Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Advertisements

Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages (December 2000)
Structural Basis for the Highly Selective Inhibition of MMP-13
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (July 2002)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2001)
Volume 17, Issue 11, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 6, Issue 10, Pages (October 1998)
Transmembrane Signaling across the Ligand-Gated FhuA Receptor
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages (December 2003)
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 85, Issue 7, Pages (June 1996)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Allosteric Effects of the Oncogenic RasQ61L Mutant on Raf-RBD
The Gemin6-Gemin7 Heterodimer from the Survival of Motor Neurons Complex Has an Sm Protein-like Structure  Yingli Ma, Josée Dostie, Gideon Dreyfuss, Gregory.
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
The three-dimensional structure of PNGase F, a glycosyl asparaginase from Flavobacterium meningosepticum  Gillian E Norris, Timothy J Stillman, Bryan.
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Catalytic Center Assembly of HPPK as Revealed by the Crystal Structure of a Ternary Complex at 1.25 Å Resolution  Jaroslaw Blaszczyk, Genbin Shi, Honggao.
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)
Crystal Structure of an Inactive Akt2 Kinase Domain
Kevin G. Hoff, José L. Avalos, Kristin Sens, Cynthia Wolberger 
Crystal Structure of PMM/PGM
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Seisuke Yamashita, Kozo Tomita  Structure 
The 1.9 Å Structure of α-N-Acetylgalactosaminidase
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (November 2004)
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
The Crystal Structure of the Costimulatory OX40-OX40L Complex
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 56, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (December 1998)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Structural Basis for the Highly Selective Inhibition of MMP-13
The basis for K-Ras4B binding specificity to protein farnesyl-transferase revealed by 2 Å resolution ternary complex structures  Stephen B Long, Patrick.
Crystal Structure of the N-Terminal Domain of the Secretin GspD from ETEC Determined with the Assistance of a Nanobody  Konstantin V. Korotkov, Els Pardon,
Masaru Goto, Rie Omi, Noriko Nakagawa, Ikuko Miyahara, Ken Hirotsu 
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
A Role for Intersubunit Interactions in Maintaining SAGA Deubiquitinating Module Structure and Activity  Nadine L. Samara, Alison E. Ringel, Cynthia Wolberger 
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Neali Armstrong, Eric Gouaux  Neuron 
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (July 2009)
Structure of a water soluble fragment of the ‘Rieske’ iron–sulfur protein of the bovine heart mitochondrial cytochrome bc1 complex determined by MAD phasing.
Ying Huang, Michael P. Myers, Rui-Ming Xu  Structure 
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
Human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase: the crystal structure reveals a structural NADP+ molecule and provides insights into enzyme deficiency  Shannon.
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Structural Insights into the Mode of Action of a Pure Antiestrogen
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Structure of a HoxB1–Pbx1 Heterodimer Bound to DNA
Volume 8, Issue 9, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Brett K. Kaiser, Matthew C. Clifton, Betty W. Shen, Barry L. Stoddard 
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Structural Switch of the γ Subunit in an Archaeal aIF2αγ Heterodimer
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Stanley J Watowich, John J Skehel, Don C Wiley  Structure 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 321-330 (February 2006) Structure and Thermodynamic Characterization of the EphB4/Ephrin-B2 Antagonist Peptide Complex Reveals the Determinants for Receptor Specificity  Jill E. Chrencik, Alexei Brooun, Michael I. Recht, Michelle L. Kraus, Mitchell Koolpe, Anand R. Kolatkar, Richard H. Bruce, Georg Martiny-Baron, Hans Widmer, Elena B. Pasquale, Peter Kuhn  Structure  Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 321-330 (February 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2005.11.011 Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The Ephrin Binding Domain of the EphB4 Receptor in Complex with an Antagonistic Peptide, TNYL-RAW The ephrin binding domain (α helices in green, β-sheets in red, loops in blue, and peptide in magenta) consists of a jellyroll folding topology with 13 antiparallel B-sheets connected by loops of varying lengths. Peptide binding orders the D-E and J-K loops, which cannot be visualized in the apo structure of the related EphB2 receptor. Structure 2006 14, 321-330DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.11.011) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Superposition of the EphB4 Receptor on the EphB2 Receptor from the EphB2-Ephrin-B2 Structure The EphB4 receptor is shown in red and the EphB2 (Himanen et al., 2001, PDB code: 1KGY) is shown in blue. The structures are superimposed with an overall rmsd of 1.08 Å between equivalent Cα positions. The J-K loop is displaced by as much as 20 Å in EphB4 compared to EphB2. Structure 2006 14, 321-330DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.11.011) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Model of the EphB4-Ephrin-B2 Complex The EphB4 (blue)-ephrin-B2 (green) complex is predicted to form interactions similar to those previously described in the EphB2-ephrin-B2 complex. Although several interactions are likely absent in the EphB4-ephrin-B2 complex compared to the EphB2-ephrin-B2 complex, the tetramer is likely to form at high EphB4 and ephrin-B2 concentrations. Structure 2006 14, 321-330DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.11.011) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Stereoview of Sigma-A Weighted 2|Fobs| − |Fcalc| Electron Density at 1.65 Å Resolution, Contoured at 1σ for the Antagonistic TNYL-RAW Peptide The peptide was placed into the density after an initial round of structure refinement. The N-terminal threonine lacks clear electron density and is therefore absent from the structure. Structure 2006 14, 321-330DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.11.011) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Superposition of the TNYL-RAW Peptide on the EphB4-Ephrin-B2 Model The ligand G-H loop extends into the hydrophobic binding cleft of the EphB4 receptor such that the TNYL-RAW peptide (orange) and the ephrin-B2 G-H loop (red) compete for the same binding site. Position of the peptide is distinct from the ephrin-B2 G-H loop. Structure 2006 14, 321-330DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.11.011) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Detailed View of Critical EphB4-TNYL-RAW van der Waals Interactions and Schematic LIGPLOT Diagram of EphB4-TNYL-RAW Interactions (A) All interactions are less than 4 Å and indicated by dashed green lines. The peptide (yellow) is depicted with all bonds shown, while receptor residues (cyan) are drawn schematically. Water and sulfates have been removed for clarity. (B) The peptide (purple) is depicted with all bonds shown, while receptor residues (red spoked arcs) involved in hydrophobic interactions with the peptide are drawn schematically. Peptide atoms involved in hydrophobic contacts have spokes coming out of the individual atoms. Receptor residues (orange) involved in hydrogen bond interactions with the peptide are depicted with all bonds. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed green lines. Water and sulfates have been removed for clarity. Structure 2006 14, 321-330DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.11.011) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Detailed View of Critical EphB4-TNYL-RAW van der Waals Interactions and Schematic LIGPLOT Diagram of EphB4-TNYL-RAW Interactions (A) All interactions are less than 4 Å and indicated by dashed green lines. The peptide (yellow) is depicted with all bonds shown, while receptor residues (cyan) are drawn schematically. Water and sulfates have been removed for clarity. (B) The peptide (purple) is depicted with all bonds shown, while receptor residues (red spoked arcs) involved in hydrophobic interactions with the peptide are drawn schematically. Peptide atoms involved in hydrophobic contacts have spokes coming out of the individual atoms. Receptor residues (orange) involved in hydrogen bond interactions with the peptide are depicted with all bonds. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed green lines. Water and sulfates have been removed for clarity. Structure 2006 14, 321-330DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.11.011) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions