(a) Overview of the database and the comments received

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Date/ event: Author: Overview of ETC Water data outputs 2010 Miroslav Fanta ETC Water data manager WISE TG Meeting Madrid Miroslav Fanta.

Advertisements

WISE SOE reporting on Transitional and Coastal waters Beate Werner.

April 2009 Main issues for WISE infrastructure Stefan Jensen.

Event/ date: WISE GIS – IT workshop, EEA, Author: Miroslav Fanta, ETC/ICM 1 Selected critical issues in current GIS datasets incl. general.

7-8 November 2006 Belgrade, Serbia Extension of the EEA European Topic Centre’s Work Program to the West Balkan Countries in the field of water 1 The EIONET-Water.

Experience from the data collection exercise for update of the WFD priority substances 2011 D.PREUX and B.FRIBOURG-BLANC, IOW.

JRC - IRMM – 17/18 June 2008 – EAQC-WISE project workshop – Held1 The EAQC-WISE blueprint: Recommendations for a quality control system for chemical monitoring.

International Office for Water B. Fribourg-Blanc, WG-E (4), Brussels, 14/10/2008 slide 1 Agenda Item 6.2 : (a) New data collection. Overview of the new.

Technical Support for the Impact Assessment of the Review of Priority Substances under Directive 2000/60/EC Updated Project Method for WG/E Brussels 22/10/10.

Indicators to communicate progress towards good status WG DIS, April 2015.

1 Event/ date: Working Group D meeting, 7 April 2011, Brussels Author: Dr Anita Künitzer/ Miroslav Fanta, CENIA 1 State of the Environment Reporting Miroslav.

© WRc plc 2010 Agenda item 3b: Summary of WISE electronic delivery: presentation of an example.

Summary of replies to the streamlining questionnaire Agnieszka Romanowicz DG ENV B1.

WFD Schemas Article 3 – RBDs and Competent Authorities Article 5 – Water Bodies, Protected Areas and Summary RBD information Article 8 – Monitoring Programmes.

International Office for Water B. Fribourg-Blanc, WG-E (6), Brussels, 6/7/2009 slide 1 Agenda Item 5 : (a) Data collection, associated data treatments.

Ireland and the WFD The Dangerous Substances Surveillance Monitoring Programme Ciaran O’Donnell Environmental Protection Agency.

International Office for Water Alice James - WG E (6), Brussels, 6 July 2009 International Office for Water Alice James - WG E (6), Brussels, 6 July 2009.

| Slide 1 Reporting Requirements Michael Nagy Umweltbundesamt Wien Workshop on Environment Statistics Budapest, 23 April 2004.

Dedicated maps on contaminants

Concept of a Danube River Basin GIS

Relationship between EUROWATERNET and the Water Framework Directive, and for broader water reporting Steve Nixon ETC/WTR.

- Progress and planning- European Commission

Agenda Item 8(b): Progress with data collection template

D8 and D9 REVIEW PROCESS April-June 2014: February 2015:

WFD Article 3 Attempts to make a map

EU Water Framework Directive

Report on WISE Art.8 and GIS issues

(a) Data collection WG-E(3)-03/03/IOW - Data collection

on Priority Substances Strategic Coordination Group

Agenda Item 6(a): Review of the list of priority substances (Decision 2455/2001/EC) WG-E(1)-17/10/INERIS - Data collection.

Agenda Item 4 : (a) – proposals for testing of quality and representativeness of monitoring data and for presentation of results B.FRIBOURG-BLANC, IOW.

Philippe QUEVAUVILLER

Two main areas identified

on Priority Substances Strategic Coordination Group

Hydrological Feature coding

Discussion on compliance checking

Chemical Monitoring Activity 9° Plenary Meeting Ghent

Preliminary feedback on analysis of Article V reports

Change and adapt the Eionet water data flow to meet WFD requirements

Unit D.2 – Water and Marine, DG Environment, European Commission

CMA Plenary Meeting 21/10/2008 PARIS

Commission report on Art. 8 WFD Monitoring programmes

Draft concept to assess quality of monitoring database

Progress SOE –drafting group

Quality assessment of the monitoring database on priority substances

Background document: How to build the Inventory of Emissions, Discharges and Losses: main elements and compilation of existing datasets (2007) DG on inventory.

