Saurabh Kumar et al. JACEP 2017;3:

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Honors Geometry Section 7.4 Surface Area & Volume of Cylinders

Advertisements

Epicardial Atrial Ablation with High Intensity Focused Ultrasound on the Beating Heart. Mathew Williams, Mauricio Garrido, Susan Kourpanidis, Jennifer.

P449. p450 Figure 15-1 p451 Figure 15-2 p453 Figure 15-2a p453.

11-7 Areas and Volumes of Similar Solids. Problem 1: Identifying Similar Solids Are the two rectangular prisms similar? If so what is the scale factor.

You will use the ratio of two similar figures to find their perimeter and area.

10-8 Areas and Volumes of Similar Solids

Similar Ratios Are the following similar and if so what is their ratio? / 6 1 / 2 2 / 4 1 / 2 3 / 6 1 / 2 Yes, 1:2.

) Find the surface area of this rectangular prism. 2) Find the volume of this rectangular prism.

Date of download: 6/1/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Experimental setup for evaluation of laser light application in respect to fiber.

From: Contribution of the crystalline lens gradient refractive index to the accommodation amplitude in non-human primates: In vitro studies Journal of.

Thomas A. Csepe, BSc, Brian J. Hansen, BSc, Vadim V. Fedorov, PhD

Atorvastatin 20 mg (n=25 lesions) Atorvastatin 5 mg (n=25 lesions)

Yenn-Jiang Lin et al. JACEP 2016;2:

Saurabh Kumar et al. JACEP 2017;3:

Figure 1 Box plot of the venous diameter in lesions

Steven E. Williams et al. JACEP 2015;1:

Jonathan M. Behar et al. JACEP 2017;3:

Pablo Ávila et al. JACEP 2015;1:

Steven E. Williams et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep

Jonathan M. Behar et al. JACEP 2016;2:

Efficacy of a cooled bipolar epicardial radiofrequency ablation probe for creating transmural myocardial lesions Mark A. Wood, MD, Amy L. Ellenbogen,

Gregory F. Michaud, and Saurabh Kumar JACEP 2016;2:

Jonathan M. Behar et al. JACEP 2016;2:

Jonathan M. Behar et al. JACEP 2017;3:

Simon W. Rabkin et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep

Pablo Ávila et al. JACEP 2015;1:

11.7: Surface Area and Volume for Similar Solids

Junaid A.B. Zaman et al. JACEP 2017;3:

Masatoshi Yamazaki et al. JACEP 2015;1:

Junjie Zhang et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep

Jong Sung Park et al. JACEP 2016;2:

Masatoshi Yamazaki et al. JACEP 2015;1:

Shohreh Honarbakhsh et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep

Konstantin Krieger et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep

Stavros Stavrakis et al. JACEP 2015;1:1-13

Eran Leshem et al. JACEP 2018;j.jacep

Eran Leshem et al. JACEP 2018;j.jacep

Lilian Mantziari et al. JACEP 2015;1:

Surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation: The efficacy of a novel bipolar pen device in the cardioplegically arrested and beating heart Shun-ichiro.

Jacob S. Koruth et al. JACEP 2015;1:

K.R. Julian Chun et al. JACEP 2017;3:

Vivek Y. Reddy et al. JACEP 2016;2:

Faisal F. Syed et al. JACEP 2015;1:

Vittorio Calzolari et al. JACEP 2017;3:

Eran Leshem et al. JACEP 2018;j.jacep

Masatoshi Yamazaki et al. JACEP 2015;1:

Eran Leshem et al. JACEP 2018;j.jacep

Eran Leshem et al. JACEP 2018;j.jacep

Anna Björkenheim et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep

Vittorio Calzolari et al. JACEP 2017;3:

Simon W. Rabkin et al. JACEP 2017;3:

Bernard Lim et al. JACEP 2016;2:

Eran Leshem et al. JACEP 2018;j.jacep

Eran Leshem et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep

Atsuyuki Watanabe, MD, Atsuko Seki, MD, Michael C

Jose C. Pachon M. et al. JACEP 2015;1:

Jonathan M. Behar et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep

Duy T. Nguyen et al. JACEP 2017;3:

Volume 112, Issue 9, Pages (May 2017)

Fehmi Keçe et al. JACEP 2018;j.jacep

E. Kevin Heist et al. JACEP 2017;j.jacep

Vivek Y. Reddy et al. JACEP 2019;j.jacep

Leonard M. Rademakers et al. JACEP 2016;2:

The average electrode contact artifact diameter was 9. 3 mm, while 1

Moisés Rodríguez-Mañero et al. JACEP 2016;j.jacep

Table 4. Surface roughness (outer faces)

Fig. 4 Randomized benchmarking measurement.

Table 3. Surface roughness (inner faces)

Atrophied Brain T2 Lesion Volume at MRI Is Associated with Disability Progression and Conversion to Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis The rate.

Presentation transcript:

Saurabh Kumar et al. JACEP 2017;3:1114-1125 Schematic Showing Mean ± SD of Lesions Seen in High-Flow vs. Low-Flow Ablation Low-flow lesions had a maximal lesion diameter at or 0.04 mm below the endocardial surface, with a smaller epicardial diameter compared with high-flow lesions, which had a maximal lesion diameter 1.5 mm below the endocardial surface with a larger epicardial diameter. Low-flow lesions, compared with high-flow lesions, had a similar lesion volume and similar absolute lesion depth when corrected for tissue thickness. Note that the posterior RA was thinner in swine randomized to low-flow lesions (see also Table 3); the representative pathology is shown in Online Figure 3. Saurabh Kumar et al. JACEP 2017;3:1114-1125 2017 The Authors