Susan K Lyman, Randy Schekman  Cell 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Binding of Secretory Precursor Polypeptides to a Translocon Subcomplex Is Regulated by BiP Susan K Lyman, Randy Schekman Cell Volume 88, Issue 1, Pages.
Advertisements

Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Purusharth Rajyaguru, Meipei She, Roy Parker  Molecular Cell 
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
The Protein Import Motor of Mitochondria
Volume 98, Issue 1, Pages (July 1999)
by Guang Yang, Shu-Ching Huang, Jane Y. Wu, and Edward J. Benz
Usa1 Functions as a Scaffold of the HRD-Ubiquitin Ligase
Hsp104, Hsp70, and Hsp40  John R Glover, Susan Lindquist  Cell 
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Fátima Gebauer, Marica Grskovic, Matthias W Hentze  Molecular Cell 
Monica C. Rodrigo-Brenni, Erik Gutierrez, Ramanujan S. Hegde 
Activation of Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase γ by Ras
Volume 91, Issue 2, Pages (October 1997)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (July 2000)
Volume 95, Issue 5, Pages (November 1998)
John F Ross, Xuan Liu, Brian David Dynlacht  Molecular Cell 
Selective Degradation of Ubiquitinated Sic1 by Purified 26S Proteasome Yields Active S Phase Cyclin-Cdk  Rati Verma, Hayes McDonald, John R Yates, Raymond.
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (June 2000)
PARP1 Represses PAP and Inhibits Polyadenylation during Heat Shock
Class C Vps Protein Complex Regulates Vacuolar SNARE Pairing and Is Required for Vesicle Docking/Fusion  Trey K. Sato, Peter Rehling, Michael R. Peterson,
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Components and Dynamics of DNA Replication Complexes in S
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
A Branched Pathway Governing the Activation of a Developmental Transcription Factor by Regulated Intramembrane Proteolysis  Nathalie Campo, David Z. Rudner 
Volume 94, Issue 6, Pages (September 1998)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Role of the regulatory domain of the EGF-receptor cytoplasmic tail in selective binding of the clathrin-associated complex AP-2  Werner Boll, Andreas.
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
Yutian Peng, Lois S. Weisman  Developmental Cell 
Volume 70, Issue 2, Pages e6 (April 2018)
A Role for Ran-GTP and Crm1 in Blocking Re-Replication
Volume 89, Issue 4, Pages (May 1997)
Volume 90, Issue 2, Pages (July 1997)
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Association Between HLA-DM and HLA-DR In Vivo
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Kunio Nakatsukasa, Gregory Huyer, Susan Michaelis, Jeffrey L. Brodsky 
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
Temporal Regulation of Salmonella Virulence Effector Function by Proteasome- Dependent Protein Degradation  Tomoko Kubori, Jorge E. Galán  Cell  Volume.
TopBP1 Activates the ATR-ATRIP Complex
A Biochemical Function for the Sm Complex
Christopher W. Carroll, Maria Enquist-Newman, David O. Morgan 
Volume 88, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (February 2001)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Detecting Folding Intermediates of a Protein as It Passes through the Bacterial Translocation Channel  Hiroshi Kadokura, Jon Beckwith  Cell  Volume 138,
The Rab GTPase Ypt1p and Tethering Factors Couple Protein Sorting at the ER to Vesicle Targeting to the Golgi Apparatus  Pierre Morsomme, Howard Riezman 
Functional Recognition of the 5′ Splice Site by U4/U6
Anu Cherukuri, Paul C. Cheng, Hae Won Sohn, Susan K. Pierce  Immunity 
Hitoshi Nakatogawa, Koreaki Ito  Molecular Cell 
Sequence-Specific Alteration of the Ribosome–Membrane Junction Exposes Nascent Secretory Proteins to the Cytosol  Ramanujan S Hegde, Vishwanath R Lingappa 
CRM1 Is an Export Receptor for Leucine-Rich Nuclear Export Signals
Regulation of Yeast mRNA 3′ End Processing by Phosphorylation
James Fishburn, Neeman Mohibullah, Steven Hahn  Molecular Cell 
Impact of LAMP interaction on TAPL function.
Vidhya Ramachandran, Khyati H. Shah, Paul K. Herman  Molecular Cell 
Cvt19 Is a Receptor for the Cytoplasm-to-Vacuole Targeting Pathway
Volume 91, Issue 2, Pages (October 1997)
BiP Acts as a Molecular Ratchet during Posttranslational Transport of Prepro-α Factor across the ER Membrane  Kent E.S Matlack, Benjamin Misselwitz, Kathrin.
Empty Site Forms of the SRP54 and SRα GTPases Mediate Targeting of Ribosome– Nascent Chain Complexes to the Endoplasmic Reticulum  Peter J Rapiejko, Reid.
Andreas Mayer, William Wickner, Albert Haas  Cell 
Elva Dı́az, Suzanne R Pfeffer  Cell 
TRAM Regulates the Exposure of Nascent Secretory Proteins to the Cytosol during Translocation into the Endoplasmic Reticulum  Ramanujan S Hegde, Sabine.
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Unassembled Ig Heavy Chains Do Not Cycle from BiP In Vivo but Require Light Chains to Trigger Their Release  Marc Vanhove, Young-Kwang Usherwood, Linda.
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (September 2001)
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
The Engagement of Sec61p in the ER Dislocation Process
Volume 84, Issue 2, Pages (January 1996)
Presentation transcript:

Binding of Secretory Precursor Polypeptides to a Translocon Subcomplex Is Regulated by BiP  Susan K Lyman, Randy Schekman  Cell  Volume 88, Issue 1, Pages 85-96 (January 1997) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81861-9 Copyright © 1997 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Binding of ppαF to Sec62p, Sec71p, and Sec72p Is ATP-Independent and Requires an Intact Signal Sequence Standard reactions consisted of 150 μg of yeast microsomes, an ATP-regenerating system (present or absent as indicated), and 250,000 cpm of the precursor protein 35S-ppαF (wild-type or mutant signal sequence). The extent of complex formation between 35S-ppαF and either Sec62p, Sec71p, or Sec72p was determined by cross-linking followed by immunoprecipitation and scintillation counting. On the x-axis, (62), (71), and (72) represent immunoprecipitations performed with antibodies directed against Sec62p, Sec71p, or Sec72p, respectively. (A) Standard binding, cross-linking, and immunoprecipitation reactions were carried out as described in Experimental Procedures. (B) 35S-ppαF was allowed to bind to the receptor complex in yeast microsomes in the absence of ATP for 20 min. This reaction was then split into two parts: ATP was added to one half (−/+ ATP) while the other half received an equal volume of buffer (−ATP), and both were incubated for an additional 20 min. For comparison, a control reaction was performed in which ATP was present throughout the entire 40 min incubation (+ATP). In all experiments, the low background level of 35S-ppαF precipitated in the absence of cross-linking has been subtracted from the cross-linked values. This background value routinely averaged 40–70 cpm. Cell 1997 88, 85-96DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81861-9) Copyright © 1997 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 35S-ppαF Chases from the Receptor into the Pore An ATP chase reaction (as in Figure 1B) was performed using either ribosome-tethered ppαF (A) or the ppαF–avidin conjugate (B). Reactions were cross-linked and immunoprecipitated with anti-Sec72p or anti-Sec61p antibodies as indicated. Cell 1997 88, 85-96DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81861-9) Copyright © 1997 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Mutations in sec62, sec71, or sec72 Impair Precursor Binding to the Receptor Complex Reactions containing microsomes derived from wild-type sec62-1, Δsec71, and Δsec72 strains were analyzed for the interaction of 35S-ppαF with Sec62p, Sec71p, and Sec72p in the presence or absence of ATP as indicated. Cell 1997 88, 85-96DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81861-9) Copyright © 1997 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Isolation of a Translocation Complex from sec62-1 Membranes 35S-labeled microsomes were prepared from wild-type and sec62-1 strains, and 5 OD units of cell equivalents of membranes per reaction were incubated, cross-linked, and immunoprecipitated with 5 μg of anti-Sec63p antibody. The final pellets from these reactions were resuspended in Laemmli sample buffer + 5% BME, heated for 15 min at 65°C to reverse the DSP cross-link, and resolved on 11% polyacrylamide gels. DSP, dithiobis (succinimidylpropionate). Cell 1997 88, 85-96DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81861-9) Copyright © 1997 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 BiP Is Not Associated with a Translocation Complex Isolated from Digitonin-Solubilized Membranes Microsomes derived from a strain bearing 6 × His-tagged versions of Sec61p and Sec63p were solubilized in digitonin and incubated with Ni–NTA resin. (F), (W), and (E) represent flowthrough, wash, and eluate fractions, respectively. Fractions were resolved on a 12.5% polyacrylamide gel, and proteins were subsequently visualized by immunoblotting. Cell 1997 88, 85-96DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81861-9) Copyright © 1997 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 ATP Does Not Release the Precursor from a Digitonin-Solubilized Bip-less Translocon Microsomes were solubilized with digitonin and then assayed for interaction of 35S-ppαF with the receptor complex. (A) Microsomes were solubilized with digitonin in the presence or absence of ATP, incubated with wild-type or signal sequence mutant ppαF, cross-linked, and immunoprecipitated with antibodies directed against Sec62p, Sec71p, and Sec72p as indicated on the x-axis. The absolute level of binding of ppαF to the digitonin-solubilized complex in the absence of ATP was reproducibly ∼20–30% less than that seen in the presence of ATP; a difference that may reflect decreased stability of the solubilized proteins in the absence of ATP. (B) Microsomes derived from wild-type sec62-1, Δsec71, or Δsec72 strains were solubilized with digitonin in the presence of ATP, incubated with ppαF, and processed as for (A). Cell 1997 88, 85-96DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81861-9) Copyright © 1997 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 BiP Mediates the Release of Precursor from the Digitonin-Solubilized Receptor Complex (A) Microsomes were solubilized with digitonin in the presence of ATP, and ppαF was allowed to bind to the solubilized receptor complex in the digitonin extract for 25 min. Reactions were then provided with either 15 μg of BiP (+BiP) or an equal volume of buffer (−BiP), incubated for an additional 25 min, and cross-linked and immunoprecipitated to analyze the extent of interaction of ppαF with Sec62p, Sec71p, and Sec72p. (B) Reactions were carried out as in (A), except that 15 μg of Ssa1p or DnaK was substituted for BiP (as indicated) and one reaction (as indicated) contained sec63-1 microsomes in place of wild-type microsomes. All reactions were immunoprecipitated with anti-Sec72p antibody. (C) Reactions containing either wild-type or sec63-1 microsomes were carried out as in (A), except that the amount of BiP added varied from 7.5 μg to 60 μg. The volume of addition was kept constant. Cell 1997 88, 85-96DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81861-9) Copyright © 1997 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Model of Polypeptide Translocation into the ER Note that the arrangement of these components does not depict all of the protein–protein interactions known to occur in the ER translocon. See text for further details. Cell 1997 88, 85-96DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81861-9) Copyright © 1997 Cell Press Terms and Conditions