Reviewing In-School Management

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The Value of a Project Management Office Copyright: Kathy J. Lang, 2004.

Advertisements

PROFESSIONAL GROWTH PLAN UPDATE PROPOSALS COMMITTEE UPDATE MAY 2008

Head teacher Performance Management

SLG Goals, Summative Evaluations, and Assessment Guidance Training LCSD#7 10/10/14.

Parkview Elementary Audit findings and responses Dates of Visit: November 4, 5, 6, 2014.

PROPOSED MULTIPLE MEASURES FOR TEACHER EFFECTIVENESS

Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.

How do I manage my work as well as possible? Know who is responsible for what Three key parties: 1.The student (you) 2.Your supervisor 3.Your unit/UCC.

Policy Development – Helpful Hints School Councils

Process Engineer’s Role in Project Management Dr Abdullah Malik.

 DAY 5 Using Scratch to Develop Numeracy © PDST Technology in Education/Lero 2013.

Unit 2: Managing the development of self and others Life Science and Chemical Science Professionals Higher Apprenticeships Unit 2 Managing the development.

Quality Assurance at the University St. Kliment Ohridski Elizabeta Bahtovska National Bologna promoter TEMPUS SCM C-032B06 West Balkan Bologna Promoters.

Introduction to Home/School Compacts

ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT

The role of governance in self-assessment NATSPEC conference Sue Preece HMI March

Intervention and Referral Services (I&RS)

GUIDELINES ON CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR PROGRAM ACCREDITATION (AREA 1, 2, 3 AND 8)

Athlete Selection Leadership. Contents  Athlete selection definition and explanation  Athlete selection policy  Athlete selection procedures  Athlete.

South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.

ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.

|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

Preparing for, planning and implementing change Practical tips for managing projects Christian Fielder 17 November 2014.

PLANNING How To Best Meet Your Mission We must plan for the future, because people who stay in the present will remain in the past. Abraham Lincoln.

Professional Certificate in Electoral Processes Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.

Principals’ & Deputy Principals’ Conference Presentation of Conference Theme Paper “Towards a New Model of In-School Management in Primary Schools” Declan.

Sales Management Performance Reviews & Sales Person Analysis Topic 19.

Project management Topic 3 Quality.

The Nebraska Frameworks External Visitation Team Exit Report.

Certified Evaluation Orientation August 19, 2011.

1 Performance Auditing ICAS & IRAS Officers NAAA 21 Jan 2016.

ESEA on Teacher Quality Pros Requires licensure, BA/BS, subject area knowledge Provides funding to states for PD Requires annual, measurable objectives.

IT 499 Bachelor Capstone Week 2. Adgenda Administrative Review UNIT One UNIT Two Project UNIT Three Preview Project Status Summary.

Board Assessment Governing Board Online Training Module.

SZABIST INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH DEPARTMENT QUALITY ENHANCEMENT CELL.

School practice Dragica Trivic. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM TEMPUS MASTS CONFERENCE in Novi Sad Practice should be seen as an integral part of the.

Strong leadership and whole school engagement – How does this happen? Rationale: Whole school change occurs when the leadership team has a common vision,

Council of International Schools “Your Worldwide Partner in International Education” Our Mission The Council of International Schools (CIS) is a not-for-profit.

Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.

Chapter 4 Policy, Procedures, and Guidelines

GOOD PRACTICES AND REFORM OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process

Developing the Research Proposal

Kari Kiesiläinen Heikki Liljeroos

Instructional Leadership Team: Implementation Woodland Middle School

School Self-Evaluation

Internal Audit Quality Assurance and Improvement Program

Monitoring and Evaluation using the

IS4550 Security Policies and Implementation

[Insert Year] School Year

Welcome! [Year] School Year.

Interim Superintendent

Loyola’s Performance Management Process For Employees

Russell Center Small Research Grants Program

BCSD Federal Time -accounting Guidelines & procedures

[Insert Year] School Year

[Insert Year] School Year School Name Teacher’s Name Grade Level

FUNCTION OF MANAGEMENT

[Insert Year] School Year School Name Teacher’s Name Grade Level

Loyola’s Performance Management Process For Employees

EVALUATIONS in the EU External Aid

Performance Assessment in Finland

ETBI Annual Conference for Principals and Deputy Principals

[Insert Year] School Year School Name Teacher’s Name Grade Level

[Insert Year] School Year School Name Teacher’s Name Grade Level

NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process

Programme 1: Responsibilities

[Insert Year] School Year School Name Teacher’s Name Grade Level

Dean of Engagement Evaluation

Center/Institute Name Director’s Name Proposal Team Members

Presentation transcript:

Reviewing In-School Management Reviewing In School Management (I.S.M.) Reviewing in-school management Reviewing In-School Management I.P.P.N. Conference 2005 Conference 2005 ISM / PM / PK

Reviewing In School Management (I.S.M.) The administration of the in-school management (I.S.M.) team is not adequately clarified and the monitoring proposed at the commencement of the process has not materialised. Conference 2005 ISM / PM / PK

Review Process – A Suggestion Reviewing In School Management (I.S.M.) Reviewing in-school management Review Process – A Suggestion B.O.M. or post holder initiates review of duties. Review takes place Discussion Document Reviewing in school management structures Principal meets on a one to one basis and agrees the format for Review Principal discusses review with I.S.M. team Conference 2005 ISM / PM / PK

Review Procedure Reporting to staff Current Definition Reviewing in-school management Review Procedure Reporting to staff Current Definition Flexibility (Openess to change) Budget / Resources Clear Specification Professional Development Meetings Time Outside school hours Composite report to B.O.M. Agreed Plan Conference 2005 ISM / PM / PK

Reviewing in-school management Review Procedure Reviewing in-school management The following types of reviews may be conducted. Termly. Initiated in the last two weeks of every term. Mid-Year Typically done in the beginning of the second half of the year. Covering over the first half of the year. End of year This covers the entire year. Initiated in the last term and must be completed no later than the second week in June of each academic year. Conference 2005 ISM / PM / PK

Reviewing in-school management Development Plan Name:_________________________ Title of Post:_________________ Objectives (What ?) Specific Measurable Agreed Realistic Timebound Targets SMART How? Budget Individual Development Plan Time Frame Term 1 Term 2 Term 3 Signed ___________________ ____________________ Date ____________ Chairperson B.O.M. Conference 2005 ISM / PM / PK

Framework for formulating School Policy Reviewing in-school management Title / Area / Aspect Whole school / Department / Subject Area Relationship to School / Ethos / Mission Statement / Aims of school Rationale for this School Policy Goals of this policy ( i.e. objectives ) Roles and Responsibilites in developing and implementing this policy Content of policy Performance criteria ( i.e. criteria by which the policy will be judged to be effective / ineffective Person(s) / Group(s) responsible for monitoring the implementation of this policy Person(s) / Group(s) responsible for reviewing this policy Time Frame (to include review of policy). Conference 2005 ISM / PM / PK