Vurdering av seismisk AVO-respons i slumpområder

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Data Analysis Lecture 12 Sand Fairway Burial History Trap Analysis A’
Advertisements

Properties of Ocean Water
Wedge Modeling HRS-9 Hampson-Russell Software
TPG4160 Reservoir Simulation 2012 Gullfaks Group Project
Seismic Stratigraphy EPS 444
8. Ocean Crustal Structure and Seismic Reflection William Wilcock (via Michelle W.) OCEAN/ESS 410.
NORSAR Seismic Modelling
5. AVO-AVA Introduction Weak-contrast, short spread approximation for reflection coefficient Information content Classification Tuning effect Examples.
CALIPSO Data: A Tutorial The CERES S’COOL Project National Aeronautics and Space Administration
AVO responses as modelled with a finite- difference program Peter Manning and Gary Margrave Introduction: classic AVO cases Surface seismic records F-D.
AVO analysis & rock physics based AVO inversion
Classification: Internal Status: Draft WAG Mechanisms at macroscopic/ field level Presentation at FORCE WAG Seminar Stavanger, 18 Mar 2009 Anders Gjesdal.
Oil water Geometric Proof of Archimedes’ principal---From Pressure on a submerged surface Consider a submerged body in an oil-water layered system (shown.
Reflection Field Methods
GG 450 April 31, 2008 Reflection Interpretation 2.
PESGB North Sea Special Conference Session
Elastic Inversion Using Partial Stack Seismic Data: Case Histories in China.
OIL RECOVERY MECHANISMS AND THE MATERIAL BALANCE EQUATION
Use of PP and PS time-lapse stacks for fluid-pressure discrimination. ALEXEY STOVAS 1, MARTIN LANDRØ 1 & BØRGE ARNTSEN 2 1 NTNU, Dept. of Petroleum Engineering.
GullfaksVillage2012 IOR with a diverging agent from China Petter Eltvik Discipline leader Gullfaks Classif ication: Interna l
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 26 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Fri 28 Feb: Burger (§8.4–8.5) Last Time: Industry Seismic Interpretation.
Seawater Seawater is a solution of about 96.5% water and 3.5% dissolved salts. The most abundant salt in seawater is sodium chloride (NaCl). Most elements.
New Trends in AVO Brian Russell and Dan Hampson
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 19 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Fri 21 Feb: Burger (§ ) Last Time: Reflection Data Processing Step.
“Perspectives on Montana’s Petroleum Industry” MREA-MPA-MONTAX “Bridges to the Future” Conference October 15, 2009 Dave Ballard President Ballard Petroleum.
Earthquakes and the Interior  Earthquakes are definitely a geologic hazard for people living in earthquake regions, but the seismic waves generated by.
Thin Films Observations In small groups, take turns blowing bubbles from your bubble mix. Notice the color of the bubbles and when it appears that.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
Uncertainty in AVO: How can we measure it? Dan Hampson, Brian Russell
Classification: Internal Status: Draft Gullfaks Village 2010 IOR Challenges.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics I tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
The following discussions contain certain “forward-looking statements” as defined by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 including, without.
Inversions. Usually temperature decreases with height by approximately 5.5 C per km But with high pressure, clear or near clear skies, and light winds,
PAWNEE RESERVOIR SIMULATION STUDY Pioneer Natural Resources Co. Performed By Gemini Solutions, Inc. January 2001.
Characteristic curves and their responses. The method of Characteristic Curves (Two layer case) Summary of steps Set  1 =  a1 Construct the ratios 
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 24 Feb 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 For Fri 26 Feb: Burger (§8.4) Last Time: Industry Seismic Interpretation Well.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 26 Feb 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 For Mon 29 Feb: Burger (§8.4) Last Time: Industry Seismic Interpretation Seismic.
68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna 1 Impact of Time Lapse Processing on 4D Simultaneous Inversion The Marlim Field Case Study C. Reiser * 1, E.
Amit Suman and Tapan Mukerji 25th SCRF Annual Meeting May 9 – 11, 2012
Amit Suman and Tapan Mukerji
Combining statistical rock physics and sedimentology to reduce uncertainty in seismic reservoir characterization Per Åge Avseth Norsk Hydro Research Centre.
on Petroleum and Refinery
4D Seismic - A Technology for Future Oil and Gas Exploration
Seawater Seawater is a solution of about 96.5% water and
Peipei Li, Tapan Mukerji
Nan Cheng, Statoil 26-June-2013
Uncertainties in quantitative time-lapse seismic analysis by M
Lithology Fluids Total Porosity Modeled Stack Sands Shale
Dario Grana, Tapan Mukerji
Mapping pressure and saturation changes in a heterogeneous segment – possibilities and limitations   by   M. Landrø1, P. Digranes2 and L.K. Strønen2  
Marine Reflection Seismology - Geometry
Oil or Gas??? Should there be a difference in seismic response (AVO) between an oil-filled reservoir and a gas-filled reservoir? Model response with different.
Seismic attribute applications:
DHIs: Amplitude Anomalies
Elements of 3D Seismology: Introduction to Interpretation
Upscaling of 4D Seismic Data
by J. D. O. Williams, S. Holloway, and G. A. Williams
Pressure drawdown to a gas condensate well
Introduction to the Gulltopp Satellite Field
A Geologic Model 1m 75 m Perm 250 mD Sand Shale 0.1 mD 50 m Slide 16
Comparison of Seismic and Well Data
Seismic Line Across ‘Alpha’
Rainbow B time-lapse results
Grid of 2-D seismic lines
A Prospect A prospect is a location and depth that has been identified as a good place to drill for oil and/or gas For us to find oil or gas, certain conditions.
Shot Gather For Shot 1 Source Receivers R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 S1
Density of water: 1.0 g/cm3 Density of steel: 8.0 g/cm3
Upscaling Petrophysical Properties to the Seismic Scale
Geology Quantitative Methods
Creating Trends for Reservoir Modelling Using ANN
Presentation transcript:

