Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Distribution of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Lines: Who, When, and Where Jennifer B. McCormick, Jason Owen-Smith, Christopher Thomas Scott Cell Stem Cell.
Advertisements

Volume 143, Issue 4, Pages (November 2010)
Human Naive Embryonic Stem Cells: How Full Is the Glass?
Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines from Adult Rat Cells
Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors  Kazutoshi Takahashi, Shinya Yamanaka  Cell 
Hypoxia Enhances the Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (June 2007)
Nanog Is the Gateway to the Pluripotent Ground State
Kouichi Hasegawa, Jordan E. Pomeroy, Martin F. Pera  Cell Stem Cell 
Metastable Pluripotent States in NOD-Mouse-Derived ESCs
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2014)
Pluripotency Takes Off without Blimp1
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 9, Issue 20, Pages S1-S2 (October 1999)
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Natalia J. Martinez, Richard I. Gregory  Cell Stem Cell 
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
Reprogramming the Methylome: Erasing Memory and Creating Diversity
Small RNAs: Keeping Stem Cells in Line
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 1, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Hakan Bagci, Amanda G. Fisher  Cell Stem Cell 
Rebuilding Pluripotency from Primordial Germ Cells
Contributions of Mammalian Chimeras to Pluripotent Stem Cell Research
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 1-3 (July 2018)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Early Embryos Reprogram DNA Methylation in Two Steps
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
Chemical-Induced Naive Pluripotency
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Nanog Is the Gateway to the Pluripotent Ground State
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (July 2018)
Esrrb Complementation Rescues Development of Nanog-Null Germ Cells
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (September 2015)
Wnt Signaling Promotes Reprogramming of Somatic Cells to Pluripotency
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Robust Self-Renewal of Rat Embryonic Stem Cells Requires Fine-Tuning of Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 Inhibition  Yaoyao Chen, Kathryn Blair, Austin Smith 
Dynamic Pluripotent Stem Cell States and Their Applications
Metastable Pluripotent States in NOD-Mouse-Derived ESCs
Early Lineage Segregation between Epiblast and Primitive Endoderm in Mouse Blastocysts through the Grb2-MAPK Pathway  Claire Chazaud, Yojiro Yamanaka,
Jamie A. Hackett, Toshihiro Kobayashi, Sabine Dietmann, M. Azim Surani 
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
Germline Competent Embryonic Stem Cells Derived from Rat Blastocysts
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
The synthetic Oct6 molecule contributes to epigenetic reprogramming of mouse embryonic fibroblasts The synthetic Oct6 molecule contributes to epigenetic.
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Reprogramming the Methylome: Erasing Memory and Creating Diversity
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (October 2012)
Isolation of Epiblast Stem Cells from Preimplantation Mouse Embryos
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
Naive and Primed Pluripotent States
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (August 2016)
Regulatory Principles of Pluripotency: From the Ground State Up
Resetting the Epigenome beyond Pluripotency in the Germline
Heterogeneity of Embryonic and Adult Stem Cells
Genetic and Epigenetic Regulators of Pluripotency
Nanog-Independent Reprogramming to iPSCs with Canonical Factors
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages e6 (June 2018)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 110-117 (July 2012) The Germ Cell Determinant Blimp1 Is Not Required for Derivation of Pluripotent Stem Cells  Siqin Bao, Harry G. Leitch, Astrid Gillich, Jennifer Nichols, Fuchou Tang, Shinseog Kim, Caroline Lee, Thomas Zwaka, Xihe Li, M. Azim Surani  Cell Stem Cell  Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 110-117 (July 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.02.023 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Cell Stem Cell 2012 11, 110-117DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2012.02.023) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Derivation of Blimp1−/− ESCs from Blastocysts (A) Summary of Blimp1−/− ESC derivations from whole ICMs. (B) Summary of ESC derivations from trypsinized ICMs plated as single cells. (C) Oct4 and Nanog immunostaining of Blimp1−/−, Blimp1+/−, and Blimp1+/+ ESCs. (D) Chimeras generated with Blimp1−/− ESCs (dark agouti) injected into albino C57BL/6 blastocysts. See also Tables S1 and S2. Cell Stem Cell 2012 11, 110-117DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2012.02.023) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Reprogramming of Blimp1−/− EpiSCs to rESCs and Expression Analysis of Blimp1-null Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines (A) Embryo at E6.5 generated from Blimp1−/− ESCs after injection into 4N teraploid host blastocyst. Epiblast tissue was divested of the proximal region (black line). epi, epiblast; exe, extraembryonic ectoderm; epc, ectoplacental cone. (B) Dissected epiblast tissue. (C) Derivation of epiSCs from epiblast. (D) AP staining in epiSCs. (E) Derivation of rESCs from epiSCs. (F) Uniform AP staining of rESCs. Scale bars represent 200 μm. (G and H) Number of Blimp1−/− rESCs from Blimp1−/− epiSCs of 129 inbred genetic background (G) and mixed genetic background (H). (I) qRT-PCR analysis of Blimp1−/− epiSCs, ESCs, and rESCs. rESCs and ESCs were cultured in FCS/LIF. Heterozygous cell lines and mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) were used as control. At least two, and usually three, biological replicates were analyzed for each cell type and genotype. Error bars denote the standard deviation of two technical replicates. (J) Correlation heatmap generated after microarray analysis of the cell lines analyzed in (I). The same Blimp1−/− and Blimp1+/− ESCs cultured in 2i/LIF were also included. Asterisk denotes rESC lines. See also Figure S1 and Table S3. Cell Stem Cell 2012 11, 110-117DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2012.02.023) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 PGCs in Embryos Generated from Blimp1−/− rESCs and control rESCs (A) Chimeras generated with Blimp1−/− rESCs (dark agouti) injected into C57BL/6 (black) blastocysts. (B) Summary of blastocyst injections. (C and D) Comparison of PGCs detected by AP staining at E8.5 in WT control (C) embryos, versus Blimp1−/− (D) embryos, revealed migrating PGCs in wild-type embryos (arrowheads) and only a few nonmigrating AP-positive cells in Blimp1−/− embryos. al, allantois. Scale bar represents 200 μm. (E) Number of PGCs detected in control E8.5 embryos (n = 6) and Blimp1−/− E8.5 embryos (n = 8) of 129 genetic background Blimp1−/− rESCs. (F) PGCs from control E8.5 embryos (n = 17) and mutant rESC-derived E8.5 embryos (n = 12) of mixed genetic background. See also Figure S2. Cell Stem Cell 2012 11, 110-117DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2012.02.023) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Representation of Blimp1 Requirement in Pluripotency, Reprogramming, and Germ Cells Blimp1 is not essential for the derivation and the maintenance of pluripotent ESCs or epiSCs. Reprogramming of epiSCs to rESCs, which is accompanied by epigenetic changes such as DNA demethylation and X reactivation that are also detected in the early germline, can also occur in the absence of Blimp1. By contrast, Blimp1 is critical for PGC specification and epigenetic reprogramming in early germ cells, which is mechanistically unrelated to the reprogramming of epiSCs to rESCs that does not entail an obligatory route through a PGC-like state. Cell Stem Cell 2012 11, 110-117DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2012.02.023) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions