Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (April 2001)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Advertisements

Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages (February 1998)
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages (November 2009)
Phosphorylation of the WASP-VCA Domain Increases Its Affinity for the Arp2/3 Complex and Enhances Actin Polymerization by WASP  Giles O.C. Cory, Rainer.
Volume 23, Issue 21, Pages (November 2013)
Activating and Silencing the Mitotic Checkpoint through CENP-E-Dependent Activation/Inactivation of BubR1  Yinghui Mao, Ariane Abrieu, Don W. Cleveland 
Cofilin Dissociates Arp2/3 Complex and Branches from Actin Filaments
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 123, Issue 5, Pages (December 2005)
Etienne Morel, Robert G. Parton, Jean Gruenberg  Developmental Cell 
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Control of the Assembly of ATP- and ADP-Actin by Formins and Profilin
Volume 115, Issue 2, Pages (August 1998)
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages (December 1999)
Marie-Thérèse Leccia  Journal of Investigative Dermatology 
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (March 2000)
Volume 95, Issue 5, Pages (November 1998)
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (July 2004)
Anita Reddy, Elisabet V. Caler, Norma W. Andrews  Cell 
Volume 128, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 16, Issue 22, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages (February 1998)
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Sofia Yu. Khaitlina, Hanna Strzelecka-Gołaszewska  Biophysical Journal 
Architecture Dependence of Actin Filament Network Disassembly
Volume 13, Issue 20, Pages (October 2003)
Critical Conformational Changes in the Arp2/3 Complex Are Induced by Nucleotide and Nucleation Promoting Factor  Erin D. Goley, Stacia E. Rodenbusch,
Volume 23, Issue 21, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages (September 1997)
Interaction of Cortactin and N-WASp with Arp2/3 Complex
Volume 16, Issue 22, Pages (November 2006)
Deborah N. Burshtyn, Jiyeon Shin, Christopher Stebbins, Eric O. Long 
NikR Repressor Chemistry & Biology
Cdc42-induced actin filaments are protected from capping protein
Volume 11, Issue 21, Pages (October 2001)
Volume 12, Issue 21, Pages (October 2002)
Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages (April 2004)
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages (September 2001)
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Cadherin-Directed Actin Assembly
Volume 97, Issue 2, Pages (April 1999)
Ca2+ Regulation of Gelsolin Activity: Binding and Severing of F-actin
Activation of a Signaling Cascade by Cytoskeleton Stretch
Volume 74, Issue 2, Pages (February 1998)
Aip1 Destabilizes Cofilin-Saturated Actin Filaments by Severing and Accelerating Monomer Dissociation from Ends  Ambika V. Nadkarni, William M. Brieher 
Volume 45, Issue 2, Pages (January 2005)
Yann Leverrier, Anne J. Ridley  Current Biology 
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 11, Issue 13, Pages (July 2001)
Jennifer Y. Hsiao, Lauren M. Goins, Natalie A. Petek, R. Dyche Mullins 
A novel Cdc42Hs mutant induces cellular transformation
Characterization of a Specificity Factor for an AAA+ ATPase
How Capping Protein Binds the Barbed End of the Actin Filament
Gα12 and Gα13 Interact with Ser/Thr Protein Phosphatase Type 5 and Stimulate Its Phosphatase Activity  Yoshiaki Yamaguchi, Hironori Katoh, Kazutoshi Mori,
Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitor BB-3103 Unlike the Serine Proteinase Inhibitor Aprotinin Abrogates Epidermal Healing of Human Skin Wounds Ex Vivo1 
Volume 16, Issue 19, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 13, Issue 15, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages 620-625 (April 2001) The F-actin side binding activity of the Arp2/3 complex is essential for actin nucleation and lamellipod extension  Maryse Bailly, Ilia Ichetovkin, Wayne Grant, Noureddine Zebda, Laura M Machesky, Jeffrey E Segall, John Condeelis  Current Biology  Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages 620-625 (April 2001) DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00152-X

