Mechanistic model for the control of N‐domain movement and implication for IBMPFD. Schematic diagram for the control of the N‐domain conformation in (A)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SBL 100 Dr. Tapan K. Chaudhuri (course co-ordinator)
Advertisements

Hydration profiles of GLIC′s pore in WT and Ser6′ mutant simulations.
Positioning of the TGF‐β3 and BMP receptor complexes on a membrane surface. Positioning of the TGF‐β3 and BMP receptor complexes on a membrane surface.
How DNA breaks in the transcribed strand alter start site selection by pol III. (A) View of the transcribed strand taken from the structure of the pol.
Structure of the Rho Transcription Terminator
R.Ian Menz, John E. Walker, Andrew G.W. Leslie  Cell 
Analysis of the effect of loss of Brca2 on in vivo somatic mutation frequency and mutation type. Analysis of the effect of loss of Brca2 on in vivo somatic.
Structurally ordered water molecules in the pore of GLIC
(A, B) Stereoscopic views of the P3 RNase MRP RNA domain in complex with the RNase MRP/RNase P protein components Pop6 and Pop7. (A, B) Stereoscopic views.
The RNA components of eukaryotic RNase P and RNase MRP have multiple common structural features including the P3 domain. The RNA components of eukaryotic.
Face‐to‐face kinase domain dimerisation of human Ire1α.
Cooperative formation of a higher‐order complex containing AP1 and HMG‐I(Y). Cooperative formation of a higher‐order complex containing AP1 and HMG‐I(Y).
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Structural States and Dynamics of the D-Loop in Actin
Tail-Anchored Protein Insertion by a Single Get1/2 Heterodimer
Crystal Structure of T7 Gene 4 Ring Helicase Indicates a Mechanism for Sequential Hydrolysis of Nucleotides  Martin R Singleton, Michael R Sawaya, Tom.
Recognition of double‐stranded telomeric DNA
Differential regulation of SRF and NFAT by Ca2+.
LepB operates by a different catalytic mechanism compared with classical RabGAPs. LepB operates by a different catalytic mechanism compared with classical.
Structure‐based functional characterization of H
Control of IL‐6 synthesis by ζPKC and RelA Ser311 phosphorylation.
A Corkscrew Model for Dynamin Constriction
Features of the helicase region of RecQΔC.
Jue Chen, Gang Lu, Jeffrey Lin, Amy L Davidson, Florante A Quiocho 
Adam G. Larson, Nariman Naber, Roger Cooke, Edward Pate, Sarah E. Rice 
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
VAP‐A is recruited to interorganelle contact sites together with MOSPD2 VAP‐A is recruited to interorganelle contact sites together with MOSPD2 AHeLa cells.
Structure of the Human MutSα DNA Lesion Recognition Complex
Two nucleotide-binding sites of ABCE1 act functionally asymmetric.
Structural Insights into RNA-Dependent Ring Closure and ATPase Activation by the Rho Termination Factor  Emmanuel Skordalakes, James M. Berger  Cell 
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (September 2006)
Crawling and Wiggling on DNA
The MSP domain of MOSPD2 binds the FFAT motif
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
BAM3 is a CLE45 receptor BAM3 is a CLE45 receptor Schematic overview of the BAM3 gene structure. bam3 loss‐of‐function mutations that were isolated as.
Crawling and Wiggling on DNA
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Liqiang Dai, Holger Flechsig, Jin Yu  Biophysical Journal 
Yi Qin Gao, Wei Yang, Martin Karplus  Cell 
Three-dimensional structure of B. subtilis PRPP synthase.
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (September 2005)
Zhenjian Cai, Nabil H. Chehab, Nikola P. Pavletich  Molecular Cell 
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (April 2005)
Structural Basis for the Interaction between FxFG Nucleoporin Repeats and Importin-β in Nuclear Trafficking  Richard Bayliss, Trevor Littlewood, Murray.
Sequence alignment of PHCCEx domains with secondary structure elements of the Tiam2 PHCCEx domain at the top. Sequence alignment of PHCCEx domains with.
Sachin Surade, Tom L. Blundell  Chemistry & Biology 
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 113, Issue 1, Pages (July 2017)
Crystal Structure of the DegS Stress Sensor
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
A Corkscrew Model for Dynamin Constriction
Microtubule Interaction Site of the Kinesin Motor
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages (November 2001)
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Diverse Pore Loops of the AAA+ ClpX Machine Mediate Unassisted and Adaptor- Dependent Recognition of ssrA-Tagged Substrates  Andreas Martin, Tania A. Baker,
Flora Ambre Honoré, Vincent Méjean, Olivier Genest  Cell Reports 
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Mechanistic Basis of 5′-3′ Translocation in SF1B Helicases
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (May 2009)
GSC tumor phenotype in ago3 mutant germaria
Schematic design of the SSM
Christina Karatzaferi, Marc K. Chinn, Roger Cooke  Biophysical Journal 
A Model for the γδ Resolvase Synaptic Complex
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (July 2002)
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages (March 2016)
Shayantani Mukherjee, Sean M. Law, Michael Feig  Biophysical Journal 
Morgan Huse, Ye-Guang Chen, Joan Massagué, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Presentation transcript:

Mechanistic model for the control of N‐domain movement and implication for IBMPFD. Schematic diagram for the control of the N‐domain conformation in (A) the wild‐type and (B) IBMPFD mutant p97 N–D1 fragment. Mechanistic model for the control of N‐domain movement and implication for IBMPFD. Schematic diagram for the control of the N‐domain conformation in (A) the wild‐type and (B) IBMPFD mutant p97 N–D1 fragment. The N‐, D1‐, and D2‐domains are in magenta, blue, and green, respectively, and as labelled. The small yellow circles between N‐ and D1‐domains represent positions of mutations. Four states are defined for each nucleotide‐binding site in D1: Empty state, ATP state, ADP‐locked, and ADP‐open, as labelled. Each protomer is assumed to operate independently. The stimuli for changes in D1 nucleotide state may come either from the N‐domain or from ATP hydrolysis of the D2‐domain. In the ADP‐locked state, the N‐domains are in Down‐conformation with a pre‐bound ADP shown as a black rectangle. This ADP‐locked state has been observed crystallographically in wild‐type p97. In the ATP state, the N‐domains of hexameric wild‐type p97 could be either in an Up‐conformation with bound ATP shown as a black diamond or in a Down‐conformation in an ADP‐locked state, whereas the N‐domains of mutants adopt only the Up‐conformation as observed in this study. On the basis of available structural and biochemical information, we introduce two additional conformational states. The Empty state has the N‐domain conformation undefined and the nucleotide‐binding site shown as a black circle. The ADP‐open state also has an N‐domain conformation similar to that of Down‐conformation as determined by the crystal structure of R155H mutant with bound ADP, which is also shown as a black rectangle. Bound ADP can only be exchanged through the ADP‐open state. In wild‐type p97, the equilibration between ADP‐open and ADP‐locked favours heavily the latter and is presumably regulated by effectors such as p47 or ATP hydrolysis in D2‐domain. In IBMPFD mutants, the tight control between ADP‐open and ADP‐locked is disrupted and the equilibration is now favouring the ADP‐open state. Wai Kwan Tang et al. EMBO J. 2010;29:2217-2229 © as stated in the article, figure or figure legend