Teacher Evaluation in BTSD (AchieveNJ)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TEACHNJ Regulation Proposals: Building an Effective Evaluation System for Teachers and Principals March 6, 2013.
Advertisements

Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation Pilot September 1, 2011 – September 30, 2012 NJ State Board of Education, July 13, 2011.
Teacher Practice in  In 2012, the New Jersey Legislature unanimously passed the TEACHNJ Act, which mandates implementation of a new teacher.
PUSD Teacher Evaluation SY12/13 Governing Board Presentation May 10, 2012.
AchieveNJ: Teacher Evaluation Scoring Guide
Freehold Borough Teacher Evaluation System Freehold Intermediate School Friday – February 15, 2013 Rich Pepe Director of Curriculum & Instruction.
Student Learning Targets (SLT)
Amendments to TEACHNJ Educator Evaluation Regulations April 2014.
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
New Jersey DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Overview of Student Growth Percentiles for New Jersey Students and Educators March 4, 2015 Bari Anhalt Erlichson, Ph.D.,
Verona Public Schools DEAC Meeting Agenda February 6, 2014  AchieveNJ  Official Waiver Process…  Assessing and Adjusting SGOs (see attachment)  Marzano.
Student Learning targets
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Update on Virginia’s Growth Measure Deborah L. Jonas, Ph.D. Executive Director for Research and Strategic Planning Virginia Department of Education July-August.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
PERSONNEL EVALUATION SYSTEMS How We Help Our Staff Become More Effective Margie Simineo – June, 2010.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
Student Growth Objectives Unifying Standards, Instruction, and Assessment to Improve Student Learning June
Verona Public Schools DEAC Meeting Agenda:
Standards IV and VI. Possible Artifacts:  School Improvement Plan  School Improvement Team  North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey  Student.
Student Growth Percentiles Basics Fall Outcomes Share information on the role of Category 1 assessments in evaluations Outline steps for districts.
Teacher Evaluation in BTSD (AchieveNJ) K-5 Meeting May 22 nd
Barren County Schools CERTIFIED EVALUATION PLAN
APPR: Ready or Not Joan Townley & Andy Greene October 20 and 21, 2011.
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION COSA PRINCIPAL’S CONFERENCE 2015 ODE Update on Educator Effectiveness.
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION COSA LAW CONFERENCE 2015 ODE Update on Educator Effectiveness.
Overview of Proposed Educator Evaluation Regulations August 1, 2012.
Student Achievement. AchieveNJ for Teachers Nothing impacts student learning in schools more than teachers. All New Jersey students deserve great teachers,
AchieveNJ: Principal and Assistant/ Vice Principal Evaluation Scoring Guide
AchieveNJ: Principal and Assistant/ Vice Principal Evaluation Scoring Guide
TEACHER EVALUATION TEACHER TENURE TEACHER MENTORING New Educational Laws and What They Mean for Us.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Achievenj in 2016 and beyond
TEACHNJ Proposed Regulations. TEACHNJ Regulations Proposal  Two Terms that are very important to know: SGO – Student Growth Objective (Created in District)
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
APPR 2.0 (based on CR 3012-d) NSCSD Goals The NSCSD District Goals Can be evidenced in planning, classroom instruction, assessment and teacher’s.
MSBSD Educator Evaluation
DEAC MEETING AGENDA: District Updates: New Teacher Forum & Mentoring
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
Teacher Evaluation Timeline
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Licensed Educator Professional Growth and Evaluation Process
Teacher Evaluation System
Teacher and Administrator Evaluation
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
Woodland Park School District Educator Effectiveness
Value-Added Evaluation & Tenure Law
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Teacher Evaluation Training
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Overview This presentation provides information on how districts compile evaluation ratings for principals, assistant principals (APs), and vice principals.
Lead Evaluator for Principals Part I, Series 1
AchieveNJ: Teacher Evaluation Scoring Guide
Educator Effectiveness Annual Update
TeachNJ By Heather Perruso.
AchieveNJ Updates Franklin Lakes Public Schools
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Overview This presentation provides information on how districts compile evaluation ratings for principals, assistant principals (APs), and vice principals.
TEACHNJ Act Tenure Law & Value Added Teacher Evaluation
STUDENT GROWTH OBJECTIVES
Quantitative Measures: Measuring Student Learning
Evaluation by the Numbers
Value-added Teacher Evaluation
STUDENT GROWTH OBJECTIVES
Evaluation Training September 4, 2018
Student Growth Measures
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

Teacher Evaluation in BTSD (AchieveNJ) William Annin Faculty Meeting May 1st 2013

Keep everything in perspective How does this impact me?

How did we get here? 2010 2011 2012 2013 EPAC, Pilot 1 launched TEACHNJ Act passed Educator Effectiveness Task Force formed $38 million Race to the Top award for NJ EPAC and external Rutgers reports issued 2010 2011 2012 2013 Task Force releases recommendations Pilot 2 selected 2nd round of evaluation regulations proposed Here is why it’s important 1st round of evaluation regulations proposed

Context: What’s the same? Annual evaluation of all teaching staff members Annual summary conferences Individualized professional development planning: Three observations with post-observation conferences for all nontenured teaching staff members by April 30 of each year Mentoring for novice teachers

Teacher Evaluation: Introduction (What’s new?) The TEACHNJ Act requires evaluations to include multiple measures of student progress and multiple data sources. New teacher evaluation systems will include the following components: Teacher Practice (observations) Performance on a teacher practice instrument, driven primarily through observation Stu. Growth Percentile State-calculated score that measures individual teacher’s ability to drive growth on NJ ASK NJASK Stu. Growth Objective Locally-calculated score that measures an individual teacher’s impact on stu. achievement Summative Rating Overall eval. score that combines the multiple measures of practice and student progress N.J.A.C. 6A:10-4.1 Inputs of Effective Teaching Outcomes of Effective Teaching

Student Growth Percentile Student Growth Objective Teacher Evaluation: Introduction to Teacher Practice Teacher Practice Student Growth Percentile Student Growth Objective Sum. Rating N.J.A.C. 6A:10-6

Observation Process in ‘13-’14 Conducted using Teachscape Rubric aligned with Danielson 3 observations for ALL staff (non-tenured & tenured) Conducted by at least two administrators At least one will be unannounced May be double-scored but not required Observations combine for a weighted score on summative evaluation. 4 Tiered rating system

Student Growth Percentile Student Growth Objective Teacher Evaluation: Training and reliability provisions All teaching staff members being evaluated must be trained on evaluation rubric. We piloted during the ‘12-’13 school year. Before observing for the purpose of evaluation, all observers must be trained on the instrument. All evaluators must participate in yearly “refresher” training. CSA/Superintendent will certify every year that observers for the purpose of evaluation have been trained. Teacher Practice Student Growth Percentile Student Growth Objective Sum. Rating N.J.A.C. 6A:10-2.2

Student Growth Percentiles What is a Student Growth Percentile or SGP? Student Growth Percentiles

Student Growth Percentile Student Growth Objective Calculating Student Growth Percentiles   All students can show growth. Student Growth Percentiles (SGP) measure how much a student has learned from one year to the next compared to peers with similar academic history from across the state. Students scored on a scale from 1 – 99. Growth baseline established by student’s prior learning as measured by all of student’s NJ ASK results.                                                      Teacher Practice Student Growth Percentile Student Growth Objective Sum. Rating

Student Growth Percentile Student Growth Objective Who are SGP or tested teachers? Median SGP Teachers of at least one 4th-8th grade math and/or English/language arts (ELA) class (15%-20% of New Jersey teachers). More teachers will be included with PARCC assessments. NJ Teachers with Median Student Growth Percentiles (mSGPs) Yes No Grades 4–8 ELA and Math X   Grades 9–11 ELA and Math x Grades Pre-K–3 (All) Grades 4 –12 Non- ELA, Non-Math All Electives (e.g., economics, psychology, art, music, etc.) Teacher must have at least 20 SGP scores. Students must be enrolled in class 60% of time before test. Teacher Practice Student Growth Percentile Student Growth Objective Sum. Rating N.J.A.C. 6A:10-4.2

Other SGPs Speedway Grand Prix ( SGP) Suzuki Genuine Parts ( SGP) Strain Gradiant Plasticity Sheep and Goat Pox ( SGP)

Student Growth Objectives What is a Student Growth Objective or SGO? Student Growth Objectives

Student Growth Percentile Student Growth Objective Teacher Evaluation: Introduction to Student Growth Objectives All teachers will set Student Growth Objectives (SGOs): SGOs are annual, specific, and measureable academic goals based on growth and achievement for groups of students. Establishing an SGO is a collaborative process between teacher and supervisor with the principal having final decision. SGOs may be based on appropriate national, state, or LEA- developed assessments, including rubric-measured portfolios. Teachers with an SGP score will set a minimum of 1 SGO. Teachers without an SGP score will set 2 SGOs. Teacher Practice Student Growth Percentile Student Growth Objective Sum. Rating N.J.A.C. 6A:10-4.2 14

