Akron Metropolitan Area Transportation Study Annual Meeting October 12, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
QUESTIONS (AND ANSWERS) FROM THE ALABAMA DRIVER’S MANUAL
Advertisements

County of Fairfax, Virginia Board Transportation Committee Updates on Alternatives for Improving Roadway Services in Fairfax County Discussion of Converting.
0-1 Welcome!! Safe and Effective Use of Law Enforcement Personnel in Work Zones Welcome!! Safe and Effective Use of Law Enforcement Personnel in Work Zones.
State Aid Programs An Introduction to: Local Bridge Replacement Program Local Road Improvement.
DESTINATION INNOVATION PROGRAM SAFE COORIDOR ENHANCEMENT (SCorE) Jon Jackels Mn/DOT ITS Program Engineer Traffic Topics April 7, 2011.
Status Report: Evaluation of Private Sector Data in Minneapolis Shawn Turner Texas Transportation.
Federal Safety Funding for Local Governments Martin Andersen Local Government Section Manager February 19, 2010.
Roadway Safety for Local Agencies Doug Bish Traffic Services Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation.
1 MAXIMIZING PUBLIC INVESTMENT Ohio Department of Transportation Highway Funding Overview Julie Ray, Deputy Director Division of Finance & Forecasting.
Ohio QuickClear Ohio Fire Chiefs' Association Annual Conference
1 ODOTs Complete Streets Initiative. 2 Tipping Point for Complete Streets.
ODOTs District-wide School Travel Plan Process Columbus Public Schools Discussion May 16, 2012 SafeRoutesToSchool.
Driving skill is measurably impaired by text-messaging. Writing text messages creates a significantly greater impairment than reading text messages, but.
90 Percent of work zone fatalities are motorists In 2011 there were 4,836 crashes in work zones in Illinois 1,525 injuries 23 fatalities.
Traffic Analysis Toolbox & Highway Capacity Manual Transition
Strategic Highway Safety Plan Connecting South Dakota and the Nation Welcome.
Its Your Life…. Buckle Up. The Importance of Safety Belt Use Among Employees Presented by: Insert Presenters Name Insert Company Logo here or Delete box.
Insert the title of your presentation here Presented by Name Here Job Title - Date A reduction in fatal casualties Who, why and what does this mean? Louise.
VARIABLE SPEED LIMIT DEPLOYMENT EVALUATION I-270/I-255 Traffic and Safety Conference May 12, 2010 Missouri University of Science and Technology and HDR.
TRB SAFETY ACTIVITIES A BRIEF SUMMARY for the Subcommittee on Safety Management August, 2012.
2011 FRANKLIN COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=332.
Signs, Signals, and Pavement Markings
Drivers Education Journal # Please pick up all the handouts Get out a sheet of loose leaf paper and something to write with Write the.
Urban Transportation Council Green Guide for Roads Task Force TAC 2009 Annual Conference and Exhibition Vancouver.
School Bus Drivers In-service School Bus Drivers In-service Develop a Special Needs Emergency Exit Plan.
All Roads Transportation Safety Roadway Departure Crash (Formerly Jurisdictionally Blind Safety)
Tracy Lovell, PE A FOCUSED APPROACH TO SAFETY. Provide a Transportation System  Safe  Efficient  Environmentally Sound  Fiscally Responsible.
Safety Data Analysis Tools Workshop Michael S. Griffith, Director FMCSA Office of Research and Analysis TRB Transportation Safety Planning Working Group.
HSM: Celebrating 5 Years Together Brian Ray, PE Casey Bergh, PE.
Distracted Driving There are three main types of distraction: · Visual - taking your eyes off the road · Manual - taking your hands off the wheel ·
Good Drivers Just Driving! Driving and Mobile Phone BUILDING EFFICIENCY MIDDLE EAST AUGUST 2010.
STOPPING THE #1 KILLER OF TEENS IN AMERICA. TOO MANY TEENS ARE DYING Motor vehicle crashes are the #1 killer of teens in America About 3,500 teens per.
1 Safety should be the #1 priority Improving Bicycling Safety in New York City LIN, Ming LaGCC
Investigations of Cell Phone Use While Driving in NC Jane Stutts William Hunter Herman Huang University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center.
Early 2008 Highlights Office of Accident Records Lee Axdahl.
Kerri Procida Audience: year olds. .. There are more than 1,700 fatalities and 840,000 injuries yearly due to vehicle crashes off public highways.
Early 2009 SD Crash Statistics Transportation Safety Conference “Working together to Save Lives” Office of Accident Records Chuck Fergen.
Fleet Safety. Introduction: Why Address Fleet Accidents Frequency of Fleet Accidents (NSC) 22% of workplace fatalities were highway accidents 80-90% were.
Distractive Driving By: Karley Fiesel & Amber Werner.
DISTRACTED DRIVING NATIONAL TRAUMA AWARENESS MONTH 2015 (DEVELOPED BY DONOVAN STEWART, RN, MSN)
The Driver and Pedestrian Distraction Challenge Diane Wigle Safety Countermeasures Division National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) April.
From Planning to Pouring: The Evolution of Safe Routes to School Julie Walcoff, Ohio DOT, Columbus, OH Alex Smith, Columbus Public Health, Columbus, OH.
1-1 Roles and Responsibilities. 1-2 Module Objectives  Recognize the roles of LEOs and others in work zones  List LEO responsibilities and expectations.
All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Hot Spot ODOT Region 1 Kick-Off Meeting March 18, 2015.
Task Force on Safe Teen Driving Joint Transportation Committee January 10, 2013.
WELCOME! July 31, 2012 ODOT District July 31, 2012 PURPOSE OF TONIGHT’S MEETING Introduce the project –Reconstruct I-75.
Rural Transportation Planning Eunice Fitzpatrick Transportation Planner Kentucky River ADD Hazard, KY.
University of Minnesota Intersection Decision Support Research - Results of Crash Analysis University of Minnesota Intersection Decision Support Research.
Putting Together a Safety Program Kevin J. Haas, P.E.—Traffic Investigations Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation Traffic—Roadway Section (Salem,
FACTORS RELATED TO YOUTHFUL DRIVERS ALABAMA COURSE OF STUDY #13 Analyze data regarding inexperienced drivers and traffic collisions.
Caltrans External Advisory Liaison Committee October 2015.
Director Malcolm Dougherty California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) October 28, 2015 Caltrans’ Highway Safety Improvement Program.
The Greater Metropolitan Houston Traffic Safety Program October 14, 2004 Ned Levine, PhD Houston-Galveston Area Council Houston, TX 2004 AMPO Annual Conference.
Grab BagData General Information Laws $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100.
5/8/02FHWA Office of Safety1 FHWA Safety Core Business Unit Office-Level Structure Develops and manages programs for the safe operation of roadways, bicycle.
October 15 th, 2013 The City of Akron SUM – Exchange Street / Cedar Street Corridor Safety Study.
Oregon’s All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Zahidul Siddique, Ph.D., PE, PTOE Oregon Department of Transportation October 26, st International.
Estimation of 2001 Crash Costs Using FARS and GES John McFadden, Len Meczkowski, FHWA-Office of Safety R&D; Carol Conly, Lendis Corporation; Promod Chandhok,
Chapter 1 Responsible Driving Textbook. Highway Transportation System A system made up of all the roadways, motor vehicles, and people. There are nearly.
Defeating Distracted Driving How Commercial Truck and Bus Drivers and Passenger-Vehicle Drivers Can Reduce Distractions and Avoid Crashes.
Defeating Distracted Driving 1. Wikipedia Distracted Driving Definition Driving while engaged in other activities Talking on a cell phone Texting Eating,
1 Chapter 1 You Are the Driver. 2 Chapter 1 Overview Chapter 1 introduces you to the highway transportation system and the driving task. The chapter also.
TRB Update AASHTO SCOHTS Annual Meeting April 2016.
June 2016 Using Naturalistic Driving Data to Examine Teen Driver Behaviors Present in Motor Vehicle Crashes,
Distracted Driving There are three main types of distraction: · Visual - taking your eyes off the road · Manual - taking your hands off the.
Moving Maryland Toward Zero Deaths
Using CMF’s in Benefit/Cost Analysis and Project Prioritization
Clark County, WA Safety Management Program
Distracted Driving There are three main types of distraction: · Visual - taking your eyes off the road · Manual - taking your hands off the.
Partners in Highway Safety
Presentation transcript:

