PSY402 Theories of Learning

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transposition: Spence’s Behavioral Solution Transposition seems to support the cognitive view that organisms learn by discovering how things are related,
Advertisements

PSY402 Theories of Learning Chapter 10 – Stimulus Control of Behavior.
Inhibitory Pavlovian Conditioning Stimuli can become conditioned to signal the absence of a US— such learning is called Inhibitory Conditioning CS+ = excitatory.
Lecture 18&19: Stimulus Control (Pavlovian & Instrumental) Learning, Psychology 5310 Spring, 2015 Professor Delamater.
PSY 402 Theories of Learning Chapter 8 – Stimulus Control How Stimuli Guide Instrumental Action.
PSY402 Theories of Learning
PSY 402 Theories of Learning Chapter 5 – The Role of Conditioning in Behavior.
PSY 402 Theories of Learning
PSY402 Theories of Learning Wednesday, November 19, 2003 Chapter 6 -- Traditional Theories (Cont.)
PSY402 Theories of Learning Chapter 4 (Cont.) Indirect Conditioning Applications of Conditioning.
PSY 402 Theories of Learning Chapter 9 – Motivation.
PSY402 Theories of Learning Monday January 13, 2003.
Last Day To Register  This is the last day to register for the November special election.  To register, go to: Rock the Vote website:
PSY 402 Theories of Learning Chapter 3 – Nuts and Bolts of Conditioning (Mechanisms of Classical Conditioning)
Stimulus Control of Operant Behavior Discrimination Generalization Generalization Gradients Peak Shift Concepts Overview of stimulus control of operant.
Theoretical Analysis of Classical Conditioning Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D. Penn State Harrisburg.
Learning Prof. Tom Alloway. Definition of Learning l Change in behavior l Due to experience relevant to what is being learned l Relatively durable n Conditioning.
CHAPTER 4 Pavlovian Conditioning: Causal Factors.
Psychology 2250 Last Class Characteristics of Habituation and Sensitization -time course -stimulus-specificity -effects of strong extraneous stimuli (dishabituation)
STIMULUS CONTROL OF BEHAVIOR Chapter 10. Stimulus Control of Behavior  Generalization Responding in the same manner to similar stimuli.  Discrimination.
Copyright McGraw-Hill, Inc Chapter 5 Learning.
Pavlovian Conditioning Basic Principles Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D. Penn State Harrisburg.
Experimental Evidence  Rats drink little saccharin water at first but increase over time.  Loud tones (110 db) produce different responses depending.
Extinction of Conditioned Behavior Effects of Extinction  the rate of responding decreases  response variability increases  experiment by Neuringer,
Developing New Behavior. Non Contingent Reinforcement Potency (e.g. amount/quality) of “R+” Include Extinction Vary “Reinforcement”
The Associative Structure of Instrumental Conditioning Simple, Binary Associations  S-R association.
Unit 1 Review 1. To say that learning has taken place, we must observe a change in a subject’s behavior. What two requirements must this behavioral change.
PSY 402 Theories of Learning Chapter 8 – Stimulus Control How Stimuli Guide Instrumental Action.
Stimulus Control. Stimulus Control of Behavior Having stimulus control means that the probability of the behavior varies depending upon the stimuli present.
PSY 402 Theories of Learning Chapter 3 – Nuts and Bolts of Conditioning (Mechanisms of Classical Conditioning)
Dr. Steven I. Dworkin Extinction and Stimulus Control Chapter 8.
PSYCHOLOGY AS A SCIENCE Psychology changed dramatically during the early 20th-century as another school of thought known as behaviorism rose to dominance.
 No such thing as “personality”  Rejects notion of traits  Behavior a function of the environment  People and animals are similar  Equipotentiality.
Learning Factors in Stimulus Control. Learning Factors Why does stimulus generalization occur? – CS transfers to other stimuli with similar physical properties.
Stimulus Control of Behavior
PSY402 Theories of Learning
PRINCIPLES OF BEHAVIOR
PSY402 Theories of Learning
PSY402 Theories of Learning
Context Cues and Conditional Relations
Chapter 5 Learning © 2013 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution.
Discrimination learning: Introduction
Classical Conditioning Operant Conditioning Learning by Observation
Unit 6: Learning (Behaviorism)
PSY402 Theories of Learning
Operant Conditioning – Chapter 8
Experimental Psychology PSY 433
PSY 402 Theories of Learning
PSY402 Theories of Learning
PSY402 Theories of Learning
PSY402 Theories of Learning
PSY402 Theories of Learning
Learning = 7-9% of AP Exam Rat Maze Activity
Secondary Reinforcers & Punishers
PSY402 Theories of Learning
Experimental Psychology PSY 433
Learning and Conditioning
Learning liudexiang.
PSY402 Theories of Learning
Differential Reinforcement: Stimulus Control & Shaping
Unit 5: Learning (Behaviorism)
Learning (Behaviorism)
Learning Chapter 8.
PSY402 Theories of Learning
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
PSY 402 Theories of Learning
PSY402 Theories of Learning
PSY402 Theories of Learning
Behavioral Approach.
Presentation transcript:

