Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (February 2007)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Advertisements

Volume 23, Issue 14, Pages (July 2013)
Mark M Metzstein, H.Robert Horvitz  Molecular Cell 
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Daniel Chi-Hong Lin, Alan D Grossman  Cell 
Autoinhibition of c-Abl
Laurel B. Bender, Ru Cao, Yi Zhang, Susan Strome  Current Biology 
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
The 130-bp key region of the promoter of TsVP1 is a direct binding target of TsNAC1. The 130-bp key region of the promoter of TsVP1 is a direct binding.
Sp1 Is Required for Glucose-Induced Transcriptional Regulation of Mouse Vesicular Glutamate Transporter 2 Gene  Tao Li, Liqun Bai, Jing Li, Suzu Igarashi,
Volume 124, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
Rose-Anne Romano, Barbara Birkaya, Satrajit Sinha 
Volume 126, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Xiaofeng Cao, Steven E. Jacobsen  Current Biology 
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Xianfeng Morgan Xu, Tea Meulia, Iris Meier  Current Biology 
Volume 15, Issue 22, Pages (November 2005)
AGL15 Interacts in a Sequence-Specific Manner with a Noncanonical CArG Motif Present in the Regulatory Region of AtGA2ox6.(A) Enrichment of the AtGA2ox6.
Polina Iakova, Samir S Awad, Nikolai A Timchenko  Cell 
SUMO Promotes HDAC-Mediated Transcriptional Repression
The Rpd3 Core Complex Is a Chromatin Stabilization Module
Mobile 24 nt Small RNAs Direct Transcriptional Gene Silencing in the Root Meristems of Arabidopsis thaliana  Charles W. Melnyk, Attila Molnar, Andrew.
An Acetylation Switch in p53 Mediates Holo-TFIID Recruitment
Scot A Wolfe, Elizabeth I Ramm, Carl O Pabo  Structure 
Volume 126, Issue 6, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Transcription Factor MIZ-1 Is Regulated via Microtubule Association
Volume 130, Issue 5, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 137, Issue 3, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 98, Issue 6, Pages (September 1999)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 1997)
Marc Spingola, Manuel Ares  Molecular Cell 
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 1997)
Kristoffer Palma, Yuelin Zhang, Xin Li  Current Biology 
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (February 1998)
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
The Basis for IL-2-Induced IL-2 Receptor α Chain Gene Regulation
Interplay between Two Epigenetic Marks
Marco Trujillo, Kazuya Ichimura, Catarina Casais, Ken Shirasu 
Volume 27, Issue 8, Pages (April 2017)
MyoD Targets TAF3/TRF3 to Activate Myogenin Transcription
Volume 13, Issue 24, Pages (December 2003)
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Michelle N Arbeitman, David S Hogness  Cell 
Arabidopsis MSBP1 Is Activated by HY5 and HYH and Is Involved in Photomorphogenesis and Brassinosteroid Sensitivity Regulation  Shi Qiu-Ming , Yang Xi.
Codependent Activators Direct Myoblast-Specific MyoD Transcription
Volume 22, Issue 16, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Andrei Kuzmichev, Thomas Jenuwein, Paul Tempst, Danny Reinberg 
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (January 1998)
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Dan Yu, Rongdiao Liu, Geng Yang, Qiang Zhou  Cell Reports 
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Transcriptional Control of SLC26A4 Is Involved in Pendred Syndrome and Nonsyndromic Enlargement of Vestibular Aqueduct (DFNB4)  Tao Yang, Hilmar Vidarsson,
Defining the Regulatory Elements in the Proximal Promoter of ΔNp63 in Keratinocytes: Potential Roles for Sp1/Sp3, NF-Y, and p63  Rose-Anne Romano, Barbara.
The PHD Finger/Bromodomain of NoRC Interacts with Acetylated Histone H4K16 and Is Sufficient for rDNA Silencing  Yonggang Zhou, Ingrid Grummt  Current.
Bart A. Jessen, Marjorie A. Phillips, Robert H. Rice 
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 72, Issue 2, Pages (July 2007)
Control of PHERES1 Imprinting in Arabidopsis by Direct Tandem Repeats
ERF12 Binds Directly to the DRE/CRT Element in the DOG1 Promoter.
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages 379-384 (February 2007) The SRA Methyl-Cytosine-Binding Domain Links DNA and Histone Methylation  Lianna M. Johnson, Magnolia Bostick, Xiaoyu Zhang, Edward Kraft, Ian Henderson, Judy Callis, Steven E. Jacobsen  Current Biology  Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages 379-384 (February 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.01.009 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Correlation of DNA and Histone Methylation in Arabidopsis (A) Bisulfite sequencing data for wild-type, drm1 drm2 cmt3, and met1 at AtSN1, expressed as the average number of methylated CG, CNG, or CNN residues per clone. (B) ChIP analysis with antibodies specific for H3K9me2 from the wild-type, drm1 drm2 cmt3, met1, and kyp-6. AtSN1 was amplified from the IP and no antibody control (no AB). ACTIN was amplified from the IP. The relative quantity precipitated for each sample was derived from a standard curve of input DNA. The average of two biological replicas done in duplicate is shown with standard deviation. (C) Bisulfite sequencing data from AtCOPIA4. The remaining non-CG methylation in the drm1 drm2 cmt3 triple mutant is discussed in [19]. (D) ChIP analysis of H3K9me2 at AtCOPIA4. The average of two biological replicas done in duplicate is shown with standard deviation. Current Biology 2007 17, 379-384DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2007.01.009) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 The SRA Domain (A) ClustalW alignment of the SRA domains from the nine SUVH genes, two Arabidopsis SRA- and RING-domain-containing proteins, mouse np95, and human ICBP90. The site of the KYP S200F [4] mutation is indicated with #, the E208K mutation is indicated with a ∗, and the R260H [4] mutation is indicated with a +. Arrows show the SRA domain identified by SMART, and the boxed amino acids are those included in the GST-SUVH6-SRA fusion protein. The association of SRA domains with SET domain proteins is unique to the plant kingdom. (B) Immunofluorescence of H3K9me2 compared to DAPI in nuclei isolated from wild-type, kyp-2 (null allele), and kyp-5 (SRA mutation E208K). (C) Regions of the SUVH genes contained in the various constructs analyzed in Figure 3. Current Biology 2007 17, 379-384DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2007.01.009) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 KYP-SRA Domain Preferentially Binds Methylated DNA (A) Mobility shift assays with increasing amounts of GST-KYP-SRA (KYP-SRA) (25, 50, and 100 nM) added to a binding reaction with either a methylated (m) or unmethylated (u) all-C double-stranded oligonucleotide probe. GST-KYP-SET (KYP-SET) was added at 100 nM in the indicated lanes. Anti-GST antibodies (AB) were added to the binding reaction shown in the last lane. (B, D, and E) KYP-SRA (B), KYP-SRA(E208K) (D), or KYP-SRA(S200F) (F) was bound to oligonucleotides with cytosines methylated in all sequences contexts (all-mC), or in a CG, CNG, or CNN context. In (D) and (F), the last lane is GST-KYP-SRA bound to the all-mC probe used as a positive control. (C) Competition assays were performed by addition of the indicated unlabeled DNA, added in 1000-fold excess to the all-mC probe. (F) GST-SUVH6-SRA (10 nM) was bound to the indicated probes. (G and H) GST-SUVH6-SRA (10 nM) or GST-KYP-SRA (100 nM) was bound to the methylated CNG probe with either no competitor (−), or 100×, 300×, 1000×, or 3000× unlabeled mCG or mCNG oligonucleotides. The lane indicated by fp (free probe) has no added protein. Current Biology 2007 17, 379-384DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2007.01.009) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Binding of the ORTH Proteins to Methylated DNA Is Dependent on the SRA Domain (A) Diagram of the different regions of ORTH1 or ORTH2 fused to GST and used in mobility shift assays. (B) Mobility-shift assays were done with the indicated protein with either unmethylated or methylated CG probes. The last lane (indicated by ∗) contains GST antibody that inhibited binding of GST-PNS to methylated CG. (C) Mobility-shift assays were performed with increasing amounts (35, 70, and 140 nM) of GST-PNS binding to mCG, mCNG, or mCNN. (D) Mobility-shift assays with increasing amounts of GST-PNS (70, 140, and 280 nM) or GST-KYP (77, 154, and 308 nM) with methylated (Methylated) or unmethylated (U) CG. The first lane in all panels is the free probe (fp). Current Biology 2007 17, 379-384DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2007.01.009) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions