Foundations of Team Leadership

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Dr. Clara Carroll, Harding University 1 Videotaping-- Smile! You're on Candid Camera! National Board Candidate Retreat.
The 21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership John C. Maxwell
Coaching Data Teams DEVELOPED BY JANE COOK LITERACY & TECHNOLOGY COACH, EASTCONN & BETH MCCAFFERY SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT.
How can you think like a Historian?
Is It Bias? Making Diversity Work Is It Bias? Long Workshop Welcome to Is It Bias? Long Workshop © 2010 Sondra Thiederman, Ph.D.Slide #1.
Is It Bias? Making Diversity Work Is It Bias? Short Workshop Welcome to Is It Bias? Short Workshop © 2010 Sondra Thiederman, Ph.D.Slide #1.
Chapter 3 Individual Differences and Work Behavior
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
Growing Every Child! The following slides are examples of questions your child will use in the classroom throughout the year. The questions progress from.
1 of 20 Evaluating an Information Project From Questions to Results © FAO 2005 IMARK Investing in Information for Development Evaluating an Information.
Understanding Diversity
Pathfinder Communications Rules Created by James J. Messina, Ph.D.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
In Their Hands by Emily Will.
Coordinate Plane Practice The following presentation provides practice in two skillsThe following presentation provides practice in two skills –Graphing.
0 - 0.
ALGEBRAIC EXPRESSIONS
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
MULTIPLYING MONOMIALS TIMES POLYNOMIALS (DISTRIBUTIVE PROPERTY)
ADDING INTEGERS 1. POS. + POS. = POS. 2. NEG. + NEG. = NEG. 3. POS. + NEG. OR NEG. + POS. SUBTRACT TAKE SIGN OF BIGGER ABSOLUTE VALUE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Addition Facts
When I’m at work: Solving problems.
Building Relationships
Effective Phone Techniques
Correction, feedback and assessment: Their role in learning
Discussion Discussion # 86 Moving from Criticism to Feedback
Foundations of Team Leadership 7a-1 1 Foundations of Team Leadership The Art of Feedback.
1 CONFLICT RESOLUTION Raising the level of understanding and acceptance regarding zoning issues among residents. 15.
Trait Test Business Plan – Business Reality. Starting and managing your own business in Canada. Page 3.
O X Click on Number next to person for a question.
© S Haughton more than 3?
Twenty Questions Subject: Twenty Questions
Past Tense Probe. Past Tense Probe Past Tense Probe – Practice 1.
This, that, these, those Number your paper from 1-10.
Hazard Recognition and Risk Analysis
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
Event 4: Mental Math 7th/8th grade Math Meet ‘11.
Your 30 second introduction This PowerPoint presentation will guide you thru your 30 second introduction. To move to the next slide, click the enter key,
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
1 Using one or more of your senses to gather information.
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
11 = This is the fact family. You say: 8+3=11 and 3+8=11
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
O X Click on Number next to person for a question.
Ethical, Servant, Spiritual, and Authentic Leadership
Copyright © 2008 First Steps Training & Development, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 1 Coaching for Personal Accountability Presented by:
BMA5557: Theories for Action: How do we know if we know what we’re doing? Class # 2 Fall, 2010.
Ground Rules for Meetings
Foundations of Team Leadership 1 Challenging Conversations.
Foundations of Team Leadership 1 Genuine Inquiry & Open Advocacy.
Fundamental Leadership Skills -Examining Mental Models Karen J. Hannan Collaboration Works, Inc.
MENTAL MODELS FOR MANAGERIAL TEAMWORK OBJECTIVE OF THE SESSION UNDERSTANDING HOW MENTAL MODELS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR OUR CURRENT SITUATION. DEVELOPING.
Listening “Seek first to understand… Then to be understood.”
The Ladder of Inference:
The Ladder of Inference: An Introduction We are so skilled at thinking that we jump up the ladder without knowing it. We tacitly register some data and.
Critical Thinking Skills for all Subjects
Basic Counselling Skills Session 6 1. Learning objectives: 2 Understand counselling, Qualities of a good counsellor; values and attitudes of a counsellor.
Listening Module Seventeen Copyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Self Perception/Intrapersonal Communication.  Our Internal Voice  Think about things  Respond to our experiences and surroundings  Powerful force.
Distinguishing Between Inferences and Assumptions
Critical Thinking Getting all of the Pieces of the Critical Thinking Puzzle to Improve Effective Decision Making To every complex question there is a.
Marketing Skill.
Presentation transcript:

Foundations of Team Leadership Ladder of Inference CONCLUSIONS ASSUMPTIONS ??FILTERS?? FACTS/ DATA ACTIONS

Ladder of Inference CONCLUSIONS ASSUMPTIONS ??FILTERS?? FACTS/ DATA ACTIONS The Ladder is a metaphor for how our mental models influence perception, judgment, and action “Climbing the ladder,” from data to conclusion, is an automatic, unconscious process

How We Usually Climb The Ladder… Unaware of Some of Our Mental Processes We are so skilled that we jump to the top rungs of the ladder without knowing it... We tacitly filter some data and ignore other data We impose our own interpretations on these data We draw conclusions from interpreted data CONCLUSIONS ASSUMPTIONS FACTS/ DATA ACTION ???FILTERS??? Source: Action Design/ Pegasus

How We Usually Climb The Ladder… Filters Assumptions are colored by filters: Automatic Inferred to be true Personal filters come from one’s background, experiences, & beliefs (Culture-family-faith…) These often come from Mental Models These filters are mostly unconscious

Implications of the Ladder Blind about Ourselves We don’t realize that we are making interpretations because we do not think about our thinking -... Our conclusions feel SO obvious to us We see no need to retrace the steps we took Or explain how we reached our conclusions Even if others reach different conclusions Source: Action Design/ Pegasus

Steps in the Ladder of Inference Assumptions Conclusion Data Action Johari Example Johari XX Statement in the Johari I listened with my filters … I made an Assumption I decided which statement was true I raised my hand accordingly Filtered Meaning

Climbing Our Inference Ladder CONCLUSIONS ASSUMPTIONS FACTS/ DATA ACTION ???FILTERS???

Implications of the Ladder From the Top of the Ladder When people disagree, they often hurl conclusions at each other from the top of their respective ladders This makes it hard to resolve differences and to learn from one another Source: Action Design/ Pegasus

Climbing the Inference Ladder DATA CONCLUSIONS ASSUMPTIONS FACTS/ DATA ACTION ???FILTERS???

Implications of the Ladder Blind about Ourselves & Others We see the different conclusions of others as obviously wrong And INVENT REASONS to explain why others say things that are so obviously WRONG Even if others reach different conclusions We do not often think to explain how we reached our own conclusions, because our conclusions seem so obvious to us Source: Action Design/ Pegasus

Bushfire Example of Inferences CONCLUSIONS ASSUMPTIONS FACTS/ DATA ACTION ???FILTERS?? Scenario #1 Action-Leave Conclusion- Safe to drive away in car Assumption-Car can outpace fire Data Selected- CAR Scenario #2 Action-Stay Conclusion- Unsafe to drive away Assumption-Fire moves faster than car Data Selected- CAR

SO WHAT? Self Awareness As a Tool of Reflection Can be used to slow down thinking Make more obvious one’s assumptions CONCLUSIONS ASSUMPTIONS ??FILTERS?? FACTS/ DATA ACTIONS

Lessons from the Ladder Effective Conversations Are Enabled by Moving Up & Down Our Ladders If we are willing/able to climb down one’s ladder And make an effort to review data together And to share with each other our reasoning and assumptions CONCLUSIONS ASSUMPTIONS ??FILTERS?? FACTS/ DATA ACTIONS

Able to Come Down Our Inference Ladder CONCLUSIONS ASSUMPTIONS FACTS/ DATA ACTION ??FILTERS??

Using the Ladder Positively ONESELF Pay attention to how your conclusions are based on your inferences Explain to others the steps in your thinking, from the data you select and the meanings you paraphrase, to the conclusions you reach Ask others if they have other ways of interpreting the data or if they see gaps in your reasoning Source: Action Design/ Pegasus

Using the Ladder Positively OTHERS Assume that others may reach different conclusions because they have their own ladder of inference with logic that makes sense to them Paraphrase (aloud) the meanings you hear in what others say Ask others to explain the steps in their thinking Source: Action Design/ Pegasus

Analyzing Our Inference Ladders Foundations of Team Leadership Open FTL Analyzing Our Inference Ladders Exercise Format Review the details of the Ladder of Inference steps Re-create on the exercise sheet’s ladder the steps you inferred in one of the Johari mystery card “read-out” What assumptions did you make? How did these lead you to the conclusions you made?

Inference Ladder & Mental Models DATA CONCLUSIONS ASSUMPTIONS FACTS/ DATA ACTION ???FILTERS???

Inference Ladder Exercise Open FTL Foundations of Team Leadership Inference Ladder Exercise DATA CONCLUSIONS ASSUMPTIONS FACTS/ DATA ACTION ???FILTERS???