FLUKA SIMULATION OF MUON DETECTOR,MUCH,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radiation Levels in ALICE Andreas Morsch Meeting on ALICE Radiation Tolerance 30/8/2004.
Advertisements

CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Particle identification in ECAL Alexander Artamonov, Yuri Kharlov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Preliminary studies for T2 primary target for the NA61 fragmentation beam run 11 th October 2010 – NA61 Collaboration Meeting M. Calviani on behalf of.
P HI T S Exercise ( II ) : How to stop , ,  -rays and neutrons? Multi-Purpose Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System title1 Feb revised.
EAR2 simulation update Collaboration board meeting Christina Weiss & Vasilis Vlachoudis.
1 Activation problems S.Agosteo (1), M.Magistris (1,2), Th.Otto (2), M.Silari (2) (1) Politecnico di Milano; (2) CERN.
Pion yield studies for proton drive beams of 2-8 GeV kinetic energy for stopped muon and low-energy muon decay experiments Sergei Striganov Fermilab Workshop.
Pion capture and transport system for PRISM M. Yoshida Osaka Univ. 2005/8/28 NuFACT06 at UCI.
Shielding Studies using MARS Monte Carlo code Noriaki Nakao (SLAC) Jan. 6, 2005, WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at ILC, SLAC.
1 Induced radioactivity in the target station and in the decay tunnel from a 4 MW proton beam S.Agosteo (1), M.Magistris (1,2), Th.Otto (2), M.Silari (2)
Medium heavy Λ hyper nuclear spectroscopic experiment by the (e,e’K + ) reaction Graduate school of science, Tohoku University Toshiyuki Gogami for HES-HKS.
ELI-NP: the way ahead, March Anna Ferrari An overview of the shielding problems around high energy laser-accelerated beams Anna Ferrari Institute.
Radiation levels in CBM Radiation effects iFluka (Fluka C++ interface to CbmRoot) Fluka Geometry Models Results Conclusion.
Charmonium feasibility study F. Guber, E. Karpechev, A.Kurepin, A. Maevskaia Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow CBM collaboration meeting 11 February.
Simulations on “Energy plus Transmutation” setup, 1.5 GeV Mitja Majerle
Beam Background Simulations for HL-LHC at IR1 Regina Kwee-Hinzmann, R.Bruce, A.Lechner, N.V.Shetty, L.S.Esposito, F.Cerutti, G.Bregliozzi, R.Kersevan,
Monte Carlo methods in ADS experiments Study for state exam 2008 Mitja Majerle “Phasotron” and “Energy Plus Transmutation” setups (schematic drawings)
Beam MC activity A.K.Ichikawa for beam group For more details,
Integrated Radiation Measurement and Radiation Protection of BES Ⅲ Zhang Qingjiang, Wu protection group, accelerator center, IHEP,
Initial (FLUKA) calculations for synchrotron radiation at TLep April 4 th, 2013 F. Cerutti, A. Ferrari, L. Lari* *BE Dept.
PNPI, R&D MUCH related activity ● Segmentation ● Simulation of the neutral background influence ● R&D of the detectors for MUCH ● Preparation to the beam.
RPC Design Studies Gabriel Stoicea, NIPNE-HH, Bucharest CBM Software Week GSI-Darmstadt May 10, 2004.
STS simulations: Layout, digitizers, performance Radoslaw Karabowicz GSI.
Collimator and beamline heating External Review of the LHC Collimation Project CERN Wed 30/6/2004.
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
J-PARC でのハイパー核ガンマ線分光実験用 散乱粒子磁気スペクトロメータ検出器の準備 状況 東北大理, 岐阜大教 A, KEK B 白鳥昂太郎, 田村裕和, 鵜養美冬 A, 石元茂 B, 大谷友和, 小池武志, 佐藤美沙子, 千賀信幸, 細見健二, 馬越, 三輪浩司, 山本剛史, 他 Hyperball-J.
Simulations on “Energy plus Transmutation” setup, 1.5 GeV Mitja Majerle, V Wagner, A Krása, F Křížek This document can be downloaded.
Radiation Shielding Assessment for MuCool Experimental Enclosure C. Johnstone 1), I. Rakhno 2) 1) Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois.
Radiation study of the TPC electronics Georgios Tsiledakis, GSI.
Meson Production at Low Proton Beam Energy (Update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies May 9, /9/113.
1 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Background radiation studies using Geant4.
4th International Summer School « Nuclear Physics Methods and Accelerators in Biology and Medicine » Monte-Carlo simulations : FLUKA vs. MCNPX Maxime ODEN.
E.B. Holzer BLM Meeting: Q & A March 20, Questions and Answers.
Photon & e+e- Hits in Muon Higgs Factory T. Markiewicz T. Maruyama SLAC MAP Collaboration Meeting. Fermilab 29 May 2014.
N_TOF EAR-1 Simulations The “γ-flash” A. Tsinganis (CERN/NTUA), C. Guerrero (CERN), V. Vlachoudis (CERN) n_TOF Annual Collaboration Meeting Lisbon, December.
Beampipe design F.Raffaelli G.Calderini, M.Marchiori, M.Mazur, E.Paoloni Framework for Geant4 Interaction Region simulation.
Monte Carlo methods in spallation experiments Defense of the phD thesis Mitja Majerle “Phasotron” and “Energy Plus Transmutation” setups (schematic drawings)
The Status of the CBM Experiment
Heating and radiological
Induced-activity experiment:
The Transition Radiation Detector for the PAMELA Experiment
Proton emission from deformed rare earth nuclei: A possible AIDA physics campaign Paul Sapple PRESPEC Decay Physics Workshop Brighton 12 January 2011.
U.Frankenfeld GSI Darmstadt
Silicon Pixel Detector for the PHENIX experiment at the BNL RHIC
Methods of Experimental Particle Physics
IHEP group Shashlyk activity towards TDR
Hans Rudolf Schmidt GSI Darmstadt
Central detector for CLAS12: CTOF and Neutron detector
Summary of hadronic tests and benchmarks in ALICE
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #14 Energy Deposition in Media Particle Detection
M. Calviani, A. Ferrari (EN/STI), P. Sala (INFN)
Update on GEp GEM Background Rates
The Compact Muon Solenoid Detector
First results from technical run with deuteron beam
Detector Configuration for Simulation (i)
Revisions and Updates, December 13. Some technical details:
Radiation Backgrounds in the ATLAS New Small Wheel
Parasitic Run Physics Simulations
Search for f-N Bound State in Jefferson Lab Hall-B
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
Geant4 in HARP V.Ivanchenko For the HARP Collaboration
in c-tau factory detector
Backgrounds using v7 Mask in 9 Si Layers at a Muon Higgs Factory
PERFORMANCE OF THE METAL RADIATION MONITORING SYSTEMS
Background Simulations at Fermilab
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #18 Monday ,April 9, 2012 Dr. Brandt Calorimeter
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #14 Energy Deposition in Media Particle Detection
Presentation transcript:

FLUKA SIMULATION OF MUON DETECTOR,MUCH, CBM,FAIR Bidhan Chandra Mandal 15--17.02.2018

Description of the set up Simulation/Analysis Results Conclusion Introduction Description of the set up Simulation/Analysis Results Conclusion .

Introduction a) Muon Chamber System (MUCH) is for muon measurement in heavy ion collision b) Identify low momentum MUON in high particle density(~0.3 hits/cm2 per central event even at first detector layer) environment c) Track the particle through hadron absorber system d) Absorber detector system is placed downstream to STS e) To reduce meson decays to muon, system is compact f) System consists of 5 hadron absorber layers- iron plates of 16cm & 44 cm (part of 1st Absorber) , 20cm, 20cm and 30 cm, 35 cm. g) Nos. of gaseous (70/30 Ar+CO2) tracking chamber located in triplet behind each iron. Each GEM layer including base is of 38 mm thick h) Reaction rate of 10 MHz is assumed i)Spanning of 500 conical angle j) Proto type chamber based on GEM(gas electron multiplier) technology is working fine at rates of about 1.4 MHz/cm2. k) 30 GeV/c momentum proton beam of point source is assumed to interact Au target.

Zone of simulation for

SECTIONAL VIEW OF MUCH DETECTOR with STS 2. Description of the set-up Fe-3 Fe-2 Abs1B Fe-1 Fe-4 Abs1A Graphite STS ( 300µ Si) Au target (-40 cm) Beam Pipe (Al) Pb shield Gas Detector Triplet Stn-1 Stn-2 Stn-3 Stn-4 SECTIONAL VIEW OF MUCH DETECTOR with STS

SECTIONAL VIEW OF GEM Kit ( Station 1-layer 1,2 & 3 after absorber 1) 0.8 1.4 1.0 1.4 Dimentions are in cm SECTIONAL VIEW OF GEM Kit ( Station 1-layer 1,2 & 3 after absorber 1)

SECTIONAL VIEW OF DETECTOR ELEMENT layer 1 (a,b & c) Z=190 cm & 190.25 cm (a) (c) Components Materials used Target Au STS stns. Si Beam Pipe Al Abs1a&b Graphite Absorber 2,3,4 Fe Gas Detector, GEM 70/30 Ar-CO2 gas Gas Detector Casing FR4 ( ~ G10) GEM holder Al Magnetic field chosen as 1T uniformly Beam of 30 GeV proton uniform distribution Z=190.05cm (b) SECTIONAL VIEW OF DETECTOR ELEMENT layer 1 (a,b & c)

Nos. of segment 10 overlap 16 nos. 20 nos. 26 nos. 30 nos. Note:-250µ gold foil is used as target. 30 GeV proton beam is considered.

[1] Absorber 1 is divided into 2 parts [see Table1] and is made of graphite. Remaining all 4 absorbers are made of iron. (a) Absorber­1 starts at 125 cm from the target. (b) 1st part of Absorber­1 is trapezoid ( z position 125-­141 cm), 2nd part is parallelepiped (z position 141­-185 cm) (c) Magnet shield bars have been removed. (d) Other absorbers are parallelepiped with conical beam pipes. (e) Target is at ­40 cm inside the magnet. [2] In the implementation of the parallelepiped, (i) Parallelepiped sides have been calculated using [tan(25°) x (last position of absorber z) +30 cm]. It should be noted that there are 30 cm extra absorber lengths on X and Y sides except the block inside dipole) to keep stations inside the absorbers. Quoted values in the table are calculated taking this additional 30 cm into account.   (ii) The beam pipe is conical. [3] For each station, all three layers are of same size. Outer radii of stations are calculated from the last layer taking z(Last Layer)*tan25 shown in column 5 Table 2. Inner radii of stations(active area) are calculated from the 1st layer taking z(1st Layer)*tan5.6 shown in column 4 Table 2. For inclusion of frame, extra 2.5 cm is subtracted from inner radius of station which is shown in column 3 Table2. [4] From z=125 to z=185 cm. Pb shielding is used as a part of the beam pipe.

FLUKA CODE FOR 2e6 PARTICLE HISTORY WITH 3. SIMULATION FLUKA CODE FOR 2e6 PARTICLE HISTORY WITH 30 GeV/c momentum proton beam of point source is interacting on gold target. Dose is in Gy and expressed for 1MeV neutron equivalent in silicon. 2.85e+1 (98.3%) GeV particle escaping the system i.e. system simulated without external concrete. Dose for 1 month in neq/cm2/1month Proton-Au collision ( 1 month of running corresponds to 109 Au ion/s on a 250µ Au target yields 2.6x1013 interaction in its 1% nuclear interaction length) Scoring plane for MUCH system is chosen selectively Without magnetic field means Bx=0,By=0,Bz=0 With magnetic field means Bx=0,By=1 Tesla,Bz=0 EMFCUT for graphite,Al,Fe & detector gas is taken as 10 MeV Low neutron,260, downscatter,20 MeV max Lowdown and lowbias for Absorbers to bean pipes = 7.9852 Mev All dimensions are in cm

Without magnetic field 4.Results Without magnetic field With magnetic field Pion radial count vs Φ Pion count vs Z

