Davie County Comprehensive Land Development Plan

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Forest Legacy Assessment of Need Identifying Future Forest Legacy Areas Governors Commission for Protecting the Chesapeake Bay through Sustainable Forestry.
Advertisements

Jackson Community Comprehensive Plan – Big Picture Planning for Natural Resources Keeping it Green: Conserving Your Future Through Land Use Planning Presented.
GAINESVILLE HALL COUNTY Comprehensive Plan Update Land Demand & Development Capacity May 28, 2003.
1 Site Capacity and Natural Resource Protection Relationships in Subdivision Design.
K INCORA V ILLAGE C ENTER ZMAP Board of Supervisors Committee of the Whole May 18, 2010.
3680 Avalon Park Blvd E Orlando, FL Phone: Fax: Future Land Use Allocation Model (FLUAM)
 Matt Gates.  Forecast sprawl  Guide long-range population and employment forecasts o For the region o For individual counties  Allocate growth to.
Proposed Modification of Policies for Rural Employment Centers Policy 6.3 of the Future Land Use Element of the Alachua County Comprehensive plan CPA
Single Family Development in City of Austin Since Passage of Watershed Regulations Neighborhood Planning and Zoning Department April, 2008.
Community Opportunities The values associated with Smart Growth communities encourage affordable, mixed income housing; higher density; and a vibrant,
Where are we now Dover grew by 3,103 persons between 2000 and 2010 making it the fastest growing community in the region during that time, by.
Floyd County Public Meeting Amendment to the County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance for New Albany Township Area.
Simulating Future Suburban Development in Connecticut Jason Parent, Daniel Civco, and James Hurd Center for Land Use Education and.
Using the Land Use in Central Indiana (LUCI) Models in Transportation Planning John R. Ottensmann Center for Urban Policy and the Environment Indiana University.
Luci2 Urban Simulation Model John R. Ottensmann Center for Urban Policy and the Environment Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis.
Multi-Family Development Trends in Delaware David L. Edgell, AICP Principal Planner.
REGIONAL FORUM FOR BEVERLY, DANVERS AND SALEM DECEMBER 8, 2010 North Shore Regional Strategic Planning Project.
UrbanFootprint Module 3: Base Data Preparation and Updating Materials prepared with funding support from the California Governor’s Office of Planning and.
Transfer of Development Rights & Possibilities for Coastal Communities Steven Bruder, NJ State TDR Bank Monmouth University: Urban Coast Institute November.
Ohio Balanced Growth Program Best Local Land Use Practices Development Incentives Kirby Date, AICP, Cleveland State University.
Housing Element Update Workshop The City of Fillmore is Currently Updating its Housing Element  State law mandates the Housing Element be included.
E151U: Housing and Urban Development Policy Housing Planning.
Land Market Monitoring: Beyond Land Supply Gerrit-Jan Knaap Professor and Director National Center for Smart Growth Research and Education University of.
A Regional Sustainability Initiative Jon Parsons, P.E. Executive Director.
North East Study Area Staff Recommendation Thursday, June 25, 2009.
Chittenden County Land Use - Transportation Decision Support System November 19, 2003 Chittenden County Metropolitan.
Kevin Behm – Addison County Regional Planning Commission Community Build-Out Analysis Nov 5, 2007 New techniques - for an old friend.
Data Development Common Issues for UPLAN and I-PLACE3S.
FLORIDA 2060 A Research Project of 1000 Friends of Florida.
Flintstone-Oldtown Planning Region Comprehensive Plan Kick-Off Meeting June 23, 2010 Insert pictures.
Legal Regulations for High School Road II BAINBRIDGE ISLAND MUNICIPAL CODES & COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONDITIONAL USES.
BRAC RTF CGIA Progress Report July 26, BRAC RTF Task #10 CGIA role Mapping and analysisMapping and analysis Geographic Information SystemsGeographic.
UPlan: How It Works and How to Get Started A description for the rest of us Nathaniel Roth Information Center for the Environment University of California,
Introduction Leslie Kohli Administrator Springfield Township Lucas County, Ohio.
Gauging Urban Growth Boundary Effectiveness in King County By Gabe Thum CEE 498 E GIS for Civil Engineers.
Community Development Department FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT SMALL-SCALE LU-MIN & ZONING MAP AMENDMENT RZ-OTH
DRAFT Clark County Land Use Categories – Urban Areas 10/8/2015 – Draft, for discussion1.
The Capacity of Hope: Developing a Regional Build-Out Model with GIS Martin Kim, Tom Harner, Kathryn Youra Polk The Capacity of Hope: Developing a Regional.
Eastside Activity Center Zoning Overlay District and Amended Land Development Regulations.
RR Farms, LLC Presented by James Stowers, Esq. Wright, Casey & Stowers, P.L. --- Pioneer Square --- Pioneer Square.
Alternative Growth Futures Studio University of Colorado at Denver Sponsors: Custer Heritage Committee San Isabel Foundation Sonoran Institute.
Secondary & Cumulative Effects Analysis Training Program Module 4: How to Develop SCEA Land Use Information How to Develop Land Use Information.
 Kevin Behm – Addison County Regional Planning Commission  Kevin Behm – Addison County Regional Planning Commission Community Build-Out.
MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Master Plans in Montgomery County.
GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE FUNCTIONAL MASTER PLAN Prince George’s County MNCPP-C Draft: December, 2004.
Jefferson County Agricultural Preservation and Land Use Plan Jefferson County’s Comprehensive Plan: Process and Strategies Presented to: Dane County Officials.
Metropolitan Planning Organization for Blair County (Altoona MSA) Regional Long Range Transportation Plan Draft Agency Coordination Meeting (ACM)
Baseline Scenario Quality Growth Strategy.
Ohio Balanced Growth Program Codes and Ordinances Workshop: Recommendations for Development and Site Layout Kirby Date, AICP, Cleveland State University.
TOPICS IN LAND SURVEYING: SUBDIVISIONS TREC #7220 TIM HOWELL, RLS TREC INSTRUCTOR #1556.
Regional Planning Directors’ Meeting July 22, 2011 Growth Allocation Project Metro Planning & Development Department Research Center REGIONAL GROWTH /
Calais Planned Unit Development (PUD) Central Vermont RPC Chris Walsh & Daniel Currier.
STAMFORD CAPACITY AND LIMITS TO GROWTH STUDY SOUTH KESTEVEN DISTRICT COUNCIL FINAL REPORT PRESENTATION PRESENTERS: UNA McGAUGHRIN JESSE HONEY 14 TH DECEMBER.
Joy Patterson, Principal Planner City of Sacramento March 16 th, 2016 For the 2016 Planning Academy.
Island County Comprehensive Plan 2016 Review and Update Buildable Lands Analysis Results 1.
GREEN GROWTH TOOLBOX Wildlife & Natural Resource Stewardship in Planning Wildlife & Natural Resource Stewardship in Planning Black-crowned night heron.
Clarendon Town Plan 2015 Barbara Noyes Pulling
2017 Comprehensive Plan Update
Hooksett TIF District Build-Out Analysis Preliminary Results
“Palm Coast 145, LLC” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning Planning and Land Development Regulation Board December 21, 2016.
Portuguese American Cultural Center Property Rezoning to
Marina Del Palma Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Map Amendment
2040 Comprehensive Plan Open House
Land Use Assumptions Public Hearing - 5/31/18
ROOSEVELT CITY GENERAL PLAN 2010
Tweet about this presentation #TransitGIS
Transportation Demand Analysis
Assessing Likelihood of Development in Countywide Corridors
Trip Generation I Meeghat Habibian Transportation Demand Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Davie County Comprehensive Land Development Plan Growth Strategy Sub-Committee 11.9.18 • Davie County Development Services Jesse Day, Planning Director Cameron Colvin, Regional Planner Malinda Ford, GIS Manager

