #9 Title: Critical Reasoning
Philosophy 1010 Class #4 Title: Introduction to Philosophy
Essay Do's and Don'ts Introductions Development Conclusions
Philosophy 1100 Title: Critical Reasoning Instructor: Paul Dickey
Argumentative Writing
“Still I Look to Find a Reason to Believe”
Philosophy 1100 Title: Critical Reasoning Instructor: Paul Dickey
Philosophy 1010 Class #10 Title: Introduction to Philosophy
9th Literature EOC Review
History of Western Philosophy in Five Minutes
Units 3 & 4 Business management transition
Megan Smoot 4th Quarter Project 5/1/19
July 24, 2009 Peer Critiques.
Presentation transcript:

Philosophy 1100 Class #7 Title: Critical Reasoning Instructor: Paul Dickey E-mail Address: pdickey2@mccneb.edu Website: http://mockingbird.creighton.edu/NCW/dickey.htm Tonight: Submit Mid-term Exam Re-take Questions on Final Class Essay? – DUE 11/10 Class Presentations on assigned fallacy & Discussion of Chapters 7 & 8 Next Week: Portfolio #6 Student Portfolio is Due Read Chapter 9, pp. 243- 251, 255-270. pp.272-274 Exercise 9-2. 1

Portfolio Assignment #6 What is formal Deductive Logic and is it relevant to your life? ·         “Collect” from your daily experience 2-3 “artifacts” that describe a use of a formal logical argument and show its relevance to daily living. ·         For each, write a description or explanation of the artifact selected and evaluate for yourself whether this shows whether formal deductive logic is significant in your life. (1 paragraph) ·         Write a brief assessment of your analyses of Rhetoric & Logical Fallacies in Section #5 of your portfolio.

Chapter Seven / Eight: Logical Fallacies Presenters: Dottie: Generalizations, etc. ( pp. 197-202) Nicole: The Weak Analogy (pp 202-203) & & Various appeals to Popularity ( pp. 204-206) Paul: Fallacies Related to Cause & Effect (pp. 207-213) Justin: Slippery Slope & Untestable Explanations (pp. 213-214) & Three Formal Fallacies (pp.222-225) Megan: Equivocation and Amphiboly & Composition/Division, Confusing Explanation & Excuses & Contraries / Contradictories (pp. 225-231) Kim: Consistency/Inconsistency & Miscalculating Probabilities (pp 231-235) In your presentation, you must define your fallacy type, give examples, and distinguish it from other logical fallacies that are similar. I encourage you to use powerpoint slides in your presentation if possible, but it is not required. 3

Chapter Nine Deductive Arguments: Categorical Logic 4

Categorical Logic Consider the following claims: 1. Everybody who is ineligible for Physics 1A must take Physical Science 1. 2) No students who are required to take Physical Sciences 1 are eligible for Physics 1A. Are these different claims or the same claim? Categorical logic is important because it gives us a tool to work through the confusion with a technique to answer that question clearly. Such is done through the use of standard logic forms. 5

Categorical Logic Categorical Logic is logic based on the relations of inclusion and exclusion among classes. That is, categorical logic is about things being in and out of groups and what it means to be in or out of one group by being in or out of another group. 6

Four Basic Kinds of Claims in Categorical Logic (Standard Forms) A: All _________ are _________. (Ex. All Presbyterians are Christians. E: No ________ are _________. (Ex. No Muslims are Christians. ___________________________________ I: Some ________ are _________. (Ex. Some Arabs are Christians. O: Some ________ are not _________. (Ex. Some Muslims are not Sunnis. 7

Four Basic Kinds of Claims in Categorical Logic What goes in the blanks are terms. In the first blank, the term is the subject. In the second blank goes the predicate term. A: All ____S_____ are ____P_____. (Ex. All Presbyterians are Christians. 8

Venn Diagrams 9

Categorical Logic The Four Basic Kinds of Claims in Categorical Logic can be represented using Venn Diagrams. (See page 256 in textbook.) The two claims that include one class or part of a class within another are the affirmative claims (I.e. the A-claims & the I-Claims. The two claims that exclude one class or part of a class from another are the negative claims (I.e. the E-claims and the O-claims. 10

Translating Claims into Standard Form for Analysis The Bottom Line? Translating Claims into Standard Form for Analysis Two claims are equivalent claims if, and only if, they would be true in all and exactly the same circumstances. Equivalent claims, in this sense, say the same thing. Equivalent claims will have the same Venn Diagram. 11

Some Tips The word “only” used by itself, introduces the predicate term of an A-claim, e.g. “Only Matinees are half-price shows” is to be translated as “All half-price shows are matinees” The phrase “the only” introduces the subject term of an A-claim, e.g Matinees are the only half-price shows” also translates to “All half-price shows are matinees.” Claims about single individuals should be treated as A-claims or E-claims, e.g. “Aristotle is left-handed” translates to either “Everybody who is Aristotle is left handed” or “No person who is Aristotle is not left-handed.” 12