Fracture resistance of premolars restored with inlay and onlay ceramic restorations and luted with two different agents Gloria Beatriz de Azevedo Cubas, DDS MSc, Luciano Habekost, DDS MSc, Guilherme Brião Camacho, DDS MSc, PhD, Tatiana Pereira-Cenci, DDS MSc PhD Journal of Prosthodontic Research Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages 53-59 (January 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2010.07.001 Copyright © 2010 Japan Prosthodontic Society Terms and Conditions
Fig. 1 MOD inlays. Journal of Prosthodontic Research 2011 55, 53-59DOI: (10.1016/j.jpor.2010.07.001) Copyright © 2010 Japan Prosthodontic Society Terms and Conditions
Fig. 2 Onlays with palatine cuspid coverage. Journal of Prosthodontic Research 2011 55, 53-59DOI: (10.1016/j.jpor.2010.07.001) Copyright © 2010 Japan Prosthodontic Society Terms and Conditions
Fig. 3 Total onlays with both cuspids coverage. Journal of Prosthodontic Research 2011 55, 53-59DOI: (10.1016/j.jpor.2010.07.001) Copyright © 2010 Japan Prosthodontic Society Terms and Conditions
Fig. 4 Schematic illustration of the stainless steel ball in contact with teeth. Journal of Prosthodontic Research 2011 55, 53-59DOI: (10.1016/j.jpor.2010.07.001) Copyright © 2010 Japan Prosthodontic Society Terms and Conditions
Fig. 5 Failure modes for each group. Journal of Prosthodontic Research 2011 55, 53-59DOI: (10.1016/j.jpor.2010.07.001) Copyright © 2010 Japan Prosthodontic Society Terms and Conditions