Future Growth Scenario Modeling Helps planners to make decisions about development, land use, transportation and conservation. Visualize where future homes and jobs might go within the County. Compare scenarios of different land use regulations

Control Totals GIS Software will allocate NEW homes and jobs that are projected to locate to Davie County between 2016 (base year) and 2050 (horizon year). Davie County Total Base Year (2016) Horizon Year (2050) Change Population 42,211 64,135 21,924 Dwelling Units 15,888 24,140 8,252 Single-Family 12,087 18,829 6,742 Multi-Family 793 1,207 414 Mobile Homes 3,008 4,104 1,095 Employment 18,498 27,736 9,238 Retail/Office 6,969 12,949 5,980 Industrial 6,149 7,553 1,404 Institutional 5,380 7,234 1,854 Source: NC OSBM Source: Population in households divided by 2016 average household size (2.63); Assumed trend continuation for SF/MF/Mobile split Population projections from NC OSMB Derived DU projections by calculating population in households and using the average HH size from 2016 (2.63) Assumed continuation in trends of SF/MF/Mobile split SF slight increase, assumed 78% MF slight decrease, assumed 5% Mobile slight decrease, assumed 17% Employment Projections from Woods & Poole who use BEA data Source: Woods & Poole (US BEA)

Control Totals Break down by jurisdiction, assuming current allocation of population and jobs. Assuming 79% of population lives outside municipal limits and about 38% of jobs are located outside limits Change (2016-2050) County Total Unincorporated Areas Mocksville Bermuda Run Cooleemee Dwelling Units 8,252 6,342 1,075 676 159 Single-Family 6,742 5,225 808 561 148 Multi-Family 414 47 251 112 4 Mobile Homes 1,095 1,070 16 3 6 Employment 9,238 3,479 4,625 1,126 8 Retail/Office 5,980 1,965 3,192 816 7 Industrial 1,404 914 479 10 1 Institutional 1,854 600 954 300

Development Constraints Remove highly constrained areas from future development Wetlands 100-year floodplain 30-foot stream buffers (perennial streams in water supply watersheds) Conservation lands (managed lands in Natural Heritage Program database) Calculated developable area for each parcel

