Strategic Guidelines for EU Territorial Cooperation Programmes Post-2020 Introductory notes. Malta: 26 April Eduardo medeiros 2017.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden Transnationality and locally implemented pilot actions in the BSR.
Advertisements

Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden INTERREG III B General Introduction BSR INTERREG III B Joint Secretariat.
Territorial cohesion: what scales for policy intervention? Bruxelles Jean Peyrony DG REGIO, Unit C2 (Urban development, territorial cohesion)
1 DG Regio Evaluation Network Meeting Albert Borschette, Brussels, 14 October 2010 Ex post evaluation of Interreg III - Presentation of Final Results Pasi.
The political framework
Smart Growth for Europes Cities and Regions: Insights from Economic Geography for An Integrated Approach Philip McCann University of Groningen Special.
New opportunities for regional development through cross-border cooperation Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development November 16,
Role and potential small and medium-sized urban areas Latvia’s case
„South East Europe Programme” as a financing opportunity for projects in the Danube region and complementarity to other instruments COMPLEMENTARITY OF.
MINISTRY OF ECONOMY AND FINANCE SEC. GEN. OF INVESTMENTS AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGING AUTHORITY CIP Interreg Interregioanal Cooperation in INTERREG III Programmes.
EU DANUBE STRATEGY On the way to „implementation“ ?! Roland Arbter, Federal Chancellery Vienna, 5 July 2011, Summerschool BOKU/DRC
INTERREG IVA 2 Mers Seas Zeeën Crossborder Cooperation Programme Part-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) Green: Going.
Financing possibilities for implementation of the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region: different solutions INTERACT Point Turku 14 October.
LV-RU programme and Europe territorial cooperation future perspectives in Latvia Ināra Buda Project “Cross-Border E-archive” Closing Conference, Riga,
ICZM in Europe Anne Burrill
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Territorial Co-operation in Territorial Co-operation in Territorial Co-operation Unit DG Regional Policy West Sussex,
Part-financed by the European Union Promoting attractive and competitive cities and regions Arve Skjerpen, Norway Member of the BSR INTERREG IIIB Steering.
EU Territorial Agenda and aspects related to the Baltic Area Content: Chapter I: Tomorrow´s Territorial Challenges to be tackled today.
Contribution of the Territorial Cooperation Programmes to the EU Strategy for the Danube Region Kiril Geratliev, Director General “Territorial Cooperation.
EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Measures, tools, methods for supporting cross-border cooperation prepared used for adoption and implementation of joint.
PREDSTAVITEV PROGRAMA MED Margarita Jančič Ministrstvo za okolje in prostor Direktorat za evropske zadeve In investicije 10. April 2008, Ljubljana.
Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION 1 Interregional Cooperation and the Lisbon and Gothenburg Agendas “GROW” Brussels, 18 October 2007 Territorial Co-operation.
NORTH SEA INTERREG PROGRAMME – Jon Jordan UK Contact Point for the North Sea INTERREG Programme europeanpolicysolutions.
The Future of Transnational Cooperation in Central Europe ( ) Claudia Pamperl JTS INTERRREG IIIC East.
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden A Community Initiative concerning Transnational co-operation on spatial.
EUROPEAN STUCTURAL FUNDS Esben Poulsen, European Commission Head of the INTERREG Unit Directorate General for Regional Policy INTERREG IIIB Partner Search.
│ 1│ 1 What are we talking about?… Culture: Visual Arts, Performing Arts, Heritage Literature Cultural Industries: Film and Video, Television and radio,
European Territorial Cooperation Programmes European Territorial Cooperation Programmes Greece-Italy A case study in cross-border cooperation.
EU Structural Funds Presentation to Chief Executives 9 May 2006 Hillgrove Hotel Monaghan.
1 European Territorial Cooperation in legislative proposals Peter Berkowitz Head of Unit Conception, forward studies, impact assessment, DG Regional Policy.
EU funding Available EU Structural Funds. Objective 2 / Mål 2 Interreg 4A NORD Kolarctic ENPI CBC Northern Periphery Programme Baltic Sea programme North.
Transnacionalno teritorialno sodelovanje Program Jugovzhodna Evropa Margarita Jančič, MOP,DEZI Novo mesto,17. april 2008.
Financing possibilities for implementation of the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region 21 September 2011 | Riga, Latvia.
Indicators on Territorial Cohesion – The ESPON INTERCO project 1 Open Days | European Week of Regions and Cities Regional and Local Economies in a Changing.
MANAGEMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF PROJECTS: BEST PRACTICES COOPERATING IN SOUTH WEST EUROPE 12th of October 2005.
March 2007, Smolyan Angelos SANOPOULOS, Euroconsultants SA CROSS BORDER COOPERATION Bulgaria-Greece Experiences, Framework and New Operational.
Brainstorming meeting House of Catalonia, Bruxelles 26 March 2014 Territorial Vision and Pathways 2050.
EU A new configuration of European Territorial Cooperation Vicente RODRIGUEZ SAEZ, DG Regional Policy, European Commission Deputy Head of Unit.
AlpCity AlpCity Final Conference Prà Catinat, 16 October 2006 Ivan Curzolo - JTS Alpine Space Programme.
Synchronization and development of national strategies of logistics in V4 countries Lajos Veres Ph.D chairman Scientific Association for Spatial Development.
Pre-accession funds for regional development Ieva Vērzemniece Ministry of Regional development and local governments.
1 Second call for proposals – National Information Day EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Benoît Dalbert, Project Officer, Joint Technical Secretariat.
European Community European Regional Development Fund Baltic Sea Region INTERREG III B Programme Area 2000 – 2006.
 from the Barents Sea to the Mediterranean  5500 km  12 EU member states  63 regions.
Iruma Kravale Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development Head of Development Instruments Department 28 November 2013, Riga.
PRESENTATION OF EUROPEAN TERRITORIAL COOPERATION OBJECTIVE PROGRAMMES FOR – POTENTIAL FOR COOPERATION Gediminas ČESONIS Deputy Director of Regional.
Filippo Compagni - UK Contact Point – Atlantic Area
Rosa Expósito Coordinator of the Liaison Office ENPI CBC Mediterranean Sea Basin Barcelona, 7 July 2016 From ENPI CBC MED to ENI CBC MED : main results.
INTERREG-IIIB CADSES Neighbourhood Program: a general overview
cbss. st/documents/cbsspresidencies/10russian/dbaFile263
PRIORITIES FOR THE FUTURE
Financing possibilities for implementation of the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region: different solutions INTERACT Point Turku 14.
Please note this information is subject to change.
New opportunities for cooperation
European Union’s Regional Development Policy
South-East European Space
ESPON TerrEvi project Jürgen Pucher, Metis GmbH
Cohesion Policy, using geospatial information and statistics
Purpose of the CSF and Staff Working Document
Veľký Meder / Nagymegyer 6th November 2014

ESPON, the European Spatial Planning Observatory Network
Territorial Trends and Challenges in Regional Policies
Cohesion Forum Brussels, May 2001
1st Balkan Forum Thematic Workshop
SMATH project kick-off meeting
Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café
‘Regional Policy contributing to Sustainable Growth in EU 2020’
Interreg Annual Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Strategic Guidelines for EU Territorial Cooperation Programmes Post-2020 Introductory notes. Malta: 26 April Eduardo medeiros 2017

ETC- INTERREG – Present (2014-2020) The overarching objective of European Territorial Cooperation (ETC) is to promote a harmonious economic, social and territorial development of the Union as a whole. Interreg is built around three strands of cooperation: cross-border (Interreg A), transnational (Interreg B) and interregional (Interreg C): 60 Cross-Border – Interreg V-A / 12 IPA Cross-border / 16 ENI Cross-border 15 Transnational – Interreg V-B The interregional co-operation programme, INTERREG Europe, and 3 networking programmes (Urbact III, Interact III and ESPON) Source: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/cooperation/european-territorial/

TERRITORIAL COHESION Source: author

TERRITORIAL COOPERATION Territorial cooperation, as the name indicates, can be defined as a process of collaboration between different territories Source: Medeiros, 2016

What is Cross-Border Cooperation? Not just another regional development programme but has special features and objectives: Specific on reducing the barrier effect along the borderline in all its dimensions: (institutional-urban; economic-technological; social-cultural; environmental-heritage; accessibilities); Fundamental in enhancing the border region territorial capital: institutional building; territorial articulation; socioeconomic cohesion; environmental sustainability.

GUIDELINES – CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION - POST-2020 Reduce/Mitigate border barriers (or obstacles) in all dimensions Focus on cross-border development potentials Engage on cross-border planning ‘Impact Oriented Projects’ Evaluation: TIA – Territorial Impact Assessment

BORDER BARRIERS

Relevance and frequency of obstacles for EU citizens - 2015 (%) BORDER OBSTACLES Relevance and frequency of obstacles for EU citizens - 2015 (%) Cultural Differences Source: (Eurobarometer - Author Calculations)

BORDER OBSTACLES

Why is it relevant and necessary? Cross Border Planning A systematic preparation and implementation of a spatial-oriented policy or plan, in a border region, with a view to anticipate spatial changes, and in order to have direct or indirect positive effects on spatial activities, with the ultimate goal of reducing the barrier effect and enhancing territorial capital’. Why is it relevant and necessary? 1 - Time: It allows for a more strategic longer-term planning; 2 - Solidified Institutional Networking: between national, regional, local.. 3 - Improved articulation with existing territorial development plans 4 - Extending sources of financing: national and regional sources; 5 - Reinforcing the principle of subsidiarity: cross-border programmes work best if planned and managed at the regional level, rather than at the national level.

Cross Border Planning

- Keep INTERREG-A on border areas – Border NUTS III KEEP IN MIND – CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION - POST-2020 - Keep INTERREG-A on border areas – Border NUTS III - Produce border statistics - Tailor Made (Place Based) - Emphasis on CB Mobility - Support CBC entities - Prevent Programme Overlapping

CROSS-BORDER MATURITY

CROSS-BORDER MOBILITY - PERCEPTION Figure 4 - Accessibility barriers intensity based in the EU CBC programmes - 2015 Respondents (%) < 20 20 - 30 30 - 40 > 40 Source: Eurobarometer survey on border obstacles

CROSS-BORDER MOBILITY - PERCEPTION Cross-Border Accessibility as a Border Obstacle – EU Survey 0 400 km Source: Medeiros, 2016

CROSS-BORDER MOBILITY – PUBLIC TRANSPORTS Source: Medeiros, 2016

CROSS-BORDER MOBILITY – COMMUTING Medeiros Cartography

CROSS-BORDER STRUCTURES

CROSS-BORDER STRUCTURES

Tackle transnational vulnerabilities GUIDELINES – TRANSNATIONAL - POST-2020 Tackle transnational vulnerabilities Focus on transnational development potentials Engage on transnational planning (macro-regions) ‘Impact Oriented Projects’ Evaluation: TIA – Territorial Impact Assessment

- Select Transnational Programmes based on needs and potentials KEEP IN MIND – TRANSNATIONAL COOPERATION - POST-2020 - Select Transnational Programmes based on needs and potentials - Engage on large impact transnational projects (energy, transports, green economy) - Focus on Territorial Cohesion - Emphasis on Polycentrism - Prevent Programme Overlapping

SOCIOECONOMIC COHESION ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY CONTRIBUTIONS FROM TRANSNATIONAL PROGRAMMES TO TERRITORIAL COHESION SOCIOECONOMIC COHESION Job Creation Human Capital Innovation Culture Infrastructures POLYCENTRISM Connectivity Polycentricity Compactivity Hierarchy GOVERNANCE Multilevel Governance Participation Place-Based approach Transnational institutional building Administrative Capacity TERRITORIAL COHESION ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY Clean Energy Nature Protection Green Economy Climate Change Natural Resources

PROGRAMME CRITERIA: Physical Geography 1 – Baltic Sea 2 – North Sea 3 – Atlantic - Mediterranean 4 – East Mediterranean 5 – Alpine 6 – Danube 7 – Atlantic Islands 8 – Non-EU Territory Programmes

Develop and deliver better policy GUIDELINES – INTERREGIONAL - POST-2020 Develop and deliver better policy Focus on Administrative Capacity Focus on the Green Economy ‘Impact Oriented Projects’ Evaluation: TIA – Territorial Impact Assessment

THANKS FOR WATCHING emedeiros@campus.ul.pt