The Structural Basis of Peptide-Protein Binding Strategies

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Advertisements

Networks of Dynamic Allostery Regulate Enzyme Function
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Nir London, Ora Schueler-Furman  Structure 
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Antonio del Sol, Chung-Jung Tsai, Buyong Ma, Ruth Nussinov  Structure 
Blocking HIV-1 gp120 at the Phe43 Cavity: If the Extension Fits…
Solution Structure of the U11-48K CHHC Zinc-Finger Domain that Specifically Binds the 5′ Splice Site of U12-Type Introns  Henning Tidow, Antonina Andreeva,
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
AnchorDock: Blind and Flexible Anchor-Driven Peptide Docking
Structural Basis for the Specific Recognition of Methylated Histone H3 Lysine 4 by the WD-40 Protein WDR5  Zhifu Han, Lan Guo, Huayi Wang, Yue Shen, Xing.
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
DNA Nanomechanics in the Nucleosome
Allosteric Effects of the Oncogenic RasQ61L Mutant on Raf-RBD
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
The Origin of CDR H3 Structural Diversity
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e3 (May 2017)
Ubiquitin Recognition by the Human TSG101 Protein
Volume 130, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
OmpA: A Flexible Clamp for Bacterial Cell Wall Attachment
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Phospho-Pon Binding-Mediated Fine-Tuning of Plk1 Activity
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 19, Issue 10, Pages (October 2011)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Veronica Salmaso, Mattia Sturlese, Alberto Cuzzolin, Stefano Moro 
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Binding of the Bacteriophage P22 N-Peptide to the boxB RNA Motif Studied by Molecular Dynamics Simulations  Ranjit P. Bahadur, Srinivasaraghavan Kannan,
A Conformational Switch in the CRIB-PDZ Module of Par-6
Regulation of the Protein-Conducting Channel by a Bound Ribosome
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
Binding Dynamics of Isolated Nucleoporin Repeat Regions to Importin-β
Structural Basis for Vertebrate Filamin Dimerization
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e3 (May 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Ligand Binding to the Voltage-Gated Kv1
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
The Structure of the Tiam1 PDZ Domain/ Phospho-Syndecan1 Complex Reveals a Ligand Conformation that Modulates Protein Dynamics  Xu Liu, Tyson R. Shepherd,
Nir London, Ora Schueler-Furman  Structure 
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Structural Basis for the Recognition of Methylated Histone H3K36 by the Eaf3 Subunit of Histone Deacetylase Complex Rpd3S  Chao Xu, Gaofeng Cui, Maria.
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Recognition of the Regulatory Nascent Chain TnaC by the Ribosome
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Reduced Curvature of Ligand-Binding Domain Free-Energy Surface Underlies Partial Agonism at NMDA Receptors  Jian Dai, Huan-Xiang Zhou  Structure  Volume.
Volume 130, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 127, Issue 2, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Structural Insight into BLM Recognition by TopBP1
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (April 2014)
Clemens C. Heikaus, Jayvardhan Pandit, Rachel E. Klevit  Structure 
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
Damian Dawidowski, David S. Cafiso  Structure 
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e5 (July 2019)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Chengfei Yan, Xianjin Xu, Xiaoqin Zou  Structure 
Structure of the Mtb CarD/RNAP β-Lobes Complex Reveals the Molecular Basis of Interaction and Presents a Distinct DNA-Binding Domain for Mtb CarD  Gulcin.
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Presentation transcript:

The Structural Basis of Peptide-Protein Binding Strategies Nir London, Dana Movshovitz-Attias, Ora Schueler-Furman  Structure  Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages 188-199 (February 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2009.11.012 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The peptiDB Data Set of Peptide-Protein Interactions The distribution of different features is shown. (A) Peptide sizes in the data set. (B) Peptide secondary structure. (C) Conformational changes of the binding protein. “ > 1 chain” indicates cases where the binding protein is composed of two chains; in these cases no free conformations were evaluated. Most peptides are between 6 and 11 residues long, adapt a coiled conformation, and induce no significant conformational changes in the protein partner upon binding. Structure 2010 18, 188-199DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.11.012) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Substantial Involvement of the Peptide Main Chain in Peptide-Protein Hydrogen Bonds (A) Comparison of the distribution of hydrogen bonds across interfaces of heterodimers, homodimers, and peptide-protein complexes. Black represents main-chain/main-chain hydrogen bonds; gray, side-chain/main-chain hydrogen bonds; white, side-chain/side-chain hydrogen bonds. Heterodimers and homodimers were taken from Cohen et al. (2008). PeptiDB, full data set; PeptiDB w/o β, set without β sheet forming peptides. (B) Distribution of side-chain/main-chain hydrogen bonds in peptiDB: in most cases the main-chain atom involved in the hydrogen bond is contributed by the peptide. Structure 2010 18, 188-199DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.11.012) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Peptide Hot Spot Residues Contribute the Major Part of the Binding Energy The binding energy is not uniformly distributed among all peptide residues, rather it concentrates on a few hot spots. This histogram shows the percentage of the total binding energy that is contributed by these hot spots in each of the peptide-protein complexes of peptiDB. The contribution to binding energy by different residues is evaluated by calculating the predicted effect of mutating each residue to alanine (see Experimental Procedures). For example, in 30 complexes, 90%–100% of the binding energy is contributed by peptide hot spots, whereas only in 5 complexes 40%–50% of the binding energy origins from peptide hot spots. Structure 2010 18, 188-199DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.11.012) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Aromatic Amino Acids, as Well as Leucine and Isoleucine, Are Overrepresented in Peptide Hotspot Residues (A) The frequency of different amino acids in binding peptides (in peptiDB, black), compared with protein-protein interfaces (as calculated by Glaser et al. [2001], white). (B) Amino acid overrepresentation in peptide hot spot residues: the plot shows the overrepresentation of each amino acid type in hot spots, relative to its frequency in binding peptides (shown in A). Hot spot residues are enriched significantly with amino acids W, F, Y, I, and L. Leucine is overrepresented in peptide hotspots, even when normalized against its already high background frequency in peptides. Structure 2010 18, 188-199DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.11.012) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Protein Side Chains Are Prearranged to Accommodate the Peptide The unbound human protein kinase PIM-1 (in red; PDB ID 2J2I:B) shows perfect agreement with the bound structure (in orange, bound to the PIM-1 consensus peptide in purple; PDB ID 2C3I): Note the exact placement of side chains, and a very low interface atom rmsd value of 0.29 Å. Structure 2010 18, 188-199DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.11.012) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Peptides Tend to Bind in the Largest Pocket on the Protein Surface (A) Distribution of peptide pocket binding strategies. Most peptides bind either to a large pocket, or latch on to a hole that accommodates one side chain. (B) Whether binding to a large pocket or binding via a knob-hole fashion interaction, peptides tend to bind to the largest pocket on the surface. (C) Complement protein C8 in complex with a peptide baring the C8 binding site (PDB ID 2QOS). The β hairpin peptide is bound in the largest pocket on the protein surface. (D) DnaK substrate binding PDZ domain bound to a substrate peptide (PDB ID 1MFG). The peptide is anchored to the protein via its C′-terminal valine knob that fits into its corresponding hole in the PDZ domain. Structure 2010 18, 188-199DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2009.11.012) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions