Selective Activation of Cognate SNAREpins by Sec1/Munc18 Proteins

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cotranscriptional Recruitment of the mRNA Export Factor Yra1 by Direct Interaction with the 3′ End Processing Factor Pcf11  Sara Ann Johnson, Gabrielle.
Advertisements

Volume 124, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 97, Issue 2, Pages (April 1999)
Volume 49, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 50, Issue 4, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 129, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 125, Issue 1, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 123, Issue 5, Pages (December 2005)
Structure of the Papillomavirus DNA-Tethering Complex E2:Brd4 and a Peptide that Ablates HPV Chromosomal Association  Eric A. Abbate, Christian Voitenleitner,
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
Human mRNA Export Machinery Recruited to the 5′ End of mRNA
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
Sherilyn Grill, Valerie M. Tesmer, Jayakrishnan Nandakumar 
The Unstructured C-Terminal Tail of the Clamp Subunit Ddc1 Activates Mec1/ATR via Two Distinct Mechanisms  Vasundhara M. Navadgi-Patil, Peter M.
Volume 91, Issue 2, Pages (October 1997)
Communication with the Exon-Junction Complex and Activation of Nonsense-Mediated Decay by Human Upf Proteins Occur in the Cytoplasm  Guramrit Singh, Steffen.
Volume 139, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (March 2002)
Class C Vps Protein Complex Regulates Vacuolar SNARE Pairing and Is Required for Vesicle Docking/Fusion  Trey K. Sato, Peter Rehling, Michael R. Peterson,
Rules for Nuclear Localization Sequence Recognition by Karyopherinβ2
Yanhui Xu, Yu Chen, Ping Zhang, Philip D. Jeffrey, Yigong Shi 
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 134, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
HMGN Proteins Act in Opposition to ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodeling Factors to Restrict Nucleosome Mobility  Barbara P. Rattner, Timur Yusufzai, James.
A Dual E3 Mechanism for Rub1 Ligation to Cdc53
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Chemical Dissection of an Essential Redox Switch in Yeast
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Coiled-Coil Domains of SUN Proteins as Intrinsic Dynamic Regulators
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
c-Src Activates Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages e3 (July 2017)
Claudia Schneider, James T. Anderson, David Tollervey  Molecular Cell 
Structural Basis for Specific Recognition of Reelin by Its Receptors
A Critical Role for Noncoding 5S rRNA in Regulating Mdmx Stability
Frida E. Kleiman, James L. Manley  Cell 
Volume 2, Issue 5, Pages (November 1998)
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
Yi Tang, Jianyuan Luo, Wenzhu Zhang, Wei Gu  Molecular Cell 
A Role for the Fizzy/Cdc20 Family of Proteins in Activation of the APC/C Distinct from Substrate Recruitment  Yuu Kimata, Joanne E. Baxter, Andrew M.
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Autoantigen La Promotes Efficient RNAi, Antiviral Response, and Transposon Silencing by Facilitating Multiple-Turnover RISC Catalysis  Ying Liu, Huiling.
Cotranscriptional Recruitment of the mRNA Export Factor Yra1 by Direct Interaction with the 3′ End Processing Factor Pcf11  Sara Ann Johnson, Gabrielle.
TopBP1 Activates the ATR-ATRIP Complex
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 73, Issue 3, Pages e3 (February 2019)
Two Functional Modes of a Nuclear Receptor-Recruited Arginine Methyltransferase in Transcriptional Activation  María J. Barrero, Sohail Malik  Molecular.
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 104, Issue 3, Pages (February 2001)
Michael S. Kuhns, Mark M. Davis  Immunity 
A Stable Prefusion Intermediate of the Alphavirus Fusion Protein Reveals Critical Features of Class II Membrane Fusion  Claudia Sánchez-San Martín, Hernando.
SNAREpins: Minimal Machinery for Membrane Fusion
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Structure of the Siz/PIAS SUMO E3 Ligase Siz1 and Determinants Required for SUMO Modification of PCNA  Ali A. Yunus, Christopher D. Lima  Molecular Cell 
Regulation of Yeast mRNA 3′ End Processing by Phosphorylation
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (November 2011)
Damian Dawidowski, David S. Cafiso  Structure 
In Vitro Analysis of Huntingtin-Mediated Transcriptional Repression Reveals Multiple Transcription Factor Targets  Weiguo Zhai, Hyunkyung Jeong, Libin.
