Population-based analysis of inpatient vascular procedures and predicting future workload and implications for training Jeffrey Jim, MD, Pamela L. Owens, PhD, Luis A. Sanchez, MD, Brian G. Rubin, MD Journal of Vascular Surgery Volume 55, Issue 5, Pages 1394-1400.e1 (May 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.11.061 Copyright © 2012 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Fig 1 United States population estimates during study period. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2012 55, 1394-1400.e1DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2011.11.061) Copyright © 2012 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Fig 2 Per capita (per 100,000 capita) rates of (A) percutaneous, (B) endovascular aortic, (C) “major,” and (D) all inpatient vascular procedures in the United States during the study period. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2012 55, 1394-1400.e1DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2011.11.061) Copyright © 2012 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Fig 3 United States future population predictions. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2012 55, 1394-1400.e1DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2011.11.061) Copyright © 2012 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Fig 4 Predicted future workload for all inpatient vascular procedures in the United States. Journal of Vascular Surgery 2012 55, 1394-1400.e1DOI: (10.1016/j.jvs.2011.11.061) Copyright © 2012 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions