Benjamin Pettit, Zsuzsa Ákos, Tamás Vicsek, Dora Biro  Current Biology 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Binocular rivalry Colin W.G. Clifford Current Biology Volume 19, Issue 22, Pages R1022-R1023 (December 2009) DOI: /j.cub Copyright ©
Advertisements

Volume 26, Issue 20, Pages (October 2016)
Teddy A. Wilkin, Ben C. Sheldon  Current Biology 
Volume 25, Issue 17, Pages (August 2015)
Attention Narrows Position Tuning of Population Responses in V1
Erman Misirlisoy, Patrick Haggard  Current Biology 
Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
The Dynamic Range of Human Lightness Perception
Homing Behavior: Decisions, Dominance and Democracy
Flying Drosophila Orient to Sky Polarization
From Compromise to Leadership in Pigeon Homing
Mark S. Blumberg, Cassandra M. Coleman, Ashlynn I. Gerth, Bob McMurray 
Sensory-Motor Integration: More Variability Reduces Individuality
Visual Development: Learning Not to See
Katherine Woollett, Eleanor A. Maguire  Current Biology 
EEG Responses to Visual Landmarks in Flying Pigeons
Chimpanzees Trust Their Friends
Volume 21, Issue 20, Pages R837-R838 (October 2011)
Adam M. Corrigan, Jonathan R. Chubb  Current Biology 
Sergei Gepshtein, Martin S. Banks  Current Biology 
Ingvars Birznieks, Richard M. Vickery  Current Biology 
The Availability of Research Data Declines Rapidly with Article Age
Homing Behavior: Decisions, Dominance and Democracy
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (February 2010)
Wild Birds Use an Ordering Rule to Decode Novel Call Sequences
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages (February 2016)
Margarita V. Chibalina, Dmitry A. Filatov  Current Biology 
Old-Growth Fishes Become Scarce under Fishing
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (February 2010)
Cultural Confusions Show that Facial Expressions Are Not Universal
Disruption of Perceptual Learning by a Brief Practice Break
Target Detection Is Enhanced by Polarization Vision in a Fiddler Crab
What We Know Currently about Mirror Neurons
Confidence Is the Bridge between Multi-stage Decisions
Walter Jetz, Dustin R. Rubenstein  Current Biology 
A General Principle of Neural Arbor Branch Density
Integration Trumps Selection in Object Recognition
Gradual Assembly of Avian Body Plan Culminated in Rapid Rates of Evolution across the Dinosaur-Bird Transition  Stephen L. Brusatte, Graeme T. Lloyd,
Jake E. Bicknell, Matthew J. Struebig, David P. Edwards, Zoe G. Davies 
Elise Facer-Childs, Roland Brandstaetter  Current Biology 
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages e6 (February 2018)
Non-cortical magnitude coding of space and time by pigeons
Sensory Convergence Solves a Motion Ambiguity Problem
Volume 77, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
Planar Cell Polarity: Microtubules Make the Connection with Cilia
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages (March 2016)
Jeroen B. Smaers, Aida Gómez-Robles, Ashley N. Parks, Chet C. Sherwood 
Direct Two-Dimensional Access to the Spatial Location of Covert Attention in Macaque Prefrontal Cortex  Elaine Astrand, Claire Wardak, Pierre Baraduc,
Daniel Hanus, Josep Call  Current Biology 
Mark S. Blumberg, Cassandra M. Coleman, Ashlynn I. Gerth, Bob McMurray 
Adaptation can explain evidence for encoding of probabilistic information in macaque inferior temporal cortex  Kasper Vinken, Rufin Vogels  Current Biology 
Visual Development: Learning Not to See
Noa Raz, Ella Striem, Golan Pundak, Tanya Orlov, Ehud Zohary 
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages (January 2017)
Male Violence and Sexual Intimidation in a Wild Primate Society
Raghav Rajan, Allison J. Doupe  Current Biology 
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (June 2013)
Where has all the road kill gone?
An Alternative Root for the Eukaryote Tree of Life
Context-Dependent Functions of Avian Duets Revealed by Microphone-Array Recordings and Multispeaker Playback  Daniel J. Mennill, Sandra L. Vehrencamp 
Daniela Vallentin, Andreas Nieder  Current Biology 
Kevin R. Foster, Thomas Bell  Current Biology 
Rapid Evolution of the Cerebellum in Humans and Other Great Apes
Volume 25, Issue 14, Pages (July 2015)
Grasping Weber's law Current Biology
Reduced Effectiveness of Selection Caused by a Lack of Recombination
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages R198-R202 (March 2008)
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (June 2013)
Head-Eye Coordination at a Microscopic Scale
Presentation transcript:

Speed Determines Leadership and Leadership Determines Learning during Pigeon Flocking  Benjamin Pettit, Zsuzsa Ákos, Tamás Vicsek, Dora Biro  Current Biology  Volume 25, Issue 23, Pages 3132-3137 (December 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.10.044 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 GPS Tracks and Homing Efficiency for Solo and Flock Flights (A) Homing efficiency of all pigeons across their 18 flights. Boxplots show quartiles and range, with points plotted individually if they are below the lower quartile by at least 1.5 times the interquartile range. Colors indicate flight sequence within each site. (B–D) GPS tracks from one of the four subject groups, with the same color coding as (A). From each site, each pigeon had an initial solo flight (B) followed by four flock flights (C) and then a second solo flight (D). The sequence was repeated using four separate groups; the group shown here (group L) had a mean efficiency closest to the overall mean. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2015. Current Biology 2015 25, 3132-3137DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2015.10.044) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Flock Leadership Compared to Solo Homing Efficiency and Speed Plots show the mean value for each bird, with different symbols for the four replicate groups. Fit lines are from an LMM with group as a random factor. The estimated regression for the fixed effect is shown in black, or gray if nonsignificant, as judged from a likelihood-ratio test (LRT) against a model without that fixed effect (α=0.05). Dashed colored lines show random effects of group on slope and intercept. Dotted black lines in (C) and (D) are the diagonals y = x. (A and B) Flock leadership plotted against previous solo efficiency (A) and speed (B). Speed effect in minimum adequate model: slope = 0.19, SE = 0.06. (C) Solo efficiency after flock flights, compared to solo efficiency before (slope = 0.40, SE = 0.12). (D) Solo speed after flock flights, compared to solo speed before (slope = 0.53, SE = 0.12). (E) The residuals from (C) plotted against flock leadership to show the additional effect of flock leadership on subsequent homing efficiency. LRT against model without leadership: p = 0.014, leadership slope = 0.055, SE = 0.017. (F) The residuals from (D) plotted against flock leadership. LRT against model without leadership: p = 0.37, leadership slope = 0.20, SE = 0.17. See Figures S1–S4 for additional explanation and analysis of the variables shown here. Current Biology 2015 25, 3132-3137DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2015.10.044) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions