Box 5 Calibration Result

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/613r0 May 2015 Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc.Slide 1 Box 5 Calibration Result Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0551r1 SubmissionSuhwook Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 OBSS Preamble Detection Evaluation Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0861r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury Impact of CCA adaptation on spatial reuse in dense residential scenario Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1420r1Nov 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Impact of Preamble Error on MAC System Performance Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1441r0 Submission Simulation Setting of Box5 Calibration Date: Authors: Slide 1Jiyong Pang (Huawei Technologies) Nov 2014.
Doc.: IEEE /610r1 Submission Vida Ferdowsi, Newracom May 2015 Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Vida Ferdowsi Daewon Lee Reza Hedayat.
Doc.: IEEE /0680r1 SubmissionJiyong Pang, Huawei TechnologiesSlide 1 Reference Box5 Calibration Assumptions and Parameters Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0814r0 Submission July 2015 Simulation Results for Box5 Calibration Ke Yao, et, al. (ZTE) Slide 1 Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Doc.: IEEE / ax Submission M. Shahwaiz Afaqui DSC calibration results with NS-3 Authors: Nov
Doc.: IEEE /1392r3 SubmissionSuhwook Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Simulation results for Box 5 calibration Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE /1373r1 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 Updated Box 5 Calibration Results Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1392r5 SubmissionSuhwook Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Simulation results for Box 5 calibration Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE /0871r1 Jul Jiyong Pang, et. al. Huawei Further Calibration Results towards Integrated System Level Simulation Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/1161r0 September 2014 Eric Wong et al (Apple)Slide 1 Parameters for Power Save Mechanisms Date: Authors:
OFDMA performance in 11ax
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Simulation results for spatial reuse in 11ax
OFDMA performance in 11ax
TGax SLS MAC Calibration Test 4 Results
Parameters for Power Save Mechanisms
TDMA for Eliminating Hidden Station Effect in Dense Networks
Performance Evaluation of OBSS Densification
TPC combined with channel allocation method for OBSS environment
Simulation results for
Additional Test Cases for MAC calibration
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Simulation Results for Box5
MAC Calibration Results
Box 5 Calibration Results
SLS Box5 Calibration Results and Discussions
Simulation Results of Box5
Reference Simulation Model for Dynamic CCA / DSC Calibration
2840 Junction Ave. San Jose, CA 95134
Simulation Analysis of ED Threshold Levels
MAC Calibration Results
MAC Calibration Results
The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator
Simulation Results of Box5
Updated Simulation Results for Box5
Box 5 Calibration Results
Box 5 Calibration Results
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Power Save Simulation Results
Simulation Results for Box 5 Calibration
Simulation Results for Box5
OBSS Preamble Detection
Simulation results for
Joint submission for Box 5 calibration
Simulation results for
OBSS Preamble Detection
Simulation Results for Box5
TDMA for Eliminating Hidden Station Effect in Dense Networks
Simulation Results of Box5
2840 Junction Ave. San Jose, CA 95134
OFDMA performance in 11ax
Box5 Calibration Results
Box5 Results of 11ac SS6 Date: Authors: Jan 2015 Sept 2014
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
OFDMA performance in 11ax
11ax PAR Verification through OFDMA
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
Simulation results for
Simulation results for
System Level Simulator Evaluation with/without Capture Effect
DSC Calibration Result
Simulation results for
Consideration on System Level Simulation
802.11ax scenario 1 CCA Date: Authors: March 2015
Presentation transcript:

Box 5 Calibration Result Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 July 2015 Box 5 Calibration Result Date: 2015-07-12 Authors: Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc. Chinghwa Yu, MediaTek

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 July 2015 Abstract This presentation describes MediaTek’s Box 5 calibration results. Applying 1 BSS UL test case. Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc. Chinghwa Yu, MediaTek

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 July 2015 Background Performance differences are found and results are not aligned since members providing results from Sep. 2014. Box 5 simulation members agreed to focus on aligning single BSS UL test case in the Mar. 2015 IEEE meeting. Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc. Chinghwa Yu, MediaTek

Single BSS Calibration Case Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 July 2015 Single BSS Calibration Case No Shadowing: Fixed MCS 5: To avoid path-loss dependent transmission failure due to using MCS 7. 5 Combinations: All DL. Single STA. STA 3, STA9. STA 3, STA15. STA 3, STA 27. STA 3, STA 9, STA 15. STA 3, STA 9, STA 27. BSS B, UL traffic. AP B (40,20) STA3 (7.5+xb, ‑9.5+yb) STA9 (7+xb, -7.5+yb) STA15 (3+xb, -0.5+yb) STA21 (-6.5+xb, -3+yb) STA27 (‑6+xb, 2.5+yb) Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc. Chinghwa Yu, MediaTek

PHY Parameters July 2015 PHY parameters BW All BSSs at 5GHz [80 MHz, no dynamic bandwidth] Channel model TGac D NLOS per link Shadow fading iid log-normal shadowing (5 dB standard deviation) per link Data Preamble Type [5GHz, 11ac], always decoded correctly after successful reception, duration is considered. STA TX Power 15 dBm per antenna  AP TX Power 20 dBm  per antenna AP number of TX/RX antennas 1/1 STA number of TX /RX antennas AP antenna gain 0 dBi STA antenna gain -2 dBi Noise Figure 7dB CCA threshold -56 dBm (measured across the entire bandwidth after large-scale fading) Rx sensitivity -76 dBm Link Adaption Fixed MCS =5 (234.0 Mbps) Channel estimation ideal PHY abstraction RBIR, BCC [1, 5] Channel correlation Independent or time-correlated channel per packet Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc.

MAC Parameters July 2015 MAC parameters Access protocol [EDCA, AC_BE with default parameters] [CWmin = 15, CWmax = 1023, AIFSn=3 ] Queue length A single queue for each traffic link is set inside AP/STA sized of 2000 packets Traffic type UDP CBR with rate 10^8bps (may not enough to model full buffer) MPDU size 1538 Bytes (1472 Data + 28 IP header + 8 bytes LLC + 30 MAC header) Aggregation [A-MPDU / max aggregation size / BA window size, No A-MSDU, with immediate BA], Max aggregation: 32 MPDUs with 4-byte MPDU delimiter Max number of retries 10 Beacon Disabled RTS/CTS OFF Traffic direction UL Only Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc.

Simulation Results July 2015 doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Month Year Case STA Throughput (Mbps) all DL 3 40.542 9 40.427 15 40.056 21 39.468 27 38.914 sum 199.407 UL 1 STA 99.983 99.923 100.001 99.972 99.922 UL 3+9 99.815 99.826 199.641 UL 3+15 99.906 99.797 199.703 UL 3+27 99.841 99.737 199.578 UL 3+9+15 70.928 63.202 59.371 193.501 Ul 3+9+27 63.196 68.249 62.656 194.101 Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc. Chinghwa Yu, MediaTek

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 July 2015 Conclusions Update MTK’s Box 5 calibration results on single BSS test case. Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc. Chinghwa Yu, MediaTek

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 July 2015 References R. Porat et al, “Evaluation Methodology”, IEEE 11- 14/571r9. S. Merlin et al, “Simulation Scenarios”, IEEE 11- 14/980r12. P. Loc et al, “TGac Functional Requirements and Evaluation Methodology”, IEEE 11-09/0451r16. Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc. Chinghwa Yu, MediaTek