Akron Metropolitan Area Transportation Study Annual Meeting October 12, 2012

Dave Pulay, PE Transportation Engineer AMATS Dave Griffith, PE Safety Engineer ODOT District 4 Eric Smith, PE, PTOE Engineer and Vice President URS Corporation – Akron Office

Introduction Highway Safety 101 Crash Trends Areas of Special Concern How To Apply for Safety Funds

The Ohio Department of Transportation has one of the largest safety programs in the country About $72 million is available annually for projects and programs that address high and severe crash locations. Can be used on any public road

Funding available for studies, design, right of way, and construction Typical request is from $50,000 to $5 million Some safety funding is also available for education and enforcement Historically our area has done well with obtaining safety funding. Currently there are 27 projects in the TIP with safety funding worth $29.7 Million.

Crashes are usually studied in three year periods Animal and construction zone crashes are removed, these do not reflect highway deficiencies Crashes are separated into three primary categories Intersection (46%) Segment or Non-intersection (38%) Freeway (16%)

Crash Severity Levels Property Damage Only (PDO) Injury (Approximately 25%) Fatal (Less than 1%, %) Crash Rate Takes into account the number of crashes and the traffic volume Expressed in terms of crashes per million vehicles

The four Es of traffic safety Engineering Emergency Response Education Enforcement Because 93% of crashes involve some driver error ROADWAY 34% DRIVER 93% VEHICLE 13% Contributing Factors to Crashes

The Highway Safety Manual (HSM) is a new analysis tool to help quantify and predict safety related transportation decisions Over ten years of research by the Transportation Research Board (TRB) Mathematical relationship for safety performance based on roadway conditions – how many crashes are predicted vs. actual crashes Crash reductions factors

Fatal crashes are more random and evenly distributed than other crashes Alcohol and/or drugs suspected in 41% of fatal crashes Failure to Control and Unsafe Speed are the top contributing factors 43% are Fixed Object type crashes 36% occur on weekends

126 Total

Distracted driving is any non-driving activity that has the potential to distract from the primary task of driving There are three main types of distraction: Visual taking your eyes off the road Manual taking your hands off the wheel Cognitive taking your mind off what youre doing Texting and cell phone use involves all three types of distraction

Nationwide its estimated that 18 percent of injury crashes and 16 percent of fatalities involved distracted driving Ohio House Bill 99 (August 31, 2012) prohibits texting while driving for all ages and also prohibits texting and cell phone use for drivers under 18 The new Ohio police report has a specific section to indicate if distracted driving contributed to the crash

Ages Largest percentage of overall crashes (35%) Largest percentage of fatalities (22%) Experience issues, dont calculate risk well Drive with others in the car (social driving) Largest percentage of distracted drivers???

Age 65 and up, rapidly growing % Driving = Independence 27% of senior related crashes are angle crashes. For all drivers 17% are angle crashes. Vision and reaction time issues, physical limitations More likely to be injured Self regulated, friends, family, and doctors can help

78% of bicycle crashes and 85% of pedestrian crashes result in an injury Nearly 36% of pedestrian crashes occur in dark conditions As non-automobile forms of transportation gain popularity designers are developing Complete Streets concepts

A Complete Street integrates other modes of transportation into the street design

1.Determine Location 2.Engineering Study 3.Apply to ODOT District Office 4.Sent to ODOT Central Office 5.Funding Decisions Yes- Project No or Less-Reevaluate

AMATS analyzes crash data and produces an annual technical memorandum (currently ) ODOT also produces a statewide list of locations including freeways Local safety forces Local maintenance personnel 1. Determine Location

Local residents (use with caution) Look for clues – Skid marks, broken glass and car parts, damaged to roadside appurtenances Locations that are also congested Bottom Line: Minimum of 10 crashes / 3 years and a crash rate of at least 1.0. Others considered on a case by case basis 1. Determine Location

The essential parts of this study are: Existing Conditions Collision Diagrams Crash Data and Analysis Recommendations and countermeasures Short Term-Low Cost Long Term-High Cost Costs and rate of return analysis Photos 2. Engineering Study

Condition Diagram

Collision Diagram

Relative Severity Analysis

Rate of Return Analysis

This process must begin at least two months prior to April 30 and September 30 The District Safety Review Team (DSRT) is a multi- disciplinary committee that reviews the applications The DSRT scores the applications and then produces another safety funding application that is sent to the ODOT Central Office in Columbus 3. Apply to ODOT District Office

Some things that an application is scored on Number of crashes Number of severe injury and fatal crashes Crash rate Congestion (Traffic Volume) Percent trucks Rate of Return on the investment 3. Apply to ODOT District Office

This is done by the District Office safety engineer Deadline for this submittal is April 30 and September 30 A Safety Program Committee at the Central Office evaluates the applications from all the districts statewide Usually a video conference is done between the Central Office and the District Office along with other stakeholders 4. Sent to ODOT Central Office

If a project is approved it is then funded and added to the State Transportation Improvement Program. Funding should be programmed within 30 days. Sometimes a only part of the funding will be approved and the scope of work will need to be altered On a large corridor project, a recommendation may be handed down to do it phases with only one phase being funded at the current time 5. Funding Decisions

Ohio has one of the most aggressive safety programs in the country Around $72 million are allocated toward safety. Can be used on any public road. Safety funds can also be spent on education and enforcement Choose your location and countermeasures wisely. You are competing against the rest of the state for safety funds.

AMATS and ODOT do a safety analysis annually using the last three years of complete crash data and the results are on each agencies website AMATS can do a pre-engineering analysis of any location if requested. Talk to Dave Griffith about locations you are considering. With his many years of experience working with safety he can help you through the process.