Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 1996)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Novel Cofactor for p300 that Regulates the p53 Response
Advertisements

Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Autoinhibition of c-Abl
Phosphorylation of NF-κB p65 by PKA Stimulates Transcriptional Activity by Promoting a Novel Bivalent Interaction with the Coactivator CBP/p300  Haihong.
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Iman M Shammat, Sharona E Gordon  Neuron 
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Pim-1 Kinase and p100 Cooperate to Enhance c-Myb Activity
Pim-1 Kinase and p100 Cooperate to Enhance c-Myb Activity
James Kim, Smita Ghosh, Deborah A Nunziato, Geoffrey S Pitt  Neuron 
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 1996)
Neurexins Are Functional α-Latrotoxin Receptors
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 1996)
ASK1 Is Essential for JNK/SAPK Activation by TRAF2
A Human Nuclear-Localized Chaperone that Regulates Dimerization, DNA Binding, and Transcriptional Activity of bZIP Proteins  Ching-Man A Virbasius, Susanne.
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages (December 1999)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (April 1996)
Volume 89, Issue 3, Pages (May 1997)
M.Brandon Parrott, Michael A. Barry  Molecular Therapy 
Interaction with PCNA Is Essential for Yeast DNA Polymerase η Function
MADR1, a MAD-Related Protein That Functions in BMP2 Signaling Pathways
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (December 2001)
A Tripartite Protein Complex with the Potential to Couple Synaptic Vesicle Exocytosis to Cell Adhesion in Brain  Stefan Butz, Masaya Okamoto, Thomas C.
Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages (October 2005)
Homo-Oligomerization of Human Corneodesmosin Is Mediated by Its N-Terminal Glycine Loop Domain  Cécile Caubet, Nathalie Jonca, Frédéric Lopez, Jean-Pierre.
Alvaro Villarroel, M.Paz Regalado, Juan Lerma  Neuron 
Class C Vps Protein Complex Regulates Vacuolar SNARE Pairing and Is Required for Vesicle Docking/Fusion  Trey K. Sato, Peter Rehling, Michael R. Peterson,
Transcription Factor MIZ-1 Is Regulated via Microtubule Association
Michael D Ehlers, Su Zhang, Jeffrey P Bernhardt, Richard L Huganir 
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (February 2008)
WNK1 Phosphorylates Synaptotagmin 2 and Modulates Its Membrane Binding
Yuji Yamanashi, David Baltimore  Cell 
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (April 2001)
Sabine Sewing, Jochen Roeper, Olaf Pongs  Neuron 
Per Stehmeier, Stefan Muller  Molecular Cell 
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages (January 2008)
Accessory Protein Facilitated CFTR-CFTR Interaction, a Molecular Mechanism to Potentiate the Chloride Channel Activity  Shusheng Wang, Hongwen Yue, Rachel.
Volume 85, Issue 7, Pages (June 1996)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Functional Assembly of AMPA and Kainate Receptors Is Mediated by Several Discrete Protein-Protein Interactions  Gai Ayalon, Yael Stern-Bach  Neuron  Volume.
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (January 1998)
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
Andrei Kuzmichev, Thomas Jenuwein, Paul Tempst, Danny Reinberg 
TRADD–TRAF2 and TRADD–FADD Interactions Define Two Distinct TNF Receptor 1 Signal Transduction Pathways  Hailing Hsu, Hong-Bing Shu, Ming-Gui Pan, David.
Yi-Ping Hsueh, Eunjoon Kim, Morgan Sheng  Neuron 
TopBP1 Activates the ATR-ATRIP Complex
KCNE1 Binds to the KCNQ1 Pore to Regulate Potassium Channel Activity
Involvement of PIAS1 in the Sumoylation of Tumor Suppressor p53
Silva H Hanissian, Raif S Geha  Immunity 
Volume 91, Issue 2, Pages (October 1997)
Volume 87, Issue 5, Pages (November 1996)
George Simos, Anke Sauer, Franco Fasiolo, Eduard C Hurt  Molecular Cell 
In Vitro Analysis of Huntingtin-Mediated Transcriptional Repression Reveals Multiple Transcription Factor Targets  Weiguo Zhai, Hyunkyung Jeong, Libin.
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 1999)
Kenton J Swartz, Roderick MacKinnon  Neuron 
Dual Function of the Voltage-Dependent Ca2+ Channel α2δ Subunit in Current Stimulation and Subunit Interaction  Christina A Gurnett, Michel De Waard,
Transcriptional Termination Factors for RNA Polymerase II in Yeast
Elva Dı́az, Suzanne R Pfeffer  Cell 
Andrew Tinker, Yuh Nung Jan, Lily Yeh Jan  Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Cotranslational Biogenesis of NF-κB p50 by the 26S Proteasome
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Gα12 and Gα13 Interact with Ser/Thr Protein Phosphatase Type 5 and Stimulate Its Phosphatase Activity  Yoshiaki Yamaguchi, Hironori Katoh, Kazutoshi Mori,
The LIN-2/LIN-7/LIN-10 Complex Mediates Basolateral Membrane Localization of the C. elegans EGF Receptor LET-23 in Vulval Epithelial Cells  Susan M Kaech,
Transport-Dependent Proteolysis of SREBP
Acetylation Regulates Transcription Factor Activity at Multiple Levels
Presentation transcript:

Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 441-453 (February 1996) NAB Domain Is Essential for the Subunit Assembly of both α–α and α–β Complexes of Shaker-like Potassium Channels  Weifeng Yu, Jia Xu, Min Li  Neuron  Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 441-453 (February 1996) DOI: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80062-8

Figure 1 Expression of K+ Channels in COS Cells (A) K+ currents recorded from transfected COS cells. Current responses to different holding potentials were recorded from a mock-transfected COS cell (n = 8; top), a cell transfected with ShBΔ(6–46) (n = 6; middle), and a cell transfected with Shal2 (n = 6; bottom). The bottom trace indicates the voltage steps from −77 to +33 mV at 20 mV increments. Bars, 5 ms and 500 pA. (B) Voltage-dependent activation of ShBΔ (6–46) expressed in COS cells. Conductance (G) was calculated and normalized (see Experimental Procedures) according to the maximum conductance (G/Gmax; y-axis) and plotted against potentials (x-axis). Data were taken from the same cell illustrated in (A). (C) Immunoblot analysis of the ShB expression in transiently transfected COS cells. Cell lysates containing approximately equal amounts of protein were separated by 10% SDS–PAGE and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane. The ShB and possibly related endogenous polypeptides were detected by an affinity-purified anti-NShB antibody. COS-ShB, COS cells transfected with ShB; COS-MOCK, mock-transfected COS cells; HEK293-MOCK, mock-transfected HEK293 cells. The protein molecular weight markers (in kilodaltons) are indicated on the right. Neuron 1996 16, 441-453DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80062-8)

Figure 2 Selective Inactivation of K+ Channels by Kvβ1 (A) Whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings were carried out on COS cells transfected with RCK4 (n = 6) or RCK4 plus Kvβ1 (n = 6) (indicated by the arrow). Current responses to a voltage step from −77 to +33 mV (indicated in the bottom trace) were normalized according to the peak current and superimposed. The accelerated N-type inactivation of RCK4 is indicated by the arrow. (B) Whole-cell recordings were obtained from COS cells transfected with ShB (n = 5) or ShB plus Kvβ1 (n = 5). Current responses to a voltage step from −77 to +33 mV (indicated in the bottom trace) were normalized according to the peak current and superimposed. The accelerated N-type inactivation of ShB is indicated by the arrow. (C) Whole-cell recordings were obtained from COS cells transfected with Shal2 with or without Kvβ1. Current responses to a voltage step from −77 to +33 mV (indicated in the bottom trace) were normalized according to the peak current and averaged within the group. The control trace shows the averaged current response recorded from COS cells transfected with Shal2 (τ = 24.3 ± 1.5 ms, mean ± SEM; n = 6). The second trace (indicated by the arrow) illustrates the averaged current response obtained from COS cells cotransfected with Shal2 and Kvβ1 (τ = 26.4 ± 2.9 ms, mean ± SEM; n = 8). There is no significant difference between the time constants of these two groups (p < .05, t test). Neuron 1996 16, 441-453DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80062-8)

Figure 3 Affinity Binding of Kvβ1 to NShB (A) The NShB fusion protein was prepared in Sf9 cells using a recombinant baculovirus (see Experimental Procedures). As indicated in the diagram, the NShB fusion protein contains GST, heart muscle kinase (HMK) recognition sequence (Li et al. 1992), and a 12CA5 epitope. (B) Soluble Sf9 lysate containing GST–NShB was incubated with glutathione–Sepharose to generate the NShB affinity column. The GST–NShB polypeptide in different fractions was detected by SDS–PAGE and immunoblot using rabbit anti-NShB (Li et al. 1992). Lane 1, soluble Sf9 cell lysate; lane 2, wash; lane 3, elution with 20 mM glutathione. (C) Kvβ1 binds to the NShB affinity column. The soluble bacterial lysate (see Experimental Procedures for a detailed protocol) was incubated with NShB affinity matrix. The Kvβ1 polypeptide with an apparent molecular weight of 51 kDa (indicated by an arrow) in each fraction was analyzed by SDS–PAGE and detected by Coomassie staining. Lane 1, crude bacterial lysate; lane 2, unbound material; lane 3, eluted material by the binding buffer supplemented with 0.5 M NaCl. Neuron 1996 16, 441-453DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80062-8)

Figure 4 Binding of Kvβ1 to the N-Terminal Domains of the Kv1 α Subunits Tested by the Yeast Two-Hybrid System YGH1 yeast cells were transformed by different pairwise combinations of the two-hybrid constructs that express either fusion proteins of the DNA-binding domain of GAL4 (DB and pPC86) or the transcription activation domain of GAL4 (TA and pPC97) (seeXu et al. 1995Experimental Procedures for vector construction. The transformants carrying the two different fusion proteins were first selected by dextrose synthetic dropout medium with no supplement of leucine and tryptophan (SD, −leu, −trp, +his) to ensure that in different combinations the tranformants have both pPC97 and pPC86 plasmids. Identical numbers of cells in each combination were also dotted on the same medium without histidine (SD, −leu, −trp, −his). The transformants were allowed to grow at 30°C for 65 hr. Eight different plasmid combinations are listed on the right. Their growth in the SD, −leu, −trp, +his medium is shown in the middle panel on the left. Their growth in the SD, −leu, −trp, −his medium is shown in the bottom panel on the left. Neuron 1996 16, 441-453DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80062-8)

Figure 5 The Binding Sites for α–Kvβ1 Association (A) Deletion mapping of the region(s) in RCK4 for Kvβ1 binding. A diagram representing the coding sequence of RCK4 is shown. Black boxes indicate the putative membrane-spanning segments, S1–S6; the dashed box indicates the NABRCK4 region (aa 174–272) (according to the sequence in GenBank, X16002). Different coding sequences, as indicated in parentheses, were cloned into the pPC86 vector for the yeast two-hybrid test with pPC97-Kvβ1, as described in Figure 3 and Experimental Procedures. The “+” indicates growth, and the “−” indicates no growth. (B) Amino acid sequence comparison of the Kvβ1-binding site of RCK4 (aa 174–306) with the corresponding regions of ShB (aa 96–227) and Shal2 (aa 40–185). The “−” indicates that the amino acid at that position is identical to RCK4; gaps were introduced to increase the alignment scores. The numbers in the parentheses at the end of ShB and Shal2 indicate the percentage of amino acid identity to RCK4. The amino acid positions at which the deletions were made are indicated on the top of the RCK4 sequence. (C) Deletion mapping of the region in Kvβ1 that binds to NRCK4. A diagram representing the coding sequence of Kvβ1 is shown. The shaded box indicates the core region (aa 73–401). Different coding regions as indicated were cloned into the pPC97 vector for the yeast two-hybrid test with pPC86-NRCK4. The “+” indicates growth, and “−” indicates no growth. The core region (aa 73–401) was sufficient to mediate the association. (D) Amino acid comparison of the core region of Kvβ1 with those of Kvβ2 (aa 39–367) and Kvβ3 (aa 80–408). The “−” indicates that the amino acid at that position is identical to Kvβ1. The numbers in the parentheses indicate the percentage of amino acid identity to Kvβ1. The amino acid positions at which the deletions were made are indicated on the top of Kvβ1 sequence. Neuron 1996 16, 441-453DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80062-8)

Figure 5 The Binding Sites for α–Kvβ1 Association (A) Deletion mapping of the region(s) in RCK4 for Kvβ1 binding. A diagram representing the coding sequence of RCK4 is shown. Black boxes indicate the putative membrane-spanning segments, S1–S6; the dashed box indicates the NABRCK4 region (aa 174–272) (according to the sequence in GenBank, X16002). Different coding sequences, as indicated in parentheses, were cloned into the pPC86 vector for the yeast two-hybrid test with pPC97-Kvβ1, as described in Figure 3 and Experimental Procedures. The “+” indicates growth, and the “−” indicates no growth. (B) Amino acid sequence comparison of the Kvβ1-binding site of RCK4 (aa 174–306) with the corresponding regions of ShB (aa 96–227) and Shal2 (aa 40–185). The “−” indicates that the amino acid at that position is identical to RCK4; gaps were introduced to increase the alignment scores. The numbers in the parentheses at the end of ShB and Shal2 indicate the percentage of amino acid identity to RCK4. The amino acid positions at which the deletions were made are indicated on the top of the RCK4 sequence. (C) Deletion mapping of the region in Kvβ1 that binds to NRCK4. A diagram representing the coding sequence of Kvβ1 is shown. The shaded box indicates the core region (aa 73–401). Different coding regions as indicated were cloned into the pPC97 vector for the yeast two-hybrid test with pPC86-NRCK4. The “+” indicates growth, and “−” indicates no growth. The core region (aa 73–401) was sufficient to mediate the association. (D) Amino acid comparison of the core region of Kvβ1 with those of Kvβ2 (aa 39–367) and Kvβ3 (aa 80–408). The “−” indicates that the amino acid at that position is identical to Kvβ1. The numbers in the parentheses indicate the percentage of amino acid identity to Kvβ1. The amino acid positions at which the deletions were made are indicated on the top of Kvβ1 sequence. Neuron 1996 16, 441-453DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80062-8)

Figure 6 The Core Region of Kvβ1 Is Necessary for the Kvβ1-Mediated Inactivation A schematic digram (A) shows the wild-type Kvβ1 and two Kvβ1 deletion constructs. The voltage-clamp recordings were obtained from COS cells. The current responses to a voltage step from −77 to +33 mV (indicated at the bottom of [B] and [D]) were normalized according to the peak response. The control responses were obtained from COS cells transfected with ShBΔ(6–46). This trace was superimposed with the reponse from cotransfection of ShBΔ(6–46) with Kvβ1 (B; τ = 18.7 ± 2.8 ms; mean ± SEM; n = 9), Kvβ1Δ(73–401) (C; n = 11), or Kvβ1Δ(1–72) (D; n = 8). Neuron 1996 16, 441-453DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80062-8)

Figure 8 A Working Model for α–Kvβ1 Interaction The diagram represents the postulated α–Kvβ1 interaction. The putative membrane-spanning segments of the α subunit are designated as S1–S6, and the inactivation gate (present in some Kv1 α subunits) is represented as an open circle. The S4–S5 loop, the putative receptor for the inactivation gate of the α subunit, is highlighted as a thicker line. The N-terminal domain of the α subunit that mediates the α–Kvβ1 association is illustrated as an open box. The shaded model represents a Kvβ1 subunit, in which the inactivation gate of Kvβ1 is designated as a circle. The model may not represent the real stoichiometry of the α–Kvβ1 complex. Neuron 1996 16, 441-453DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80062-8)

Figure 7 Compatible Binding Site in the N-Terminal Domains of α Subunits Is Necessary for the Kvβ1-Mediated Inactivation (A) A diagram illustrates the construction of the two chimeric ShB α subunits. The coding segment representing amino acids 95–227 of ShBΔ(6–46), including the Kvβ1-binding site, was replaced by the corresponding region of Shal2 (aa 40–185; NShal/ShB; left) or by the corresponding region of RCK4 (aa 174–306; NRCK4/ShB; right). (B) Whole-cell recordings were carried out on COS cells transfected with either NShal/ShB (left) or NRCK4/ShB (right) in the presence or absence of Kvβ1. Current responses to a voltage step from −77 to +33 mV were normalized according to the peak current. The left panel shows the recordings from NShal/ShB-transfected COS cells in the presence (n = 6) or absence (n = 3) of Kvβ1. The right panel shows the recordings from NRCK4/ShB-transfected COS cells in the presence (n = 7) or absence (n = 3) of Kvβ1. Arrows indicate the recording from a cell cotransfected with chimera and Kvβ1. (C) Immunoblot analysis of Kvβ1 expression. Total protein lysates were prepared from the cells transfected with the indicated combinations of plasmid(s). The expression of Kvβ1 was detected by the affinity-purified MAb against the 12CA5 tag fused to the C-terminus of Kvβ1 (see Experimental Proce- dures). MOCK, no plasmid DNA; ShB, 18 μg; ShB+Kvβ1, 6 μg + 12 μg; Kvβ1, 18 μg; NShal/ShB, 18 μg; NShal/ShB+Kvβ1: 12 μg + 6 μg. The molecular weight standards are indicated on the right. Neuron 1996 16, 441-453DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80062-8)