Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 114, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Advertisements

Genetic Manipulation of Brown Fat Via Oral Administration of an Engineered Recombinant Adeno-associated Viral Serotype Vector  Wei Huang, Travis McMurphy,
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (July 2000)
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages (July 2001)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
Evaluation of polyethylene glycol modification of first-generation and helper-dependent adenoviral vectors to reduce innate immune responses  Hoyin Mok,
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Human Papilloma Virus E6 and E7 Proteins Support DNA Replication of Adenoviruses Deleted for the E1A and E1B Genes  Dirk S. Steinwaerder, Cheryl A. Carlson,
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (July 2000)
Neonatal Gene Therapy for Hemophilia B by a Novel Adenovirus Vector Showing Reduced Leaky Expression of Viral Genes  Shunsuke Iizuka, Fuminori Sakurai,
Nelson C Di Paolo, Nico van Rooijen, Dmitry M Shayakhmetov 
New generation adenoviral vectors improve gene transfer by coxsackie and adenoviral receptor-independent cell entry  Paul N. Reynolds, David T. Curiel 
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2004)
Gene delivery to in situ veins: Differential effects of adenovirus and adeno-associated viral vectors  Mohammad H. Eslami, MD, Sidhu P. Gangadharan, MD,
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Prevention of Irradiation-induced Salivary Hypofunction by Microvessel Protection in Mouse Salivary Glands  Ana P Cotrim, Anastasia Sowers, James B Mitchell,
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (September 2003)
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages (March 2003)
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2008)
Strong Promoters Are the Key to Highly Efficient, Noninflammatory and Noncytotoxic Adenoviral-Mediated Transgene Delivery into the Brain in Vivo  Christian.
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (July 2002)
J.P O'Rourke, H Hiraragi, K Urban, M Patel, J.C Olsen, B.A Bunnell 
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (November 2003)
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Ajay Gautam, Charles L. Densmore, J.Clifford Waldrep  Molecular Therapy 
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (July 2003)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 18, Issue 12, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 15, Issue 7, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 2001)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (December 2008)
Development of Novel Formulations That Enhance Adenoviral-Mediated Gene Expression in the Lung in Vitro and in Vivo  Maria A. Croyle, Xuan Cheng, Arbans.
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 18, Issue 10, Pages (October 2010)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages 770-779 (June 2002) In Vivo Hepatic Adenoviral Gene Delivery Occurs Independently of the Coxsackievirus– Adenovirus Receptor  Theodore Smith, Neeraja Idamakanti, Helen Kylefjord, Michele Rollence, Laura King, Michele Kaloss, Michael Kaleko, Susan C. Stevenson  Molecular Therapy  Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages 770-779 (June 2002) DOI: 10.1006/mthe.2002.0613 Copyright © 2002 American Society for Gene Therapy Terms and Conditions

FIG. 1 Western immunoblot analysis of capsid proteins in adenoviral vectors containing mutated fiber proteins and a targeting peptide. The following adenoviral vectors were subjected to SDS–PAGE and western immunoblot analysis under denaturing conditions: lane 1, Av3nBg; lane 2, Av3nBgFKO1; lane 3, Av1nBgHIRGD; lane 4, Av1nBgFKO1RGD. A total of 5 × 109 viral particles was applied per lane. (A) Levels of fiber were evaluated with a rabbit anti-Ad5 fiber polyclonal antiserum. (B) To control for loading differences, levels of penton were also analyzed with a rabbit anti-Ad5 penton polyclonal antiserum. The bound antibodies were then detected by chemiluminescence. The positions of fiber and penton monomer are indicated. Molecular Therapy 2002 5, 770-779DOI: (10.1006/mthe.2002.0613) Copyright © 2002 American Society for Gene Therapy Terms and Conditions

FIG. 2 Adenoviral-mediated transduction of A549 and HDF cells. A549 (A) or HDF cells (B) were infected with each adenoviral vector with 0–12,500 particles per cell (PPC) of Av3nBg (open circle), Av3nBgFKO1 (filled circle), Av1nBgHIRGD (open square), or Av1nBgFKO1RGD (filled square) for 1 hour at 37°C. After 24 hours, the cells were fixed and stained with X-gal. The percentage of transduced cells was determined per high-power field for each vector dose. The data represent the mean percentage of transduction ± SD (n = 3 wells) from one representative experiment. Molecular Therapy 2002 5, 770-779DOI: (10.1006/mthe.2002.0613) Copyright © 2002 American Society for Gene Therapy Terms and Conditions

FIG. 3 Competition analysis of adenovirus binding to A549 cells. A549 cell monolayers were transduced with 200 PPC of Av3nBg (wt), Av3nBgFKO1 (KOI), Av1nBgHIRGD (wt+RGD), or Av1nBgFKO1RGD (KO1+RGD) in the presence or absence of fiber knob (16 μg/ml), penton peptide (500 nM), heparin (3 mg/ml), or with a combination of all competitors (mix) for 1 hour at 37°C. After 24 hours, the cells were fixed and stained with X-gal. The number of transduced cells per high-power field was determined for each condition and expressed as a percentage of the total transduction in the absence of competitor. The level of transduction for each vector in the absence of competitor was defined as 100%. The data show the average percentage ± SD from a representative experiment. Molecular Therapy 2002 5, 770-779DOI: (10.1006/mthe.2002.0613) Copyright © 2002 American Society for Gene Therapy Terms and Conditions

FIG. 4 Liver adenoviral-mediated gene delivery in vivo. Adenoviral vectors were administered to C57BL/6 mice via tail vein injection at a dose of 1 × 1013 particles/kg in cohorts of five mice per treatment group. We killed the mice 3 days after vector delivery and analyzed livers for β-galactosidase gene expression (A) and adenoviral DNA content (B). (A) The average β-galactosidase activity level (relative light units, RLU/µg protein) ± SD is shown for each treatment group (n = 5 per group). (B) Liver DNA was isolated and analyzed by real-time PCR for adenoviral hexon DNA content. The average hepatic adenoviral DNA content (adenoviral genome copies per cell) ± SD is shown for each treatment group. Asterisk indicates significant difference from Av3nBg virus control according to an unpaired, two-tailed t-test analysis (P < 0.01). Molecular Therapy 2002 5, 770-779DOI: (10.1006/mthe.2002.0613) Copyright © 2002 American Society for Gene Therapy Terms and Conditions

FIG. 5 Immunohistochemical localization of β-galactosidase in mouse livers. The indicated adenoviral vectors were administered to C57BL/6 mice via tail vein injection at a dose of 1 × 1013 particles/kg. We killed the mice 3 days after vector delivery and analyzed livers for β-galactosidase expression by immunohistochemistry of liver sections. Brown nuclear staining indicates the presence of β-galactosidase. (A) Mock-treated, (B) Av3nBg, (C) Av3nBgFKO1, (D) Av1nBgFKO1RGD, (E) Av1nBgHIRGD. Representative photomicrographs are shown. Molecular Therapy 2002 5, 770-779DOI: (10.1006/mthe.2002.0613) Copyright © 2002 American Society for Gene Therapy Terms and Conditions

FIG. 6 Adenoviral-mediated liver transduction of fiber-modified viral particles after systemic delivery. C57BL/6, Balb/C, or CD-1 mice were injected intravenously via the tail vein with HBSS (–), Av3nBg (wt), or Av3nBgFKO1 (KO1) at a dose of 1 × 1013 particles/kg. The mice were killed 3 days after vector delivery and livers were analyzed for β-galactosidase gene expression (A) and adenoviral DNA content (B). (A) The average β-galactosidase activity level (relative light units, RLU/µg protein) ± SD is shown for each treatment group (n = 5 per group). (B) Liver DNA was isolated and analyzed by real-time PCR for adenoviral hexon DNA content. The average hepatic adenoviral DNA content (adenoviral genome copies per cell) ± SD is shown for each treatment group. Asterisk indicates significant difference from Av3nBg virus control according to an unpaired, two-tailed t-test analysis (P < 0.01). Molecular Therapy 2002 5, 770-779DOI: (10.1006/mthe.2002.0613) Copyright © 2002 American Society for Gene Therapy Terms and Conditions

FIG. 7 In vitro adenoviral gene delivery to human and mouse hepatocytes. Human hepatocarcinoma cells, HepG2 (A), the mouse hepatocyte cell line, FL83B (B), or primary CD-1 mouse hepatocytes (C) were infected with each adenoviral vector from 0 up to 12,500 particles per cell (PPC) of Av3nBg (open circle) or Av3nBgFKO1 (filled circle) for 1 hour at 37°C. After 24 hours the cells were fixed and stained with X-gal. The percentage of transduced cells was determined per high-power field for each vector dose. The data represent the mean percentage of transduction ± SD (n = 3 wells) from one representative experiment. Molecular Therapy 2002 5, 770-779DOI: (10.1006/mthe.2002.0613) Copyright © 2002 American Society for Gene Therapy Terms and Conditions

FIG. 8 Competition analysis of adenoviral transduction of primary murine hepatocytes. CD-1 murine primary hepatocytes were transduced with Av3nBg (wt) at 2500 PPC or Av3nBgFKO1 (KO1) at 12,500 PPC in the presence or absence of fiber knob (10 μg/ml), an RGD peptide (200 μg/ml), or heparin (3 mg/ml) for 1 hour at 37°C. After 24 hours, the cells were fixed and stained with X-gal. The number of transduced cells was determined per high-power field for each condition and was expressed as a percentage of the total transduction in the absence of competitor. The level of transduction for each vector in the absence of competitor was defined as 100%. The data show the average percentage control ± SD from a representative experiment. Molecular Therapy 2002 5, 770-779DOI: (10.1006/mthe.2002.0613) Copyright © 2002 American Society for Gene Therapy Terms and Conditions