Vurdering av seismisk AVO-respons i slumpområder Classification: Statoil internal Status: Draft I5B-segmentet Vurdering av seismisk AVO-respons i slumpområder

Top Cook depth map. Seismic profiles indicated as red lines L2881

Increasing amplitudes with offset indicates oilfilled reservoir Line 2881, I4 segment 1999 full stack mid near far Increasing amplitudes with offset indicates oilfilled reservoir Top Brent Top Cook Top Statfjord Yellow/red represents a decrease in acoustic impedance Base Crt.

Randomline, I4 segment 1999 full stack mid far near Note the opposite avo response due to the pressure effect (blue arrow) and oilfilled reservoir (red arrow) Top Brent Top Cook Top Statfjord Yellow/red represents a decrease in acoustic impedance Base Crt.

Top Cook depth map. Seismic profile indicated as red line L2995 Top Brent Top Cook Top Statfjord Yellow/red represents a decrease in acoustic impedance Base Crt.

Line 2995, I5B segment (prospect) 1985 1996 1996 1999 Top Brent Top Cook Top Statfjord Yellow/red represents a decrease in acoustic impedance Base Crt.

Line 2995, I5B segment (prospect), offset stacks 1985, full stack mid near far Top Brent Top Cook Top Statfjord Yellow/red represents a decrease in acoustic impedance Base Crt.

Classification: Statoil internal Status: Draft Cook-2 and Cook-3 How much does geological setting affect seismic response? Model the seismic response in a three-layer setting with varying thicknesses and fluids

How much does geological setting affect seismic response? Cook-2 and Cook-3 are very different reservoirs, both in a geological sense and from a production point of view Cook-2 is 50-60 meters thick, while Cook-3 is 15-50 meters thick, both thinning towards north In the east the formation is eroded by the BCU. We know that we can observe pressure build-up in Cook on 4D seismic We want to predict how water flooding will appear in the 4D seismic, but our model has probably been to coarse, mixing Cook-2 and Cook-3 properties

How much does geological setting affect seismic response? Cook-2 Cook-3 BCU Drake Shetland Interfaces Uneroded: Drake->Cook-3 “Uneroded”: Shetland->Cook-3 Eroded: Shetland->Cook-3 Eroded: Shetland->Cook-2 Fluids Brine, oil, gas Thickness variations Cook-2: 0-60 meters Cook-3: 0-50 meters Task: Determine the seismic response in a 3-layer model with varying thicknesses and fluids Get parameters from geomodel!