PSY402 Theories of Learning Wednesday November 12, 2003 Chapter 7 – Stimulus Control

The Role of Environmental Stimuli In operant conditioning, the stimulus becomes associated with the reinforcer or punishment. Reward or punishment is the UCS. The stimulus signaling reward or punishment is the CS. The CR motivates operant behavior. Responding can be used as a measure of the strength of a CR.

Definitions of Terms Stimulus control -- Environmental stimuli signal the opportunity for reward or punishment. Generalization – responding in the same way to similar stimuli. Discrimination – responding to some stimuli but not to others.

Generalization Gradient Degrees of generalization occur. In some situations, the same response occurs to similar stimuli. In other situations, the amount of response varies with the similarity. Generalization gradient – a graph showing how the strength of response changes with similarity. Steep gradients mean narrow response (stimuli must be very similar).

Kinds of Gradients Excitatory conditioning (S+) – a CS-UCS response to a stimulus is learned. Excitatory gradient – the S+ is varied and the CR is measured. Inhibitory conditioning (S-) – a CS signals absence of the UCS and thus inhibits the CR. Inhibitory gradient – the S- is varied and the CR is measured.

Shapes of Gradients Most sensory stimuli produce similar gradients. Pigeons pecking at colored lights. Tones paired with shocks. Words paired with pretzels or candy: Synonyms and homonyms produce salivation. Semantic similarity works best.

Flat Gradients A flat gradient means all stimuli are being responded to as if they were the same. Responding with a gradient to a tone occurred only when the tone signaled reward during training.

Generalization of Inhibition Inhibition example: fear of dating. A good experience leads to less fear of dating a different person. Inhibition gradients are similar to excitatory gradients – the more the stimulus varies, the less inhibition.

Explanation Lashley-Wade theory – people and animals generalize because they are unable to discriminate. Can’t tell the difference between stimuli A contrast is needed during training to enable discrimination. Discrimination training leads to steeper generalization gradients. Perceptual experience matters.

Discrimination Learning Important to recognize when reinforcement is not available so that responding can be withheld. Discriminative stimulus: SD – reinforcement is available (S+) SD – reinforcement is unavailable (S-) Conditioned stimuli always produce a response. Discriminative stimuli signal the opportunity to respond.

Two-Choice Discrimination Tasks The discriminative stimuli are on the same dimension: Red vs green light. Need not be presented simultaneously. Two-choice discrimination includes one SD and one SD . Other tasks can use multiple multiple SD or multiple SD.

Three Phases Subjects begin by responding equally to both stimuli – prediscrimination phase. Discrimination phase -- with training, response to SD increases and response to SD declines. Shift back to non-differential reinforcement to show that behavior was caused by reinforcement.

Conditional Discrimination Availability of reinforcement depends on the condition of a stimulus. The stimulus does not always signal the same thing. More difficult to learn. Nissen’s chimpanzees: Large, small squares, white or black. SD = large white, small black.

Behavioral Contrast Behavioral contrast – the increased responding to the differential stimulus, decreased response to SD Contrast also occurs with changes in the duration of reinforcement. VI-10 to VI-3 Local contrast – emotional Sustained contrast – related to the differential reinforcement.

Anticipatory Contrast Williams – sustained contrast occurs due to anticipation of a future reinforcement contingency. Not due to recall of past contingency. VI-3, VI-6, VI-3 Compare the first and third VI-3 behavior. VI-6 affected the first VI-3 more than the last VI-3 -- a prospective effect.

Occasion Setting A conditioned stimulus (CS) can create the conditions for operant responding to a second conditioned stimulus (CS). Occasion setting – ability of one stimulus to enhance the response to another stimulus. The facilitating stimulus does not produce a CR by itself.

SD as an Occasion Setter A Pavlovian occasion-setter can increase operant responding. Example: A meal elicits CR craving for cigarette. Requesting a cigarette after a meal – an operant behavior caused by CR. Conditional occasion-setting: Second stimulus modifies meaning of first discriminative stimulus.

Conclusions An occasion-setter can increase operant responding. A discriminative stimulus (SD) can increase response to a CR (Pavlovian conditioning). This implies interchangeability of Pavlovian occasion-setters and discriminative stimuli.

Central Motivational States Conditioned stimuli influence operant behavior through their effect on motivational states: Appetitive Aversive Emotional responses influence operant behavior.