Comments Clarification on VHT Format HT Control Field

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0342r0 SubmissionLiwen Chu Etc.Slide 1 Power Efficient PS Poll Date: Authors: Date: March, 2012.
Advertisements

Preamble for 120MHz Date: Authors: Nov, 2010 Month Year
Doc.: IEEE /0026r0 Submission January 2011 Sameer Vermani, QualcommSlide 1 VHT Supported MCS Field Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /863r0 Submission June WG Slide 1 Liaison presentation to SC6 regarding IEEE m(b) Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0184r0 Submission January 2011 Rolf de Vegt (Qualcomm)) Slide ah Spec Development Discussion Document Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0081r0 Submission January 2012 Osama Aboul-Magd, Huawei TechnologiesSlide 1 On Traffic Stream Setup for Audio/Visual Bridging Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Submission March 2010 Slide 1 Slot Time Synchronization for Coexistence of 5 MHz, 10 MHz and 20 MHz Systems Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1165r0 September 2013 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Discussion of the comments related to FILS Request Parameter Date:
Doc.: IEEE /401r1 Submission May 2012 Mark RISON (CSR)Slide 1 Highest Supported Data Rate Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0818r1 Submission Further Analysis of Feedback and Frequency Selective Scheduling (FSS) for TGax OFDMA July 2015 Slide 1 Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1329r2 November 2015 Yujin Noh, NewracomSlide 1 Link Adaptation for HE WLAN Date: Authors:
FILS Reduced Neighbor Report
VHT SG Report to EC Date: Authors: November 2008 April 2007
VHTL6 task group work plan proposal (VHTL < 6 GHz)
Further Rotation Modulation Application
Clarification on TRN Subfield Definition for MIMO
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
VHT SG PAR Feedback from Individuals
Channel Estimation Field for EDMG OFDM PHY in 11ay
LB225 CR (Link Adaptation)
Maximum Tone Grouping Size for ax Feedback
Link Adaptation Subfield for VHT
Sounding and P Matrix Proposal
VHT Link Adaptations Date: Authors: Month Year Month Year
Maximum Tone Grouping Size for ax Feedback
MAC Capabilities Info. in HE Capabilities IE
General ad hoc- LB115- Comment Resolutions – Jan 08
Maximum Tone Grouping Size for ax Feedback
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
GroupID Concept for Downlink MU-MIMO Transmission
Task Group ac Process Overview
802.11af Liaison Report Date: Authors: November 2011
FILS Reduced Neighbor Report
General ad hoc- LB115- Comment Resolutions – Jan 08
Raising the PAR Date: Authors: January 2014 January 2014
Comparison of Draft Spec Framework Documents
Resolution for CID 118 and 664 Date: Authors: Month Year
Efficient Frame Format for MU Transmission
Efficient Frame Format for MU Transmission
Efficient Frame Format for MU Transmission
Explanations on CID #10076 Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
Proposed text for HTSG draft PAR and 5 Criteria
Raising the PAR Date: Authors: January 2014 January 2014
STA Antenna Indication in VHT Capabilities
Proposed text for HTSG draft PAR and 5 Criteria
Power Efficient PS Poll
Preamble for 120MHz Date: Authors: Nov, 2010 Month Year
Comments on Sub 1 GHz license-exempt operation
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
Data Subcarrier and Interleaving for 120MHz
Resolution to TGaj Draft 0.01 CID 146
Introductory TGah Proposal
Various Bit Order Date: Authors: April 2011 Month Year
Comments Clarification on VHT Operation Notes and VHT Action Field
Spatial Sharing Mechanism in aj (60GHz New Technique Proposal)
Consideration on multi-STA BA frame indication
Link Adaptation for HE WLAN
GEN ad hoc Summary - Sep 14 ‘07
Introductory TGah Proposal
120 MHz PHY Transmission Date: Authors: January 2010
802.11ac preamble for VHT auto-detection
Strawmodel ac Specification Framework
Link Adaptation Subfield for VHT
Channelization for China’s Spectrum
Joint Multichannel CSMA
Clarification on TRN Subfield Definition for MIMO
Spatial Sharing Mechanism in aj (60GHz New Technique Proposal)
Proposed Resolution to CID 147 in CC12
Submission Title: [JPKG comment suggestions]
Month Year doc.: IEEE /1081r0 May, 2016
Presentation transcript:

Comments Clarification on VHT Format HT Control Field January 2010 2019/5/12June 2010 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0084r3 Comments Clarification on VHT Format HT Control Field Date: 2010-06-24 Authors: Xie Gang, Cisco Systems , Cisco Systems

2019/5/12June 2010 doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/xxxxr0 Introduction This presentation is comments clarification on VHT format HT Control field in Draft P802.11ac_D1.0. Currently, the Subfield of “MRQ, Unsolicited MFB” and each meaning of subfield in table 8-ac1 cannot satisfy the VHT requirement, and we propose our revise advice. And the MCS subfield in table 8-ac2 also exist this problem. The N_STS and NSTS definition is not definite and we propose some revise advice. Slide 2 Page 2 Xie Gang, Cisco Systems Xie Gang, Cisco Systems

VHT format HT Control field Problem Statement In VHT format HT Control field, MFB has four subfields (VHT N_STS, MCS, BW, SNR), so “MCS feedback” cannot represent the whole MFB meaning in VHT. And MRQ has been used in IEEE 802.11n just meaning MCS request, but MCS in VHT is just one MFB subfield, so “MCS request” cannot represent the VHT MRQ meaning. MRQ and MFB are used for VHT link adaptation. According to the context of the P802.11ac_D1.0 ( 9.27.3 Link adaptation using…) , MRQ meaning is “MFB request”, so “MRQ meaning” in table 8-ac1 cannot satisfy the VHT requirement. Slide 3

Recommend changes for VHT format HT Control field we propose our revise advice: The MRQ in table 8-ac1 should be changed into “VHT MRQ” and its meaning should be changed into “MFB request”. The Unsolicited MFB’s meaning in table 8-ac1 should be changed into “Unsolicited MFB indicator”. Table 8-ac1 Subfield Meaning Definition VHT MRQ MFB request Set to 1 to request MCS feedback (solicited MFB), otherwise set to 0. … Unsolicited MFB Unsolicited MFB indicator Set to 1 if the MFB is not a response to an MRQ. Set to 0 if the MFB is a response to an MRQ. Slide 4

Recommend changes for VHT format HT Control field The meaning of MCS subfield in table 8-ac2 should be the Recommended MCS, not the Recommended MCS feedback, the word "feedback" is redundant. we propose our revise advice: The MCS meaning in table 8-ac2 should be changed into “Recommended MCS”. Table 8-ac2 Subfield Meaning Definition MCS Recommended MCS Indicates the recommended VHT MCS as defined in 9.27.3 (Link adaptation using the VHT format of the HT Control field). Slide 5

Recommend changes for N_STS and NSTS NSTS is a parameter in 11ac, and N_STS is a subfield in table 8-ac1, which both means "Number of space time streams". we propose our revise advice: NSTS should be revised to N_STS in page 4 and should add a note for NSTS definition for its first time appearance. 3.3 Abbreviations and acronyms … N_STS: Number of space time streams. Subfield Meaning Definition … VHT N_STS Recommended VHT NSTS Indicates the recommended VHT NSTS as defined in 9.27.3 (Link adaptation using the VHT format of the HT Control field). Add a Note blow the table 8-ac2: NSTS : Number of space time streams. Slide 6

Summary The problems are: MRQ and Unsolicited MFB Subfield and their meaning in table 8-ac1 cannot satisfy the VHT requirement. And the MCS subfield in table 8-ac2 also exist this problem. The N_STS and NSTS definition is not definite These slides provide solutions to the problems: The MRQ in table 8-ac1 should be changed into “VHT MRQ” and its meaning should be changed into “MFB request”. The Unsolicited MFB’s meaning in table 8-ac1 should be changed into “Unsolicited MFB indicator”. The MCS meaning in table 8-ac2 is changed into “Recommended MCS”. NSTS should be revised to N_STS in page 4 and should add a note for NSTS definition for its first time appearance Slide 7

Reference [1] IEEE P802.11ac/D1.0: Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC) and physical layer(PHY) specifications: Enhancements for Very High Throughput for Operation in Bands below 6 GHz, 2011. [2] IEEE P802.11n: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) specifications: Enhancements for Higher Throughput, Oct. 2009. [3] 11-11-0276-17-00ac-tgac-d0-1-comments Slide 8