Jongbum Kwon, Anthony N Imbalzano, Adam Matthews, Marjorie A Oettinger 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Xuan Li, Carrie M. Stith, Peter M. Burgers, Wolf-Dietrich Heyer 
Advertisements

Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages e3 (July 2017)
Sebastian D Fugmann, David G Schatz  Molecular Cell 
The Mre11 Complex Is Required for Repair of Hairpin-Capped Double-Strand Breaks and Prevention of Chromosome Rearrangements  Kirill S. Lobachev, Dmitry.
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Stimulation of V(D)J recombination by histone acetylation
Nucleosome Sliding via TBP DNA Binding In Vivo
Reconstitution of a Functional Core Polycomb Repressive Complex
Sherif Abou Elela, Haller Igel, Manuel Ares  Cell 
The Nature of the Nucleosomal Barrier to Transcription
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
RAG1/2-Mediated Resolution of Transposition Intermediates
Ben B. Hopkins, Tanya T. Paull  Cell 
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
VgRBP71 Stimulates Cleavage at a Polyadenylation Signal in Vg1 mRNA, Resulting in the Removal of a cis-Acting Element that Represses Translation  Nikolay.
Tn10 Transposition via a DNA Hairpin Intermediate
V(D)J Recombination and RAG-Mediated Transposition in Yeast
A Rad51 Presynaptic Filament Is Sufficient to Capture Nucleosomal Homology during Recombinational Repair of a DNA Double-Strand Break  Manisha Sinha,
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Stephen Schuck, Arne Stenlund  Molecular Cell 
Novel Fluorescent Ligase Detection Reaction and Flow Cytometric Analysis of SYT-SSX Fusions in Synovial Sarcoma  Robyn Gaffney, Artemis Chakerian, John.
Distinct Strategies to Make Nucleosomal DNA Accessible
Hairpin Coding End Opening Is Mediated by RAG1 and RAG2 Proteins
Mechanism of Bidirectional Leading-Strand Synthesis Establishment at Eukaryotic DNA Replication Origins  Valentina Aria, Joseph T.P. Yeeles  Molecular.
Jung-Ok Han, Sharri B Steen, David B Roth  Molecular Cell 
DNA Transposition by the RAG1 and RAG2 Proteins
Polynucleotide Ligase Activity of Eukaryotic Topoisomerase I
Xinyang Zhao, P.Shannon Pendergrast, Nouria Hernandez  Molecular Cell 
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Hideaki Saeki, Jesper Q. Svejstrup  Molecular Cell 
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
HMGN Proteins Act in Opposition to ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodeling Factors to Restrict Nucleosome Mobility  Barbara P. Rattner, Timur Yusufzai, James.
NAD+-Dependent Modulation of Chromatin Structure and Transcription by Nucleosome Binding Properties of PARP-1  Mi Young Kim, Steven Mauro, Nicolas Gévry,
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (December 1997)
Mikhail Grigoriev, Peggy Hsieh  Molecular Cell 
Mediator–Nucleosome Interaction
The Basis for IL-2-Induced IL-2 Receptor α Chain Gene Regulation
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Frpo: A Novel Single-Stranded DNA Promoter for Transcription and for Primer RNA Synthesis of DNA Replication  Hisao Masai, Ken-ichi Arai  Cell  Volume.
An Autoregulatory Mechanism Imposes Allosteric Control on the V(D)J Recombinase by Histone H3 Methylation  Chao Lu, Alyssa Ward, John Bettridge, Yun Liu,
DNA Topology and Global Architecture of Point Centromeres
Pierre-Henri L Gaillard, Eishi Noguchi, Paul Shanahan, Paul Russell 
Chromatin Constrains the Initiation and Elongation of DNA Replication
Hansen Du, Haruhiko Ishii, Michael J. Pazin, Ranjan Sen  Molecular Cell 
Mu Transpositional Recombination: Donor DNA Cleavage and Strand Transfer in trans by the Mu Transposase  Harri Savilahti, Kiyoshi Mizuuchi  Cell  Volume.
Nbs1 Converts the Human Mre11/Rad50 Nuclease Complex into an Endo/Exonuclease Machine Specific for Protein-DNA Adducts  Rajashree A. Deshpande, Ji-Hoon.
The Polymerases for V(D)J Recombination
Hairpin Opening and Overhang Processing by an Artemis/DNA-Dependent Protein Kinase Complex in Nonhomologous End Joining and V(D)J Recombination  Yunmei.
RSC Unravels the Nucleosome
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
Beyond Homing: Competition between Intron Endonucleases Confers a Selective Advantage on Flanking Genetic Markers  Heidi Goodrich-Blair, David A Shub 
Excision of the Drosophila Mariner Transposon Mos1
Replication-Coupled Nucleosome Assembly and Positioning by ATP-Dependent Chromatin-Remodeling Enzymes  Tejas Yadav, Iestyn Whitehouse  Cell Reports  Volume.
Angela K Kennedy, David B Haniford, Kiyoshi Mizuuchi  Cell 
SWI/SNF Chromatin Remodeling Requires Changes in DNA Topology
An Early Developmental Transcription Factor Complex that Is More Stable on Nucleosome Core Particles Than on Free DNA  Lisa Ann Cirillo, Kenneth S Zaret 
Vytautas Naktinis, Jennifer Turner, Mike O'Donnell  Cell 
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
J.Russell Lipford, Stephen P Bell  Molecular Cell 
Generating Crossovers by Resolution of Nicked Holliday Junctions
Michael J. McIlwraith, Stephen C. West  Molecular Cell 
Ali Hamiche, Raphael Sandaltzopoulos, David A Gdula, Carl Wu  Cell 
The V(D)J Recombinase Efficiently Cleaves and Transposes Signal Joints
H3K4me3 Stimulates the V(D)J RAG Complex for Both Nicking and Hairpinning in trans in Addition to Tethering in cis: Implications for Translocations  Noriko.
Assembly of a Double Hexameric Helicase
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Presentation transcript:

Accessibility of Nucleosomal DNA to V(D)J Cleavage Is Modulated by RSS Positioning and HMG1  Jongbum Kwon, Anthony N Imbalzano, Adam Matthews, Marjorie A Oettinger  Molecular Cell  Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages 829-839 (December 1998) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80297-X

Figure 1 Experimental Design (A) DNA templates for nucleosome assembly. Nucleosomal templates for generating different rotational (left) and translational positions (right) of the 12- or 23RSS are represented to scale. Triangles represent the position of the RSS with the nonamer lying toward the point of the triangle. Predicted sizes of cleavage products visualized by 32P labeling at the 5′ end (*) are indicated. While the templates with a 12RSS are labeled at the 5′ end of the top strand, the templates with the 23RSS are labeled at both 5′ ends, allowing detection of the bottom strand of the signal ended fragment as well (designated as DSB). The expected position of the dyad is indicated. (B) Scheme used for analysis of nucleosome assembly and cleavage. See text for detailed description. Free DNA is used to refer to DNA that has not become incorporated into nucleosomes, while naked DNA denotes substrates never subjected to a nucleosome assembly protocol. Molecular Cell 1998 2, 829-839DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80297-X)

Figure 2 Rotational Positioning of the 12 Signal for In Vitro–Assembled Nucleosomes (A) DNase I footprinting. DNase I digestion patterns for the top strand of nucleosomes (N), N12RSS+0, N12RSS+3, and N12RSS+6, are shown with those of corresponding naked DNA (D) and sequencing marker (G+A). The positions of the heptamer (hep) and nonamer (non) are indicated. (B) Schematic representation of rotational positioning of the 12-signal on the surface of the histone octamer. By comparing the 10 bp DNase I ladder with the sequencing marker, the relative orientation of the signal sequence was determined for each of the three nucleosomes; DNase I cleavage sites were aligned at the position of the double helix furthest from the surface of the histone octamer. Molecular Cell 1998 2, 829-839DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80297-X)

Figure 3 V(D)J Cleavage Is Inhibited on Nucleosomal Templates (A) Analysis of the nucleosomal cleavage reaction by gel electrophoresis under native conditions. N12RSS+0 was incubated with buffer alone (−) or RAG1/2 (+). The position of the nucleosomes (NUC) and hairpin product (HP) are shown. (B) Denaturing gel analysis of the samples eluted from the gel in (A) (NUC, lanes 3 and 4) and from separate cleavage reactions of the naked 12RSS+0 template (DNA, lanes 1 and 2). The positions of the substrate, hairpin (HP), and nicked species are indicated along with schematic representations of the products. Filled circles indicate the position of 32P; triangles indicate the location of the RSS. Molecular Cell 1998 2, 829-839DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80297-X)

Figure 4 HMG1 Stimulation of V(D)J Cleavage on Nucleosomal Templates Containing a 12RSS Is Sensitive to Rotational Position (A) Denaturing gel analysis. The indicated nucleosomes were incubated with no protein (lanes 2, 7, and 12), RAG1/2 alone (lanes 3, 8, and 13), or RAG1/2 plus two concentraions of HMG1 (0.2 μg/ml for lanes 4, 9, and 14; 1.0 μg/ml for lanes 5, 10, and 15). The cleavage of naked DNA of the corresponding nucleosome is shown in the first lane of each subset (D) (lanes 1, 9, and 17). (B) Representative native gel analysis. Reactions with 2.5 μg/ml of HMG1; lanes 3, 6, and 9 for each nucleosome are shown along with reactions containing no HMG1 and no RAG1/2 (lanes 1, 4, and 7) or RAG1/2 alone (lanes 2, 5, and 8). (C) HMG1 stimulates the cleavage of naked DNA equivalently for all three templates. Naked DNA of 12RSS+0, 12RSS+3, or 12RSS+6 was incubated with RAG1/2 alone (lanes 1, 4, and 7) or RAG1/2 plus 0.25 μg/ml (lanes 2, 5, and 8) or 2.5 μg/ml (lanes 3, 6, and 9) of HMG1 and analyzed on a denaturing gel. All labeling is as in Figure 3. Molecular Cell 1998 2, 829-839DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80297-X)

Figure 5 HMG1 Stimulates Cleavage of 23RSS Nucleosomes (A) DNase I footprinting for N23RSS+0. DNase I digestion patterns for both top and bottom strands are shown. (B) Denaturing gel analysis of V(D)J cleavage. Indicated nucleosomes were incubated with no protein (lanes 7, 12, and 17), RAG1/2 alone (lanes 8, 13, and 18), or RAG1/2 plus 0.25 μg/ml (lanes 9, 14, and 19), 1.0 μg/ml (lanes 10, 15, and 20), or 2.5 μg/ml (lanes 11, 16, and 21) of HMG1. The cleavage for the corresponding naked DNA templates is shown in lanes 1–6. Because DNA was labeled at the 5′ ends of both strands, the signal-ended fragment (DSB) was also detectable in addition to the nick and hairpin after cleavage of naked DNA. Only the DSB product was recovered from the nucleosomal templates (see text for discussion). Molecular Cell 1998 2, 829-839DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80297-X)

Figure 6 HMG1 Stimulates Cleavage of a 12RSS Equivalently when the RSS Is Positioned on the Dyad or Closer to the Entry/Exit Points of the Nucleosome The indicated nucleosomes were incubated with no protein (lanes 3, 10, and 17), RAG1/2 alone (lanes 4, 11, and 18), or RAG1/2 plus 0.25 μg/ml (lanes 5, 12, and 19), 1.0 μg/ml (lanes 6, 13, and 20), or 5.0 μg/ml (lanes 7, 14, and 21) of HMG1. V(D)J cleavage of the corresponding naked DNA templates is also shown (lanes 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16). A schematic representation of nucleosomes N12RSS/TP1, N12RSS/TP2, and N12RSS/TP3 is shown below. The expected position of the single strong translational position of the histone core is represented by an oval. The 152 bp DNA template (horizontal line) containing a 12RSS (triangle) is schematically represented for each nucleosome with the position of the dyad indicated by an arrow. Other labeling is as in Figure 3. Molecular Cell 1998 2, 829-839DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80297-X)

Figure 7 The Stimulation of V(D)J Cleavage by HMG1 of 23RSS Nucleosomal Templates Is Sensitive to the Position of the RSS Relative to the Dyad Indicated nucleosomes were incubated with no protein (lanes 3 and 10), RAG1/2 alone (lanes 4 and 11), or RAG1/2 plus 0.25 μg/ml (lanes 5 and 12), 1.0 μg/ml (lanes 6 and 13), or 5.0 μg/ml (lanes 7 and 14) of HMG1. The cleavage of the corresponding naked DNA is shown in lanes 1, 2, 8, and 9. DNA was labeled at both 5′ ends as in Figure 5. A schematic representation of nucleosomes N23RSS/TP1 and N23RSS/TP2 is also shown. The translational position of each nucleosome was determined as described in the text. The 23-signal is positioned over the dyad (N23RSS/TP1) or positioned with the nonamer end located 63 bp away from the dyad (N23RSS/TP2). Molecular Cell 1998 2, 829-839DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80297-X)