Teacher Evaluation: Student Growth Objectives Sample SGOs Subject Assessment For teacher to earn a rating Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1 Second Grade Lang. Arts The Text Reading and Comprehension (TRC) assessment 90% of students increase at least 1 proficiency level 80% of students increase at least 1 proficiency level 70% of students increase at least 1 proficiency level 60% of students increase at least 1 proficiency level Eighth Grade Visual Arts Portfolio score using a district-created rubric assessing students’ ability to draw from direct observation 90% of students increase at least 1 proficiency level 80% of students increase at least 1 proficiency level 70% of students increase at least 1 proficiency level 60% of students increase at least 1 proficiency level Teacher Practice Student Growth Percentile Student Growth Objective Sum. Rating

Timeline for SGO development SGO workshop during WAMS dept. meetings on May 15th. Supervisors will identify possible SGO assessments Development of SGO by October 15th Approval no later than November 15th Beyond 2013-2014 9/30 and 10/15.

Other SGOs Surgeon General’s Office ( SGO) Office of Secretary General Sweat Output per Gland (SGO) Stuff Going On ( SGO)

How does it all come together?

Student Growth Percentile Student Growth Objective Teacher Evaluation: Weighting of Components (Tested) Tested Grades and Subjects (Currently grades 4-8, math and ELA): 50% from teacher practice and 50% from student achievement measures 50% Student Achievement 50% Student Achievement 50% Teacher Practice 50% Teacher Practice * The Department will look to incorporate other measures where possible and percentages will change as system evolves. Teacher Practice Student Growth Percentile Student Growth Objective Sum. Rating N.J.A.C. 6A:10-4.1

Student Growth Percentile Student Growth Objective Teacher Evaluation: Weighting of Components (NTGS) Teacher in Non-Tested Grades and Subjects: Weights will be phased in over time to move towards 50% teacher practice and 50% student achievement 15% Student Achievement 50% Student Achievement 85% Teacher Practice 50% Teacher Practice *The Department will look to incorporate other measures where possible and percentages will change as system evolves. Teacher Practice Student Growth Percentile Student Growth Objective Sum. Rating N.J.A.C. 6A:10-4.1

Student Growth Percentile Student Growth Objective Teacher Evaluation: Summative Ratings Component Raw Score Weight Weighted Score Teacher Practice Eval. Instrument 3.0 X 50% 1.5 Student Growth Percentile 2.0 X 35% .70 Student Growth Objective 3.5 X 15% .525 Sum of the Weighted Scores 2.725 This is a sample scale. The NJDOE will determine the actual scale prior to September 2013. 2.725 Ineffective Partially Effective Effective Highly Effective Teacher Practice Student Growth Percentile Student Growth Objective Sum. Rating N.J.A.C. 6A:10-4.1

Student Growth Percentile Student Growth Objective Teacher Evaluation: Summative Rating Timeline June Annual summary conference includes: Available component measures. October Department collects all other component measures for teachers with SGP. November/December NJASK scores released. Department calculates SGP data and sends to districts the SGP and summative ratings of each teacher with a SGP score. January Summative rating added to personnel file. At summative conference, all available component scores (i.e. teacher practice, SGO results) will be discussed. SGP data will be available on the following timeline. All available component measures will be discussed at annual summary confernece. Teacher Practice Student Growth Percentile Student Growth Objective Sum. Rating N.J.A.C. 6A: 10-2.4

School Improvement Panel Monitors and recommends Professional Development to support evaluation process Reviews SGO progress Liaisons with DEAC

Corrective Action Plan 10-2.5 Corrective Action Plan for all teaching staff June - December: SGP teachers earning low ratings on practice inputs placed on CAP. SGP added to performance report when available. May-September: Non-SGP teachers, CAP is developed by September 15. February 15: Extra observation done if CAP was created at beginning of school year. Content: Needs, goals, and timeline Responsibilities Replaces individual PD plan but not required PD identified by supervisor Monitoring Progress: Discussed and documented Evidence of progress does not guarantee a better rating Mid-year evaluation: additional observation and conference Multiple observers N.J.A.C. 6A:10-2.5

Tenure Charges: Key Changes for TEACHNJ Alignment Reflects elimination of 90-day improvement period. Exception for inefficiency charge now only applies to teacher, principal, AP, and VP. N.J.A.C. 6A:3-5.1 N.J.A.C. 6A:3-5.3 Time period for filing answer to inefficiency charges is 10 days. Reflects new requirement for arbitrator. N.J.A.C. 6A:3-5.5 Signals the different timeline for inefficiency charges. Commissioner may no longer retain case for hearing. N.J.A.C. 6A:3-5.6 Reflects requirement for a withdrawal or settlement to be approved by to arbitrator not ALJ or Commissioner.