Genome-wide analysis shows no genomic predictors of ovarian response to stimulation by exogenous FSH for IVF  Jeroen van Disseldorp, Lude Franke, Rene.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Development of guideline-based quality indicators for recurrent miscarriage E. van den Boogaard, M. Goddijn, N.J. Leschot, F. van der Veen, J.A.M. Kremer,
Advertisements

Miscarriage risk for IVF pregnancies in poor responders to ovarian hyperstimulation  Maaike L Haadsma, Henk Groen, Thea M Mooij, Curt W Burger, Frank JM.
Effect of androgen supplementation or modulation on ovarian stimulation outcome in poor responders: a meta-analysis  Sesh Kamal Sunkara, Jyotsna Pundir,
Programmes and prospects for ovotechnology
Cancer and fertility: strategies to preserve fertility
Kay Neumann, Georg Griesinger  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
Vuong Thi Ngoc Lan, Nguyen Khanh Linh, Ho Manh Tuong, P. C
Diet and endometriosis risk: A literature review
Miscarriage risk for IVF pregnancies in poor responders to ovarian hyperstimulation  Maaike L Haadsma, Henk Groen, Thea M Mooij, Curt W Burger, Frank JM.
FMR1 gene CGG repeat variation within the normal range is not predictive of ovarian response in IVF cycles  Scott J. Morin, Ashley W. Tiegs, Jason M.
Low-dosage clomiphene reduces premature ovulation rates and increases transfer rates in natural-cycle IVF  M von Wolff, M Nitzschke, P Stute, N Bitterlich,
IVF with planned single-embryo transfer versus IUI with ovarian stimulation in couples with unexplained subfertility: an economic analysis  Minouche M.E.
E. Jauniaux, I. Ben-Ami, R. Maymon  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
A. Osman, J. Pundir, M. Elsherbini, S. Dave, T. El-Toukhy, Y. Khalaf 
Pharmacokinetics and follicular dynamics of corifollitropin alfa versus recombinant FSH during ovarian stimulation for IVF  Bart C.J.M. Fauser, Michael.
Intra-cycle fluctuations of anti-Müllerian hormone in normal women with a regular cycle: a re-analysis  Annelies Overbeek, Frank J. Broekmans, Wouter.
E. Jauniaux, I. Ben-Ami, R. Maymon  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
No association between endogenous LH and pregnancy in a GnRH antagonist protocol: part II, recombinant FSH  George Griesinger, Daniel B. Shapiro, Efstratios.
Management of ovarian stimulation for IVF: narrative review of evidence provided for World Health Organization guidance  Cindy Farquhar, Jane Marjoribanks,
Anti-Müllerian hormone for the assessment of ovarian response in GnRH-antagonist- treated oocyte donors  Nikolaos P. Polyzos, Dominic Stoop, Christophe.
In vitro maturation improves oocyte or embryo cryopreservation outcome in breast cancer patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation 
L. L. van Loendersloot, M. van Wely, S. Repping, F. van der Veen, P. M
Publication productivity in IVF in Europe, 1990–2006
Short follicular phase of stimulation following corifollitropin alfa or daily recombinant FSH treatment does not compromise clinical outcome: a retrospective.
A. Cobo, Nicolás Garrido, Juana Crespo, Remohí José, Antonio Pellicer 
Establishment and validation of a score to predict ovarian response to stimulation in IVF  Clelia Chalumeau, Jessika Moreau, Nicolas Gatimel, Clementine.
Anti-Müllerian hormone as a predictor of pregnancy following IVF
Why are reproductive cancers more common in nulliparous women?
Perinatal outcomes after stimulated versus natural cycle IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis  Mohan Shashikant Kamath, Richard Kirubakaran, Mariano.
Hillary B. Alberta, Roberta M. Berry, Aaron D. Levine 
What’s on the mind of IVF consumers?
Effect of N-acetyl-cysteine after ovarian drilling in clomiphene citrate-resistant PCOS women: a pilot study  A. Nasr  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
L. Simon, I. Proutski, M. Stevenson, D. Jennings, J. McManus, D
Individual demands of human embryos on IVF culture medium: influence on blastocyst development and pregnancy outcome  B. Wirleitner, P. Vanderzwalmen,
Chief editor's 2017 annual report
M. Dieterich, M. Bolz, T. Reimer, S. Costagliola, B. Gerber 
Impact of ovarian endometrioma on ovarian responsiveness and IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis  Chun Yang, Yuhong Geng, Yanhui Li, Chunyan Chen,
Randomized, controlled, open-label, non-inferiority study of the CONSORT algorithm for individualized dosing of follitropin alfa  F. Olivennes, G. Trew,
Myotonic dystrophy type 1 and PGD: ovarian stimulation response and correlation analysis between ovarian reserve and genotype  C. Dechanet, C. Castelli,
Ronit Machtinger, Raoul Orvieto  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
Donor information considered important to donors, recipients and offspring: an Australian perspective  I.S. Rodino, P.J. Burton, K.A. Sanders  Reproductive.
Dehydroepiandrostendione sulphate and prediction of live birth after IVF in young women with low anti-Müllerian hormone concentration  Miro Šimun Alebić,
Impact of vitamin D levels on ovarian reserve and ovarian response to ovarian stimulation in oocyte donors  Alberta Maria Fabris, Maria Cruz, Carlos Iglesias,
V Isachenko, E Isachenko, R Kreienberg, M Woriedh, JM Weiss 
LH concentrations do not correlate with pregnancy in rFSH/GnRH antagonist cycles  Kevin Doody, Paul Devroey, Keith Gordon, Han Witjes, Bernadette Mannaerts 
Sperm DNA fragmentation index as a promising predictive tool for male infertility diagnosis and treatment management – meta-analyses  Daniele Santi, Giorgia.
S. Seshadri, S.K. Sunkara, Y. Khalaf, T. El-Toukhy, H. Hamoda 
Does ovarian stimulation regimen affect IVF outcome
Should we be promoting embryo transfer at blastocyst stage?
Stephen C. Collins, Esther Chan  Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
Pietro Gambadauro, Ramesan Navaratnarajah 
Selection of embryos for transfer in IVF: ranking embryos based on their implantation potential using morphological scoring  Laura van Loendersloot, Madelon.
Does exogenous LH in ovarian stimulation improve assisted reproduction success? An appraisal of the literature  Micah J. Hill, Gary Levy, Eric D. Levens 
The Alpha Consensus Meeting on the professional status of the clinical embryologist: proceedings of an expert meeting    Reproductive BioMedicine Online 
Testosterone concentrations in early pregnancy: relation to method of conception in an infertile population  Ruth B. Lathi, Sharon E. Moayeri, Charitha.
Propofol versus thiopental sodium as anaesthetic agents for oocyte retrieval: a randomized controlled trial  Evangelia Goutziomitrou, Christos A. Venetis,
Nigel Pereira, Anna Voskuilen-Gonzalez, Kolbe Hancock, Jovana P
Nadine M. P. Daan, Annemieke Hoek, Eva Corpeleijn, Marinus J. C
Ovarian reserve screening before contraception?
Comparative incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome following ovarian stimulation with corifollitropin alfa or recombinant FSH  Basil C. Tarlatzis,
Cryobanking of human ovarian tissue: do women still want their tissue stored beyond 5 years?  Kirsten Tryde Macklon, Erik Ernst, Anders Nyboe Andersen,
The significance of the number of CGG repeats and autoantibodies in premature ovarian failure  Cem Fıçıcıoglu, Gazi Yildirim, Rukset Attar, Banu Kumbak,
Cost effectiveness of ovarian reserve testing in in vitro fertilization: a Markov decision- analytic model  Lobke M. Moolenaar, M.D., Frank J.M. Broekmans,
Programmes and prospects for ovotechnology
Claudio Manna, Loris Nanni, Alessandra Lumini, Sebastiana Pappalardo 
John Yovich, James Stanger, Peter Hinchliffe 
Does theFMR1 gene affect IVF success?
A. Finn, L. Scott, Thomas O’Leary, D. Davies, J. Hill 
M. Franz, J. Ott, A. Watrelot, L. Küssel, H. Husslein 
Use of progestins to inhibit spontaneous ovulation during ovarian stimulation: the beginning of a new era?  Antonio La Marca, Martina Capuzzo  Reproductive.
Presentation transcript:

Genome-wide analysis shows no genomic predictors of ovarian response to stimulation by exogenous FSH for IVF  Jeroen van Disseldorp, Lude Franke, Rene Eijkemans, Frank Broekmans, Nick Macklon, Cisca Wijmenga, Bart Fauser  Reproductive BioMedicine Online  Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages 382-388 (April 2011) DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.12.006 Copyright © 2010 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Poisson distribution of the number of oocytes retrieved with normal curve. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2011 22, 382-388DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.12.006) Copyright © 2010 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Quantile–quantile plot of observed versus expected P-values of the 10,000 most significant SNPs, with reference line. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2011 22, 382-388DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.12.006) Copyright © 2010 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Terms and Conditions

Feedback: Privacy Policy Feedback
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
About project: SlidePlayer Terms of Service

© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc. All rights reserved.