Status of AA3, AA1 and AA2 (In order of maturity)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Integration Relation for Control Volume
Advertisements

First Wall Heat Loads Mike Ulrickson November 15, 2014.
31/03/11FV 1 CEDAR from flammable gas safety point of view.
Oak Ridge SNS Experimental Facilities X /arb 1 SNS MPS Review Target-MPS Review WBS Ron Battle Target Controls, Target Systems Experimental.
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Two Tube Failure Event for the Helium Cooled Blanket Lee Cadwallader and Brad Merrill INEEL Fusion.
Michael Butzek, Jörg Wolters, Bernhard Laatsch Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Proton beam window for High Power Target Application 4th.
AREVA NP EUROTRANS WP1.5 Technical Meeting Task – ETD Safety approach Safety approach for EFIT: Deliverable 1.21 Lyon, October Sophie.
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Safety Issues Related to Flibe/Ferritic Steel Blanket and Vacuum Vessel Placement Brad Merrill.
May 22nd & 23rd 2007 Stockholm EUROTRANS: WP 1.5 Task Containment Assessment IP-EUROTRANS DOMAIN 1 Design WP 1.5 Safety Assessment of the Transmutation.
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Beryllium-Steam Reaction in Ceramic Blanket Brad Merrill and Lee Cadwallader Fusion Safety Program.
Status of T2K Target 2 nd Oxford-Princeton High-Power Target Workshop 6-7 th November 2008 Mike Fitton RAL.
ARIES Meeting General Atomics, February 25 th, 2005 Brad Merrill, Richard Moore Fusion Safety Program Pressurization Accidents in ARIES-CS.
AREVA NP EUROTRANS WP1.5 Technical Meeting Task – ETD Safety approach Safety approach for EFIT: Deliverable 1.21 Stockholm, May Sophie.
Safety Review: RF Issues Derun Li Absorber Safety Review December 9-10, 2003 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA
Oxidation of Graphite Walls: Preliminary Results from SOMBRERO Safety Analysis S. Reyes, J. F. Latkowski Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Laser IFE.
UCN Phase 2 Design Status September 10, Design Components Bulk Shielding Target Crypt Cryogenic Insert Target Insert UCN Port Beam Window Cooling.
Evaluation of Safety Distances Related to Unconfined Hydrogen Explosions Sergey Dorofeev FM Global 1 st ICHS, Pisa, Italy, September 8-10, 2005.
Chapter 7 Energy and Energy Balance
TBM WG Meeting UCLA, March 2-4, 2005 Brad Merrill/Fusion Safety Program DCLL TBM Safety Update.
23 Jan 2007 LASA Cryogenics Global Group 1 ILC Cryomodule piping L. Tavian for the cryogenics global group.
High-Power Density Target Design and Analyses for Accelerator Production of Isotopes W. David Pointer Argonne National Laboratory Nuclear Engineering Division.
Study of a new high power spallation target concept
Completion of Water-Cooled Backup Study Eric Pitcher TAC-10 November 5, 2014.
Summary Why consider a packed bed as a high power target?
Nuclear Thermal Hydraulic System Experiment
BL1U at TRIUMF UCN Beamline Spallation Target & Remote-Handling System (Aug/2010) L.Lee.
PSB dump: proposal of a new design EN – STI technical meeting on Booster dumps Friday 11 May 2012 BE Auditorium Prevessin Alba SARRIÓ MARTÍNEZ.
Calculation of Beam loss on foil septa C. Pai Brookhaven National Laboratory Collider-Accelerator Department
ERMSAR 2012, Cologne March 21 – 23, 2012 ESTIMATION OF THERMAL-HYDRAULIC LOADING FOR VVER-1000 UNDER SEVERE ACCIDENT SCENARIO Barun Chatterjee 1, Deb Mukhopadhyay.
Solid Targets for Neutron Spallation Sources Eric Pitcher Los Alamos National Laboratory Presented to: AHIPA Workshop October 20, 2009.
PSB dump replacement 17 th November 2011 LIU-PSB meeting Alba Sarrió.
Kick off meeting EFDA Task TW6-TSL-002 Garching 9th/10/2006 ENEA Overview of the task and coordination: refined description of the accident sequences,
Beam Instrumentation in Monolith Stephen Molloy PBI Taskforce Leader.
Risk Analysis P. Cennini AB-ATB on behalf of the n_TOF Team  Procedure  Documents in preparation  Conclusions Second n_TOF External Panel Review, CERN,
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Jörg Wolters, Michael Butzek Focused Cross Flow LBE Target for ESS 4th HPTW, Malmö, 3 May 2011.
Simulation of heat load at JHF decay pipe and beam dump KEK Yoshinari Hayato.
AQA A2 Physics A Nuclear Physics Section 15 Fission.
NuMI PS Specs June 2001 S. Childress Page 1 NuMI NuMI requirements are for a very large fraction of the available Main Injector intensity over a period.
Beam on Target Diagnostics Beam on Target Meeting 2013 March Tom Shea.
ESS Target Station Hazards Analysis and Safety Classification Process Linda R. Coney European Spallation Source (ESS) HPTW
ARIES Meeting University of Wisconsin, April 27 th, 2006 Brad Merrill, Richard Moore Fusion Safety Program Update of Pressurization Accidents in ARIES-CS.
Update on the ESS monolith design Rikard Linander Monolith and Handling Group ESS Target Division TAC 10, Lund, Nov 5,
Design for a 2 MW graphite target for a neutrino beam Jim Hylen Accelerator Physics and Technology Workshop for Project X November 12-13, 2007.
Target Systems and Monolith Design Update Rikard Linander Group Leader Monolith and Handling April 2, 2014.
The ESS Target Station Eric Pitcher Head of Target Division February 19, 2016.
1 Target Station Design Dan Wilcox February 2012.
Hazards Analysis and Safety Classification Process Linda R. Coney Group Leader – Target Safety and Controls April 7, 2016.
The ESS Target Station F. Mezei ESS target division NPPatLPS, 2013.
Thermal-hydraulic analysis of unit cell for solid breeder TBM
EP4P03 Nuclear Power Plant Systems and Operation
ISIS TS1 Project: Target Design and Analysis
60 1. What is the mass M in the system as given in the
A.Borovoi, S.Bogatov, V.Chudanov, V.Strizhov
Design of the thermosiphon Test Facilities 2nd Thermosiphon Workshop
Skeleton contributions to targets section
Approaches and measures aimed at ensuring safety, preventing severe accidents in new RF NPP designs Gutsalov N.A. 10/03/2016.
Cooling aspects for Nb3Sn Inner Triplet quadrupoles and D1
ESS elliptical cryomodule
Group 1 Best Group.
Preliminary Analysis of Loss of Vacuum Events in ARIES-RS
What is a Turbine ? A Turbine is a device which converts the heat energy of steam into the kinetic energy & then to rotational energy. The Motive Power.
Target Helium Cooling System Design Code 10th Target Technical Board Meeting Ulf Odén WP2 Manager 19 April, 2019.
ESS Per Nilsson CFD Specialist
TSS System Requirements - TSS CDR1
RSFs & categorisation 20 May, 2019.
Approaches and measures aimed at ensuring safety, preventing severe accidents in new RF NPP designs Gutsalov N.A. 10/03/2016.
ESS Target Station Radiation Safety Accident Analyses
Operation of Target Safety System (TSS)
Mikael Olsson Control Engineer
Overview of the TARGET Monolith Rough Vacuum
Presentation transcript:

