Volume 47, Issue 6, Pages (September 2012)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cotranscriptional Recruitment of the mRNA Export Factor Yra1 by Direct Interaction with the 3′ End Processing Factor Pcf11  Sara Ann Johnson, Gabrielle.
Advertisements

Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 50, Issue 1, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Structure of the Human Telomerase RNA Pseudoknot Reveals Conserved Tertiary Interactions Essential for Function  Carla A. Theimer, Craig A. Blois, Juli.
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages e9 (June 2017)
Wen Tang, Shikui Tu, Heng-Chi Lee, Zhiping Weng, Craig C. Mello  Cell 
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Shitao Li, Lingyan Wang, Michael A. Berman, Ye Zhang, Martin E. Dorf 
Global Mapping of Human RNA-RNA Interactions
RNAi Related Mechanisms Affect Both Transcriptional and Posttranscriptional Transgene Silencing in Drosophila  Manika Pal-Bhadra, Utpal Bhadra, James.
Reconstitution of an Argonaute-Dependent Small RNA Biogenesis Pathway Reveals a Handover Mechanism Involving the RNA Exosome and the Exonuclease QIP 
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 15, Issue 22, Pages (November 2005)
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Sherilyn Grill, Valerie M. Tesmer, Jayakrishnan Nandakumar 
Adrien Le Thomas, Georgi K. Marinov, Alexei A. Aravin  Cell Reports 
The Translational Landscape of the Mammalian Cell Cycle
Communication with the Exon-Junction Complex and Activation of Nonsense-Mediated Decay by Human Upf Proteins Occur in the Cytoplasm  Guramrit Singh, Steffen.
Volume 61, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Gracjan Michlewski, Sonia Guil, Colin A. Semple, Javier F. Cáceres 
Ras Induces Mediator Complex Exchange on C/EBPβ
RRNA Modifications in an Intersubunit Bridge of the Ribosome Strongly Affect Both Ribosome Biogenesis and Activity  Xue-hai Liang, Qing Liu, Maurille.
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 48, Issue 5, Pages (December 2012)
DNA Methylation Mediated by a MicroRNA Pathway
Volume 59, Issue 5, Pages (September 2015)
A Solution to Limited Genomic Capacity: Using Adaptable Binding Surfaces to Assemble the Functional HIV Rev Oligomer on RNA  Matthew D. Daugherty, Iván.
Piwi Proteins and piRNAs in Mammalian Oocytes and Early Embryos
Volume 61, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 128, Issue 6, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 137, Issue 3, Pages (May 2009)
Yanhui Xu, Yu Chen, Ping Zhang, Philip D. Jeffrey, Yigong Shi 
A Broadly Conserved Pathway Generates 3′UTR-Directed Primary piRNAs
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages (September 2008)
Baekgyu Kim, Kyowon Jeong, V. Narry Kim  Molecular Cell 
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
A Transcriptome-wide RNAi Screen in the Drosophila Ovary Reveals Factors of the Germline piRNA Pathway  Benjamin Czech, Jonathan B. Preall, Jon McGinn,
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
MicroRNA Destabilization Enables Dynamic Regulation of the miR-16 Family in Response to Cell-Cycle Changes  Olivia S. Rissland, Sue-Jean Hong, David P.
Cotranscriptional Recruitment of the mRNA Export Factor Yra1 by Direct Interaction with the 3′ End Processing Factor Pcf11  Sara Ann Johnson, Gabrielle.
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Ribosome Collision Is Critical for Quality Control during No-Go Decay
DNA Looping Facilitates Targeting of a Chromatin Remodeling Enzyme
tRNA Binds to Cytochrome c and Inhibits Caspase Activation
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Mst1 Is an Interacting Protein that Mediates PHLPPs' Induced Apoptosis
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 107, Issue 4, Pages (November 2001)
Lin28 Mediates the Terminal Uridylation of let-7 Precursor MicroRNA
Volume 38, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 139, Issue 1, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 68, Issue 3, Pages e5 (November 2017)
Volume 60, Issue 2, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages e4 (March 2017)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Assembly of a Double Hexameric Helicase
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (April 2009)
Bacterial Argonaute Samples the Transcriptome to Identify Foreign DNA
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (September 2004)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 47, Issue 6, Pages 970-979 (September 2012) A Role for Fkbp6 and the Chaperone Machinery in piRNA Amplification and Transposon Silencing  Jordi Xiol, Elisa Cora, Rubina Koglgruber, Shinichiro Chuma, Sailakshmi Subramanian, Mihoko Hosokawa, Michael Reuter, Zhaolin Yang, Philipp Berninger, Andres Palencia, Vladimir Benes, Josef Penninger, Ravi Sachidanandam, Ramesh S. Pillai  Molecular Cell  Volume 47, Issue 6, Pages 970-979 (September 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.07.019 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Molecular Cell 2012 47, 970-979DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.07.019) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 L1 Retrotransposon Derepression in Fkbp6 Mutant Mice (A) Detection of Fkbp6 in Tdrd1 immunoprecipitates from mouse testes lysates. (B) Immunofluorescence detection of indicated proteins on embryonic day 18 (E18) testis cryosections. Fkbp6 is cytosolic and not enriched in pi-bodies (arrowheads) containing Mili and Tdrd1. Scale bar is indicated. (C and D) Northern analysis (C) and quantitative-reverse transcription PCR detection (D) for transposon mRNAs in testis total RNA from indicated genotypes. Loading control (ethidium bromide for rRNA) is shown. The number in brackets identifies the biological replicates. Each bar represents individual biological replicate and standard deviation (SD) between technical replicates within a biological sample is indicated. (E) Detection of L1ORF1p in Fkbp6 mutant E18 testis. (F) Methylation-sensitive Southern blot analysis for L1 elements using testis genomic DNA. A methylation-sensitive restriction fragment in the Fkbp6 knockout mutant is indicated (arrow). HpaII (H) and MspI (M) are the methylation-sensitive and -insensitive restriction enzymes used, respectively. Molecular Cell 2012 47, 970-979DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.07.019) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Fkbp6 Is Required for Biogenesis of Miwi2 piRNAs (A) Association of piRNAs with Piwi proteins examined by immunoprecipitation and 5′ end labeling from new born pups (P0). RNA markers (nucleotides, nt) are shown. (B–D) Genome annotations (B), length distribution (C), and mapping to transposon consensus of reads (D) in testes total small RNA libraries from P0 animals. (E) Distribution of read lengths of Mili-associated piRNAs from P0 animals is plotted. (F) Genome annotation profile of reads is shown. (G) The nucleotide preference at indicated positions of the piRNA is analyzed. (H) Distribution of Mili reads on LINE1 consensus and two prepachytene piRNA clusters. (I) Prepachytene piRNAs are still associated with Mili in the Fkbp6 mutant 10-day-old (P10) animals. (J) Detection of indicated proteins in E18.5 fetal testes from indicated genotypes. Scale bar is shown. Molecular Cell 2012 47, 970-979DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.07.019) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Fkbp6 Is Inactive as an Isomerase but Associates with Hsp90 via Its TPR Domain (A) Prolyl isomerization assay with recombinant full length Fkbp6 or its FK domain alone. Positive controls (Fkbp5, -3, and -12) and negative controls (-, buffer only and GST) are indicated. The standard deviation (SD) between technical replicates is indicated. (B) Isothermal calorimetry (ITC) measurements of binding between Fkbp12 or Fkbp6 (FK domain only) and the small molecule inhibitor FK-506. High affinity observed with Fkbp12 is reported in Kd. (C) Surface model of FK domains of human Fkbp12 and human Fkbp6 generated from crystallographic data. (D) Alignment of residues forming the FK domain from demonstrated active or inactive isomerases. Identity (dark red) or biochemical conservation (light red) is indicated by different background colors. The asterisk indicates one of the key residues (W60) in the active isomerases. (E) Sequence alignment of TPR domains from indicated proteins. Highly conserved residues are shaded in red. The residue K254 (arrowhead) in mouse Fkbp6 when mutated abolishes interaction with Hsp90. (F) Fkbp6 interacts with Hsp90 in mouse testes extract. (G) HA-Fkbp6 coprecipitates endogenous Hsp90 from HEK293T cells by interaction via its TPR domain. (H) Direct interaction between Bombyx Shutdown (BmShu) and BmHsp90 is demonstrated using recombinant proteins. Molecular Cell 2012 47, 970-979DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.07.019) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 PingPong Byproducts Accumulate in Ago3 Complexes upon Hsp90 Inhibition (A) BmN4 cells treated with DMSO or Geldanamycin (GA) (incubation time in days) were subject to immunoprecipitation (IP) with Piwi antibodies. Bound RNAs were detected by 5′ end labeling, revealing 16 nt RNAs in Ago3 complexes. Note that RNA markers generated by alkaline hydrolysis (Alk.) migrate one nucleotide (nt) faster than the actual size. (B) Density of normalized reads from indicated libraries mapping to Bombyx transposon consensus. (C) Heatmap showing overall strand-bias of reads from indicated libraries on 345 Bombyx transposon consensus sequences. Classification of transposons into groups is based on that proposed by (Li et al., 2009). (D) Correlation plot showing the distance between the 5′ end of Ago3 piRNAs and 3′ ends of 16-mer reads (byproducts) from the opposite strand. A model showing the distance relationships between the Ping-pong partner piRNAs and 16-mer sequences. (E) Appearance of 16-mer species is abolished by a catalytic triad mutation (ADH) in Ago3. (F) Correlation plot showing distance between 5′ ends of Siwi piRNAs and 16-mers (on the same strand) over indicated transposon consensus. (G) Correlation plot showing distance between 5′ ends of Ago3-associated short reads (12–20 nt) from untreated BmN4 cells and Ago3 piRNAs (on the opposite strand) over the indicated transposon consensus. The peak at position 9 indicates a 10 bp overlap, potentially arising from degraded piRNAs. The peak at 25 is indicative of short reads whose 5′ ends are 26 nt away from the 5′ end of Ago3 piRNAs. This peak derives exclusively from reads that are 16 nt in length (bottom panel), indicating that these are potentially from the 16-mer byproducts generated during secondary biogenesis in untreated cells. (H) Localization of endogenous Piwi proteins in BmN4 cells and their coloclaization with HA-tagged Bombyx Vasa. (I) Arginine (R)→Lysine (K) mutation of Ago3 affects its granule accumulation in BmN4 cells. (J) Association of piRNAs with HA-tagged Piwi proteins and their R→K mutant versions in BmN4 cells. (K) The mislocalized Ago3R→K mutant fails to accumulate 16-mers upon Hsp90 inhibition (GA). (L) 5′ end labeling of RNAs with or without prior dephosphorylation is shown. (M) A model showing the generation of 16-mers and implication of a 5′ nuclease activity (5′Nuc) in the Ping-pong cycle. Molecular Cell 2012 47, 970-979DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2012.07.019) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions