Pierre Eckert Daniel Cattani MétéoSuisse

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Slide 1ECMWF forecast User Meeting -- Reading, June 2006 Verification of weather parameters Anna Ghelli, ECMWF.
Advertisements

Slide 1ECMWF forecast products users meeting – Reading, June 2005 Verification of weather parameters Anna Ghelli, ECMWF.
F. Grazzini, Forecast Products Users Meeting June 2005 SEVERE WEATHER FORECASTS F. Grazzini, F. Lalaurette.
Severe Weather Forecasts
Forecasting extreme meteorological events over complex topography Daniel Cattani Pierre Eckert MétéoSuisse.
VERIFICATION Highligths by WG5. 9° General MeetingAthens September Working package/Task on “standardization” The “core” Continuous parameters: T2m,
Slide 1 WMO Macao – April 2013 © ECMWF EFI (instructor led activity) Southern Africa.
Willem A. Landman Ruth Park Stephanie Landman Francois Engelbrecht.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Improving COSMO-LEPS forecasts of extreme events with.
Seasonal Predictability in East Asian Region Targeted Training Activity: Seasonal Predictability in Tropical Regions: Research and Applications 『 East.
Creating probability forecasts of binary events from ensemble predictions and prior information - A comparison of methods Cristina Primo Institute Pierre.
Gridded OCF Probabilistic Forecasting For Australia For more information please contact © Commonwealth of Australia 2011 Shaun Cooper.
PERFORMANCE OF NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE FORECASTS VERSUS MODEL OUTPUT STATISTICS Jeff Baars Cliff Mass Mark Albright University of Washington, Seattle,
1 Intercomparison of low visibility prediction methods COST-722 (WG-i) Frédéric Atger & Thierry Bergot (Météo-France)
1 11th INTERNATIONAL MEETING on STATISTICAL CLIMATOLOGY, EDINBURGH, JULY 12-16, 2010 Downscaling future climate change using statistical ensembles E. Hertig,
Univ of AZ WRF Model Verification. Method NCEP Stage IV data used for precipitation verification – Stage IV is composite of rain fall observations and.
CLIMAT (CLIMAT TEMP) History: 1935 – IMO (International Meteorological Organization) that mean monthly values of the main climatological elements at certain.
Probabilistic forecasts of (severe) thunderstorms for the purpose of issuing a weather alarm Maurice Schmeits, Kees Kok, Daan Vogelezang and Rudolf van.
ECMWF WWRP/WMO Workshop on QPF Verification - Prague, May 2001 NWP precipitation forecasts: Validation and Value Deterministic Forecasts Probabilities.
Bayesian Spatial Modeling of Extreme Precipitation Return Levels Daniel COOLEY, Douglas NYCHKA, and Philippe NAVEAU (2007, JASA)
How can LAMEPS * help you to make a better forecast for extreme weather Henrik Feddersen, DMI * LAMEPS =Limited-Area Model Ensemble Prediction.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Report on Workshop « Stratified verification by weather.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Data mining in the joint D- PHASE and COPS archive Mathias.
Verification of the distributions Chiara Marsigli ARPA-SIM - HydroMeteorological Service of Emilia-Romagna Bologna, Italy.
Latest results in verification over Poland Katarzyna Starosta, Joanna Linkowska Institute of Meteorology and Water Management, Warsaw 9th COSMO General.
The latest results of verification over Poland Katarzyna Starosta Joanna Linkowska COSMO General Meeting, Cracow September 2008 Institute of Meteorology.
COSMO WG4 Actvities Concentrated mainly on COSMO LEPS  presentation by Andrea Montani The rest of the activities have been absorbed into the advanced.
L. Mayoraz (1), J. Ambühl (1), R. Voisard (2), C. Voisard (1), M. Züger (2), H. Romang (1) (1) MeteoSwiss, Zurich, Switzerland, (2) University of Zurich,
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss WG4 activities Pierre Eckert, MeteoSwiss, Geneva.
COSMO WG4 activities Oct Sept Pierre Eckert MétéoSuisse WG4 coordinator Interpretation and applications.
United States Regions By :. Regions of the United States (insert picture)
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss A more reliable COSMO-LEPS F. Fundel, A. Walser, M. A.
Probabilistic Forecasts of Extreme Precipitation Events for the U.S. Hazards Assessment Kenneth Pelman 32 nd Climate Diagnostics Workshop Tallahassee,
Verification of ensemble systems Chiara Marsigli ARPA-SIMC.
Statistical Postprocessing of Surface Weather Parameters Susanne Theis Andreas Hense Ulrich Damrath Volker Renner.
Deutscher Wetterdienst Preliminary evaluation and verification of the pre-operational COSMO-DE Ensemble Prediction System Susanne Theis Christoph Gebhardt,
Climate extremes and changes in precipitation and wind patterns ( ) in the vicinities of Montevideo, Uruguay V Pshennikov, M Bidegain, F Blixen,
Jake Mittelman James Belanger Judith Curry Kris Shrestha EXTENDED-RANGE PREDICTABILITY OF REGIONAL WIND POWER GENERATION.
10th COSMO General Meeting, Cracow, Poland Verification of COSMOGR Over Greece 10 th COSMO General Meeting Cracow, Poland.
G4: Dr. Saiful Islam, IWFM, BUET, Bangladesh Md. Raqubul Hasib, IWM, Bangladesh.
Latest results in the precipitation verification over Northern Italy Elena Oberto, Marco Turco, Paolo Bertolotto (*) ARPA Piemonte, Torino, Italy.
Operational forecasts of strong precipitation events over complex topography Pierre Eckert Ralf Kretschmar Christof Appenzeller MétéoSuisse.
WG4 Oct 2006 – Sep 2007 plans COSMO General Meeting, 21 September 2006 Pierre Eckert.
Grupo de Meteorologia e Climatologia na Universidade de Aveiro Alfredo Rocha, Tiago Luna, Juan Ferreira, Ana Carvalho and João.
Improving Numerical Weather Prediction Using Analog Ensemble Presentation by: Mehdi Shahriari Advisor: Guido Cervone.
An East Coast Winter Storm Precipitation Climatology
An East Coast Winter Storm Precipitation Climatology
Xuexing Qiu and Fuqing Dec. 2014
Physical Features North Africa GOVERNMENT RELIGION RESOURCES
Paper Review Jennie Bukowski ATS APR-2017
André Walser MeteoSwiss, Zurich
Intensity-scale verification technique
Dynamical downscaling of ERA-40 with WRF in complex terrain in Norway – comparison with ENSEMBLES U. Heikkilä, A. D. Sandvik and A.
Michael K. Tippett1,2, Adam H. Sobel3,4 and Suzana J. Camargo4
18 November 2013 Map Discussion
Post Processing.
Extreme Values of Functions
COSMO-DE-EPS Susanne Theis, Christoph Gebhardt, Michael Buchhold,
Verification of COSMO-LEPS and coupling with a hydrologic model
Statistical interpretation of ECMWF EPS
Deterministic (HRES) and ensemble (ENS) verification scores
Christoph Gebhardt, Zied Ben Bouallègue, Michael Buchhold
2nd Workshop on Short Range EPS 7th–8th April 2005, Bologna
Some Verification Highlights and Issues in Precipitation Verification
COSMO PP QPF workshop 8 March 2006 Langen Marco Arpagaus.
Some ideas on verification targeted to the use of the forecasters Pierre Eckert, MeteoSwiss, Geneva Some ideas on the presentation to the forecasters.
Climate Trends in Samoa
Seasonal common scores plots
Short Range Ensemble Prediction System Verification over Greece
Ryan Kang, Wee Leng Tan, Thea Turkington, Raizan Rahmat
Presentation transcript:

Pierre Eckert Daniel Cattani MétéoSuisse Extrem Forecast Index Pierre Eckert Daniel Cattani MétéoSuisse

EFI: definition Scores and verification Precipitations Wind gust Conclusion

p Ff(p)

An Extreme Forecast Index Takes values from –1 (all members break climate minimum records) and +1 (all beyond climate maximum records) For a single value (e.g. deterministic) forecast with climate rank Q: EFI3=(Q-50%) [1+4(Q-50%)2] Q=95%, EFI3=0.81 Q=98%, EFI3=0.92 Q=99%, EFI3=0.96

Verification parameters (1) Precipitations (nov.2001-apr.2003) Predictands: 2nd max prec. / 24h of climatological regions (W, E, S) Predictors: EFI max over regions Thresholds 10 mm/24h 20 mm/24h 50 mm/24h

Verification parameters (2) Gusts (nov.2001-apr.2003) Predictands: 2nd max gust / 24h of climatological regions (W, E ) Predictors: EFI max over regions EFI max over all the domain (45-48.5°N; 5-11.5°E) Thresholds 50 km/h 75 km/h 100 km/h

Verification: scores Forecasted : EFI gt given value Event Observed Not Observed Forecasted A B Not Forecasted C D Forecasted : EFI gt given value Hit Rate = A / (A+C) FAR = B / (A+B)

Precipitations : Switzerland West Hit = 0,5 EFI = 0,3 T+66h EFI = 0,2 T+90h EFI = 0,2 T+114

Precipitations : Switzerland West

Precipitations : Switzerland West

Precipitations : Switzerland South

Precipitations : Switzerland South

Precipitations : Switzerland South

Gusts : Switzerland West 50km/h 75km/h

Gusts : Switzerland West 50km/h 75km/h

Gusts: Switzerland West

Gusts: Switzerland West (ref region)

Conclusion: precipitations T+42-66h Hit=0.6 Prec ge 10mm Prec ge 20mm Prec ge 50mm EFI FAR West 0.2 0.6 East 0.3 0.7 South 0.5

Conclusion: Gusts Gust ge 75 km/h Hit=0.5 T+36-60h T+60-84h T+84-108h EFI FAR West (ref region) 0.3 0.7 0.5 0.2 0.8 West (ref domain) 0.9