Build Out Potential How many homes and jobs COULD be allocated to each parcel based on current zoning and watershed restrictions. Each parcel coded for: Jurisdiction (Mocksville, Bermuda Run, Cooleemee, Davie County) Water Supply Watershed (III-P, III-C, IV-P, IV-C, none) Development Status (Developed, Un-developed, Under-developed, Conservation) Only Un-developed and Under-developed parcels will receive future growth Development Type (zoning) Assumed only 1 DU/ per acre for RA (instead of 1.45)

Build Out Potential Rules established for each development type (zoning category) Site Efficiency – removes areas for right-of-ways, lot setbacks, open space Percent Residential/Non-Residential Percent Single Family, Multi-family, or Mobile Homes Percent Retail/Office, Industrial, or Institutional Residential Density (homes per acre) Non-residential Intensity (Floor Area Ratio) Employee Space Ratios (employees per square foot)

Build Out Potential If every parcels was developed to the fullest extent: TOTAL COUNTY Unincorporated TOTAL Control Totals BOP Dwelling Units 8,252 116,362 6,342 108,027 Single-Family 6,742 81,595 5,225 75,728 Multi-Family 414 4,437 47 2,744 Mobile Homes 1,095 30,330 1,070 29,555 Employment 9,238 74,707 3,479 19,689 Retail/Office 5,980 22,281 1,965 2,563 Industrial 1,404 14,404 914 1,823 Institutional 1,854 38,022 600 15,303

Land Suitability Land Suitability Factors Growth Areas Municipal Limits 2 ETJ Limits 1 Sewer Service Area Within Town limits or within 100-feet of a gravity fed sewer line 1.5 Water Service Area Within Town limits or within 100-feet of a water line Farmland Voluntary Agricultural District -2 Natural Heritage Areas Significant Natural Heritage Areas & Element Occurrences -1 Steep Slopes Slopes greater than 15% -1 to 0 Poor Soils Limited for septic systems -2 to 0 Transportation Nodes Within 1-mile of interstate interchange 0 to 2.8 Within 0.5 miles of road network intersection Destinations Major destinations such as employment centers, grocery stores, schools, hospitals, recreation facilities 0 to 2.5 Measures appropriateness of future development for each parcel Final suitability value calculated for each parcel

Land Suitability Soils limited for septic tank absorption fields

Conservation Areas

Land Suitability Measures appropriateness of future development for each parcel Final suitability value calculated for each parcel Doesn’t account for market pressures

Growth Strategy Areas Strategic Growth Areas Acres Primary Growth Area 11,199 Secondary Growth Area 23,259 Rural Growth Area 122,125

Growth Allocation Developing most suitable parcels first. Showing growth in unincorporated area only. TOTAL Control Totals BOP Dwelling Units 6,342 108,027 Single-Family 5,225 75,728 Multi-Family 47 2,744 Mobile Homes 1,070 29,555 Employment 3,479 19,689 Retail/Office 1,965 2,563 Industrial 914 1,823 Institutional 600 15,303

Growth Allocation Developing most suitable parcels first. Showing growth in unincorporated area only. TOTAL Control Totals BOP Dwelling Units 6,342 108,027 Single-Family 5,225 75,728 Multi-Family 47 2,744 Mobile Homes 1,070 29,555 Employment 3,479 19,689 Retail/Office 1,965 2,563 Industrial 914 1,823 Institutional 600 15,303

Growth Allocation Developing most suitable parcels first. Showing growth in unincorporated area only. TOTAL Control Totals BOP Dwelling Units 6,342 108,027 Single-Family 5,225 75,728 Multi-Family 47 2,744 Mobile Homes 1,070 29,555 Employment 3,479 19,689 Retail/Office 1,965 2,563 Industrial 914 1,823 Institutional 600 15,303

Growth Allocation Developing most suitable parcels first. Showing growth in unincorporated area only. TOTAL Control Totals BOP Dwelling Units 6,342 108,027 Single-Family 5,225 75,728 Multi-Family 47 2,744 Mobile Homes 1,070 29,555 Employment 3,479 19,689 Retail/Office 1,965 2,563 Industrial 914 1,823 Institutional 600 15,303

Growth Allocation Developing most suitable parcels first. Showing growth in unincorporated area only. TOTAL Control Totals BOP Dwelling Units 6,342 108,027 Single-Family 5,225 75,728 Multi-Family 47 2,744 Mobile Homes 1,070 29,555 Employment 3,479 19,689 Retail/Office 1,965 2,563 Industrial 914 1,823 Institutional 600 15,303

Growth Allocation Developing most suitable parcels first. Showing growth in unincorporated area only. TOTAL Control Totals BOP Dwelling Units 6,342 108,027 Single-Family 5,225 75,728 Multi-Family 47 2,744 Mobile Homes 1,070 29,555 Employment 3,479 19,689 Retail/Office 1,965 2,563 Industrial 914 1,823 Institutional 600 15,303

Thanks! Jesse Day jday@ptrc.org 336.904.3000 • www.ptrc.org