Muon dose vs Φ Muon radial count vs Φ

Muon count vs Z Photon radial count vs Φ

Photon count vs Z Neutron radial count vs Φ

Neutron count vs Z Electron radial count vs Φ

Electron count vs Z Proton radial count vs Φ

Proton count vs Z

Muon count Pion count Neutron count ( per particle) (per particle) ( per particle) No mag. With Mag. No mag. With Mag. No mag. With Mag. G101LU to ACD1LU :1.82e-3 1.62e-3 2.18e-2 2.14e-2 NE NE ACD1LU to G101LU :1.83e-3 1.62e-3 2.18e-2 2.14e-2 NE NE G101LU to AlB1L1 :3.36e-3 3.9e-3 3.85e-2 3.75e-2 NE NE First station(z=190cm) Layer1 GF1 to Arc_vac1 :1.35e-4 1.39e-4 1.20e-2 1.20e-2 NE NE GF1 to BP_0 :1.5e-5 1.69e-5 2.41e-3 2.38e-3 NE NE GF1 to BL_0 :5.79e-5 5.59e-5 0.143 0.143 NE NE STS1 to Arc_vac1 :3.87e-4 3.44e-4 2.73e-2 2.69e-2 NE NE Arc_vac1 to STS1 :3.87e-4 3.51e-4 2.71e-2 2.65e-2 NE NE STS Zone G102LU to ACD2LU :1.74e-3 1.52e-3 2.00e-2 1.95e-2 6.89e-2 6.88e-2 ACD2LU to G102LU :1.74e-3 1.52e-3 2.00e-2 1.95e-2 6.90e-2 6.93e-2 G102LU to AlB1L2 :3.24e-3 2.91e-3 3.52e-3 3.93e-2 0.103 0.104 First station(z=190cm) layer2 G103LU to ACD3LU :1.65e-3 1.43e-3 1.84e-2 1.79e-2 6.52e-2 6.63e-2 ACD3LU to G103LU :1.65e-3 1.44e-3 1.83e-2 1.79e-2 6.62e-2 6.72e-2 G103LU to AlB1L3 :3.12e-3 2.77e-3 3.23e-2 3.15e-2 9.62e-2 9.70e-2 First station(z=190cm) layer3 G104LU to ACD4LU :8.75e-4 8.19e-4 5.67e-3 5.39e-4 4.13e-2 4.11e-2 ACD4LU to G104LU :8.75e-4 8.20e-4 5.66e-3 5.38e-4 4.16e-2 4.15e-2 Second station(z=200cm) layer1 NE = Not evaluated

Expected fluence is as below Pion fluence : 400 kHz/cm2 at the first station 1st layer as per result :1.27 kHz/cm2 Muon count Pion count ( per particle) (per particle) No mag. With Mag. No mag. With Mag. So, first station (@1e9 p/s) :0.106 :1.27 (1st layer fluence in kHz/ cm2 ) 10x106 p/s interaction rate on target @1% interaction length i.e. 109 p/s proton source of 30 GeV Total area of GEM station 1 Layer1 = 16 x 1068.50 = 170.96e2 cm2 Total area of GEM station 1 Layer2 = 20 x 1110.98 = 222.19e2 cm2 Total area of GEM station 1 Layer3 = 26 x 1563.78 = 406.58e2 cm2 Total area of GEM station 2 Layer1 = 30 x 1995.87 = 598.76e2 cm2 No mag. With Mag. Dose in Zone G101LU+ACD1LU+AlB1L1(GeV/gm/part):5.27e-3 x (10x10x10) 4.79e-3 x (10x10x10) (Gy/part) :8.45e-7 7.67e-7 Si1MeVNE ( new/cm2/particle) 1.0050e3 1.0078e3 Si1MeVNE ( new/cm2/1 month) 2.602e18 2.61e18 Energy deposited in GeV/particle ( zone wise) Blk :2.86e1 2.86e1 ACD1LU :1.59e-3 1.41e-3 G101LU :1.51e-3 1.45e-3 ACD1LD :2.39e-4 2.29e-4 G101LD :1.28e-3 1.26e-3 AlB1L1 :.3.41e-3 3.19e-3 ACD2LU :3.4e-4 3.13e-4

5. Conclusion Muon a MIP, detection is feasible in this SIS-100B setup. MUCH Simulation geometry needs further modification for shielding ( may be concrete), geometrical dimensions , fabrication as well as other interfaces feasibility Other particle (Kaon, pion, proton, electron etc.) presence is ignorable. Magnetic field of 1 T contributes difference to MUON count. Interaction is reasonable for the GEM read out Doses distribution are addressed for detectors’ element sustainability Heat load on components needs attention for cooling. Thanks. Ref.: Technical design report for the CBM, GSI Report 2013-4, Oct2013 A GEM based Muon Tracker for CBM experiment at FAIR by Anand K Dubey, Proceedings of the DAE Symposium on Nucl. Phys. 57(2012) FLUKA respin 2011.2c.6.