Figure 1 The effect of AE360 anti-p34 antibody on the nucleation and side binding functions of the Arp2/3 complex. (a) Immunolocalization of the p34 subunit of the Arp2/3 complex using AE360 antibodies. The scale bar indicates 10 μm. Inset, an immunoblot showing the immunoprecipitation of the p34 subunit of the Arp2/3 complex from whole cell lysates using AE360 antibodies. Lane 1, AE360 antibodies; lane 2, control beads without IgG; the black mark indicates 36.5 kDa molecular weight marker. (b) Nucleation assay in vitro: 3 μM actin (5% pyrene-labeled), 10 nM Arp2/3, and 10 nM GST-VCA (squares, 40:1 ratio of antibodies to Arp2/3) or 2 μM actin, 2 nM Arp2/3, 2 nM GST-VCA (circles, 200:1 ratio of antibodies to Arp2/3) were incubated in the presence of either 400 nM AE360 anti-p34 antibodies (closed symbols) or an equal volume of TBS buffer (open symbols) at 22°C in polymerization buffer (2 mM Tris [pH 8], 0.2 mM CaCl2, 0.02% NaN3, 0.2 mM ATP, 0.5 mM DTT, 1 mM EGTA, 2 mM MgCl2, and 50 mM KCl). (c) The Arp2/3 complex-actin cosedimentation assays: 4 μM F-actin, 0.25 μM Arp2/3 complex, 0.25 μM antibodies as specified, in 5 mM imidazole (pH 7.0), 50 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM ATP, and 1 mM EGTA. The graph shows the percentage of the Arp2/3 complex that is bound to F-actin after 30 min of incubation at 22°C in the presence of the respective antibodies. (d) The effect of AE360 antibodies on the lag phase in nucleation by the Arp2/3 complex. The Arp2/3 complex (27 nM) and GST-VCA (100 nM) were added to polymerizing actin (4 μM, 5% pyrene-labeled) at 0 s (squares), 400 s (circles), and 700 s (triangles) after initiation of polymerization in the presence of 500 nM nonimmune IgG (open symbols) or AE360 antibodies (closed symbols) Current Biology 2001 11, 620-625DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00152-X)

Figure 2 The effect of AE360 anti-p34 antibodies on the branching activity of the Arp2/3 complex as measured in electron and light microscope assays. (a–d) Observations of the actin filaments in the electron microscope. Conditions: 4 μM actin, 4 μM phalloidin, 425 nM GST-VCA, and 300 nM antibodies. Actin filaments polymerized for 30 min in the presence of (a) nonimmune IgG, (b) 75 nM Arp2/3 complex and nonimmune IgG, and (c) 75 nM Arp2/3 complex and anti-p34 antibodies. The arrows point at typical branching. The scale bar indicates 0.2 μm. (d) Quantitation of the branching (number of branches per μm of filament): actin + IgG (n = 1472), actin + Arp2/3 + IgG (n = 2181), actin + Arp2/3 + anti-p34 (n = 5038); significant difference (p = 1.3x10−6). (e–h) Direct observation of actin filaments in the light microscope. Conditions: 2 μM actin, 200 nM phalloidin, 40 nM GST-VCA, and 40 nM Arp2/3. Actin filaments polymerized for 20 min in the presence of (e) TBS buffer blank, (f) 400 nM anti-p34 antibodies, and (g) 800 nM anti-p34 antibodies. The scale bar indicates 5 μm. (h) Quantitation of the total filament number and number of branched filaments (per field, mean ± SEM.). Additional control chambers were perfused with actin in the presence of 1200 nM nonimmune IgG to ensure that IgG has no nonspecific effect on actin binding to nitrocellulose (data not shown) Current Biology 2001 11, 620-625DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00152-X)

Figure 3 Inhibition of lamellipod extension after microinjection of AE360 anti-p34 antibodies. Left panel; (a,c) morphology of control noninjected cells, and (b,d) cells microinjected with AE360 anti-p34 antibodies immediately (a, b) before and (c,d) 3 min after EGF stimulation. Lamellipod extension is shown on control cells (arrowheads). Right panel; quantitation of the protrusive activity after EGF stimulation in cells 30–45 min after antibody microinjection, measured as described previously [3, 21]. Triangles, AE360 anti-p34 antibodies (n = 14); squares, nonimmune IgGs (n = 75); and diamonds, control mock-injected cells (n = 17). SEM < 5% Current Biology 2001 11, 620-625DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00152-X)

Figure 4 Barbed end number and distribution in vivo after microinjection of AE360 anti-p34 antibodies. Biotin-labeled actin (0.45 μM) was incorporated into permeabilized cells to visualize free barbed ends [3, 23] for actin polymerization after stimulation, and incorporation at the leading edge was quantified 30 s and 60 s after EGF stimulation by measuring the fluorescence intensity within 1.1 μm at the leading edge [3]. (a) exogenous-labeled actin incorporation at the leading edge of cells microinjected with AE360 anti-p34 antibodies after 1 min of EGF stimulation (the arrow points to the microinjected cell). The scale bar indicates 20 μm. (b) The relative number of barbed ends at the leading edge. White columns, control cells in the field (n = 8–30); and gray columns, cells microinjected with anti-p34 antibodies (n = 10–27). Mean ± SEM Current Biology 2001 11, 620-625DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00152-X)