Background CRiteria for the IDentification of Groundwater thrEsholds BRIDGE Summary of BRIDGE achievements Contract N° (SSPI) Co-ordinator:

- Progress and planning- European Commission

Workshop on WFD Article 8 reporting tools and WISE GIS

Water Information System for Europe

Project 2.7 Guidance on Monitoring

Mandate of the EEA To provide the Community and Member States with:

Progress Report Working Group A Ecological Status Intercalibration (1) & Harmonisation (3) Activities Presented by Anna-Stiina Heiskanen EC Joint Research.

Towards a shared IS for Water

EU Water Framework Directive

Water Information System for Europe

WATER QUALITY Nitrate and Pesticide pollution IRENA No and 27

3rd meeting, 8 March 2006 EEA Copenhagen

Water Framework Directive implementation: RBMP assessment

CIS WG D meeting 7 April 2011 DG ENV, Brussels

Agenda Item 6: Review of the list of priority substances (Decision 2455/2001/EC) EAF(9)-06/02/INERIS - Data processing - preparation for data collection.

2018 Freshwater data call Stéphane Isoard

Benoît FRIBOURG-BLANC, IOW

Review of the results of monitoring-based prioritisation

EAF (9) Meeting, CCAB, Brussels, 02/10/2006

Beate Werner & Bo N. Jacobsen EEA

Current possibilities of the WISE system

ETC/ICM analysis of WISE aggregation reports

WISE GIS Group 15 January 2008 John Cima.

Some concepts for quantifying emissions of Priority Substances

Presentation transcript:

Agenda Item 7: Review of the list of priority substances (Decision 2455/2001/EC): (a) Overview of the database and the comments received Database content WG-E(4)-08-03- The central database and associated data treatment B.FRIBOURG-BLANC, IOW (b.fribourg-blanc@oieau.fr)

Overall situation Almost all countries provided data: Many thanks to all data providers…

Preliminary data treatment Only datasets for surface water River, Lake, Transitional, Coastal, Marine Elimination of : data measured before year 2000 non relevant parameters (e.g. P(tot), Nitrates, etc.) datasets for which neither LOD or LOQ was provided Insufficient precision of matrix or fraction (all ”other”) Correction With MS of missing LoD/LoQ, fraction, inconsistencies… Internally for missing CAS N°, wrong names, doublets Harmonisation of the measurement units Water: µg/l, Sediment: µg/kg dw, Biota: µg/kg ww

Summary situation: database content (28 Feb 08) Surface water 24 Member States + CH and NO 20 104 stations 5 water body types 385 219 sampling 5 068 940 analysis 937 substances Source : RBD GIS layer 2005 : Nilsson et al: International River Basin Districts under the EU Water Framework Directive, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), IOW treatment)

Stations 5 Water Body Types (N° of stations): River: 16 575 Lake: 1 214 Transitional: 868 Coastal: 1 383 Marine: 41 Source : RBD GIS layer 2005 : Nilsson et al: International River Basin Districts under the EU Water Framework Directive, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), IOW treatment)

Number of analysis

Apportionment of analysis LoD ….and/or LoQ are provided 26% analysis where the substance is not detected 58% analysis where the substance is detected 16% analysis where the substance is quantified

EU relevance of substances

Substances analysed in 16 countries or more

Matrices and fractions (5 068 940 analysis)

Conclusions and perspectives The central database : A centralised dataset The cornerstone for the definition of a manageable list of substances presented with the prioritisation process The first building block to apply the monitoring-based prioritisation method A living system that will be transferred to WISE and the EEA New treatments needed: by RBD, validity criteria?

Thanks for your attention…