Status of AA3, AA1 and AA2 (In order of maturity) Kristoffer Sjögreen

Status AA3 in review. Remaining questions are: reported dose in relation to conservatism in analysis, and iteration with operational limits. Close to release. AA1 in prereview within working group. The changes on AA1 regarding conservatism and reported dose will follow the outcome of the AA3- discussion. Source term is final, but dose calculation not yet updated. AA2 not yet reached review state. Some calculations remaining before source term is finally defined. Dose calculation not yet updated.

General description of ESS Target

Target vessel

Cassette and spallation material

Cassette and spallation material

Tungsten brick

Section view

AA3 Cooling concept Event and event categorisation Event progression Source term Dose to public

Cooling principle

Machine protection functions for AA3 Description Failure frequency Remark PF1 Low inlet pressure 10-6/hr PF2 High inlet temperature PF3 High outlet temperature PF4 Low massflow 10-5/hr PF5 High local target temperature Not credited

Event frequencies AA3 Event 1: Helium compressor stop Event 2: Failure of pressure control Event 3: Unintended isolation Event 4: Heat exchanger malfunction Event 5: Large leakage Event 6: Ingress of water All events require failure of 2 or more credited machine protection functions, the event class has been deduced to be H3. For the unmitigated case, the bounding event is deduced to be a complete loss of the cooling function.

Loss of cooling Cooling lost Beam entrance window breaks Moderator damaged Helium leaks out Oxidation in steam starts Shroud melts, friction increase, wheel stops Tungsten falls out, ingress into moderator Beam penetrates two sectors Beam penetrates monolith Steam generation cease Air leaks in and causes hydrogen explosion Beam damages proton beam window cooling equipment outside monolith Event stops

2. BEW Failure t=0s T=1s 1. Wheel Cooling Failure 2. Wheel BEW Failure 3. Water Moderator Damage 4. Wheel Shroud Collapse 5.Tungsten Block Crash 6. Wheel Rotation Stop 7. Two Sectors Damaged 8. Beam Through Monolith 9. Beam Reach AC Pits t=0s T=1s Divided, all paths simultaneously BEW fails all around due to thermal load Helium coolant released Tungsten exposed 14

3. Water Moderator Damage 1. Wheel Cooling Failure 2. Wheel BEW Failure 3. Water Moderator Damage 4. Wheel Shroud Collapse 5.Tungsten Block Crash 6. Wheel Rotation Stop 7. Two Sectors Damaged 8. Beam Through Monolith 9. Beam Reach AC Pits t=0s T=1s BEW Edges mechanically damage Water Moderators Water released Divided, all paths simultaneously 15

3. Water Moderator Damage: Monolith 1. Wheel Cooling Failure 2. Wheel BEW Failure 3. Water Moderator Damage 4. Wheel Shroud Collapse 5.Tungsten Block Crash 6. Wheel Rotation Stop 7. Two Sectors Damaged 8. Beam Through Monolith 9. Beam Reach AC Pits t=0s T=1s Void volume in monolith vessel, below vertical position (l) Water level at lower surface of neutron void Divided, all paths simultaneously ~2 m3 void 16 Position below proton beam centre (mm)

Mitigation In the mitigated scenario, TSS stops the event from progressing beyond this point. Credited TSS functions are designed to cover all initiating events. Low massflow High temperature Low pressure

4. Wheel Collapse t=0s t=280s 1. Wheel Cooling Failure 2. Wheel BEW Failure 3. Water Moderator Damage 4. Wheel Shroud Collapse 5.Tungsten Block Crash 6. Wheel Rotation Stop 7. Two Sectors Damaged 8. Beam Through Monolith 9. Beam Reach AC Pits t=0s t=280s Lower part of cassette and shroud deforms due to thermal load Wheel starts braking - rotation slows down Blocks escape beam partially Divided, all paths simultaneously 18

5. Tungsten block crash t=0s t=200s 1. Wheel Cooling Failure 2. Wheel BEW Failure 3. Water Moderator Damage 4. Wheel Shroud Collapse 5.Tungsten Block Crash 6. Wheel Rotation Stop 7. Two Sectors Damaged 8. Beam Through Monolith 9. Beam Reach AC Pits t=0s t=200s 4. Some blocks in outer rows fall out Heat added to water in moderator Blocks more exposed to steam Divided, all paths simultaneously Blocks escape beam partially 19

6. Wheel Rotation Stop t=0s t=200s Beam -> Moderator edge 1. Wheel Cooling Failure 2. Wheel BEW Failure 3. Water Moderator Damage 4. Wheel Shroud Collapse 5.Tungsten Block Crash 6. Wheel Rotation Stop 7. Two Sectors Damaged 8. Beam Through Monolith 9. Beam Reach AC Pits t=0s t=200s 34 * 4 rows entirely lost 2 sectors (front and back) Beam -> Divided, all paths simultaneously 1100 kg Tungsten Moderator edge MR Plug edge 20

The unmitigated release is dominated by airborne tungsten oxides

Limitation Oxidation is limited based on maximum temperature

Limitation Oxidation is limited based on access to steam and temperature

Limitation Oxidation is limited based on maximum particle concentration in monolith Kmax = 500 g WO3/m3 mairborne= K * steamflow msettling= (K-Kmax)*Airborne mass/1s

Source term AA3 unmitigated Material Mass damaged Airborne release fraction Release time Helium 30 kg 1 10s Filter particles from helium loop 10 g 0.01 Tungsten 53.8 kg 0,38 1000s Moderator cooling water 700 kg 0.46 20000s Steel 131 kg 0,01 Deposited tungsten oxides (hydrogen explosion) 33.1 kg 0.005 Instantly after 5000 s Diffusion from tungsten 1100 kg 8.3e-4

Source term AA3 mitigated Material Mass damaged Airborne release fraction Release time Helium 30 kg 1 10s Filter particles from helium loop 10 g 0.01 Tungsten 1.2 g 0,5 1000s Moderator cooling water 700 kg 0.24 20000s

Leak paths A comparative analysis showed that the leak path giving the highest dose was directly out through monolith relief path.

AA3- Dose to public Unmitigated dose to reference person = 156 mSv

AA1 Motion control concept Event and event categorisation Event progression Source term Dose to public

Motion control concept- target rotation

Machine protection functions Description Failure frequency Remark PF7 Low or high target speed 10-6/hr PF8 Syncronisation with timing system PF9 Bearing temperature 10-5/hr Not credited PF10 Bearing vibration PF2 Inlet helium temperature

Event frequencies AA1 Applied to the unmitigated case Event 1: Target wheel stop but rolls out slowly. If the rollout is slow it will lead to target failure before target has stopped and therefore become an initiating event for AA3 for the unmitigated case. Release will be less than for AA3. If the wheel rolls out faster than the threshold where target breaks due to unsyncronised beam, the unmitigated consequences will be the same as for the direct stop. Event category is H3. Event 2: Target rotation stops directly. It is judged to only happen as a result of an undetected change in operating conditions, ie increased helium inlet temperature. Event category is H4.

Event frequencies AA1 Applied to the mitigated case- mitigation based on wheel rotation Event 1: Target wheel stop but rolls out. If the rollout is slow the wheel stop will be detected by TSS before substantial target damage. If the wheel rolls out faster than TSS reaction time, there will be target damage but less than that for a direct stop. Event 2: Target rotation stops directly. Target will be stopped and suffer direct stationary impact from proton beam during TSS reaction time.

AA1 event timeline Loss of rotation Beam entrance window ruptures Coolant starts flowing out Premoderator breaks Melting starts Beam penetrates two sectors Shroud beneath two sectors melt Two complete sectors spill out Ingress into lower moderator Oxidation in steam Proton beam penetrates monolith Release through relief path by chimney effect of airborne particles Hydrogen explosion affect settled particles End

Wheel Rotation Stop- unmitigated scenario similar to AA3 Two Sectors Damaged Beam Through Monolith t=0s T=10s Two sectors (front and back) are heated by beam Beam -> Moderator edge MR Plug edge 35

Source term- AA1 unmitigated Dominated by aerosols

Oxidation rate and mass transport for AA1 unmitigated

Tungsten cooling due to outflow of helium credited Source term- AA1 mitigated- 3 seconds to melting starts in the first row Tungsten cooling due to outflow of helium credited Total helium massflow Estimated fraction of helium possible to be used for cooling is 10 %.

Source term AA1 unmitigated Material Mass damaged Airborne release fraction Release time Helium 30 kg 1 10s Filter particles from helium loop 10 g 0.01 Tungsten 24 kg 0,38 1400s Steel 13 kg 0,01 Beryllium 9.5 kg Deposited tungsten oxides (hydrogen explosion) 15 kg 0.005 Instantly after 5000 s Diffusion from tungsten 172 kg 0.001

Source term AA1 mitigated Material Mass damaged Airborne release fraction Release time Helium 30 kg 1 30s Filter particles from helium loop 10 g 0.01 Tungsten 2,9 kg

Dose to public- AA1 Release is judged to follow the same path as for AA3- directly out through monolith relief line. Unmitigated dose was calculated to be 56 mSv but recalculation is being done with contribution from melted steel. Expected dose is around 60 mSv. Mitigated dose is being calculated but is expected to be lower than threshold for H4 (20 mSv).

AA2 Beam parameters Event and event categorisation Event progression Source term Dose to public

AA2- Beam parameters Proton beam window Target RMS beamlet size 11.2x4.2 mm 13.5x5.05 mm Rastering 49.4x16.6 mm 60x20 mm Rastering frequency 39.55x29.05 kHz Average current density 84 uA/ cm2 53 uA/ cm2 Beam footprint size 160x60 mm

AA2- Worst case beam footprints Proton beam window Target Rastering failure (RMS) 11.2x4.2 mm 13.5x5.05 mm Focusing failure (RMS) 49.4x16.6 mm 60x20 mm Combination of above 0.5x0.5 mm

AA2- Machine protection functions Description Failure frequency Remark PF1 Defect focusing system (quadropoles) 10-7/hr State of quadropoles PF2 Beam size or position 10-6/hr Aperture monitors, grid monitors, beam position monitors PF3 Defect rastering system (raster magnets) State of rastering magnets PF4 Target speed PF5 Target syncronisation 10-5/hr PF6 Beam mode consistent with beam destination Pulse length, rep rate and beam current PF7 Beam current monitors Beam current

Event frequencies AA2 Event 1: Focusing failure including failure of PF1 and PF2 = H3 Event 2: Rastering failure including failure of PF2 and PF3 = H3 Event 3: Combination of failures above including failure of PF1, PF2 and PF3 = H4. Event 4: Target wheel out of sync with accelerator including failure of PF4, PF5 and PF6 = H4. Event 4 will be an initiating event for AA3. Event 1 and Event 2 will not lead to dangerously high beam current densities on target (from a radiation safety perspective) Only Event 3 is analysed in detail

Event progression for unrastered small beamlet on target 1. Focusing and rastering system failure t =0 2. Wheel BEW Failure t=0 s 3. Proton beam window failure 4. Tungsten melting t= 0 s 5. Passive shutdown t= 0.7 s The time for the passive shutdown is being revisited

Radial heat distribution on spallation material Curve fitting to radial heat distribution; Estimation of tungsten damage for different beam footprints

Beam footprints for accidents For unrastered beamlet, the double gaussian distribution gives power as function of standard deviation and focusing. Example below for proton beam window.

Beam footprints for accidents Rastered beam footprint Deposited power in rastered beam is 90%, For nominal beam.

Pencil beam on tungsten Even with small beam footprint, The power will spread in the Tungsten.

Source term, AA2, unmitigated was the same as source term for the mitigated case Combined failure of focusing and rastering Material Mass damaged Airborne release fraction Release time Helium 30 kg 1 10s Filter particles from helium loop 10 g 0.01 Tungsten 1 kg 0,01 1000s Source term will be revisited. It will probably get higher since the estimation of accelerator passive shutdown is different.

Hole in proton beam window The proton beam window is a water- cooled double walled aluminium structure. Leakage Proton beam

Dose to public for AA2 Unmitigated from 10 meters (assuming all is released through beam pipe) 0.4 mSv. Mitigated from 45 meters (assuming all is relelased through stack) is 0.04 mSv. Both values will change.