CAPACITY strategy & MODEL atlantic 2020 PILOT

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Info1409 De Montfort University1 Requirements Modelling Systems Analysis & Design Academic Year 2008/9 Info 1409 Lecture 7.
Advertisements

David Halldearn, ERGEG Conference on Implementing the 3 rd Package 11 th December 2008 Implementating the 3rd Package: An ERGEG Consultation paper.
How to use the VSS to design a National Strategy for the Development of Statistics (NSDS) 1.
Benoît ESNAULT Commission de Régulation de l’Energie 17th Madrid Forum Madrid, 15 January year network development plan ERGEG recommendations.
Concept of Transparency Platform Martin Reisner Junior Adviser, Transparency ENTSOG’s Transparency Workshop Brussels – 11 September 2012.
1TAP Masterplanning kick-off25 September 2012 TAP TSI Masterplanning Overview of RU/IM obligations Masterplanning Kick-off Brussels, 25 September 2012.
Slide: 1 CEOS SIT Technical Workshop |Caltech, Pasadena, California, USA| September 2013 CEOS Work Plan Section 6.1 G Dyke CEOS ad hoc Working Group.
The Central Role of the Network Operators 28 March 2007 ERGEG-GTE Meeting.
We increase the impact of marketing measures and enhance our customers’ brand value. In order to achieve this goal we combine market research and consulting.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
Implementing Program Management Standards at Duke Energy.
Practical IT Research that Drives Measurable Results Establish an Effective IT Steering Committee.
1 Capacity and Congestion Management Duties of TSOs - Availability of infrastructure and capacities for shippers to fulfil their supply obligations - Guarantee.
Seite 1 WP1 Organisation and Management Management Group Meeting, Halle 18 March 2014.
Madrid, 23rd Sep th SG Meeting South Gas Regional Initiative OSP and Interoperability.
Systems Development Life Cycle
ITIL SERVICE LIFECYCLE
Auditing Sustainable Development Goals
Czech-Slovak Corridor
NGTA Halton Planning and Public Works Committee
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
Benchmarking.
Ground System implication for ASAS implementation
Redesign of the International Timetabling Process (TTR)
Hyper-V Cloud Proof of Concept Kickoff Meeting <Customer Name>
S&TT structure 13 September 2017.
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
TTR IT Implementation Capacity Offer/Request/Allocation
Non-RU Applicant (NRA), PCS UG
RFC Short Term Path Request Pilots
Content Management System
Redesign of the International Timetabling Process (TTR)
Draft Guidance Document (ERDF/ESF)
Envelope Concept report, PCS UG
Temporary Capacity Restrictions: TCR WG & TCR tool
Conduction of a simulation considering cascading effects
Health Ingenuity Exchange - HingX
Redesign of the International Timetabling Process (TTR)
PCS Outlook PCS User Group 12th September 2018, Vienna.
PCS Minor Release th February 2018, PCS UG.
Evaluation plans for programming period in Poland
PCS CCB Group 22nd February, 2017.
TAF-TSI Train Object 25th June 2018, Prague.
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
PaP Publication strategy TT2019 – Combined PaP
Redesign of the International Timetabling Process (TTR)
Capacity Methodology Statements: Impact of Mod 452
IT Support for TTR Pilots
Project management Learning Unit 5.
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
SOME IMPORTANT CONSIDERATIONS AND STEPS
PCS User Group 15th February, 2017.
Retrospective report of the past year
TTR IT Landscape PCS-TTR Day Vienna, 21 November 2018.
PaP Product Definition
3. An overview of the SDMX implementation process
TSI Compliant PCS Mandatory Interface
DROUGHT MANAGEMENT PLANS IN SPAIN Drought indicators Rome, 7 Dicember 2006 Teodoro Estrela Deputy Water Director Spanish Ministry of Environment.
Systems Development Life Cycle
RFC Short Term Path Request developments
Envelope concept changes
Customer Visit TT2020 Standard Presentation
Annex A1.6.2b RU access to OBI RNE General Assembly 16 May 2018.
Customer Visit TT2020 Standard Presentation
Modelling of Train and Path in TAF/TAP TSIs
Civil Society Facility and Media Programme Call for proposals: EuropeAid/162473/DH/ACT/Multi Webinar no. 3: Preparing effective Concept Note.
DSG Governance Group Recommendations.
Outline Context for database development Goals of database development
Railway timetabling tools with automatic solutions
Draft Charter Community of Practice for Direct Access Entities
Presentation transcript:

CAPACITY strategy & MODEL atlantic 2020 PILOT Steering Committee meeting – TTR 13.04.2018 – Vienna Steerco TTR - PILOT ATL 2020 April 13, 2018

REMINDER : target PROCESS Extract from executive summary agreed by RNE AND FTE IN 2017 Steerco TTR - PILOT ATL 2020 April 13, 2018

REMINDER : PILOTS Pilot lines Phases Phase 1: Capacity partitioning and capacity planning Dec 2017 Dec 2018 Pilote Antwerp – Rotterdam Pilot Munich – Verona Phase 2: Capacity publication and capacity requests Dec 2018 Dec 2019 Phase 3: Running timetable Pilot ATL Mannheim – Miranda de Ebro Dec 2019 Dec 2020

Capacity STRATEGY EXAMPLE FOR SPANISH SECTION OF THE PILOT LINE (All three IM have the same structure) Each IM provided a proposal of capacity strategy for the different national sections of the Pilot ATL line Convergent model and content Example of content provided by ADIF Temporary Capacity Restrictions Maintenance will be done during the normal reserved maintenance windows. Section between Irún and Miranda is double track so there is no total closure at any moment for maintenance. Extraordinary track works are foreseen for TT-2020 between Irún and San Sebastián. Details are not yet known but night total closure could be possible during long periods. Traffic flows Traffic flows must be considered and prioritized regarding their fees contribution and their strategic importance, as far as in line with the respective national law. An adequate amount of capacity can be safeguarded from the Annual TT for later capacity needs like ad hoc traffic. National rules must be respected for the allocation process during the TTR pilot. Eg. Requests placed after the Annual TT deadline must follow the rule “first come – first served”. A capacity model must be shaped in advance, starting from real traffic observation, Market considerations, and RU early announcements, to define a balanced solution for all needs, taking in consideration the above TCR policy. Long distance traffics must be safeguarded due to the complexity of finding suitable solutions. Public service obligations must be safeguarded. Commuter traffic must be safeguarded, particularly during the peak hours. Specific studies are done in advance to prepare and announce solutions for traffic during major closures. Steerco TTR - PILOT ATL 2020 April 13, 2018

CAPACITY model – overview DEFINITION After discussions (RU/IM) in the pilot working team, and exchanges with the two other pilots, 5 items have been considered as necessary to define a capacity model, to be in line with a capacity strategy. The content of the items is now under tuning for 2020 TT, starting with an axis before combining axis to build a network structure, Observed traffic data section by section for a normal day Regular-interval timetable Freight traffic matrix including capacity bandwidths 24-hour view of the model (bandwidths and TCRs) Commercial offer underlying capacity bandwidths for dynamic traffic (basis for capacity partitioning) 1 4 3 Steerco TTR - PILOT ATL 2020 April 13, 2018

CAPACITY model (1) OBSERVED TRAFFIC DATA SECTION BY SECTION FOR A NORMAL DAY Steerco TTR - PILOT ATL 2020 April 13, 2018

CAPACITY model (2) Regular interval timetables (from international TO regional interactions) Steerco TTR - PILOT ATL 2020 April 13, 2018

CAPACITY model (2) Freight traffic matrix Steerco TTR - PILOT ATL 2020 April 13, 2018

CAPACITY model (3) 24-HOUR GRAPHIC VIEW (TCR and FREIGHT CAPACITY bandwidths) Steerco TTR - PILOT ATL 2020 April 13, 2018

Capacity MODEL (5) COMMERCIAL OFFER UNDERLYING CAPACITY BANDWIDTHS – EXAMPLE FOR LONG-DISTANCE INTERNATIONAL TRAFFIC A commercial RP offer is safeguarded in the pilot capacity model, open exclusively to freight path requests having origin or destination East of LEROUVILLE on one side and South of MORCENX on the other side. The offer is the following : Capacity for 2 trains MA100 TRAX 1800t Departure Mannheim for Hendaye, arrival between 1:00 et 4:00 from Mo to Fr on 48* weeks with a guaranteed transit time of 24 hours. Capacity for 2 trains MA100 TRAX 1800t Departure Mannheim for Hendaye between 13:00 et 16:00 from Mo to Fr on 48* weeks with a guaranteed transit time of 21 hours. Capacity for 2 trains MA100 TRAX 1800t Departure Hendaye for Mannheim between 1:00 et 3:00 from Mo to Fr on 48* weeks with a guaranteed transit time of 21 hours. Capacity for 2 trains MA100 TRAX 1800t Departure Hendaye for Mannheim between 16:00 et 20:00 from Mo to Fr on 48* weeks with a guaranteed transit time of 21 hours. The potential four yearly weeks (*) with exemption (linked to TCR) of this offer will be defined and communicated in April 2018. Rolling Planning and Capacity bandwitdhs : both concepts must not be confused! Some capacity bandwidths may be used within the traditional yearly process (as a commercial offer replacing PaPs or national preconstructed paths) and some may be used within the RP process (see example above). Steerco TTR - PILOT ATL 2020 April 13, 2018

IT SUPPORT NEED FOR IT TOOL STEERING DISPLAY AND DECISION-MAKING Content IT tool gathering as projects all : Path data capacity bandwidth (ATT and RP offered and/or already sold for multiannual periods) data TCR data. Coordination process The international coordination process should be top-down oriented : global axis harmonization then only bilateral harmonization between IMs. A common deadline must be defined to provide data in order to feed coordination exchanges IM/IM and IM/RU. Need for a leading entity to steer the process An escalation process (not yet described in the current draft version of the TCR Guidelines) must be set up with a decision-making structure Conclusions of the coordination must be published Steerco TTR - PILOT ATL 2020 April 13, 2018

OUTPUTS A COMMON DATABASE ON WHICH STAKEHOLDERS CAN PLACE QUERIES Roles of the IT-tool to be developed Display of the capacity model Feeding the national TT construction IT-tools with the different capacity objects Management of the availability of the (national and international) capacity bandwidths day after day (counting functionality) Steerco TTR - PILOT ATL 2020 April 13, 2018

Operating procedures EACH IM SHOULD IMPLEMENT NEW PRACTICES TO MANAGE THE CAPACITY MODEL A sensitive issue : how can IMs represent and manage capacity bandwidths to guarantee along the capacity process the commercial offer defined? The safeguarded capacity is guaranteed through reference paths in IMs’ internal tools. The timetable planners must take care that these reference paths remain overlapped with capacity bandwidths. Steerco TTR - PILOT ATL 2020 April 13, 2018

risks THE PROPOSED APPROACH IS SUBJECT TO RISKS Identified issues No data Too many data No willingness from IMs to change their practices to go beyond national optimum when planning commercial traffic and TCR Late changes of coordinated TCRs Network effect uncontrolled Steerco TTR - PILOT ATL 2020 April 13, 2018