Sequential E2s Drive Polyubiquitin Chain Assembly on APC Targets
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages (September 1999)
SNAREs Contribute to the Specificity of Membrane Fusion
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Presentation transcript:

Selective Activation of Cognate SNAREpins by Sec1/Munc18 Proteins Jingshi Shen, David C. Tareste, Fabienne Paumet, James E. Rothman, Thomas J. Melia  Cell  Volume 128, Issue 1, Pages 183-195 (January 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.12.016 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Munc18-1 Strongly Stimulates Neuronal/Exocytic SNARE-Mediated Membrane Fusion (A) Incubation procedures for liposome fusion reactions. (B) v- and t- SNARE liposomes were mixed and incubated at 4°C with 5 μM Munc18-1 protein or an equal volume of protein buffer. Incubation was continued at 4°C for 3 hr before the temperature was elevated to 37°C to start fusion. To block the formation of trans-SNARE complexes, the cytoplasmic domain of VAMP2 (cdv2) was added to a final concentration of 20 μM (negative controls). The effect of Munc18-1 was also tested on liposomes without preincubation, in which the v- and t-SNARE liposomes were directly mixed with Munc18-1 or buffer at 37°C (no preincubation). The first 20 min of the fusion reactions were shown to highlight the initial fusion rates. A 2 hr fusion reaction is shown in Figure 3. (C) Munc18-1 was incubated with t- or v-liposomes for 3 hr at 4°C before the liposomes were warmed up to 37°C and mixed with prewarmed cognate liposomes to start fusion. (D) Dose dependence of the stimulatory activity of Munc18-1 on membrane fusion. The plot depicts the fold activation of the initial liposome fusion rate with varying Munc18-1 concentration. Error bars equal standard deviation. Cell 2007 128, 183-195DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.12.016) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Munc18-1 Selectively Acts on Assembled SNARE Complexes (A) Incubation procedures for liposome fusion reactions catalyzed by preassembled SNARE complexes. (B) v- and t- liposomes were incubated with Munc18-1 or buffer for 3 hr at 4°C before the temperature was elevated to 37°C to start fusion. For fusion mediated by preassembled SNAREs, inhibitory cdv2 was added after the 4°C liposome preincubation to block unpaired t-SNAREs. Negative controls are as in Figure 1B. (C) Preincubation of Munc18-1 with t- or v-SNARE liposomes. Cell 2007 128, 183-195DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.12.016) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Munc18-1 Specifically Activates Neuronal/Exocytic SNARE Pairs (A) Fusion of neuronal t-SNARE (syntaxin 1 and SNAP-25) liposomes with v-SNARE liposomes reconstituted with various v-SNAREs in the presence or absence of 5μM Munc18-1. (Top) Standard activation curves as in Figure 1. (Bottom) Preassembled SNAREs as in Figure 2. (B) Liposomes containing lysosomal/late endosomal (LE) t-SNAREs (syntaxin7, Vti1b, and mTlg1/syntaxin8) or constitutive/nonneuronal exocytic t-SNAREs (syntaxin 4 and SNAP-23) were mixed with VAMP8 or VAMP2 liposomes in the absence or presence of 5 μM Munc18-1. (C) Diagram showing the effects of Munc18-1 on membrane fusion catalyzed by various t- and v-SNARE combinations. Red, cognate neuronal/exocytic SNARE pairs. Blue, SNARE pairs not activated by Munc18-1. n-t-SNAREs, neuronal/exocytic t-SNAREs (syntaxin 1 and SNAP-25); LE-t-SNAREs, lysosomal/late endosomal t-SNAREs (syntaxin 7, Vti1b, and mTlg1); c-t-SNAREs, constitutive/nonneuronal exocytic t-SNAREs (syntaxin 4 and SNAP-23). Error bars equal standard deviation. Dashed line indicates the basal fusion level (without Munc18-1 activation). ∗ VAMP7 fuses less well than other v-SNAREs. Cell 2007 128, 183-195DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.12.016) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Mutations in VAMP2 That Decrease Munc18-1 Stimulation Reduce Exocytosis In Vivo (A) Sequence alignment of VAMP2, VAMP3, and VAMP8 showing the mutations tested in the study. Light blue, VAMP2 residues 1–28 deleted in VAMP2 ΔN mutant. Yellow, VAMP2 residues mutated to corresponding VAMP8 sequences. Bold and underlined, a three-residue motif mutated in our reconstituted assay as well as in an in vivo-regulated exocytic system (S75A/E78A/T79A). SNARE layer residues are numbered and indicated with asterisks. (B) Fusion of WT t-SNARE liposomes with WT or mutant VAMP2 (V2) liposomes in the absence or presence of 5 μM Munc18-1. (Top) Standard activation curves. (Bottom) Fusion reactions catalyzed by preassembled SNAREs. (C) Fold activation of the fusion reactions in Figure 4B. (D) Diagram correlating the effects of the VAMP2 mutations on the stimulatory activity of Munc18-1 and on in vivo exocytosis. The stimulation of WT neuronal/exocytic SNAREs (syntaxin 1, SNAP-25, and VAMP2) by Munc18-1 was set as 100%. The standard activation of mutant SNARE liposomes (green bars) or activation of preassembled SNAREs (blue bars) is shown as percentage of WT SNAREs. Standard deviation (%), (1) green bars (left to right, 7.9, 4.2, 8.4, and 3.1) and (2) blue bars (left to right, 12, 2.27, 7.4, and 3.9). ∗In vivo data of calcium-triggered exocytosis were based on published results (Borisovska et al., 2005; Sorensen et al., 2002), with the mutants normalized to WT conditions (red bars). Cell 2007 128, 183-195DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.12.016) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 A Functional Interaction between Munc18-1 and the N-Terminal Peptide Motif of Syntaxin 1 (A) Syntaxin 1 proteins containing a thrombin cleavable Habc domain were reconstituted in the place of WT syntaxin 1. Liposomes were treated with thrombin or buffer and repurified by Accudenz gradient flotation as described (Parlati et al., 1999). Full-length SNAREs or SNAREs ΔHabc were tested for Munc18-1 activation as in Figure 4B. (B) Alignment of the N-terminal sequences of syntaxin 1 from multiple organisms. Corresponding sequences in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast) Sed5p and rat syntaxin 5 are also shown. Conserved charged residues are highlighted in blue, and the hydrophobic residues are shown in red. (C) The effects of syntaxin N-peptide mutations (Δ1-19 or L8A) or open mutations (L165A, E166A) on the stimulatory activity of Munc18-1. (D) Diagram showing the effects of syntaxin mutations on Munc18-1 stimulation. Error bars equal standard deviation. Cell 2007 128, 183-195DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.12.016) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Munc18-1 Binds to Neuronal/Exocytic SNARE Complexes (A) GST-Munc18-1 was used to pull down WT or mutant SNAREs. Protein complexes were resolved by SDS-PAGE followed by Coomassie blue staining (left) or western blotting with indicated antibodies (right). ∗SNAP-25 comigrates with a nonspecific protein on the SDS-PAGE. (B) CoIP of Munc18-1 with SNAREs. Immunoprecipitates were resolved on SDS-PAGE and analyzed by western blotting. (C) Coomassie blue-stained SDS-PAGE gel showing the binding of Munc18-1 to liposomes. Lanes 1–6, float-up results showing the binding of Munc18-1 to indicated liposomes. Liposomes containing tertiary neuronal/exocytic SNARE complexes were prepared by incubating the cytoplasmic domain of VAMP2 (dashed arrow) with WT t-SNARE liposomes overnight at 4°C. Lanes 7–13, input materials. Cell 2007 128, 183-195DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.12.016) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Model for a General Mechanism of SM Protein Function in Cellular Membrane Fusion (A) SM proteins bind to the core domains of cognate SNARE complexes as well as the N-terminal peptide of syntaxin to stimulate membrane fusion. Modeled from the crystal structures of the SNAREpin complex (Sutton et al., 1998), the syntaxin 1 Habc domain (Fernandez et al., 1998), and the Sly1p-Sed5p complex (Bracher and Weissenhorn, 2002). The model is intended to depict the two primary modes of SM-SNARE interaction, although the molecular details of binding await further experimental and structural studies. Yellow, SM protein; green, syntaxin; blue, t-SNARE light chains (only core domains are shown); pink, v-SNARE; red, N-terminal peptide of syntaxin bound to the SM protein. Structures were edited in PyMOL. (B) Additional role of Munc18-1 in neuronal/exocytic fusion is binding to closed monomeric syntaxin 1 and preventing SNARE assembly (crystal structure from Misura et al. [2000]). This mode of activity appears to be unique to Munc18-1 and has not been found in other SM proteins. Cell 2007 128, 183-195DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.12.016) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions